Gastrointestinal bleeding of undetermined origin: What diagnostic strategy to propose?

Gastrointestinal bleeding of undetermined origin (GBUO) is defined as gastrointestinal bleeding without an identified cause or location despite an endoscopic assessment including an esogastroduodenal endoscopy (EOGD) and a total colonoscopy. A distinction is made between exteriorized GBUO and non-exteriorized occult GBUO. The causes in the majority of cases (vascular, inflammatory and tumoral) are located in the small intestine. The diagnostic strategy aiming to locate the origin of the GBUO is a real challenge. Innovation in endoscopic and imaging techniques has enabled minimally invasive exploration of the small intestine. In Europe, there is a strong consensus to recommend a video-capsule endoscopy (VCE) as the first-intention study. If there is reason to suspect intestinal obstruction, VCE is contraindicated and a CT-enteroscopy is then performed as first intention. Enteroscopy is performed as a second-line treatment, either for therapeutic purposes after a positive VCE or CT-enteroclysis, or for diagnostic purposes after a negative VCE. Finally, intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE) coupled with surgical exploration should be reserved either for therapeutic purposes in the event of impossibility or failure of preoperative enteroscopy, or for diagnostic purposes in the event of recurrent GBUO after failure of all other studies and explorations of the small intestine.

Obesity in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical features and impact on disability. A cross-sectional survey from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, an increasing prevalence of obesity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been observed. However, only a few studies have focused on the impact of overweight and obesity on IBD-related disability. AIMS: To identify the factors associated with obese and overweight patients with IBD, including IBD-related disability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 1704 consecutive patients with IBD in 42 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif (GETAID) using a 4-page questionnaire. Factors associated with obesity and overweight were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratios (ORs) are provided with 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: The prevalence rates of overweight and obesity were 24.1% and 12.2%, respectively. Multivariable analyses were stratified by age, sex, type of IBD, clinical remission and age at diagnosis of IBD. Overweight was significantly associated with male sex (OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.39-0.68], p < 0.001), age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.01-1.03], p < 0.001) and body image subscore (OR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.10-1.20], p < 0.001) (Table 2). Obesity was significantly associated with age (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [1.02-1.04], p < 0.001), joint pain subscore (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.02-1.14], p < 0.001) and body image subscore (OR = 1.25, 95% CI [1.19-1.32], p < 0.001) (Table 3). CONCLUSION: The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in patients with IBD is associated with age and poorer body image. A holistic approach to IBD patient care should be encouraged to improve IBD-related disability and to prevent rheumatological and cardiovascular complications.

Adalimumab in Biologic-naïve Patients With Crohn's Disease After Resolution of an Intra-abdominal Abscess: A Prospective Study From the GETAID.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The management of intra-abdominal abscesses complicating Crohn's disease (CD) is challenging, and surgery with delayed intestinal resection is often recommended. The aims of this study were to estimate the success rate of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with CD with an intra-abdominal abscess resolved without surgery, and to identify predictive factors for success. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study was conducted in biologic-naïve patients with CD with resolved intra-abdominal abscess treated with ADA with a 2-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was ADA failure at week (W) 24 defined as a need for steroids after W12, intestinal resection, abscess recurrence, and clinical relapse. Secondary post-hoc endpoint was the long-term success defined as the survival without abscess relapse or intestinal resection at W104. The factors associated with ADA failure at W24 and W104 were identified using a logistic and a Cox regression, respectively. RESULTS: From April 2013 to December 2017, 190 patients from 27 GETAID centers were screened, and 117 were included in the analysis. Fifty-eight patients (50%) were male, and the median age at baseline was 28 years. At W24, 87 patients (74%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5%-82.0%; n = 117) achieved ADA success. Among the 30 patients with ADA failure, 15 underwent surgery. At W104, the survival rate without abscess recurrence or surgery was 72.9% (95% CI, 62.1%-79.8%; n = 109). Abscess drainage was significantly associated with ADA failure at W24 (odds ratio, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.06-16.5; P =0 .043). Disease duration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.59; P = .008), abscess drainage (HR, 5.59; 95% CI, 2.21-14.15; P = .001), and inflammatory changes in mesenteric fat (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94; P = .046) were significantly associated with ADA failure at W104. CONCLUSION: Provided that the abscess was carefully managed before initiating medical treatment, this study showed the high efficacy of ADA in the short and long term in biologic-naïve patients with CD complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT02856763.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers with inflammatory bowel disease: a case-control study.

