RESUMO
Introducción: Se han desarrollado materiales bioactivos para el recubrimiento pulpar directo con el objetivo de preservar la pulpa dentaria y mantener el diente por mayor tiempo en la cavidad oral. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión fue evaluar la efectividad del uso de bioceramicos como material de recubrimiento directo pulpar para mantener la vitalidad pulpar en dientes primarios y permanentes con pulpitis reversible. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión sistemática con meta análisis. Se estudió el éxito en el tratamiento del mantenimiento de la vitalidad, el dolor postoperatorio y la decoloración. Se realizó una búsqueda Electrónica en las bases de datos: MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, LILACS, BBO. Se extrajeron los datos y se analizaron con Rev Man. Resultados: Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en la cual se realizaron recubrimiento pulpar directo con silicatos tricalcicos comparado con otros materiales de recubrimiento. Comparando tres biocerámicos no se encontraron diferencias significativas en el mantenimiento de la vitalidad pulpar. En cuanto a la decoloración se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas a favor de Biodentine (p <0,001). Discusión: la relevancia clínica de estos hallazgos es discutible debido a su pequeña magnitud general y al alto riesgo de sesgo de los estudios incluidos.
Introduction: Bioactive materials have been developed for direct pulp capping in order to preserve the dental pulp and keep the tooth longer in the oral cavity. Objective: The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of bioceramics as direct pulp capping material to maintain pulp vitality in primary and permanent teeth with reversible pulpitis. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. Success in treating vitality maintenance, postoperative pain, and discoloration was studied. An electronic search was carried out in the databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, LILACS, BBO. Data were extracted and analyzed with Rev Man. Results: Randomized clinical trials in which direct pulp capping with tricalcium silicates was performed compared with other capping materials were included. Comparing three bioceramics, no significant differences were found in the maintenance of pulp vitality. Regarding discoloration, statistically significant differences were observed in favor of Biodentine (p <0.001). Discussion: the clinical relevance of these findings is debatable due to their small overall magnitude and the high risk of bias of the included studies.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the literature on the use of povidone prior to dental treatment for the reduction of viruses in the oral cavity. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases published from January 2019 to June 2020 were reviewed. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed by two authors separately. A qualitative review of the data was performed. RESULTS: There were no randomized controlled trials or clinical observation studies on the curative or preventive effect of povidone against COVID-19, but there are clinical trial protocols in the recruitment process. The use of a dose between 0.2% to 2.5% is recommended four times a day for 15-30 seconds. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Povidone mouthwash could be a viable solution before dental care that should be studied to reduce the viral load off COVID-19.