[Red blood transfusion in palliative care situation]. / Transfusion de globules rouges en situation oncologique palliative.

Anemia is frequent in oncology. We debate the decision-making process of erythrocyte transfusion in palliative care situation from a case report. A patient with a prostatic metastatic cancer was in palliative situation with asthenia and coronary symptom. We analyze, in this particular case that does not describe reality of normal practice, the decision-making process of erythrocyte transfusion. These transfusions were based, in this case, on the evaluation of oncology prognosis, the short-term vital threats, life project and clinical safety of the transfusion. The patient has received 5 erythrocyte transfusions in 4 months until a multidisciplinary meeting decided to stop transfusion because of poor prognostic situation and bad tolerance of the act. This patient could be a collegial model used to measure the reasonable nature of prescription depending on the purpose and the goal of the patient but does not allow generalization. Although there is low risk of erythrocyte shortage, it seems important to train doctors to reduce abusive transfusion and define transfusion thresholds. Different levels of erythrocyte transfusion security would raise the issue of management of several stocks. Erythrocyte transfusion in palliative care can be considered subject to prognostic information and the palliative aim of the transfusions, multidisciplinary decision-making, during short hospitalizations and with evaluation of the act and consequences for the patient.

[Advance directives in dermato-oncology: The current situation and future prospects]. / Directives anticipées en dermato-oncologie : situation actuelle et perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Patient information and advance directives (AD) are described in the French laws of 4 March 2002 and 22 April 2005, which concern the decisions of subjects regarding end-of-life treatment. At present, practitioners rarely seek the opinion of patients on this matter. The Claeys-Leonetti law requires doctors to identify any advance directives by patients, which are binding upon medical staff. The present study sought to analyse the extent of application of the laws of 2002 and 2005 and to collect the observations of clinicians in dermato-oncology regarding the new legislation. METHODS: We contacted members of the French dermato-oncology group by email and asked them to assess their practices with regard to information provision, patient surrogates and advance directives. RESULTS: To 111 requests we received 34 replies from hospital dermatologists, i.e. a response rate of 31 %. In all, 85 % of clinicians informed patients with metastasis that their disease was incurable, and 94 % stated that they have procedures in place concerning the appointment of a patient surrogate. One third of respondents reported having a procedure in place for provision of information or collection of advance directives. According to 91 % of clinicians, the binding nature of advance directives did not constitute any loss of chance for the patient in question; 59 % felt that the new law would affect their practices, but of these, paradoxically, 60 % felt that this would have no impact on their therapeutic decision-making. In all, 26 clinicians (76.5 %) did not intend to modify their decision-making process. CONCLUSION: The law of 2002 is generally better known than that of 2005. Dermato-oncologists are not aware of the practical consequences of the new binding nature of advance directives with regard to the doctor-patient relationship and the actual decision-making process.