Background: Whether healthcare workers with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) due to occupational exposure is unknown. Aim: To assess the risk of COVID-19 in healthcare workers with IBD. Methods: A case control study enrolled 326 healthcare workers with IBD from 17 GETAID centres and matched non-healthcare workers with IBD controls (1:1) for gender, age, disease subtype and year of diagnosis. The study period was year 2020 during the COVID-19 outbreak. Results: In total, 59 COVID-19 were recorded among cases (n = 32) and controls (n = 27), including 2 severe COVID-19 (requiring hospitalization, mechanic ventilation) but no death. No difference was observed between healthcare workers and controls regarding the overall incidence rates of COVID-19 4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.9 per 100 patient-semesters, P = 0.34) and the overall incidence rates of severe COVID-19 (0.6 ± 7.8 vs. 0.3 ± 5.5 per 100 patient-semesters, P = 0.42). In multivariate analysis in the entire study population, COVID-19 was associated with patients with body mass index > 30 kg/m2 (HR = 2.48, 95%CI [1.13-5.44], P = 0.02). Conclusion: Healthcare workers with IBD do not have an increased risk of COVID-19 compared with other patients with IBD.

Withdrawal of infliximab or concomitant immunosuppressant therapy in patients with Crohn's disease on combination therapy (SPARE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy is a standard management strategy for patients with Crohn's disease. Concerns regarding the implications of long-term combination therapy provided the rationale for a formal clinical trial of treatment de-escalation. Our aim was to compare the relapse rate and the time spent in remission over 2 years between patients continuing combination therapy and those stopping infliximab or immunosuppressant therapy. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was performed in 64 hospitals in seven countries in Europe and Australia. Adult patients with Crohn's disease in steroid-free clinical remission for more than 6 months, on combination therapy of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy for at least 8 months were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either continue combination therapy (combination group), discontinue infliximab (infliximab withdrawal group), or discontinue immunosuppressant therapy (immunosuppressant withdrawal group). Randomisation was stratified according to disease duration before start of first anti-TNF treatment (≤2 or >2 years), failure of immunosuppressant therapy before start of infliximab, and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy. The patient number and group of each stratum were assigned by a central online randomisation website. Treatment was optimised or resumed in case of relapse in all groups. Participants, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints were the relapse rate (superiority analysis) and time in remission over 2 years (non-inferiority analysis, non-inferiority margin 35 days). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02177071, and with EU Clinical Trials Register, EUDRACT 2014-002311-41. The trial was completed in April, 2021. FINDINGS: Between Nov 2, 2015, and April 24, 2019, 254 patients were screened. Of these, 211 were randomised and 207 were included in the final analysis (n=67 in the combination group, n=71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and n=69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 39 patients had a relapse (eight [12%] of 67 in the combination group, 25 [35%] of 71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, six [9%] of 69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 2-year relapse rates were 14% (95% CI 4-23) in the combination group, 36% (24-47) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 10% (2-18) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group (hazard ratio [HR] 3·45 [95% CI 1·56-7·69], p=0·003, for infliximab withdrawal vs combination, and 4·76 [1·92-11·11], p=0·0004, for infliximab withdrawal vs immunosuppressant withdrawal). Of 28 patients who had a relapse and were retreated or optimised according to protocol, remission was achieved in 25 patients (one of two in the combination group, 22 of 23 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and two of three in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). The mean time spent in remission over 2 years was 698 days (95% CI 668-727) in the combination group, 684 days (651-717) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 706 days (682-730) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The difference in restricted mean survival time in remission was -14 days (95% CI -56 to 27) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the combination group and -22 days (-62 to 16) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The 95% CIs contained the non-inferiority threshold (-35 days). We recorded 31 serious adverse events, in 20 patients, with no difference in frequency between groups. The most frequent serious adverse events were infections (four in the combination group, two in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group) and Crohn's disease exacerbation (three in the combination group, four in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). No death nor malignancy was recorded. INTERPRETATION: In patients with Crohn's disease in sustained steroid-free remission under combination therapy with infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy, withdrawal of infliximab should only be considered after careful assessment of risks and benefits for each patient, whereas withdrawal of immunosuppressant therapy could generally represent a preferable strategy when considering treatment de-escalation. FUNDING: European Union's Horizon 2020.

