Changes in symptom burden and quality of life among women with uterine fibroids receiving relugolix combination therapy: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of findings from two research studies (known as clinical trials). The studies looked at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (heavy bleeding during a period) with uterine fibroids (noncancerous or benign growths in the uterus). In this analysis of the studies, researchers looked at how patients self-reported their uterine fibroid symptoms before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. Researchers also looked at how patients self-reported the impact of uterine fibroids on their health-related quality of life before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Women took either relugolix combination therapy or placebo (a pill that contains no medicine) by mouth once daily for 24 weeks. Women completed the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (where "quality of life" refers to the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids) before, during, and after treatment. The questionnaire let researchers see if the women felt that relugolix combination therapy decreased the burden of uterine fibroid symptoms and improved the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids. More women said that they felt less distress due to their uterine fibroid symptoms and that their health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids was better after taking relugolix combination therapy compared with women who took placebo. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Relugolix combination therapy may lessen distress associated with uterine fibroid symptoms and improve health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids.

LIBERTY randomized withdrawal study: relugolix combination therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

BACKGROUND: In the pivotal LIBERTY 1 and 2 trials and long-term extension study, once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate) reduced menstrual blood loss volume and pain among women with uterine fibroids. Relugolix combination therapy was well tolerated with preservation of bone mineral density through 52 weeks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the 2-year relugolix combination therapy efficacy and safety results of the phase 3 LIBERTY randomized withdrawal study. STUDY DESIGN: Women with uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding who completed the 24-week LIBERTY 1 or 2 trials, followed by the 28-week long-term extension study (up to 52 weeks total treatment), and who met the responder criteria (menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL and ≥50% reduction from pivotal study baseline at week 48 [week 24 of long-term extension]) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either blinded treatment with relugolix combination therapy or placebo for 52 weeks (total treatment period, 104 weeks). For women who had a relapse of heavy menstrual bleeding during the study (menstrual blood loss volume ≥80 mL), open-label relugolix combination therapy was offered. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women who maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL through week 76 (week 24 of randomized withdrawal study). Secondary endpoints included time to menstrual blood loss volume ≥80 mL, proportion of women who maintained a menstrual blood loss volume of <80 mL through week 104 (over the 52-week randomized treatment period), the proportion of women who achieved or maintained amenorrhea at week 76 at the end of treatment, and the change in Uterine Fibroid Symptom-Quality of Life Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale and symptom severity scores. Analyses were performed for the modified intent-to-treat population, including all randomized women who received ≥1 dose of the study drug. RESULTS: Of the 229 randomized women (relugolix combination therapy, n=115; placebo, n=114), 228 received the study drug and 175 (76.7%) completed the randomized withdrawal study. Through week 76, 78.4% of women on relugolix combination therapy maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL vs 15.1% in the placebo group (difference, 63.4%; 95% confidence interval, 52.9%-73.9%; P<.0001). At week 104, 69.8% of women on relugolix combination therapy maintained menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL vs 11.8% in the placebo group (difference, 58.0%; 95% confidence interval, 47.0%-69.1%; P<.0001). Through week 104, 88.3% of women on placebo relapsed with heavy menstrual bleeding (median time to relapse, 5.9 weeks). Among the 89 women in the placebo group who relapsed and received open-label rescue treatment, 87 women responded to relugolix combination therapy with a menstrual blood loss volume <80 mL. The proportion of women who achieved or maintained amenorrhea were 57.4% vs 13.3% at week 76 (difference, 44.1%; 95% confidence interval, 33.10%-55.1%; P<.0001) and 58.3% vs 10.6% at week 104 (difference, 47.6%; 95% confidence interval, 37.0%-58.3%; nominal P<.0001) for relugolix combination therapy and the placebo group, respectively. Relugolix combination therapy was generally well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified, and the adverse event profile over the second year was consistent with that reported through the first year of treatment. Bone mineral density remained stable in women who received relugolix combination therapy from week 52 to week 104. In women continuously treated with relugolix combination therapy up to 2 years, bone mineral density was generally preserved. CONCLUSION: After 2 years of treatment with relugolix combination therapy, there was evidence of durability of the effect in maintaining low menstrual blood loss volume in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Most women had return of heavy menstrual bleeding and associated symptoms after treatment cessation, which improved upon retreatment with relugolix combination therapy. Relugolix combination therapy was well tolerated, the adverse event profile remained consistent, and the mean bone mineral density was generally preserved through 2 years of treatment.

