Recommendations for stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. A GETUG (French society of urological radiation oncolgists) consensus using a national two-round modified Delphi survey.

Background and purpose: The relevance of metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) remains to be demonstrated through phase III trials. Multiple SBRT procedures have been published potentially resulting in a disparity of practices. Therefore, the french society of urological radiation oncolgists (GETUG) recognized the need for joint expert consensus guidelines for metastasis-directed SBRT in order to standardize practice in trials carried out by the group. Materials and methods: After a comprehensive literature review, 97 recommendation statements were created regarding planning and delivery of spine bone (SBM) and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) SBRT. These statements were then submitted to a national online two-round modified Delphi survey among main GETUG investigators. Consensus was achieved if a statement received ≥ 75 % agreements, a trend to consensus being defined as 65-74 % agreements. Any statement without consensus at round one was re-submitted in round two. Results: Twenty-one out of 29 (72.4%) surveyed experts responded to both rounds. Seventy-five statements achieved consensus at round one leaving 22 statements needing a revote of which 16 achieved consensus and 5 a trend to consensus. The final rate of consensus was 91/97 (93.8%). Statements with no consensus concerned patient selection (3/19), dose and fractionation (1/11), prescription and dose objectives (1/9) and organs at risk delineation (1/15). The voting resulted in the writing of step-by-step consensus guidelines. Conclusion: Consensus guidelines for SBM and NSBM SBRT were agreed upon using a validated modified Delphi approach. These guidelines will be used as per-protocole recommendations in ongoing and further GETUG clinical trials.

Vertebral compression fracture during stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis: A rare case of tracking failure.

Spinal metastasis are a daily challenge in clinical practice. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows delivery of definitive treatment with excellent long-term control rates. Its implementation needs dedicated devices and day-to-day image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The XSight™ spine tracking system, integrates with the CyberKnife® (Accuray™), provides a fiducial-free tracking system for spinal SBRT. We report a rare case of tracking failure during treatment due to the occurrence of a vertebral compression fracture (VCF).

[Practice evolution of hypofractionation in breast radiation therapy and medical impact]. / Évolution des pratiques médicales d'hypofractionnement en radiothérapie pour cancer du sein et impact économique.

PURPOSE: Whole breast irradiation after conservative surgery is the standard treatment for invasive breast cancer. Randomized studies indicate that hypofractionation can be equivalent for selected patients. This study focuses on fractionation practice evolution in a single centre, and analyses the economic impact of practice modification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All prescriptions for invasive breast cancer between January 2010 and June 2014 were analyzed. Female patients 60 years or older, pN0 were considered for the economic study. Patients included in clinical trials or patient with high-grade tumours were excluded from the hypofractionation practice study, because physician could not choose fractionation. We used data from the Medical public health system to calculate cost per fraction and transportation cost. RESULTS: Two thousand thirty one patients were treated; 399 were eligible for the economic study (20%) and 282 for the practice study (14%). Treatment with 25 fractions decreased from 90% to 16% in the first half of 2014. Meanwhile, treatment with 15 or 16 fractions increased from 6% in 2010 to 68% in the first half of 2014. Hypofractionated treatment proportion was 100% with 42.5Gy in 16 fractions in 2010 and 100% 40Gy in 15 fractions in 2014, according to long-term follow-up publication of START trials. Treatment with five fractions remained stable around 7% (4 to 16%), reserved for patients over 80 years (P<0.0001). Based on data from 3451 fractions in 2013, transport cost was calculated at 62 € per fraction, in addition to a 170.77 € reimbursement per fraction, giving a cost per fraction of 232.77 €. CONCLUSION: Practice change led to an increase of hypofractionation in recent years. Hypofractionation may be currently prescribed and may concern 20% of patients. This practice evolution is beneficial for patients and the public health system.