Comparative Acceptability of Therapeutic Maintenance Regimens in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From the Nationwide ACCEPT2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Owing to growing number of therapeutic options with similar efficacy and safety, we compared the acceptability of therapeutic maintenance regimens in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: From a nationwide study (24 public or private centers), IBD patients were consecutively included for 6 weeks. A dedicated questionnaire including acceptability numerical scales (ANS) ranging from 0 to 10 (highest acceptability) was administered to both patients and related physicians. RESULTS: Among 1850 included patients (65.9% with Crohn's disease), the ANS were 8.68 ± 2.52 for oral route (first choice in 65.8%), 7.67 ± 2.94 for subcutaneous injections (first choice in 21.4%), and 6.79 ± 3.31 for intravenous infusions (first choice in 12.8%; P < .001 for each comparison). In biologic-naïve patients (n = 315), the most accepted maintenance regimens were oral intake once (ANS = 8.8 ± 2.2) or twice (ANS = 6.9 ± 3.4) daily and subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 7.9 ± 3.0 and ANS = 7.2 ± 3.2, respectively). Among 342 patients with prior exposure to subcutaneous biologics, the preferred regimens were subcutaneous injections (≥2 week-intervals; ANS between 9.1 ± 2.3 and 8.1 ± 2.7) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.7 ± 3.2); although it was subcutaneous injections every 12 or 8 weeks (ANS = 8.4 ± 3.0 and ANS = 8.1 ± 3.0, respectively) and oral intake once daily (ANS = 7.6 ± 3.1) in case of prior exposure to intravenous biologics (n = 1181). The impact of usual therapeutic escalation or de-escalation was mild (effect size <0.5). From patients' acceptability perspective, superiority and noninferiority cutoff values should be 15% and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although oral intake is overall preferred, acceptability is highly impacted by the rhythm of administration and prior medication exposures. However, SC treatment with long intervals between 2 injections (≥8 weeks) and oral intake once daily seems to be the most accepted modalities.

Considering both the route of medication delivery and the interval between 2 administrations, we observed a strong impact of patients' experience regarding previous treatments. The most accepted maintenance regimens were subcutaneous injections with interval ≥8 weeks and oral intake.

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting. METHODS: Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively included in this study. RESULTS: Among the 203 patients included, 90 (44%) received UST, 42 (21%) received VDZ and 71 (35%) received a second anti-TNF agent. The first anti-TNF agent was discontinued due to a primary nonresponse in 42 (21%) patients. At weeks 14-24, the rates of steroid-free remission were similar between the UST, VDZ and second anti-TNF groups (29%, 38% and 44%, respectively, p = 0.15). With a mean follow-up of 118 weeks, drug survival was shorter for patients who received ustekinumab treatment (p = 0.001). In the case of trough level less than 5 µg/ml, patients treated with a second anti-TNF agent had a higher postinduction remission rate (p = 0.002), and drug survival (p = 0.0005). No other relevant factors were associated with treatment efficacy, including trough levels greater than 5 µg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: VDZ, UST and a second anti-TNF agent exhibit similar efficacy in the short term, as second-biological line treatment in patients with CD who are refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, but shorter drug maintenance is observed for patients treated with UST.

Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab Retreatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Cohort (REGAIN) Study from the GETAID.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) reintroduction in Crohn's disease (CD) after stopping for loss of response or intolerance. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study including adult patients with clinically (CD Activity Index >150) and objectively active luminal CD in whom IFX was reintroduced after at least 6 months of discontinuation. The reasons for the initial discontinuation could be a secondary loss of response or IFX intolerance. The reintroduction schedule included 3 IFX infusions at weeks 0, 4, and 8, after a systematic premedication. The primary end point was the efficacy of IFX retreatment at week 26 defined by a CD Activity Index of <150 in the absence of IFX discontinuation or use of corticosteroids, surgery, or other biologic. RESULTS: At week 26, 24 patients (35%) among the 69 analyzed reached the primary end point. No significant difference was observed between rates of clinical remission at week 26 in patients with prior LOR (n = 48) and those with IFX intolerance (n = 21) (35% and 33%, P = 0.87, respectively). Thirty-two acute infusion reactions were recorded in 27 patients, leading to withdrawal of IFX in 20 patients. No pharmacokinetic characteristic at baseline but detection of positive anti-drug antibodies at week 4 was predictive of IFX failure or infusion reaction at week 26. DISCUSSION: In this first prospective cohort study, IFX retreatment was safe and effective in one-third of the patients with CD, regardless the reason of prior discontinuation. Early detection of anti-drug antibodies can predict subsequent IFX reintroduction failure and infusion reactions.

Comparative real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab for patients with ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicentre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There are currently no comparative data on the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) after anti-TNF therapy fails. METHODS: We retrieved the full datasets of two observational, multicentre, retrospective studies of patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed and the patients were then treated with either vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission, treatment persistence, colectomy, hospitalization, and serious and infectious adverse events. Propensity scores weighted comparison was applied. RESULTS: In total, 121 patients were included in the vedolizumab group and 97 were included in the ustekinumab group. At week 14 and week 52, in the weighted cohort, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for steroid-free clinical remission (OR = 0.55 [0.21-1.41], p = .21 and 0.94 [0.40-2.22], p = .89, respectively). There was no difference between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for secondary outcomes such as clinical remission, hospitalization, UC-related surgery, treatment persistence and serious and infectious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab after propensity scores weighted comparison. Further studies are required to determine predictive factors of the efficacy of both biological agents.

Prevalence of anti-TNF contraindications in Crohn's disease: A cross-sectional survey from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: The exact rate of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy and physician perspectives on treatment choices facing to anti-TNF contraindication, are poorly reported. METHODS: A two-week cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 centres. Physicians completed a questionnaire for a total of 1,314 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease, assessing each patient's potential contraindications to anti-TNF therapy, the choice of alternative therapy to anti-TNFs, and their preference in an unrestricted reimbursement setting. RESULTS: Among the 1,293 responses to the first item, 148 (11.5%) reported 32 absolute contraindications (2.5%) and 116 relative contraindications (9.0%) to anti-TNF therapy. When asked about their preference of alternative therapies in those cases with contraindications to anti-TNF, physicians chose ustekinumab and vedolizumab, 75.6% and 23.9%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the choice of vedolizumab was the preferred choice for patients aged > 60 years with the L2 phenotype and the absence of perianal lesions. In a hypothetical setting of unrestricted reimbursement, anti-TNFs remained physicians' preferred first-line biological therapy choice for 78.2%. CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF contraindications occurred in up to 11.5% of patients with Crohn's disease. Physicians' choices for alternative therapy to anti-TNF relied on ustekinumab in 75.6% and vedolizumab in 23.9% of these cases. This choice was driven mainly by phenotypical criteria and age.

Impact of HIV Infection on the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Drug Safety Profile: A Multicenter GETAID Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) both impact innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal mucosa. As it is a rare situation, the intersection between HIV and IBD remains unclear, especially the impact of HIV infection on the course of IBD, and the drug safety profile is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study between January 2019 and August 2020. All adult patients with IBD and concomitant HIV infection were included. Each IBD patient with HIV was matched to two HIV-uninfected IBD patients. RESULTS: Overall, 195 patients with IBD were included, including 65 HIV-infected patients and 130 without HIV infection. Of the 65 infected patients, 22 (33.8%) required immunosuppressants and 31 (47.7%) biologics. In the HIV-infected group, the need for immunosuppressants (p = 0.034 for CD and p = 0.012 for UC) and biologics (p = 0.004 for CD and p = 0.008 for UC) was significantly lower. The disease course, using a severity composite criterion, was not significantly different between the two groups for CD (hazard ration (HR) = 1.3 [0.7; 2.4], p = 0.45) and UC (HR, 1.1 [0.5; 2.7], p = 0.767). The overall drug safety profile was statistically similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although HIV-infected patients receive less treatments, the course of their IBD did not differ than uninfected, suggesting that HIV infection might attenuate IBD. The drug safety profile is reassuring, allowing physician to treat these patients according to current recommendations.

Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Control Study from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity and the number of bariatric surgeries in both the general population and in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased significantly in recent years. Due to small sample sizes and the lack of adequate controls, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the available studies on the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with IBD. Our aim was to assess safety, weight loss, and deficiencies in patients with IBD and obesity who underwent BS and compare findings to a control group. METHODS: Patients with IBD and a history of BS were retrospectively recruited to centers belonging to the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Patients were matched 1:2 for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hospital of surgery, and type of BS with non-IBD patients who underwent BS. Complications, rehospitalizations, weight, and deficiencies after BS were collected in cases and controls. RESULTS: We included 88 procedures in 85 patients (64 Crohn's disease, 20 ulcerative colitis, 1 unclassified IBD) with a mean BMI of 41.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Bariatric surgery included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 3), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 73), and gastric banding (n = 12). Eight (9%) complications were reported, including 4 (5%) requiring surgery. At a mean follow-up of 34 months, mean weight was 88.6 ± 22.4 kg. No difference was observed between cases and controls for postoperative complications (P = .31), proportion of weight loss (P = .27), or postoperative deficiencies (P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective procedure in patients with IBD and obesity; outcomes in this patient group were similar to those observed in a control population.

Tofacitinib as salvage therapy for 55 patients hospitalised with refractory severe ulcerative colitis: A GETAID cohort.

BACKGROUND: Up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require hospitalization for severe flare. In patients hospitalised for severe flare, who previously experienced multiple drug failures, including steroids and anti-TNF agents, new quick-acting medical options are needed. Tofacitinib is effective in refractory UC and has a rapid onset of action. AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib as rescue therapy in patients hospitalised for UC flare. METHODS: We conducted an observational and multicentre study with both retrospective and prospective collections in 14 GETAID centres. The primary objective was to assess the survival without colectomy following tofacitinib initiation in patients hospitalised for a UC flare. We determined rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission at week 6 and week 14 and safety. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included (49 with prior infliximab failure and 19 previously exposed to ciclosporin). With a median follow-up of 6.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] [3-12.3]), rate of colectomy-free survival was estimated at 78.9% (95 CI [68.5-90.9]) and 73.6% (95 CI [61.9-87.3]) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Rates of clinical response, clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission were 60%, 45.5% and 37.5% at week 6 and 41.8%, 34.5% and 32.7% at week 14. Regarding safety, no death was observed, three patients withdrew tofacitinib due to adverse events. Two herpes zoster infections occurred in patients aged over 60 years old. No venous thrombotic or major adverse cardiovascular events occurred. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib appears as a promising option in patients hospitalised with a UC flare but needs further validation in controlled trials.

A Scoring System to Determine Patients' Risk of Colectomy Within 1 Year After Hospital Admission for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is consensus on the criteria used to define acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and on patient management, but it has been a challenge to identify patients at risk for colectomy based on data collected at hospital admission. We aimed to develop a system to determine patients' risk of colectomy within 1 y of hospital admission for ASUC based on clinical, biomarker, and endoscopy data. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with ASUC treated with corticosteroids, ciclosporin, or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and admitted to 2 hospitals in France from 2002 through 2017. Patients were followed until colectomy or loss of follow up. A total of 270 patients with ASUC were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up time of 30 months (derivation cohort). Independent risk factors identified by Cox multivariate analysis were used to develop a system to identify patients at risk for colectomy 1 y after ASUC. We developed a scoring system based on these 4 factors (1 point for each item) to identify high-risk (score 3 or 4) vs low-risk (score 0) patients. We validated this system using data from an independent cohort of 185 patients with ASUC treated from 2006 through 2017 at 2 centers in France. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the cumulative risk of colectomy was 12.3% (95% CI, 8.6-16.8). Based on multivariate analysis, previous treatment with TNF antagonists or thiopurines (hazard ratio [HR], 3.86; 95% CI, 1.82-8.18), Clostridioides difficile infection (HR, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.11-12.55), serum level of C-reactive protein above 30 mg/L (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.11-8.43), and serum level of albumin below 30 g/L (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.20-5.92) were associated with increased risk of colectomy. In the derivation cohort, the cumulative risks of colectomy within 1 y in patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 were 0.0%, 9.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-16.7%), 10.6% (95% CI, 5.6%-17.4%), 51.2% (95% CI, 26.6%-71.3%), and 100%. Negative predictive values ranged from 87% (95% CI, 82%-91%) to 92% (95% CI, 88%-95.0%). Findings from the validation cohort were consistent with findings from the derivation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a scoring system to identify patients at low-risk vs high-risk for colectomy within 1 y of hospitalization for ASUC, based on previous treatment with TNF antagonists or thiopurines, C difficile infection, and serum levels of CRP and albumin. The system was validated in an external cohort.