Relugolix combination therapy in European women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: a subgroup analysis from the randomized phase 3 LIBERTY pivotal trials.

OBJECTIVE: In the 24-week, phase 3 LIBERTY 1 (L1) and LIBERTY 2 (L2) trials, relugolix combination therapy (relugolix-CT (relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg)) reduced uterine fibroid (UF)-associated symptoms. This post hoc analysis assessed safety and efficacy of relugolix-CT in European women from L1/L2. METHODS: Premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) with UF-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) were randomized 1:1:1 in L1 (N = 388) and L2 (N = 382) to relugolix-CT or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix-CT (relugolix 40 mg then relugolix-CT; 12 weeks each). Primary endpoint: proportion of responders (menstrual blood loss (MBL) <80 mL and reduction of ≥50% from baseline MBL volume) over the last 35 days of treatment. Secondary endpoints: MBL volume, amenorrhea, UF-associated pain, symptom severity, distress related to bleeding and pelvic discomfort, health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) reporting and bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. RESULTS: In European women from L1/L2 (N = 124, 16%), a significantly greater proportion of treatment responders was observed with relugolix-CT vs. placebo (85.4% vs. 19.1%, respectively; nominal p < .0001). There were statistically significant improvements with relugolix-CT vs. placebo for several secondary endpoints: reduction in MBL volume, amenorrhea rate, proportion achieving mild-to-no pain, reduction in symptom severity and distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, and improvement in HRQoL. Incidence of AEs and percentage changes in BMD from baseline to week 24 were similar for relugolix-CT and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In European women with UF and HMB, once-daily relugolix-CT vs. placebo improved UF-associated symptoms and preserved BMD.

A plain language summary of the long-term relugolix combination therapy study for uterine fibroids.

What is this summary about? This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called the LIBERTY extension study. The LIBERTY extension study is a long-term study looking at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in reducing blood loss during menstrual periods in women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual periods. Women were included in the extension study if they finished the 24-week LIBERTY 1 or LIBERTY 2 studies. Heavy menstrual periods were considered to be menstrual blood loss of about one-third of a cup of blood (80 ml) per cycle for two cycles or about two-thirds of a cup of blood (160 ml) during one cycle. The LIBERTY extension study also looked at whether relugolix combination therapy was safe to take for up to 1 year. What were the results? Out of 770 total women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding who took part in the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies, 476 took part in the LIBERTY extension study. From the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies through the end of the LIBERTY extension: 163 women took relugolix combination therapy for 52 weeks 149 women took relugolix alone for 12 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 40 weeks 164 women took placebo for 24 weeks followed by relugolix combination therapy for 28 weeks The LIBERTY extension study showed that most women in all three treatment groups responded to relugolix combination therapy by having less bleeding during their menstrual periods, having improved anemia symptoms, and having stable bone mineral loss. Side effects were similar across treatment groups, and the most common side effects were headaches and hot flushes. What do the results mean? Women with uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding taking relugolix combination therapy may have fewer uterine fibroid bleeding symptoms for up to 1 year of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY 1) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03103087 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY 2) Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03412890 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (LIBERTY extension study).

A plain language summary of the safety of relugolix combination therapy and improvement in symptoms in women with uterine fibroids from the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of research studies (known as clinical trials) called LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2. The LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies looked at how well a medication called relugolix combination therapy worked to reduce heavy bleeding at the time of menstruation compared with placebo. The studies also looked at what side effects were reported in women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers looked at 388 adult women in the LIBERTY 1 study and 382 adult women in the LIBERTY 2 study. All women had heavy menstrual bleeding with uterine fibroids before the start of the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 studies. The women were given one of three treatments during the studies: relugolix combination therapy or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix combination therapy (relugolix alone for the first 12 weeks, then relugolix combination therapy for the last 12 weeks of the studies). More women taking relugolix combination therapy in the LIBERTY 1 study (73%) and LIBERTY 2 study (71%) had menstrual blood loss of less than one-third of a cup (80 mL) and had reduction of at least 50% less blood loss during their last menstrual period after 24 weeks of taking the medicine compared with placebo (LIBERTY 1: 19% and LIBERTY 2: 15%). The women taking relugolix combination therapy also had less pain than those taking placebo. Side effects were similar across treatment groups. Headaches and hot flushes were the most common side effects. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: More women with uterine fibroids taking relugolix combination therapy for 24 weeks were likely to have fewer uterine fibroid symptoms than women receiving placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (LIBERTY 1); NCT03103087 (LIBERTY 2).

