Long-term secondary cardiovascular prevention programme in patients subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery.

AIMS: Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are at very high risk of recurrent events. A strategy to reduce excess risk might be to deliver structured secondary prevention programmes, but their efficacy has been mostly evaluated in the short term and in experimental settings. This is a retrospective case-control study aimed at assessing, in the real world, the efficacy of a secondary prevention programme in reducing long-term coronary event recurrences after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Programme participants (henceforth 'cases') were men and women aged <75 years subjected to CABG between 2002 and 2014, living within 100 km of the hospital. Key programme actions included optimization of treatments according to the most updated European preventive guidelines, surveillance of therapy adherence, and customized lifestyle counselling. Controls were analogous patients not involved in the programme because living farther than 100 km away, matched 1:1 with cases for gender, age at CABG, and year of CABG. Both groups (n = 1248) underwent usual periodic cardiology follow-up at our centre. Data on symptomatic or silent CHD recurrences were obtained from the hospital electronic health records. Cox analysis (adjusted for baseline differences between groups) shows that programme participation was associated with a significantly lower incidence throughout 5 years post-CABG of symptomatic [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.59 (0.38-0.94)] and silent [0.53 (0.31-0.89)] coronary recurrences. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, taking part in a structured longstanding secondary prevention programme, in addition to usual cardiology care, meaningfully lowers the risk of coronary recurrences.

Traditional Risk Factors are Causally Related to Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression: Inferences from Observational Cohort Studies and Interventional Trials.

In the present review, associations between traditional vascular risk factors (VRFs) and carotid intimamedial thickness progression (C-IMTp) as well as the effects of therapies for VRFs control on C-IMTp were appraised to infer causality between each VRF and C-IMTp. Cohort studies indicate that smoking, binge drinking, fatness, diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are associated with accelerated C-IMTp. An exception is physical activity, with mixed data. Interventions for the control of obesity, diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia decelerate C-IMTp. Conversely, scarce information is available regarding the effect of smoking cessation, stop of excessive alcohol intake and management of the metabolic syndrome. Altogether, these data support a causative role of several traditional VRFs on C-IMTp. Shortcomings in study design and/or ultrasonographic protocols may account for most negative studies, which underlines the importance of careful consideration of methodological aspects in investigations using C-IMTp as the outcome.

Trials in "True" Dyslipidemic Patients Are Urged to Reconsider Comprehensive Lipid Management as a Means to Reduce Residual Cardiovascular Risk.

Randomized cardiovascular trials aimed to reduce the excessive residual risk in high-risk patients through a more aggressive low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol control or targeting triglycerides or high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels have shown a null or, at best, limited incremental benefit. In some cases, the treatment produced meaningful effects only in study subgroups. As a consequence, some compounds were withdrawn (e.g., nicotinic acid derivatives and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors), whereas others (fibrates) are utilized with reluctance due to the low level of evidence-based data. By reviewing these trials analytically, we identified a common feature that might explain their meager results: most of them involved patients generically at high cardiovascular risk with normal or near normal lipid levels and not patients with "true" dyslipidemia, who would receive the treatment if it were part of usual care. These observations may warrant re-examining a central criterion of pragmatism, eligibility, in the outline of forthcoming cardiovascular trials with novel lipid-modifying drugs.

Update of green tea interactions with cardiovascular drugs and putative mechanisms.

Many patients treated with cardiovascular (CV) drugs drink green tea (GT), either as a cultural tradition or persuaded of its putative beneficial effects for health. Yet, GT may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CV compounds. Novel GT-CV drug interactions were reported for rosuvastatin, sildenafil and tacrolimus. Putative mechanisms involve inhibitory effects of GT catechins at the intestinal level on influx transporters OATP1A2 or OATP2B1 for rosuvastatin, on CYP3A for sildenafil and on both CYP3A and the efflux transporter p-glycoprotein for tacrolimus. These interactions, which add to those previously described with simvastatin, nadolol and warfarin, might lead, in some cases, to reduced drug efficacy or risk of drug toxicity. Oddly, available data on GT interaction with CV compounds with a narrow therapeutic index, such as warfarin and tacrolimus, derive from single case reports. Conversely, GT interactions with simvastatin, rosuvastatin, nadolol and sildenafil were documented through pharmacokinetic studies. In these, the effect of GT or GT derivatives on drug exposure was mild to moderate, but a high inter-individual variability was observed. Further investigations, including studies on the effect of the dose and the time of GT intake are necessary to understand more in depth the clinical relevance of GT-CV drug interactions.