Safety of ustekinumab or vedolizumab in pregnant inflammatory bowel disease patients: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is high in women of childbearing age. Achieving clinical remission from conception to delivery using current medications is a major issue in IBD. AIMS: To assess maternal and neonatal complications and management of vedolizumab or ustekinumab) in pregnant women with IBD receiving these agents. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among GETAID centres including women with IBD who received ustekinumab or vedolizumab during pregnancy or within the 2 months before conception and compared outcomes to women exposed to anti-TNF treatment during pregnancy. RESULTS: Seventy-three pregnancies in 68 women with IBD were analysed: 29 on ustekinumab resulting in 26 (90%) live births, two (7%) spontaneous abortions and one (3%) elective termination; 44 on vedolizumab resulting in 38 (86%) live births, five (11%) spontaneous abortions and one (3%) medical interruption. The control group included 88 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF in 76 women with IBD. The median age at conception, the proportion of women who smoked or in clinical activity at conception was comparable between groups. Only the proportion of patients exposed to >2 anti-TNF agents was significantly increased among the ustekinumab and vedolizumab groups compared to control group (22% and 10% vs 3%, P < 0.005). Rates of prematurity, spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations and maternal complications were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: We report 73 pregnancies in patients receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab without a negative signal on maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed on the outcomes of pregnancies with new biologic drugs.

Ustekinumab for Perianal Crohn's Disease: The BioLAP Multicenter Study From the GETAID.

INTRODUCTION: New therapeutic options for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with perianal lesions failing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are needed. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of ustekinumab in perianal CD (pCD) and predictors of clinical success in a real-life multicenter cohort. METHODS: We conducted a national multicenter retrospective cohort study in patients with either active or inactive pCD who received ustekinumab. In patients with active pCD at treatment initiation, the success of ustekinumab was defined by clinical success at 6 months assessed by the physician's judgment without additional medical or surgical treatment for pCD. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive pCD at ustekinumab initiation, the pCD recurrence-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients were included, the mean age was 37.7 years, the mean duration of CD was 14.3 years, and the mean number of prior perianal surgeries was 2.8. Two hundred five (99%) patients had previously been exposed to at least 1 anti-TNF and 58 (28%) to vedolizumab. The median follow-up time was 48 weeks; 56/207 (27%) patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 43 weeks. In patients with active pCD, success was reached in 57/148 (38.5%) patients. Among patients with setons at initiation, 29/88 (33%) had a successful removal. The absence of optimization was associated with treatment success (P = 0.044, odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-7.82). In multivariable analysis, the number of prior anti-TNF agents (≥3) was borderline significant (P = 0.056, odds ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-1.08). In patients with inactive pCD at initiation, the probability of recurrence-free survival was 86.2% and 75.1% at weeks 26 and 52, respectively. DISCUSSION: Ustekinumab appears as a potential effective therapeutic option in perianal refractory CD. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Long-term outcome of Crohn's disease patients with upper gastrointestinal stricture: A GETAID study.

BACKGROUND: There are few data concerning patients with Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by a stricture of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT). AIMS: We evaluated the outcome and management of CD patients complicated by a stricture of the UGT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study including all CD patients with a non-passable symptomatic UGT stricture on endoscopy. Primary outcome measure was surgery-free survival from diagnosis of stricture. Efficacy of medical, endoscopic, and surgical treatments, and identification of predictors of surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS: 60 CD patients with an UGT stricture were included. 60% of the strictures were located in the duodenum. With a median follow-up of 5.5 (IQR: 3.0-12.0) years since stricture diagnosis, surgical-free survival was 75% and 64% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. At the end of the follow up, 27 (45%) patients underwent surgery. 77 endoscopic procedures were performed in 30 patients with an immediate success of 81% and a clinical benefit in 84% of the procedures. In multivariate analysis, anti-TNF treatment initiation was associated with a reduced risk of surgery. CONCLUSION: CD UGT strictures are mainly located in the duodenum. Medical and endoscopic treatments allow to avoid surgery in half of the patients.