Quality of life with relugolix combination therapy for uterine fibroids: LIBERTY randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic uterine fibroids are burdensome to live with; they are associated with symptom-related distress, affect daily activities, and reduce health-related quality of life. The LIBERTY randomized clinical trials showed that oral relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, and 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate once daily) markedly improved fibroid-associated symptoms and conditions, including heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, and anemia, and was well-tolerated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of relugolix combination therapy on the symptom burden and health-related quality of life among women with uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: Two replicate, multinational, double-blind, 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2, were conducted in premenopausal women with uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (≥80 mL per cycle for 2 cycles or ≥160 mL during 1 cycle). The symptom burden and health-related quality of life were secondary endpoints and were assessed using the validated Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, which the participants completed at baseline and at week 12 and 24 of treatment. For this secondary analysis, the pooled LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 data set was used. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire is made up of a Symptom Severity scale and a Health-Related Quality of Life scale, the latter of which includes 6 subscales focusing on the following aspects of daily life: concern, activities, energy or mood, control, self-consciousness, and sexual function. The Revised Activities subscale of the Health-Related Quality of Life scale addresses the impact of uterine fibroids on physical and social activities. Symptom burden was also assessed via the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale, a patient-reported outcome measure derived from the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Severity scale that focuses on distress from key uterine fibroid symptoms, which was a key secondary endpoint. Least squares mean changes from baseline to week 24 in the Symptom Severity scale, Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale, overall Health-Related Quality of Life scale, and the respective subscales were compared between the relugolix combination therapy and placebo groups. Responder analyses of the proportion of women who experienced a clinically meaningful change from baseline to week 24 were conducted for the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort and the activity subscales. A stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusted for stratification factors (region [North America vs rest of world] and baseline menstrual blood loss volume), was used for treatment comparisons. RESULTS: Across both trials, 509 women were randomized to the relugolix combination therapy or placebo groups (April 2017-December 2018). Participants on relugolix combination therapy showed a statistically significant reduction in symptom severity (-33.5 vs -12.1; nominal P<.0001) and the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale from baseline to week 24 when compared with those on placebo treatment (-48.4 vs -17.4; nominal P<.0001). Overall, the total Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved significantly from baseline to week 24 in the relugolix combination therapy group when compared with the placebo (+37.6 vs +13.1; nominal P<.0001). Responder analyses demonstrated that more women treated with relugolix combination therapy reported a clinically meaningful reduction in the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale and an improvement in physical and social activities when compared with those treated with the placebo (nominal P<.0001). CONCLUSION: After 24 weeks of treatment with relugolix combination therapy, women with symptomatic uterine fibroids experienced substantial improvements in health-related quality of life with all subscales showing improvement, including emotional well-being, physical and social activities, and sexual function. In addition, women reported substantial reductions in the overall symptom burden and distress caused by key fibroid-associated symptoms.

Long-term Relugolix Combination Therapy for Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas.

