Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Substudy.

AIMS: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation with the second-generation cryoballoon (CBG2) seems to be more effective than its predecessor [first-generation cryoballoon (CBG1)], but phrenic nerve palsies were observed more frequently. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of CBG1 and CBG2 in a substudy of the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Periprocedural data were analysed, and a total of 532 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were examined (n = 224 for CBG1 and n = 308 for CBG2). Procedure time decreased significantly from 149 to 130 min when comparing CBG1 with CBG2 (P < 0.0001), and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in 97.8 and 97.6% of PVs with CBG1 and CBG2 (P = 0.77), respectively. The need for dual-balloon usage within a procedure dropped (20.1 vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001), and the fluoroscopy time was reduced when operating the CBG2. Atrial fibrillation recurrence rates until discharge were similar (5.0 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.69). Comparable low rates of major complications were observed with both CBs, and there was a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. CONCLUSION: Second-generation cryoballoon demonstrated a high rate of acute PVI in a significant faster procedure, which also utilized less radiation exposure and less dual-balloon usage during an average procedure. The safety profile remains favourable with a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. If the enhancements lead to a higher clinical benefit has to be determined. The 1-year outcome data from the ongoing FREEZE Cohort Study comparing radiofrequency and CB ablation will shed some light on that issue. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.

Left heart pacing--experience with several types of coronary vein leads.

Our experience with 121 coronary vein (CV) leads in 116 patients shows that CV leads are the leads of choice for pacing the left ventricle (LV). The information gained from pre-operative venous angiography permits individual selection of the most appropriate lead model for each case. The use of steerable electrophysiology catheters facilitates guide catheter cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) when the anatomy is difficult and reduces the risk of complications. By selecting the CV lead model most suitable for each individual patient, we achieved successful implantation in 99.1% of patients. In this day and age, epicardial electrodes should be restricted to cases with CS anomalies which make CS cannulation impossible, and to LV lead implantation during heart surgery.