Effectiveness And Safety Of Ustekinumab Intensification At 90 Mg Every Four Weeks In Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: The approved maintenance regimens for ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) are 90 mg every 8 or 12 weeks. Some patients will partially respond to ustekinumab or will experience a secondary loss of response. It remains poorly known if these patients may benefit from shortening the interval between injections. METHODS: All patients with active CD, as defined by Harvey-Bradshaw score ≥ 4 and one objective sign of inflammation (CRP > 5 mg/L and/or fecal calprotectin > 250 µg/g and/or radiologic and/or endoscopic evidence of disease activity) who required ustekinumab dose escalation to 90mg every 4 weeks for loss of response or incomplete response to ustekinumab 90mg every 8 weeks were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort study. RESULTS: One hundred patients, with a median age of 35 years (Interquartile Range (IQR), 28 - 49) and median disease duration of 12 (7 - 20) years were included. Dose intensification was performed after a median of 5.0 (2.8 - 9.0) months of ustekinumab treatment and was associated with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants in respectively 29% and 27% of cases. Short-term clinical response and clinical remission were observed in respectively 61% and 31% after a median of 2.4 (1.3 - 3.0) months. After a median follow-up of 8.2 (5.6-12.4) months, 61% of patients were still treated with ustekinumab, and 26% in steroid-free clinical remission. Among the 39 patients with colonoscopy during follow-up, 14 achieved endoscopic remission (no ulcers). At the end of follow-up, 27% of patients were hospitalized, and 19% underwent intestinal resection surgery. Adverse events were reported in 12% of patients, including five serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, two-thirds of patients recaptured response following treatment intensification with ustekinumab 90 mg every 4 weeks.

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab induction therapy for 103 patients with ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicentre real-world cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but few real-world data are currently available. AIM: To assess short-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with UC. METHODS: From January to September 2019, all patients with UC treated with ustekinumab in 20 French GETAID centres were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo Clinic score ≤2) at weeks 12-16 without a rectal bleeding subscore >1. RESULTS: Among the 103 patients included, 70% had been previously exposed to ≥2 anti-TNF agents and 85% to vedolizumab. At weeks 12-16, steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission rates were 35.0% and 39.8% respectively; the absence of rectal bleeding with normal stool frequency was noted in 19.4% of patients. Two patients discontinued ustekinumab before the week 12-16 visit and underwent surgery. In multivariable analysis, a partial Mayo Clinic score >6 at inclusion (18.6% vs 46.7%, P = 0.003) and a history of both exposure to anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies (27.3% vs 80.0%, P = 0.001) were negatively associated with steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 12-16. Adverse events occurred in 7.8% of patients and serious adverse events in 3.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of highly refractory patients with UC with multiple prior drug failures, ustekinumab provided steroid-free clinical remission in one-third of cases at weeks 12-16. Clinical severity and previous use of anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies were associated with ustekinumab failure at weeks 12-16.

Vedolizumab for perianal Crohn's disease: a multicentre cohort study in 151 patients.

BACKGROUND: The management of Crohn's disease patients with perianal lesions and anti-TNF failure is challenging. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of vedolizumab in perianal Crohn's disease and the predictors of success in a real-life cohort. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide multicentre cohort study in patients with perianal Crohn's disease who received vedolizumab. In patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, the success of vedolizumab was defined by clinical success (no draining fistula at clinical examination and no anal ulcers for primary lesions) at 6 months without medical or surgical treatment for perianal Crohn's disease. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of success. In patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, recurrence was defined by the occurrence of lesions and/or the need for medical or surgical treatments. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients were included. Among them 102 patients had active perianal disease, 33 (32.4%) males, mean age 39.8 years, mean Crohn's disease duration 14.6 years; 101 (99%) had received at least one anti-TNF. The median follow-up time was 52 weeks. Sixty-eight per cent of patients discontinued therapy after a median time of 33 weeks. Vedolizumab success was reached in 23/102 (22.5%). Among patients with setons at initiation, 9/61(15%) had a successful removal. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with success were the number of prior biologic agents (≥3, odds ratio, OR: 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.98) and no antibiotics at initiation (OR: 4.76, 95% CI 1.25-18.19). In 49 patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease, perianal disease recurred in 15/49 (30.6%), 11/49 (22.4%) needed dedicated treatments. Median time to recurrence was 22 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a low rate of success of vedolizumab in patients with active perianal Crohn's disease, and nearly one third of patients with inactive perianal Crohn's disease had perianal recurrence. Further evaluation is warranted in prospective studies.