OBJECTIVE: In the LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 placebo-controlled trials, once-daily relugolix combination therapy reduced menstrual blood loss volume and pain in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas and was well tolerated, with preservation of bone mineral density (BMD) through 24 weeks. Here we report the long-term efficacy and safety of relugolix combination therapy treatment for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: Women with uterine leiomyoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding who completed any treatment arm in either the LIBERTY 1 or LIBERTY 2 trial were eligible to enroll in a 28-week long-term extension study. All participants received once-daily relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, estradiol 1 mg, norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg) in the extension study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of women who achieved or maintained a menstrual blood loss volume of less than 80 mL and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss volume from LIBERTY study baseline to the last 35 days of treatment (defined as responders ). Analyses were conducted for all three randomized treatment groups from pivotal studies. RESULTS: Overall, 477 women enrolled, 476 were treated, and 363 (76.1%) completed 52 weeks. Among patients treated with relugolix combination therapy through 52 weeks (n=163), sustained improvement in heavy menstrual bleeding was observed in 87.7% (responders). The least squares mean menstrual blood loss volume reduction was 89.9%, with 70.6% of patients achieving amenorrhea. At week 52, 59.0% of patients with anemia at baseline had improvements in hemoglobin concentration of greater than 2 g/dL. Distress due to uterine leiomyoma-associated symptoms measured by the BPD (Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort) scale score was reduced by 51.3 points. Sustained reductions in uterine and uterine leiomyoma volume were observed. Bone mineral density was preserved through week 52. CONCLUSION: Improvements in heavy menstrual bleeding and anemia and reduction of uterine leiomyoma-associated symptom burden were sustained through up to 52 weeks of treatment with relugolix combination therapy in women with uterine leiomyomas. No new safety concerns were identified, and BMD was maintained. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03049735; NCT03103087; NCT03412890. FUNDING SOURCE: Myovant Sciences GmbH.

Relugolix Combination Therapy for Uterine Leiomyoma-Associated Pain in the LIBERTY Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of once-daily relugolix combination therapy (relugolix-CT: relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg) compared with placebo on moderate-to-severe pain in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: Two replicate, multinational, double-blind, 24-week, randomized, phase 3 studies (LIBERTY 1 and 2) were conducted in premenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (80 mL or greater per cycle for two cycles or 160 mL or greater during one cycle). A predefined secondary objective was to determine the effect of relugolix-CT on moderate-to-severe uterine leiomyoma-associated pain in the pain subpopulation (women with maximum pain scores of 4 or higher on the 0-10 numerical rating scale at baseline, with pain score reporting compliance of 80% (ie, 28 days or more over the last 35 days of treatment). This key secondary endpoint was defined as the proportion of women achieving minimal-to-no uterine leiomyoma-associated pain (maximum numerical rating scale score 1 or lower) at week 24; menstrual and nonmenstrual pain were evaluated in prespecified secondary analyses. Treatment comparisons were performed in the pooled LIBERTY 1 and 2 pain subpopulation using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by baseline menstrual blood loss volume. RESULTS: Across both trials, 509 women were randomized to relugolix-CT or placebo (April 2017-December 2018). Of these, 277 (54.4%) met pain subpopulation requirements. With relugolix-CT, 45.2% (95% CI 36.4-54.3) of women achieved minimal-to-no pain compared with 13.9% (95% CI 8.8-20.5) with placebo (nominal P<.001). The proportions of women with minimal-to-no pain during menstrual days and during nonmenstrual days were significantly higher with relugolix-CT (65.0% [95% CI 55.6-73.5] and 44.6% [95% CI 32.3-57.5], respectively) compared with placebo (19.3% [95% CI 13.2-26.7], nominal P<.001, and 21.6% [95% CI 12.9-32.7], nominal P=.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Over 24 weeks, relugolix-CT significantly reduced moderate-to-severe uterine leiomyoma-associated pain with a more pronounced effect on menstrual pain. These data support that relugolix-CT had clinically meaningful effects on women's experience of uterine leiomyoma-associated pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: LIBERTY 1, NCT03049735; LIBERTY 2, NCT03103087. FUNDING SOURCE: Myovant Sciences GmbH.

Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2).

