Comparison of the Quantity of Calcium in the Aortic Valve and the Coronary Arteries in Men Versus Women Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Several studies have shown an association between aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary atherosclerosis. This study aimed to evaluate the gender differences in aortic valve calcium (AVC) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) and the association between CAC and all-cause mortality in patients with severe AS. A total of 260 patients (80 ± 7 years, 39% men) with severe AS who were scheduled for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were included. AVC and CAC before TAVI were assessed by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography. Patients with coronary intervention or aortic valve replacement before cardiac computed tomography were excluded. Standard reference values of CAC score were used to classify the percentile groups and the distribution of AVC was assessed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. In men, the AVC score was 3,911 Hounsfield units (HUs) (interquartile range [IQR] 2,525 to 5,259) and in women, 2,409 HU (IQR 1,588 to 3,359) (p <0.001). CAC score in men was 824 HU (IQR 328 to 1,855) and in women, 478 HU (IQR 136 to 962) (p <0.001). In men, the AVC score increased along with the CAC score, whereas in women, the AVC score was similar across the CAC percentile groups. During a median follow-up of 1,095 days, 59 patients (23%) died. No significant gender-difference was seen in all-cause mortality for CAC score (p = 0.187). Men with severe AS show higher AVC and CAC scores than women. Although the pattern of CAC distribution was similar between men and women, the AVC score increased along with the CAC score in men; whereas, in women, the AVC score remained similar across the various percentiles. CAC score was not associated with cumulative mortality in patients with severe AS who underwent TAVI.

Prognostic implications of left atrial dilation in aortic regurgitation due to bicuspid aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of left atrial volume index (LAVI) in patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). METHODS: 554 individuals (45 (IQR 33-57) years, 80% male) with BAV and moderate or severe AR were selected from an international, multicentre registry. The association between LAVI and the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or aortic valve surgery was investigated with Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: Dilated LAVI was observed in 181 (32.7%) patients. The mean indexed aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta diameters were 13.0±2.0 mm/m2, 19.4±3.7 mm/m2, 16.5±3.8 mm/m2 and 20.4±4.5 mm/m2, respectively. After a median follow-up of 23 (4-82) months, 272 patients underwent aortic valve surgery (89%) or died (11%). When compared with patients with normal LAVI (<35 mL/m2), those with a dilated LAVI (≥35 mL/m2) had significantly higher rates of aortic valve surgery or mortality (43% and 60% vs 23% and 36%, at 1 and 5 years of follow-up, respectively, p<0.001). Dilated LAVI was independently associated with reduced event-free survival (HR=1.450, 95% CI 1.085 to 1.938, p=0.012) after adjustment for LV ejection fraction, aortic root diameter, LV end-diastolic diameter and LV end-systolic diameter. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicentre registry of patients with BAV and moderate to severe AR, left atrial dilation was independently associated with reduced event-free survival. The role of this parameter for the risk stratification of individuals with significant AR merits further investigation.

Time course of left ventricular remodelling and mechanics after aortic valve surgery: aortic stenosis vs. aortic regurgitation.

AIMS: Pressure overload in aortic stenosis (AS) and both pressure and volume overload in aortic regurgitation (AR) induce concentric and eccentric hypertrophy, respectively. These structural changes influence left ventricular (LV) mechanics, but little is known about the time course of LV remodelling and mechanics after aortic valve surgery (AVR) and its differences in AS vs. AR. The present study aimed to characterize the time course of LV mass index (LVMI) and LV mechanics [by LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS)] after AVR in AS vs. AR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven (61 ± 14 years, 61% male) patients with severe AS (63%) or AR (37%) undergoing surgical AVR with routine echocardiographic follow-up at 1, 2, and/or 5 years were evaluated. Before AVR, LVMI was larger in AR patients compared with AS. Both groups showed moderately impaired LV GLS, but preserved LV ejection fraction. After surgery, both groups showed LV mass regression, although a more pronounced decline was seen in AR patients. Improvement in LV GLS was observed in both groups, but characterized by an initial decline in AR patients while LV GLS in AS patients remained initially stable. CONCLUSION: In severe AS and AR patients undergoing AVR, LV mass regression and changes in LV GLS are similar despite different LV remodelling before AVR. In AR, relief of volume overload led to reduction in LVMI and an initial decline in LV GLS. In contrast, relief of pressure overload in AS was characterized by a stable LV GLS and more sustained LV mass regression.

