Validity of echocardiography for detection of left ventricular thrombus with surgical validation in patients awaiting durable left ventricular assist device.

OBJECTIVE: Unrecognized left ventricular thrombi (LVT) can have devastating clinical implications and precludes patients with end-stage heart failure from undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation without cardiopulmonary bypass assistance. We assessed the reliability of an echocardiogram to diagnose LVT in patients with end-stage heart disease who underwent LVAD implantation. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study evaluated 232 consecutive adult patients requiring implantation of durable LVADs between 2005 and 2019. The validity of preoperative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) for diagnosing LVT was compared to direct inspection at the time of LVAD implantation. RESULTS: There were 232 patients that underwent LVAD implantation, with 226 patients (97%) receiving a preoperative TTE. Of those 226 patients, 32 patients (14%) received ultrasound enhancing agents (UEA). Intraoperative TEE images were available in 195 patients (84%). The sensitivity of TTE without UEA was 22% and specificity was 90% for detecting LVT, compared to 50% and 86%, respectively, for TTE with UEA. For intraoperative TEE, the sensitivity and specificity were 46% and 96%, respectively. The false omission rate ranged from 4% to 8% for all modalities of echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing LVAD implantation, preoperative TTE and intraoperative TEE had poor sensitivity for LVT detection. Up to 8% of echocardiograms were incorrectly concluded to be negative for LVT on surgical validation. The low sensitivity and positive predictive value for diagnosing LVT suggest that echocardiography has limited reliability in this cohort of patients who are at high risk of LVT formation and its subsequent complications.

Ventricular arrhythmia burden after transcatheter versus surgical pulmonary valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative ventricular arrhythmia (VA) outcomes following transcatheter (TC-PVR) or surgical pulmonary valve replacement (S-PVR) have not been evaluated. We sought to compare differences in VAs among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) following TC-PVR or S-PVR. METHODS: Patients with repaired CHD who underwent TC-PVR or S-PVR at the UCLA Medical Center from 2010 to 2016 were analysed retrospectively. Patients who underwent hybrid TC-PVR or had a diagnosis of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries were excluded. Patients were screened for a composite of non-intraoperative VA (the primary outcome variable), defined as symptomatic/recurrent non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) requiring therapy, sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation. VA epochs were classified as 0-1 month (short-term), 1-12 months (mid-term) and ≥1 year (late-term). RESULTS: Three hundred and two patients (TC-PVR, n=172 and S-PVR, n=130) were included. TC-PVR relative to S-PVR was associated with fewer clinically significant VAs in the first 30 days after valve implant (adjusted HR 0.20, p=0.002), but similar mid-term and late-term risks (adjusted HR 0.72, p=0.62 and adjusted HR 0.47, p=0.26, respectively). In propensity-adjusted models, S-PVR, patient age at PVR and native right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) (vs bioprosthetic/conduit outflow tract) were independent predictors of early VA after pulmonary valve implantation (p<0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Compared with S-PVR, TC-PVR was associated with reduced short-term but comparable mid-term and late-term VA burdens. Risk factors for VA after PVR included a surgical approach, valve implantation into a native RVOT and older age at PVR.

In-hospital statin underutilization among high-risk patients: delayed uptake of the 2013 cholesterol guidelines in a U.S. cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Clinician utilization of the 2013 cholesterol lowering guidelines remains variable and unknown. We sought to examine statin prescribing patterns and compare rates among specialists who treat high-risk cardiovascular patients admitted to the hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively (via chart review) examined four specialty groups: (i) Cardiology, (ii) Cardiovascular or Vascular (CV) Surgery, (iii) Neurology, and (iv) Internal Medicine. Adult patients were included based on a discharge diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, carotid endarterectomy, acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or high-risk chest pain. Prescribing patterns were evaluated 6 months and 18 months after the release of the 2013 guidelines. High-intensity statin was defined as atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg per day. RESULTS: 632 patients were included in our study. The following percentages of patients were discharged on high-intensity statin (6 months; 18 months): (i) Cardiology (80%; 85%), (ii) CV Surgery (52%, 65%), (iii) Neurology (59%; 66%), and (iv) Internal Medicine (45%; 48%). Among the four groups, Cardiology was the most likely to discharge patients on high-intensity statin (p < 0.001) in 2014 and in 2015. Cardiology, CV Surgery, and Neurology significantly increased the percentage of patients on high-intensity statin from pre-admission to time of discharge in both years. CONCLUSION: High-intensity statin therapy is underutilized among high-risk cardiovascular patients admitted to the hospital. Variations exist in prescribing patterns of different specialties who manage high-risk populations. This data can be used to test quality improvement interventions to improve rates of high-intensity statin utilization among high-risk patients prior to hospital discharge.

Contemporary Hospitalization Rate Among Adults With Complex Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease are hospitalized at increasing rates in the Western world. Identification of rates of and risk factors for hospitalization is essential for research and improving patient outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with a primary diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), transposition of the great arteries (both d- and l-transposition of the great arteries [TGAs]), or single ventricle (SV). We investigated the rates of mortality, annual hospitalization, and patient-specific risk factors for unplanned cardiac hospitalization. RESULTS: Adult patients with complex congenital heart disease are hospitalized at a rate four to eight times greater than the general US population (P < .001). In addition, there are significant differences between the rates of hospitalization in TOF and TGA (0.39 and 0.41 hospitalizations per patient-year, respectively) and SV (0.72 hospitalizations per patient-year). The majority of excess hospitalizations in the study group were due to cardiac disease (P < .001 for all three groups). Risk factors for unplanned cardiac hospitalization in TOF included pulmonary atresia, depressed left ventricular and right ventricular ejection fraction, and smoking; in TGA, they included Ebstein malformation, surgeries other than primary repair, noncardiac diagnoses, atrial arrhythmias, atrioventricular nodal block, left ventricular ejection fraction, and smoking; and in SV, they included atrial arrhythmias and cyanosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients born with complex congenital heart disease are hospitalized far more frequently than the general US population, primarily for cardiac-related illness. Future research should focus on confirming the present findings and on identification of strategies to improve outcomes in this growing group of patients.