Hyperlactataemia is a marker of reduced exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with an array of central and peripheral haemodynamic and metabolic changes. The exact pathogenesis of exercise limitation in HFpEF remains uncertain. Our aim was to compare lactate accumulation and central haemodynamic responses to exercise in patients with HFpEF, non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD), and healthy volunteers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right heart catheterization with mixed venous blood gas and lactate measurements was performed at rest and during symptom-limited supine exercise. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between haemodynamic and biochemical parameters and their association with exercise capacity. Of 362 subjects, 198 (55%) had HFpEF, 103 (28%) had NCD, and 61 (17%) were healthy volunteers. This included 139 (70%) females with HFpEF, 77 (75%) in NCD (P = 0.41 HFpEF vs. NCD), and 31 (51%) in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001 HFpEF vs. volunteers). The median age was 71 (65, 75) years in HFpEF, 66 (57, 72) years in NCD, and 49 (38, 65) years in healthy volunteers (HFpEF vs. NCD or volunteer, both P < 0.001). Peak workload was lower in HFpEF compared with healthy volunteers [52 W (interquartile range 31-73), 150 W (125-175), P < 0.001], but not NCD [53 W (33, 75), P = 0.85]. Exercise lactate indexed to workload was higher in HFpEF at 0.08 mmol/L/W (0.05-0.11), 0.06 mmol/L/W (0.05-0.08; P = 0.016) in NCD, and 0.04 mmol/L/W (0.03-0.05; P < 0.001) in volunteers. Exercise cardiac index was 4.5 L/min/m2 (3.7-5.5) in HFpEF, 5.2 L/min/m2 (4.3-6.2; P < 0.001) in NCD, and 9.1 L/min/m2 (8.0-9.9; P < 0.001) in volunteers. Oxygen delivery in HFpEF was lower at 1553 mL/min (1175-1986) vs. 1758 mL/min (1361-2282; P = 0.024) in NCD and 3117 mL/min (2667-3502; P < 0.001) in the volunteer group during exercise. Predictors of higher exercise lactate levels in HFpEF following adjustment included female sex and chronic kidney disease (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HFpEF is associated with reduced exercise capacity secondary to both central and peripheral factors that alter oxygen utilization. This results in hyperlactataemia. In HFpEF, plasma lactate responses to exercise may be a marker of haemodynamic and cardiometabolic derangements and represent an important target for future potential therapies.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) frequently develop atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no randomized trials examining the effects of AF ablation on HFpEF outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of AF ablation vs usual medical therapy on markers of HFpEF severity, including exercise hemodynamics, natriuretic peptide levels, and patient symptoms. METHODS: Patients with concomitant AF and HFpEF underwent exercise right heart catheterization and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. HFpEF was confirmed with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of 15 mm Hg at rest or ≥25 mm Hg on exercise. Patients were randomized to AF ablation vs medical therapy, with investigations repeated at 6 months. The primary outcome was change in peak exercise PCWP on follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (mean age: 66.1 years; 51.6% females, 80.6% persistent AF) were randomized to AF ablation (n = 16) vs medical therapy (n = 15). Baseline characteristics were comparable across both groups. At 6 months, ablation reduced the primary outcome of peak PCWP from baseline (30.4 ± 4.2 to 25.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Improvements were also seen in peak relative VO2 (20.2 ± 5.9 to 23.1 ± 7.2 mL/kg/min; P < 0.01), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (794 ± 698 to 141 ± 60 ng/L; P = 0.04), and MLHF (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure) score (51 ± -21.9 to 16.6 ± 17.5; P < 0.01). No differences were detected in the medical arm. Following ablation, 50% no longer met exercise right heart catheterization-based criteria for HFpEF vs 7% in the medical arm (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation improves invasive exercise hemodynamic parameters, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with concomitant AF and HFpEF.

Haemodynamic and metabolic adaptations in coronary microvascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the microcirculatory resistance (MR) and myocardial metabolic adaptations at rest and in response to increased cardiac workload in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). METHODS: Patients with objective ischaemia and/or myocardial injury and non-obstructive coronary artery disease underwent thermodilution-derived microcirculatory assessment and transcardiac blood sampling during graded exercise with adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. We measured MR at rest and following supine cycle ergometry. Patients (n=24) were stratified by the resting index of MR (IMR) into normal-IMR (IMR<22U, n=12) and high-IMR groups (IMR≥22U, n=12). RESULTS: The mean age was 57 years; 67% were males and 38% had hypertension. The normal-IMR group had increased IMR response to exercise (16±5 vs 23±12U, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group, who had persistently elevated IMR at rest and following exercise (38±19 vs 33±15U, p=0.39) despite similar exercise duration and rate-pressure product between the groups, both p>0.05. The normal-IMR group had augmented oxygen extraction ratio following exercise (53±18 vs 64±11%, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group (65±14 vs 59±11%, p=0.26). The postexercise lactate uptake was greater in the high-IMR (0.04±0.05 vs 0.11±0.07 mmol/L, p=0.004) compared with normal-IMR group (0.08±0.06 vs 0.09±0.09 mmol/L, p=0.67). The high-IMR group demonstrated greater troponin release following exercise compared with the normal-IMR group (0.13±0.12 vs 0.001±0.05 ng/L, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected CMD appear to have distinctive microcirculatory resistive and myocardial metabolic profiles at rest and in response to exercise. These differences in phenotypes may permit individualised therapies targeting microvascular responsiveness (normal-IMR group) and/or myocardial metabolic adaptations (normal-IMR and high-IMR groups).

Hemodynamic Profile of Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction Vary by Age.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit a range of cardiovascular phenotypic profiles modified by several common comorbidities. In particular, patients with HFpEF tend to be older; however, it is unclear whether the effects of cardiovascular aging per se modify the expression of HFpEF. We therefore sought to investigate the interaction between age and physiologic profile in patients with HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the hemodynamic and metabolic profile of 40 patients with HFpEF. Patients underwent right heart catheterization at rest and during supine cycle ergometry, and were segregated into 2 groups by the median age of the cohort. Older patients with HFpEF demonstrated reduced resting cardiac output (4.8±1.2 L/min versus 5.7±1.1 L/min). With exercise, older patients demonstrated a marked rise in arteriovenous oxygen content difference (10.8±1.8 versus 7.9±2.4 mL, P≤0.001), driven by enhanced oxygen extraction. There was no significant difference in peak pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (30±7 mm Hg versus 27±6, P=0.135), including when indexed to workload (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure/W, 0.88 mm Hg/W versus 0.92; P=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with HFpEF display a different physiological phenotype compared with younger patients, with enhanced oxygen extraction and lower increment in cardiac output to increase oxygen consumption from rest to peak supine exercise. This finding highlights the importance in considering age when considering therapeutic options in patients with HFpEF.