The effectiveness of Foley catheter balloon tamponade versus expanding sponges and hemostatic granules for catastrophic penetrating groin hemorrhage with small skin defect: A comparative study in a live tissue porcine model with evaluation of a concise training program.

BACKGROUND: Prompt bleeding control in the prehospital phase is essential to improve survival from catastrophic junctional hemorrhage. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and practicality of Foley catheter balloon tamponade (FCBT), Celox-A, and XSTAT for the treatment of catastrophic hemorrhage from penetrating groin injuries with a small skin defect in a live-tissue porcine model. In addition, this study aimed to determine whether a training program could train military personnel in application of these advanced bleeding control adjuncts. METHODS: A standardized wound was created in 18 groins from 9 anesthetized swine. Eighteen military medics participated in the training program and performed a bleeding control procedure after randomization over the swine and test products and after transection of the femoral neurovascular bundle. Primary endpoints were bleeding control, time to bleeding control, rebleeding, blood loss, medic performance, and user product rating. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in vital signs and laboratory values between the groups. In the Celox-A group, 3/6 groins achieved hemorrhage control. This was 6/6 in the XSTAT and FCBT groups. XSTAT scored best on application time, time to obtain hemorrhage control, hemorrhage control score, and practicality. No significant differences were found between groups for rebleeding, amount of blood loss, and medic performance. Military medics had a significant higher preference for XSTAT over Celox-A. This was not significant for FCBT. CONCLUSION: All tested products proved effective in obtaining hemorrhage control. XSTAT has the highest effectivity and shortest application time for the treatment of catastrophic bleeding from nonpackable, penetrating junctional groin injuries with a small skin defect, compared with Celox-A and FCBT. XSTAT scored best on practicality. This study shows that our training curriculum can be used to train military medics with limited prior experience in the use of advanced bleeding control techniques for penetrating junctional groin injuries with small skin defect.

Advanced bleeding control in combat casualty care: An international, expert-based Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage from truncal and junctional injuries is responsible for the vast majority of potentially survivable deaths in combat casualties, causing most of its fatalities in the prehospital arena. Optimizing the deployment of the advanced bleeding control modalities required for the management of these injuries is essential to improve the survival of severely injured casualties. This study aimed to establish consensus on the optimal use and implementation of advanced bleeding control modalities in combat casualty care. METHODS: A Delphi method consisting of three rounds was used. An international expert panel of military physicians was selected by the researchers to complete the Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached if 70% or greater of respondents agreed and if 70% or greater responded. RESULTS: Thirty-two experts from 10 different nations commenced the process and reached consensus on which bleeding control modalities should be part of the standard equipment, that these modalities should be available at all levels of care, that only trained physicians should be allowed to apply invasive bleeding control modalities, but all medical and nonmedical personnel should be allowed to apply noninvasive bleeding control modalities, and on the training requirements for providers. Consensus was also reached on the necessity of international registries and guidelines, and on certain indications and contraindications for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in military environments. No consensus was reached on the role of a wound clamp in military settings and the indications for REBOA in patients with chest trauma, penetrating axillary injury or penetrating neck injury in combination with thoracoabdominal injuries. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached on the contents of a standard bleeding control toolbox, where it should be available, providers and training requirements, international registries and guidelines, and potential indications for REBOA in military environments.

A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care.

PURPOSE: Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as adjunct for temporary hemorrhage control in patients with exsanguinating torso hemorrhage is increasing. Characteristics of aortic occlusion balloons (AOB) are diverse and evolving as efforts are made to improve the technology. It is important to select a device that fits the requirements of the medical situation to minimize the risk of failure and complications. The aim of this study is to appraise guidance in the choice of an AOB in a specific situation. METHODS: We assessed 29 AOB for differences and outline possible advantages and disadvantages of each. Bending stiffness was measured with a three-point bending device. RESULTS: Diameter of the AOB ranged from 6 (ER-REBOA™) to 10 (Coda®-46) French. However, some need large-bore access sheaths up to 22 French (Fogarty®-45 and LeMaitre®-45) or even insertion via cut-down (Equalizer™-40). Bending stiffness varied from 0.08 N/mm (± 0.008 SD; Coda®-32) to 0.72 N/mm (± 0.024 SD; Russian prototype). Rescue Balloon™ showed kinking of the shaft at low bending pressures. The only non-compliant AOB is REBOA Balloon®. ER-REBOA™, Fogarty®, LeMaitre®, REBOA Balloon®, and Rescue Balloon™ are provided with external length marks to assist blind positioning. CONCLUSION: In resource-limited settings, a guidewire- and fluoroscopy-free, rather stiff device, such as ER-REBOA™, Fogarty®, and LeMaitre®, is warranted. Of these devices, ER-REBOA™ is the only catheter compatible with seven French sheaths and specifically designed for emergency hemorrhage control. Of the over-the-wire devices, Q50® has several features that facilitate use and reduce the risk of malplacement or vessel damage.