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is a common cause of pelvic pain in women, for which current treatment options are suboptimal. Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, combined with estradiol and a progestin, was evaluated for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: In these two replicate, phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials at 219 community and hospital research centres in Africa, Australasia, Europe, North America, and South America, we randomly assigned women aged 18-50 years with surgically or directly visualised endometriosis with or without histological confirmation, or with histological diagnosis alone. Participants were eligible if they had moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain and, during the 35-day run-in period, a dysmenorrhoea Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of 4·0 or higher on two or more days and a mean non-menstrual pelvic pain NRS score of 2·5 or higher, or a mean score of 1·25 or higher that included a score of 5 or more on 4 or more days. Women received (1:1:1) once-daily oral placebo, relugolix combination therapy (relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, norethisterone acetate 0·5 mg), or delayed relugolix combination therapy (relugolix 40 mg monotherapy followed by relugolix combination therapy, each for 12 weeks) for 24 weeks. During the double-blind randomised treatment and follow-up period, all patients, investigators, and sponsor staff or representatives involved in the conduct of the study were masked to treatment assignment. The co-primary endpoints were responder rates at week 24 for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, both based on NRS scores and analgesic use. Efficacy and safety were analysed in the modified intent-to-treat population (randomised patients who received ≥1 study drug dose). The studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (SPIRIT 1 [NCT03204318] and SPIRIT 2 [NCT03204331]) and EudraCT (SPIRIT 1 [2017-001588-19] and SPIRIT 2 [2017-001632-19]). Eligible patients who completed the SPIRIT studies could enrol in a currently ongoing 80-week open-label extension study (SPIRIT EXTENSION [NCT03654274, EudraCT 2017-004066-10]). Database lock for the on-treatment duration has occurred, and post-treatment follow-up for safety, specificially for bone mineral density and menses recovery, is ongoing at the time of publication. FINDINGS: 638 patients were enrolled into SPIRIT 1 and randomly assigned between Dec 7, 2017, and Dec 4, 2019, to receive relugolix combination therapy (212 [33%]), placebo (213 [33%]), or relugolix delayed combination therapy (213 [33%]). 623 patients were enrolled into SPIRIT 2 and were randomly assigned between Nov 1, 2017 and Oct 4, 2019, to receive relugolix combination therapy (208 [33%]), placebo (208 [33%]), or relugolix delayed combination therapy (207 [33%]). 98 (15%) patients terminated study participation early in SPIRIT 1 and 115 (18%) in SPIRIT 2. In SPIRIT 1, 158 (75%) of 212 patients in the relugolix combination therapy group met the dysmenorrhoea responder criteria compared with 57 (27%) of 212 patients in the placebo group (treatment difference 47·6% [95% CI 39·3-56·0]; p<0·0001). In SPIRIT 2, 155 (75%) of 206 patients in the relugolix combination therapy group were dysmenorrhoea responders compared with 62 (30%) of 204 patients in the placebo group (treatment difference 44·9% [95% CI 36·2-53·5]; p<0·0001). In SPIRIT 1, 124 (58%) of 212 patients in the relugolix combination therapy group met the non-menstrual pelvic pain responder criteria versus 84 (40%) patients in the placebo group (treatment difference 18·9% [9·5-28·2]; p<0·0001). In SPIRIT 2, 136 (66%) of 206 patients were non-menstrual pelvic pain responders in the relugolix combination therapy group compared with 87 (43%) of 204 patients in the placebo group (treatment difference 23·4% [95% CI 13·9-32·8]; p<0·0001). The most common adverse events were headache, nasopharyngitis, and hot flushes. There were nine reports of suicidal ideation across both studies (two in the placebo run-in, two in the placebo group, two in the relugolix combination therapy group, and three in the delayed relugolix combination therapy group). No deaths were reported. Least squares mean percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density in the relugolix combination therapy versus placebo groups was -0·70% versus 0·21% in SPIRIT 1 and -0·78% versus 0·02% in SPIRIT 2, and in the delayed relugolix combination group was -2·0% in SPIRIT 1 and -1·9% in SPIRIT 2. Decreases in opioid use were seen in treated patients as compared with placebo. INTERPRETATION: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy significantly improved endometriosis-associated pain and was well tolerated. This oral therapy has the potential to address the unmet clinical need for long-term medical treatment for endometriosis, reducing the need for opioid use or repeated surgical treatment. FUNDING: Myovant Sciences.

Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Treatment with the combination of relugolix (an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-receptor antagonist), estradiol, and norethindrone acetate, administered once daily, may have efficacy in women with uterine fibroids and heavy bleeding while avoiding hypoestrogenic effects. METHODS: We conducted two replicate international, double-blind, 24-week, phase 3 trials involving women with fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily placebo, relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix, 1 mg of estradiol, and 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate), or delayed relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix monotherapy, followed by relugolix combination therapy, each for 12 weeks). The primary efficacy end point in each trial was the percentage of participants with a response (volume of menstrual blood loss <80 ml and a ≥50% reduction in volume from baseline) in the relugolix combination therapy group, as compared with the placebo group. Key secondary end points were amenorrhea, volume of menstrual blood loss, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, pain, fibroid volume, and uterine volume. Safety and bone mineral density were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 388 women in trial L1 and 382 in trial L2 underwent randomization. A total of 73% of the participants in the relugolix combination therapy group in trial L1 and 71% of those in trial L2 had a response (primary end point), as compared with 19% and 15%, respectively, of those in the placebo groups (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Both relugolix combination therapy groups had significant improvements, as compared with the placebo groups, in six of seven key secondary end points, including measures of menstrual blood loss (including amenorrhea), pain, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, and uterine volume, but not fibroid volume. The incidence of adverse events was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo. Bone mineral density was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo but decreased with relugolix monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in menstrual bleeding, as compared with placebo, and preserved bone mineral density in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; LIBERTY 1 [L1] and LIBERTY 2 [L2] ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03049735 and NCT03103087, respectively.).

Invasive Oral Procedures and Events in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With Denosumab for Up to 10 Years.

CONTEXT: Antiresorptive therapy has been associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), an infrequent but potentially serious adverse event. OBJECTIVE: To assess information on invasive oral procedures and events (OPEs)-dental implants, tooth extraction, natural tooth loss, scaling/root planing, and jaw surgery-during the 7-year Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) Extension study and to present details of positively adjudicated ONJ cases. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-year trial (FREEDOM) followed by 7 years of open-label denosumab (FREEDOM Extension). At Extension Year 3, women were asked to record their history of invasive OPEs since the start of the Extension to Year 2.5 and oral events in the prior 6 months. The questionnaire was then administered every 6 months until the end of the Extension. SETTING: Multicenter, multinational clinical trial. PATIENTS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. INTERVENTIONS: Subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg or placebo every 6 months for 3 years, then 7 years of open-label denosumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reports of OPEs and adjudicated cases of ONJ. RESULTS: Of respondents, 45.1% reported at least one invasive OPE. The exposure-adjusted ONJ rate in FREEDOM Extension was 5.2 per 10,000 person-years. ONJ incidence was higher in those reporting an OPE (0.68%) than not (0.05%). CONCLUSIONS: Although invasive OPEs were common in these denosumab-treated women and were associated with an increased ONJ incidence, the overall rate of ONJ was low, and all cases with complete follow-up resolved with treatment.

Safety Observations With 3 Years of Denosumab Exposure: Comparison Between Subjects Who Received Denosumab During the Randomized FREEDOM Trial and Subjects Who Crossed Over to Denosumab During the FREEDOM Extension.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) that decreases osteoclast formation, function and survival, and is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at increased or high risk for fracture, among other indications. During the pivotal 3-year fracture trial FREEDOM, denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months significantly reduced new vertebral (68%), hip (40%), and nonvertebral (20%) fractures; increased bone mineral density (BMD); and reduced bone turnover markers compared with placebo in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Questions have arisen regarding imbalances of certain low-frequency adverse events (AEs) observed in FREEDOM, as well as the top 5 most frequent adverse reactions listed in the United States prescribing information (USPI; back pain, pain in extremity, musculoskeletal pain, hypercholesterolemia, and cystitis). We examined the incidences of these AEs in women who originally received placebo during FREEDOM and then received denosumab for up to 3 years during the FREEDOM Extension (Crossover Group). This provided a unique opportunity for comparison with the original 3-year denosumab FREEDOM observations. We also examined the incidences of these AEs over 6 years of denosumab treatment (Long-term Group; ie, comparing a second 3 years of treatment with findings in the first 3 years). There was no indication of increasing trends regarding the imbalances of either low-frequency AEs or common AEs observed in FREEDOM. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

A 24-month study evaluating the efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of men with low bone mineral density: results from the ADAMO trial.

CONTEXT: One in 4 men in the United States aged >50 years will have an osteoporosis-related fracture. Fewer data are available on osteoporosis treatment in men than in women. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate denosumab therapy in men with low bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN: This was a phase 3 study with 2 treatment periods: a previously reported 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled phase and a 12-month open-label phase. SETTING: This was a multicenter study conducted in North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 228 men entered the open-label phase and 219 completed the study. INTERVENTION: Men from the original denosumab (long-term) and placebo (crossover) groups received 60 mg of denosumab sc every 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD, serum collagen type I C-telopeptide, and safety were measured. RESULTS: During the open-label phase, continued BMD increases occurred with long-term denosumab treatment (2.2% lumbar spine, 0.9% total hip, 1.3% femoral neck, 1.3% trochanter, and 0.2% 1/3 radius), resulting in cumulative 24-month gains from baseline of 8.0%, 3.4%, 3.4%, 4.6%, and 0.7%, respectively (all P < .01). The crossover group showed BMD gains after 12 months of denosumab treatment similar to those of the long-term denosumab group during the first treatment year. Significant reductions in serum collagen type I C-teleopeptide were observed after denosumab administration. Adverse event rates were similar between groups, and no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In men with low BMD, denosumab treatment for a second year continued to increase BMD, maintained reductions in bone resorption, and was well tolerated. BMD increased in men initiating denosumab during the second year. These effects were similar to those previously seen in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

Effects of up to 5 years of denosumab treatment on bone histology and histomorphometry: the FREEDOM study extension.

Denosumab reduced bone resorption, increased bone mineral density (BMD), and decreased new vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the FREEDOM trial. Consistent with its mechanism of action, transiliac crest bone biopsies from subjects treated with denosumab for 1 to 3 years demonstrated reduced bone turnover that was reversible upon treatment cessation. Long-term denosumab treatment for up to 6 years in the FREEDOM extension provides sustained bone turnover reduction and continued low fracture incidence. Here, we evaluate 5 years of denosumab treatment on bone remodeling at the tissue level. Transiliac crest bone biopsies were obtained from 41 subjects (13 cross-over and 28 long-term from the FREEDOM placebo and denosumab groups, respectively) at year 2 of the FREEDOM extension, representing up to 5 years of denosumab treatment. Demographics for this subset were comparable to the overall extension cohort. The mean (SD) duration from the last denosumab dose to the first dose of tetracycline was 5.7 (0.5) months. Qualitative bone histology assessed in all biopsy samples was unremarkable, showing normally mineralized lamellar bone. Structural indices, including trabecular bone volume, number, and surface, were similar between cross-over and long-term groups. Bone resorption was decreased as reflected by eroded surface in cross-over and long-term subjects. A total of 11 of 13 (85%) cross-over subjects and 20 of 28 (71%) long-term subjects had specimens with double or single tetracycline label in trabecular and/or cortical compartments; specimens from 5 cross-over subjects and 10 long-term subjects were evaluable for dynamic trabecular bone parameters. Dynamic remodeling indices were low for both groups and consistent with reduced bone turnover with denosumab. In conclusion, denosumab treatment through 5 years resulted in normal bone quality with reduced bone turnover. These observations are consistent with its mechanism of action and associated with continued BMD increases and low fracture incidence.

The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension.

CONTEXT: The Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) extension is evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab for up to 10 years. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to report results from the first 3 years of the extension, representing up to 6 years of denosumab exposure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter, international, open-label study of 4550 women. INTERVENTION: Women from the FREEDOM denosumab group received 3 more years of denosumab for a total of 6 years (long-term) and women from the FREEDOM placebo group received 3 years of denosumab (crossover). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), fracture, and safety data are reported. RESULTS: Reductions in BTMs were maintained (long-term) or achieved rapidly (crossover) after denosumab administration. In the long-term group, BMD further increased for cumulative 6-year gains of 15.2% (lumbar spine) and 7.5% (total hip). During the first 3 years of denosumab treatment, the crossover group had significant gains in lumbar spine (9.4%) and total hip (4.8%) BMD, similar to the long-term group during the 3-year FREEDOM trial. In the long-term group, fracture incidences remained low and below the rates projected for a virtual placebo cohort. In the crossover group, 3-year incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar to those of the FREEDOM denosumab group. Incidence rates of adverse events did not increase over time. Six participants had events of osteonecrosis of the jaw confirmed by adjudication. One participant had a fracture adjudicated as consistent with atypical femoral fracture. CONCLUSION: Denosumab treatment for 6 years remained well tolerated, maintained reduced bone turnover, and continued to increase BMD. Fracture incidence remained low.

