Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion and iron replacement in adults with gastrointestinal bleeding: An algorithm proposed by gastroenterologists and patient blood management experts.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion has long been the cornerstone of treatment for anemia due to GI bleeding. However, blood is not devoid of potential adverse effects, and it is also a precious resource, with limited supplies in blood banks. Nowadays, all patients should benefit from a patient blood management (PBM) program that aims to minimize blood loss, optimize hematopoiesis (mainly by using iron replacement therapy), maximize tolerance of anemia, and avoid unnecessary transfusions. Integration of PBM into healthcare management reduces patient mortality and morbidity and supports a restrictive RBC transfusion approach by reducing transfusion rates. The European Commission has outlined strategies to support hospitals with the implementation of PBM, but it is vital that these initiatives are translated into clinical practice. To help optimize management of anemia and iron deficiency in adults with acute or chronic GI bleeding, we developed a protocol under the auspices of the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology, in collaboration with healthcare professionals from 16 hospitals across Spain, including expert advice from different specialties involved in PBM strategies, such as internal medicine physicians, intensive care specialists, and hematologists. Recommendations include how to identify patients who have anemia (or iron deficiency) requiring oral/intravenous iron replacement therapy and/or RBC transfusion (using a restrictive approach to transfusion), and transfusing RBC units 1 unit at a time, with assessment of patients after each given unit (i.e., "don't give two without review"). The advantages and limitations of oral versus intravenous iron and guidance on the safe and effective use of intravenous iron are also described. Implementation of a PBM strategy and clinical decision-making support, including early treatment of anemia with iron supplementation in patients with GI bleeding, may improve patient outcomes and lower hospital costs.

Somatostatin for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Meta-analyses suggest that an intravenous bolus or a high dose continuous infusion of somatostatin reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Clinical guidelines, however, do not recommend this prophylaxis. The aim of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of somatostatin on the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing ERCP at a single center were randomized to either intravenous bolus of somatostatin followed by a short (4-hour) continuous infusion, or to a similar placebo regimen. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis, defined as abdominal pain with an amylase level at least three times higher than the upper limit of normality 24 hours after the ERCP and requiring admission for at least 2 days. RESULTS: A total of 510 patients were enrolled (255 patients per group) and all completed follow-up. The main indications for ERCP were choledocholithiasis (62 %), and biliary malignant stricture (31 %). Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 19 patients (7.5 %) in the somatostatin group and 17 patients (6.7 %) in the placebo group (relative risk [RR] 1.12, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 0.59 - 2.1; P = 0.73). The number of cases of moderate or severe acute pancreatitis was similar in the somatostatin (2.4 %) and the placebo (3.5 %) groups (RR 0.67, 95 %CI 0.24 - 1.85, P = 0.43). No side effects were observed related to the use of somatostatin. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of an intravenous bolus of somatostatin followed by a short continuous infusion does not reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT01060826.

Portal hypertension-related complications after acute portal vein thrombosis: impact of early anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute portal vein thrombosis (APVT) is a rare disorder that causes chronic portal hypertension if recanalization is not obtained. However, response to anticoagulation and long-term prognosis of APVT are not well-defined. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with APVT between 1995 and 2003 from 5 Spanish referral hospitals, in whom cirrhosis and malignancy were specifically excluded, were included in this retrospective study. The response to anticoagulation therapy and development of portal hypertension-related complications during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 43 months (range, 6-112 months). Recanalization occurred in 12 of 27 patients receiving anticoagulation versus 0 of 11 patients who did not receive anticoagulation (P = .008). Rates of recanalization were influenced by the precocity of heparin administration and the number of underlying prothrombotic conditions. Follow-up upper endoscopy performed in 29 patients disclosed gastroesophageal varices in 16 (55%). Varices appeared as early as 1 month after APVT. However, in most patients varices were detected in successive endoscopies, mainly during the first year. Two-year actuarial probability of variceal bleeding was 12% and for ascites 16%. Five-year survival was 87%. Mortality was related to the APVT episode in 2 cases and to an underlying hematologic disorder in one. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation achieved recanalization in about 40% of patients. Most patients not achieving recanalization will develop gastroesophageal varices during follow-up. However, development of variceal bleeding and ascites is infrequent, and survival is satisfactory.