Echocardiography in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a safe and efficient alternative for surgical valve aortic replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are inoperable or have a high risk for surgery. Randomised clinical trials have shown that TAVR is not inferior to surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients and ongoing trials will demonstrate the effects of TAVR in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients and in patients with heart failure and moderate aortic stenosis. Continuous developments in procedural and post-procedural management along with increased operator experience and technical improvements and ongoing advances in imaging modalities (particularly in three-dimensional techniques), have reduced the procedural risks and the incidence of complications such as paravalvular aortic regurgitation. Importantly, proper selection of both patient and prosthesis, procedural guidance and follow-up of prosthesis performance remain paramount for the success of the TAVR. In all these steps, echocardiography plays a crucial role. An overview of the clinical applications and current role of echocardiographic techniques in patient selection, prosthesis sizing, periprocedural guidance and post-procedural follow-up will be provided in this review article.

Association of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Natural Course and Prognostic Value.

Importance: The optimal timing to operate in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) may help to identify patients who might benefit from undergoing earlier aortic valve replacement. Objective: To investigate the prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and its prognostic implications in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based study included the institutional registries of 3 large tertiary referral centers and 220 patients with asymptomatic severe AS and preserved LVEF (>50%) who were matched for age and sex with 220 controls without structural heart disease. The echocardiograms of patients and controls were performed between 1998 and 2017. Exposures: Both clinical and echocardiographic data were assessed retrospectively. Severe AS was defined by an indexed aortic valve area less than 0.6 cm2/m2. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was evaluated on transthoracic echocardiography using speckle tracking imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and the association of impaired LV GLS with symptom onset and the need for aortic valve intervention. Results: Two hundred twenty patients (mean [SD] age, 68 [13] years; 126 men [57%]) were included. Despite comparable LVEF, LV GLS was significantly impaired in patients with asymptomatic severe AS compared with age- and sex-matched controls without AS (mean [SD] LV GLS, -17.9% [2.5%] vs -19.6% [2.1%]; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 (interquartile range, 7-23) months, mean (SD) LV GLS significantly deteriorated (-18.0% [2.6%] to -16.3% [2.8%]; P < .001) while LVEF remained unchanged. Patients with impaired LV GLS at baseline (>-18.2%) showed a higher risk for developing symptoms (P = .02) and needing aortic valve intervention (P = .03) at follow-up compared with patients with more preserved LV GLS (≤-18.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: Subclinical myocardial dysfunction that is characterized by impaired LV GLS is often present in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved LVEF. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain further deteriorates over time and impaired LV GLS at baseline is associated with an increased risk for progression to the symptomatic stage and the need for aortic valve intervention.

Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Aortic Annular and Root Sizing for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Novel Automated Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Software: Comparison with Multi-Detector Row Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) is currently the standard imaging modality for correct prosthesis sizing, despite risks of radiation and contrast-induced renal injury. Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been proposed as a potential alternative imaging technique, and recently, automated 3D transesophageal echocardiographic software (Aortic Valve Navigator [AVN], an unreleased prototype from Philips) has been developed for assessment of the aortic annulus and root. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of AVN measurements in TAVR candidates by performing a comparison with MDCT. METHODS: In 150 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for TAVR, data on aortic annular and root dimensions prospectively acquired using 3D TEE and MDCT were retrospectively analyzed. Image quality on 3D TEE and the duration of analysis with AVN were recorded, as well as the aortic valve Agatston score on MDCT. RESULTS: Data were obtained using 3D TEE and MDCT in 100% of patients for aortic annular dimensions and in 89% for aortic root dimensions. The mean duration of analysis using AVN was 4.2 ± 1.0 min, but it was significantly shorter with better 3D echocardiographic image quality and lower Agatston score on MDCT. Correlation of measurements between 3D TEE and MDCT was good to excellent for all anatomic locations (sinotubular junction mean diameter, R = 0.71; sinus of Valsalva mean diameter, R = 0.87; aortic annular mean diameter, R = 0.75; aortic annular perimeter, R = 0.83; aortic annular area, R = 0.91), with low inter- and intraobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.93 and r ≥ 0.90 for all locations). Comparison based on conventional prosthesis sizing charts yielded excellent agreement in prosthesis size choice (κ = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: New automated 3D transesophageal echocardiographic software allows accurate modeling and reproducible quantification of aortic annular and root dimensions with high feasibility. An excellent correlation between measurements with AVN and MDCT and agreement in prosthesis sizing suggests the use of AVN in clinical practice as potential alternative to MDCT before TAVR.