Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hepatol Commun ; 7(10)2023 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a heterogeneous rare congenital cholestatic liver disease. Disease progression might necessitate liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of PFIC1-4 patients after LT. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify studies on PFIC and LT. Patients were categorized according to PFIC type, genotype, graft type, age at LT, time of follow-up, and complications and treatment during follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-nine studies with 507 patients met inclusion criteria; most patients were classified as PFIC1-3. The median age at LT was 50 months. The overall 5-year patient survival was 98.5%. PFIC1 patients with diarrhea after LT were at significant risk of developing graft steatosis ( p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis showed an efficacy of 100% [95% CI: 73.9%-100%] for surgical biliary diversion to ameliorate steatosis and 94.9% [95% CI: 53.7%-100%] to improve diarrhea (n = 8). PFIC2 patients with bile salt export pump (BSEP)2 or BSEP3-genotype were at significant risk of developing antibody-induced BSEP deficiency (AIBD) ( p < 0.0001), which was reported in 16.2% of patients at a median of 36.5 months after LT. Meta-analysis showed an efficacy of 81.1% [95% CI: 47.5%-100%] for rituximab-based treatment regimens to improve AIBD (n = 18). HCC was detected in 3.6% of PFIC2 and 13.8% of PFIC4 patients at LT. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty percent of PFIC1 patients develop diarrhea and steatosis after LT. Biliary diversion can protect the graft from injury. PFIC2 patients with BSEP2 and BSEP3 genotypes are at significant risk of developing AIBD, and rituximab-based treatment regimens effectively improve AIBD. PFIC3 patients have no PFIC-specific complications following LT.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Colestase Intra-Hepática , Colestase , Fígado Gorduroso , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Transplante de Fígado , Erros Inatos do Metabolismo de Esteroides , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Rituximab , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Diarreia/complicações
2.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 44(1): e272-e274, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633025

RESUMO

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an extremely rare entity with a poor prognosis. We report on a 16-year-old boy with ascites and abdominal distension. A computed tomography scan showed peritoneal thickening and a mass adjacent to the transverse colon. Neither repeated cytologic testing of ascitic fluid, nor peritoneal tissue biopsy detected malignant cells. After the patient became progressively comatose, a magnetic resonance imaging scan of the brain showed leptomeningeal enhancement. An autopsy showed MPM infiltrating the pleura and the meninges. This is the first report on meningeal metastasis of MPM in a pediatric patient illustrating the enigmatic behavior of the tumor and highlighting the diagnostic pitfalls.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Mesotelioma Maligno , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/secundário , Mesotelioma Maligno/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma Maligno/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias Peritoneais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia
3.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 37(1): 1074-1081, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32954876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surgical resection is currently the cornerstone of liver tumor treatment in children. In adults radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established minimally invasive treatment option for small focal liver tumors. Multiprobe stereotactic RFA (SRFA) with intraoperative image fusion to confirm ablation margins allows treatment for large lesions. We describe our experience with SRFA in children with liver masses. METHODS: SRFA was performed in 10 patients with a median age of 14 years (range 0.5-17.0 years) suffering from liver adenoma (n = 3), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1), hepatoblastoma (n = 2), myofibroblastic tumor (n = 1), hepatic metastases of extrahepatic tumors (n = 2) and infiltrative hepatic cysts associated with alveolar echinococcosis (n = 1). Overall, 15 lesions with a mean lesion size of 2.6 cm (range 0.7-9.5 cm) were treated in 11 sessions. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%, as was the survival rate. No transient adverse effects higher than grade II (Clavien and Dindo) were encountered after interventions. The median hospital stay was 5 d (range 2-33 d). In two patients who subsequently underwent transplant hepatectomy complete ablation was histologically confirmed. Follow-up imaging studies (median 55 months, range 18-129 months) revealed no local or distant recurrence of disease in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: SRFA is an effective minimal-invasive treatment option in pediatric patients with liver tumors of different etiologies.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Adolescente , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA