Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e082245, 2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) are common in multimorbid patients. This study aims to describe PIMs and PPOs in an open-access outpatient setting and to investigate any association between continuity of care (CoC) and PIMs and PPOs in multimorbid older patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using patient-confirmed outpatient medication plans to describe PIMs and PPOs using the 'Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescription/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment' version 2. Four Poisson regressions modelled the number of PIMs and PPOs using context-adapted versions of the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) and the Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI) as measures for CoC. SETTING: Southern Germany, outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: 321 participants of the LoChro-trial at 12-month follow-up (both arms). The LoChro-trial compared healthcare involving an additional care manager with usual care. Inclusion criteria were age over 64, local residence and scoring over one in the Identification of Older patients at Risk Screening Tool. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Numbers of PIMs and PPOs. RESULTS: The mean number of PIMs was 1.5 (SD 1.5), lower than the average number of PPOs at 2.9 (SD 1.7). CoC showed similar results for both indices with a mean of 0.548 (SD 0.279) for MMCI and 0.514 (SD 0.262) for UPC. Both models predicting PPOs indicated more PPOs with higher CoC; statistical significance was only demonstrated for MMCI (MMCI~PPO: Exp(B)=1.42, 95% CI (1.11; 1.81), p=0.004; UPC~PPO: Exp(B)=1.29, 95% CI (0.99; 1.67), p=0.056). No significant association between PIMs and CoC was found (MMCI~PIM: Exp(B)=0.72, 95% CI (0.50; 1.03), p=0.072; UPC~PIM: Exp(B)=0.83, 95% CI (0.57; 1.21), p=0.337). CONCLUSION: The results did not show a significant association between higher CoC and lesser PIMs. Remarkably, an association between increased CoC, represented through MMCI, and more PPOs was found. Consultation of different care providers in open-access healthcare systems could possibly ameliorate under-prescribing in multimorbid older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013904.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Prescrição Inadequada , Humanos , Alemanha , Estudos Transversais , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 754, 2022 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36109707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older patients are at an increased risk of hospitalization, negatively affecting their health and quality of life. Such patients also experience a lack of physical activity during their inpatient stay, as well as being at increased risk of delirium and inappropriate prescribing. These risk factors can accumulate, promoting a degree of morbidity and the development of cognitive impairment. METHODS: Through the ReduRisk-program, patients at risk of functional impairment, immobility, falls, delirium or re-hospitalization shortly after hospital discharge, will be identified via risk-screening. These patients will receive an individually tailored, multicomponent and risk-adjusted prevention program. The trial will compare the effectiveness of the ReduRisk-program against usual care in a stepped-wedge-design, with quarterly cluster randomization of six university hospital departments into intervention and control groups. 612 older adults aged 70 years or more are being recruited. Patients in the intervention cluster (n = 357) will receive the ReduRisk-program, comprising risk-adjusted delirium management, structured mobility training and digitally supported planning of post-inpatient care, including polypharmacy management. This study will evaluate the impact of the ReduRisk-program on the primary outcomes of activities of daily living and mobility, and the secondary outcomes of delirium, cognition, falls, grip strength, health-related quality of life, potentially inappropriate prescribing, health care costs and re-hospitalizations. Assessments will be conducted at inpatient admission (t0), at discharge (t1) and at six months post-discharge (t2). In the six-month period following discharge, a health-economic evaluation will be carried out based on routine health insurance data (t3). DISCUSSION: Despite the importance of multicomponent, risk-specific approaches to managing older patients, guidelines on their effectiveness are lacking. This trial will seek to provide evidence for the effectiveness of a multicomponent, risk-adjusted prevention program for older patients at risk of functional impairment, immobility, falls, delirium and re-hospitalization. Positive study results would support efforts to improve multicomponent prevention and the management of older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00025594, date of registration: 09/08/2021.


Assuntos
Delírio , Atividades Cotidianas , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Delírio/diagnóstico , Hospitais , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 564, 2022 07 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35799113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older patients at risk of functional decline are frequently affected by polypharmacy. This is associated with a further loss of independence. However, a relationship between functional disability and medications, such as 'Potentially Inappropriate Medications' (PIMs) and 'Potential Prescribing Omissions' (PPOs), as itemised for (de) prescribing in practice-orientated medication lists, has yet to be established. METHODS: As part of a randomised comparative effectiveness trial, LoChro, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the association between PIMs and PPOs measured using the 'Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescription Criteria / Screening Tool To Alert to Right Treatment' (STOPP/START) Version 2, with functional disability assessed using the 'World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0' (WHODAS). Individuals aged 65 and older at risk of loss of independence were recruited from the inpatient and outpatient departments of the local university hospital. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to model the potential prediction of functional disability using the numbers of PIMs and PPOs, adjusted for confounders including multimorbidity. RESULTS: Out of 461 patients, both the number of PIMs and the number of PPOs were significantly associated with an increase in WHODAS-score (Regression coefficients B 2.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.5-3.8] and 1.5 [95% confidence interval: 0.2-2.7], respectively). In WHODAS-score prediction modelling the contribution of the number of PIMs exceeded the one of multimorbidity (standardised coefficients beta: PIM 0.20; multimorbidity 0.13; PPO 0.10), whereas no significant association between the WHODAS-score and the number of medications was seen. 73.5 % (339) of the participants presented with at least one PIM, and 95.2% (439) with at least one PPO. The most common PIMs were proton pump inhibitors and analgesic medication, with frequent PPOs being pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations, as well as osteoporosis prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a relationship between inappropriate prescribing, both PIMs and PPOs, and functional disability, in older patients at risk of further decline. Long-term analysis may help clarify whether these patients benefit from interventions to reduce PIMs and PPOs.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Polimedicação
6.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 108 Suppl 1: S36-44, 2014.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25458397

RESUMO

HEALTH PROBLEM: Every year about 200,000 people in Germany suffer from a first stroke and 65,000 persons from a recurrent stroke. Stroke is one of the major causes of acquired life-long disability. It is associated with multiple limitations in functioning, activities of daily living and social participation. People with stroke must develop and apply considerable coping and adaptation strategies to manage the consequences of disabilities in daily life. Insufficient adaptations may result in social isolation, depressive disorders, need for medical and nursing care and subsequently lead to increasing costs for care. Thus occupational therapy-led treatment addressing social participation as well as skills training, adaptation strategies and assistive technology for activities of daily living is essential for stroke patients after hospital discharge. CORPUS OF EVIDENCE: Based on nine randomised comparisons, a Cochrane review from 2006 revealed that occupational therapy-led training after stroke had positive effects on personal activities of daily living (8 studies; 961 participants; 0.18 SMD; 95 % CI [0.04 to 0.32]), on extended activities of daily living (6 studies; 847 participants; 0.21 SMD; 95 % CI [0.03 to 0.39]), and on poor outcome (7 studies; 1,065 participants; odds ratio 0.67; 95 % CI [0.51 to 0.87]). However, direct implementation into the German healthcare context is not recommendable due to (1) different settings and heterogeneity within the primary studies, (2) lack of manualisation of treatment programmes and (3) insufficient evaluation of client-oriented outcomes. IMPLICATION FOR RESEARCH: It is recommended to manualise client-centred standardised modules of a stage-specific occupational therapy-led training of activities of daily living and to pilot-test this intervention programme in a feasibility study. If this trial results in a set of reliable and valid client-oriented outcome measurements applicable within the German care context and in a feasible treatment programme well accepted by stroke patients and their treating occupational therapists, a large-scaled randomised clinical trial in terms of comparative effectiveness research may follow.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Atividades Cotidianas/classificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Alta do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Recidiva , Tecnologia Assistiva , Ajustamento Social
7.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 108 Suppl 1: S4-8, 2014.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25458398

RESUMO

In order to address the increasing complexity and continuously changing needs and demands in the German healthcare system, there is a need to strengthen knowledge translation, evidence-based practice and the conduct of clinical trials in the field of allied health professions. An interdisciplinary working group representing the fields of nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy developed a guide and a concept for seminars to provide potential analyses for research and innovations in the allied health professions in Germany. These potential analyses compare the current state of health care delivery for specific health problems and the corpus of evidence for the effectiveness of related interventions. Thus innovations can be identified which might improve client-centred healthcare in Germany. The introductory paper briefly reports the activities and results of the working group, describes the international context of transferring research into practice and outlines possibilities for the future development of coordinated research strategies in Germany. The following papers consist of five potential analyses: (1) Advanced Practice Nursing (APN) in long-term care; (2) giving birth in an upright position; (3) treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease; (4) training of everyday activities after stroke; and (5) communication training for patients with aphasia.


Assuntos
Ocupações Relacionadas com Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Comportamento Cooperativo , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/organização & administração , Alemanha , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Cooperação Internacional
8.
BMJ Open ; 1(1): e000096, 2011 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22021760

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the benefits and harms of a Dutch 10-session Community Occupational Therapy programme for patients with Alzheimer's disease with the impact of a one session consultation at home in German routine healthcare. DESIGN: A seven-centre, parallel group, active controlled randomised controlled trial. Patients and carers were not masked. Assessors were fully blind for treatment allocation for one of two primary-outcome measurements. SETTING: Patients' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Mini-Mental State Examination 14-24), living in the community with primary carer available and without severe depression or behavioural symptoms, were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Experimental 10 home visits within 5 weeks by an occupational therapist, educating patients in the performance of simplified daily activities and in the use of aids to compensate for cognitive decline; and educating carers in coping with behaviour of the patient and in giving supervision to the patient. Control one home visit including individual counselling of patient and carer and explanation of a leaflet on coping with dementia in daily life. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the patient's daily functioning measured with the Interview of Deterioration in Daily activities in Dementia and the Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform System of Task Analysis. Assessments were at baseline, 6, 16 and 26 weeks, with a postal assessment at 52 weeks. RESULTS: 141 patients were 1:1 randomised to the experimental (N=71) and control group (N=70). Data for 54 and 50 participants were analysed. Patients' daily functioning did not differ significantly between the experimental and control group at week 6, 16, 26 or 52 and remained stable over 26 weeks in both groups. No adverse events were associated with the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In German healthcare, a Dutch 10-session community occupational therapy was not better than a one-session consultation for the daily functioning of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Further research on the transfer of complex psychosocial is needed. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform DRKS00000053; Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA