Cerebral hemodynamic effects of head-up CPR in a porcine model.

AIM: To assess the hemodynamic effects of head elevation on cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. METHODS: VF was induced in eight 65 kg pigs that were treated with CPR after five minutes of no flow. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at the descending thoracic aorta. Internal carotid artery blood flow (CBF) was measured with an ultrasound probe. Cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP) was calculated in two ways (CerPPICAP and CerPPreported) using the same intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. CePPreported was calculated as MAP-ICP. CerPPICAP was calculated by using intracranial arterial pressure (ICAP) - ICP. The animals were switched between head up (HUP) and supine (SUP) CPR every five minutes for a total of twenty minutes of resuscitation. RESULTS: MAP and coronary perfusion pressure measurements were similar in both CPR positions (p = 0.36 and p = 0.1, respectively). ICP was significantly lower in the HUP CPR group (14.7 ± 1 mm Hg vs 26.9 ± 1 mm Hg, p < 0.001) as was ICAP (30.1 ± 2 mm Hg vs 42.6 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001). The proportional decrease in ICP and ICAP resulted in similar CerPPICAP comparing HUP and SUPCPR (p = 0.7). CBF was significantly lower during HUPCPR when compared to SUPCPR (58.5 ± 3 ml/min vs 78 ± 4 ml/min, p < 0.001). A higher CerPPreported was found during the HUP compared to SUP-CPR, when MAP was used (36.6 ± 2 mm Hg vs 23 ± 2 mm Hg, p < 0.001) without correcting for the hydrostatic pressure drop. CONCLUSION: HUP did not affect cerebral perfusion pressure and it significantly decreased internal carotid blood flow.

Cumulative Radiation Exposure in Covid-19 Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Medical imaging plays a major role in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patient diagnosis and management. However, the radiation dose received from medical procedures by these patients has been poorly investigated. We aimed to estimate the cumulative effective dose (CED) related to medical exposure in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison to the usual critically ill patients. We designed a descriptive cohort study including 90 successive ICU COVID-19 patients admitted between March and May 2020 and 90 successive non-COVID-19 patients admitted between March and May 2019. In this study, the CED resulting from all radiological examinations was calculated and clinical characteristics predictive of higher exposure risk identified. The number of radiological examinations was 12.0 (5.0-26.0) [median (interquartile range) in COVID-19 vs. 4.0 (2.0-8.0) in non-COVID-19 patient (P < 0.001)]. The CED during a four-month period was 4.2 mSv (1.9-11.2) in the COVID-19 vs. 1.2 mSv (0.13-6.19) in the non-COVID-19 patients (P < 0.001). In the survivors, the CED in COVID-19 vs. non-COVID-19 patients was ≥100 mSv in 3% vs. 0%, 10-100 mSv in 23% vs. 15%, 1-10 mSv in 56% vs. 30% and <1 mSv in 18% vs. 55%. The CED (P < 0.001) and CED per ICU hospitalization day (P = 0.004) were significantly higher in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients. The CED correlated significantly with the hospitalization duration (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and the number of conventional radiological examinations (r = 0.8, P < 0.001). To conclude, more radiological examinations were performed in critically ill COVID-19 patients than non-COVID-19 patients resulting in higher CED. In COVID-19 patients, contribution of strategies to limit CED should be investigated in the future.

Plasma procalcitonin may be an early predictor of liver injury in acetaminophen poisoning: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acetaminophen is a common cause of poisoning and liver injury worldwide; however, patient stratification is suboptimal. We aimed to assess the contribution of admission plasma procalcitonin concentration (PCT) to better identify acetaminophen-poisoned patients likely to develop liver injury. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study including all acetaminophen-poisoned patients requiring N-acetylcysteine admitted in a toxicological intensive care unit between 2012 and 2017. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox regression model to investigate factors associated with liver injury, defined as an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >100 IU/L. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients (age, 32 years (21-53), median [25th-75th percentiles]) were included after self-ingesting 16 g (9-30) acetaminophen and received N-acetylcysteine infusion administered within a median 6 h-delay (4-12) from exposure. Co-ingestions were reported in 77% of patients. Rumack-Matthew nomogram was non-interpretable in 47% cases. Liver injury occurred in 38 patients (32%) with a median peak ALT of 2020 IU/L (577-4248). In liver injury patients, admission PCT was significantly increased in comparison to patients without liver injury (21.5 ng/ml (3.2-44.9) versus 0.1 ng/ml (0-0.4), respectively, p < 0.01). The increase in PCT preceded the increase in ALT by 33 h (10-74). In a multivariate analysis, PCT > 1 ng/ml was significantly associated with liver injury (hazard ratio, 7.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.3-22.6; p < 0.001]). PCT (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve, 0.91 [95%CI: 0.84-0.97]) predicted liver injury with sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values of 0.92, 0.84, 0.96, and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSION: PCT on admission is associated with liver injury in acetaminophen poisoning. PCT might be used as a predictive tool of liver injury to improve clinical decision-making.

