How many Italian cancer patients are eligible for, and may respond to, Italian Medicines Agency-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION: This cross-sectional study was aimed at estimating the number of Italian incident cancer patients in 2020 eligible for, and respondent to, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). METHODS: The study is based on publicly available data: the ICI approved until August 2022 by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) with their specific indications and overall observed responses, rther details can be found in the Online Supplementary Materi cancer incidence estimates at 2020 and observed cancer deaths, and published papers with estimates on the frequency of different cancer stage/histology/markers etc. corresponding to AIFA authorizations. RESULTS: In the analyzed period, a total of seven ICI were authorized in Italy for 20 cancer types. The estimated number of ICI-eligible patients in 2020 was 48,400, 14.3% of those tumors (including skin epitheliomas) that may fit AIFA-indications, and 10.5% of all the incident malignant tumors, including skin epitheliomas. The number of patients who may benefit from ICI therapy was 24,052, 49.7% of the ICI-eligible ones, or 5.2% of the overall estimated incident cancers in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although the number of ICI-eligible patients is a relatively small proportion of the yearly burden of cancers, about half of them may respond to ICI-treatment.

Female breast cancer subtypes in the Romagna Unit of the Emilia-Romagna cancer registry, and estimated incident cases by subtypes and age in Italy in 2020.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate the Italian burden of incident breast cancer (BC) by subtypes, according to the distribution of hormonal receptor (HR) status and expression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). METHODS: Female breast cancers incidence in the Romagna Unit of the Emilia-Romagna registry (n. 10,711) were grouped into: HR+ /HER2-, HR+ /HER2+ , HR-/HER2+ , HR-/HER2- and missing, and by age: < 50, 50-69 and 70+ years. Data were compared with other published Italian population-bases series before using them for national estimates. We used national and regional numbers of expected breast cancers published by the Italian network of cancer registries considering the age- and geographic-specific variation of the Italian population. RESULTS: Overall, 70.7% of incident BC cases are expected to be HR+ /HER2-, 8.5% HR+ /HER2+ , 7.5% HR-/HER2-, 4.1% HR-/HER2+ and 9.3% missing. The global ranking is similar across age-groups but with age-specific differences. The proportion of missing was around 3-times lower than in the other Italian published population-based series and similar to the SEER one. In Italy, are estimated 38,841 HR+ /HER2- breast cancer cases, 4665 HR+ /HER2+ , 4098 HR-/HER2-, 2281 HR-/HER2+ , and 5092 not specified. Numbers by age-group were provided. CONCLUSIONS: The present estimates relied on high-quality population-based data and provide a clinically relevant information on the burden of breast cancer subtypes. These data will support the planning of therapy needs for oncologists, decision-makers, and all other stakeholders.

Receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy among patients with high-risk breast cancer detected by mammography screening.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared screen-detected (SD) breast cancer patients with symptomatic patients for the frequency and determinants of receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy according to accepted guidelines. METHODS: Depending on the date of diagnosis, adjuvant therapy guidelines from the 5th, 6th, and 7th St. Gallen International Conferences were used as standards to audit the treatment of 598 node-negative high-risk patients (59% SD) and 430 node-positive patients (40% SD) aged 50-69 years from an Italian cancer registry (1997-2001). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using backward stepwise logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among node-negative high-risk patients, SD cancers were smaller (P = 0.000) and of lower grade (P = 0.003). Downgrading was generally from grade 3 to grade 2, with an increased proportion of patients placed in the high-risk category due to grade 2 alone. The total rates of adjuvant systemic therapy were similar (58 vs. 60%) whereas SD patients were less often treated according to the guidelines (34 vs. 45%; OR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86). After adjustment for tumour size and other weaker confounders, the OR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.67-1.46). Among node-positive patients, the OR of receiving the standard adjuvant systemic therapy did not differ between SD and symptomatic cancers. CONCLUSIONS: SD cancers amplified the prognostic heterogeneity of node-negative high-risk patients. Their lower likelihood of being treated according to the guidelines was largely explained by their lower risk profile. No evidence was found to suggest that physicians held a priori assumptions about the relative biological indolence of SD cancers.