Risk factors associated with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis in ICU patients: a French multicentric retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to determine the incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and to describe the patient characteristics associated with IPA occurrence and to evaluate its impact on prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all successive COVID-19 patients, hospitalized in four ICUs, with secondary deterioration and one or more respiratory samples sent to the mycology department. We used a strengthened IPA testing strategy including seven mycological criteria. Patients were classified as probable IPA according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) classification if immunocompromised, and according to the recent COVID-19-associated IPA classification otherwise. RESULTS: Probable IPA was diagnosed in 21 out of the 366 COVID-19 patients (5.7%) admitted to the ICU and in the 108 patients (19.4%) who underwent respiratory sampling for deterioration. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without IPA regarding age, gender, medical history and severity on admission and during hospitalization. Treatment with azithromycin for ≥3 days was associated with the diagnosis of probable IPA (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-8.5, p = 0.02). A trend was observed with high-dose dexamethasone and the occurrence of IPA. Overall mortality was higher in the IPA patients (15/21, 71.4% versus 32/87, 36.8%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: IPA is a relatively frequent complication in severe COVID-19 patients and is responsible for increased mortality. Azithromycin, known to have immunomodulatory properties, may contribute to increase COVID-19 patient's susceptibility to IPA.

Microcatheter-Facilitated Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Direct stenting is the best method for achieving reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We hypothesized that the use of a microcatheter (MC) during PPCI when Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing would allow visualization of the downstream artery with an optimal TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure. METHODS: In this pilot study, PPCI patients with TIMI flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing formed the MC group (n = 60); the MC was positioned in the distal part of the culprit artery and a small amount of contrast was injected through it to determine stent size and length to treat the culprit lesion. The MC group was compared with previous consecutive patients treated using standard PPCI (n = 94; similar characteristics except for the rate of previous percutaneous coronary intervention). RESULTS: In the MC group, downstream arteries were visualized in 98% of cases and direct stenting was achieved in 72% vs 31% (P < 0.0001). Final TIMI 3 flow was similar in both groups (97%). There was less manual thrombectomy (20% vs 63%; P < 0.001) and bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (6.7% vs 29.8%; P < 0.002). The incidence of major adverse events (death, shock, severe arrhythmia) and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar. The peak cardiac enzymes level was significantly lower in the MC group. CONCLUSIONS: The MC strategy appears feasible and safe. It could allow exploring new strategies on the basis of more systematic direct stenting and prepared reperfusion by injecting drugs through the MC before reperfusion.

Improving cannulation time for extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause - Comparison of two percutaneous cannulation techniques in the catheterization laboratory in a center without on-site cardiovascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) without return of spontaneous circulation can be treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) implemented surgically or percutaneously. We performed a study assessing time for vaECMO percutaneous cannulation in the catheterization laboratory. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective study in a University hospital without on-site cardiovascular surgery, including patients aged >18 receiving vaECMO for out- or in-hospital refractory CA of presumed cardiac cause between 2010 and 2016, cannulated by interventional cardiologists. Cannulation time using anatomic landmarks vessel puncture and conventional wires (first period) was compared with ultrasound guidance puncture and stiff wires (second period). Data are expressed as medians (interquartile range) and percentages. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included, age 56 (49-62), 34 in the first period. Shockable initial rhythm occurred in 29 (63%), 36 (78%) had ischemic heart disease and 26 (57%) acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Out-of-hospital refractory CA occurred in 27 (59%) patients. Time from out-of-hospital refractory CA to admission was 100 (80-118) min. Cannulation was successful in 42 (91%) patients. Cannulation time was 14 (10-21) min, 17 (12-26) (first) and 8 (6-12) min (second period), p<0.001. Survival to discharge was 9%. In out-of-hospital versus in-hospital, time from CA to vaECMO was 120 (115-140) versus 82 (58-102) min, p=0.011, survival was 7% (two patients) versus 11% (two patients), p=0.35 respectively. All survivors had shockable initial rhythm. CONCLUSION: In these refractory CA patients with high prevalence of AMI and good feasibility of percutaneous vaECMO in the catheterization laboratory, cannulation time was shorter using ultrasound guidance and stiff wires.

Targeted temperature management using the "Esophageal Cooling Device" after cardiac arrest (the COOL study): A feasibility and safety study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted temperature management (TTM) between 32 and 36°C is recommended after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of the "Esophageal Cooling Device" (ECD) in performing TTM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-centre, prospective, interventional study included 17 comatose OHCA patients. Main exclusion criteria were: delay between OHCA and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)>60min, delay between sustained ROSC and inclusion >360min, known oesophageal disease. A TTM between 32 and 34°C was performed using the ECD (Advanced Cooling Therapy, USA) connected to a heat exchanger console (Meditherm III®, Gaymar, France), without cold fluids' use. Primary endpoint was feasibility of inducing, maintaining TTM, and rewarming using the ECD alone. Secondary endpoints were adverse events, focusing on potential digestive damages. Results were expressed as median (interquartiles 25-75). RESULTS: Cooling rate to reach the Target Temperature (33°C-TT) was 0.26°C/h [0.19-0.36]. All patients reached the 32-34°C range with a time spent within the range of 26h [21-28] (3 patients did not reach 33°C). Temperature deviation outside the TT during TTM-maintenance was 0.10°C [0.03-0.20]. Time with deviation >1°C was 0h. Rewarming rate was 0.20°C/h [0.18-0.22]. Among the 16 gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures performed, 10 (62.5%) were normal. Minor oeso-gastric injuries (37.5% and 19%, respectively) were similar to usual orogastric tube injuries. One patient experienced severe oesophagitis mimicking peptic lesions, not cooling-related. No patient among the 9 alive at 3-month follow-up had gastrointestinal complains. CONCLUSION: ECD seems an interesting, safe, accurate, semi-invasive cooling method in OHCA patients treated with 33°C-TTM, particularly during the maintenance phase.

High platelet reactivity on aspirin in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite dual antiplatelet treatment, major ischemic events are common following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to assess high platelet reactivity on aspirin (HPR-aspirin) and its association with P2Y12i (HPR-P2Y12i) during the acute phase of STEMI. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients admitted for STEMI treated by primary angioplasty in our center for 1year. All patients received a loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of aspirin (75mg/day) and prasugrel (ticagrelor or clopidogrel if contraindicated). Platelet reactivity was assessed 4±1days and 75±15days after admission using light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid (LTA-AA-HPR-aspirin) and VASP (HPR-P2Y12i) to define HPR as well as serum Thromboxane-B2 and LTA-ADP. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular events were recorded for 1year. RESULTS: We included 106 patients - mean age was 61y.o., 76% were male and 20% had diabetes. STEMI was anterior in 52% and LV ejection fraction at discharge was 51±9%. 50% of patients were treated with prasugrel and 34% with ticagrelor. At day 4 after STEMI, HPR-aspirin was found in 26% patients and HPR-P2Y12i in 7%. HPR- both aspirin and P2Y12i was found in 4%. Diabetes and age were predictors of HPR-aspirin. HPR-aspirin was persistent 75days later in 36% patients. At 1year, 7.9% patients had experienced major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). HPR-aspirin and HPR on both aspirin and P2Y12i were significantly associated with MACCE. CONCLUSION: HPR-aspirin is frequent just after STEMI and associated with MACCE especially when associated with HPR-P2Y12i.

Predictors of high on-aspirin platelet reactivity in high-risk vascular patients treated with single or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Aspirin is the key treatment in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis. Interindividual variability of response has been linked to a higher risk for ischemic events. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and biologic factors predicting high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HPR) in a high-risk, "real-world" population of vascular patients. All platelet testing performed from 2011 to 2013 in consecutive patients receiving long-term treatment with aspirin for coronary or cerebrovascular disease was retrospectively analyzed. Indications for platelet testing were recurrent ischemic events or high-risk angioplasty. HPR was defined as aggregation intensity≥20% using light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid 0.5 mg/ml. Collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis was also performed (threshold<165 seconds). Cardiovascular risk factors, usual biologic parameters, and antiplatelet treatment were recorded. A total of 1,508 patients were included (mean age 63 years, 71% men, 23% with diabetes). Antiplatelet treatment was aspirin alone in 333 patients and dual-antiplatelet therapy in 1,175 patients. HPR was found in 11.1% of patients. In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors of HPR on light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39 to 3.16), age (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47), fibrinogen level (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42), and von Willebrand factor level (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09). On light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid and collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis, fibrinogen remained the main factor associated with HPR (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61). Similar results were found in patients treated with aspirin alone or dual-antiplatelet therapy. A fibrinogen level>4.0 g/L was associated with a 3.9-fold increased risk for HPR in patients aged <75 years. In conclusion, fibrinogen level was the major predictor of HPR on aspirin in this large population of high-risk vascular patients.

Influence of α-stat and pH-stat blood gas management strategies on cerebral blood flow and oxygenation in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: In patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, two blood gas management strategies are used regarding the PaCO2 target: α-stat or pH-stat. We aimed to compare the effects of these strategies on cerebral blood flow and oxygenation. DESIGN: Prospective observational single-center crossover study. SETTING: ICU of University hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-one therapeutic hypothermia-treated patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest more than 18 years old without history of cerebrovascular disease were included. INTERVENTIONS: Cerebral perfusion and oxygenation variables were compared in α-stat (PaCO2 measured at 37 °C) versus pH-stat (PaCO2 measured at 32-34 °C), both strategies maintaining physiological PaCO2 values: 4.8-5.6 kPa (36-42 torr). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bilateral transcranial middle cerebral artery flow velocities using Doppler and jugular vein oxygen saturation were measured in both strategies 18 hours (14-23 hr) after the return of spontaneous circulation. Pulsatility and resistance indexes and cerebral oxygen extraction were calculated. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range 25-75) in α-stat versus pH-stat. No differences were found in temperature, arterial blood pressure, and oxygenation between α-stat and pH-stat. Significant differences were found in minute ventilation (p = 0.006), temperature-corrected PaCO2 (4.4 kPa [4.1-4.6 kPa] vs. 5.1 kPa [5.0-5.3 kPa], p = 0.0001), and temperature-uncorrected PaCO2 (p = 0.0001). No differences were found in cerebral blood velocities and pulsatility and resistance indexes in the overall population. Significant differences were found in jugular vein oxygen saturation (83.2% [79.2-87.6%] vs. 86.7% [83.2-88.2%], p = 0.009) and cerebral oxygen extraction (15% [11-20%] vs. 12% [10-16%], p = 0.01), respectively. In survivors, diastolic blood velocities were 25 cm/s (19-30 cm/s) versus 29 cm/s (23-35 cm/s) (p = 0.004), pulsatility index was 1.10 (0.97-1.18) versus 0.94 (0.89-1.05) (p = 0.027), jugular vein oxygen saturation was 79.2 (71.1-81.8) versus 83.3% (76.6-87.8) (p = 0.033), respectively. However, similar results were not found in nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: In therapeutic hypothermia-treated patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at physiological PaCO2, α-stat strategy increases jugular vein blood desaturation and cerebral oxygen extraction compared with pH-stat strategy and decreases cerebral blood flow velocities in survivors.

Biological efficacy of twice daily aspirin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with a high rate of events after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention despite aspirin treatment. Once daily aspirin might not provide 24-hour stable biological efficacy in patients with diabetes. We compared the biological efficacy of the same daily dose of aspirin given either once (OPD) or divided twice per day in a population of diabetic patients with previous coronary artery disease. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive diabetic patients with at least 1 criteria of time-dependent aspirin efficacy, elevated high-sensibility C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, platelet count, or active smoking were prospectively included. Consecutive patients were randomly treated with 150-mg aspirin daily given either OPD (150 mg in the morning) or twice per day (75 mg in the morning and 75 mg in the evening) in a crossover study. The main outcome was platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (0.5 mg/mL) measured by light transmission aggregometry at trough level before morning aspirin intake. RESULTS: Mean maximum aggregation intensity triggered by arachidonic acid was 19.7% ± 15.4% on OPD and 11.9% ± 10.4% on twice per day (P < .0001). Biological resistance (maximum aggregation intensity ≥20%) was observed in 42% of patients on OPD and 17% on twice per day (P < .001). Of the 39 patients with biological resistance on OPD, 24 (62%) overcame resistance on twice per day. Of the 16 resistant on twice per day, only 1 patient (6%) overcame resistance on OPD. Results were concordant with global evaluation of platelet reactivity by Platelet Function Analyzer-100. A better twice per day efficacy was independent of clopidogrel cotreatment. CONCLUSION: In a population of diabetic patients with coronary artery disease and a high risk of time-dependent aspirin resistance, aspirin divided twice per day can significantly decrease the rate of biological loss of efficacy at trough level.