Denosumab compared with ibandronate in postmenopausal women previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized open-label trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab to ibandronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) previously treated with a bisphosphonate. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label study, postmenopausal women received 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months (n=417) or 150 mg ibandronate orally every month (n=416) for 12 months. End points included percentage change from baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD at month 12 and percentage change from baseline in serum C-telopeptide at months 1 and 6 in a substudy. RESULTS: At month 12, significantly greater BMD gains from baseline were observed with denosumab compared with ibandronate at the total hip (2.3% compared with 1.1%), femoral neck (1.7% compared with 0.7%), and lumbar spine (4.1% compared with 2.0%; treatment difference P<.001 at all sites). At month 1, median change in serum C-telopeptide from baseline was -81.1% with denosumab and -35.0% with ibandronate (P<.001); the treatment difference remained significant at month 6 (P<.001). Adverse events occurred in 245 (59.6%) denosumab-treated women and 230 (56.1%) ibandronate-treated women (P=.635). The incidence of serious adverse events was 9.5% for denosumab-treated women and 5.4% for ibandronate-treated women (P=.046). No clustering of events in any organ system accounted for the preponderance of these reports. The incidence rates of serious adverse events involving infection and malignancy were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women previously treated with a bisphosphonate and low BMD, denosumab treatment resulted in greater BMD increases than ibandronate at all measured sites. No new safety risks with denosumab treatment were identified.

Design and methods of a postmarketing pharmacoepidemiology study assessing long-term safety of Prolia® (denosumab) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: To describe the rationale and methods for a prospective, open-cohort study assessing the long-term safety of Prolia(®) for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) in postmarketing settings. METHODS: Data will be derived from United States Medicare, United Healthcare, and Nordic (Denmark, Sweden, Norway) national registries. Observation will begin on the date of first Prolia(®) regulatory approval (May 26, 2010) and continue for 10 years. Women with PMO will be identified by postmenopausal age, osteoporosis diagnosis, osteoporotic fracture, or osteoporosis treatment. Exposure to Prolia(®) and bisphosphonates will be updated during follow-up; exposure cohorts will be defined based on patient-years during which patients are on- or post-treatment. Nine adverse events (AEs) will be assessed based on diagnosis codes: osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical femoral fracture (AFF), fracture healing complications, hypocalcemia, infection, dermatologic AEs, acute pancreatitis, hypersensitivity, and new primary malignancy. Medical review will confirm selected potential cases of ONJ and AFF. Incidence rates (IRs) of AEs will be described overall and for exposure cohorts; multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models will compare IRs of AEs across exposure cohorts. Utilization patterns of Prolia(®) for approved, and unapproved indications will be described. CONCLUSION: This study is based on comprehensive preliminary research and considers methodological challenges specific to the study population. The integrated data systems used in this regulatory committed program can serve as a powerful data resource to assess diverse and rare AEs over time.

The development of denosumab for the treatment of diseases of bone loss and cancer-induced bone destruction.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand (RANKL), an essential cytokine for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts. The role of excessive RANKL as a contributor to conditions characterized by bone loss or bone destruction has been well studied. With its novel mechanism of action, denosumab offers a significant advance in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis; bone loss associated with hormone ablation therapy in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer; and the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors by offering clinical benefit to these patients in need.

Bone remodeling in postmenopausal women who discontinued denosumab treatment: off-treatment biopsy study.

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes the activity of RANKL, leading to the inhibition of osteoclast maturation, bone-resorbing activity, and survival. Evaluation of trans-iliac crest bone biopsy specimens in the phase 3 pivotal fracture study with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed evidence of reduced bone turnover at the tissue level in subjects receiving denosumab, and up to one-third of subjects did not have evidence of tetracycline labeling in trabecular or cortical bone. Discontinuation of denosumab therapy has demonstrated that the effects of denosumab are reversible, as assessed by biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM) and BMD. The precise nature of changes that occur at the tissue level with denosumab discontinuation have not been explored. Fifteen subjects were enrolled in a cohort study to evaluate the effects of denosumab discontinuation at the tissue level. Subjects had discontinued osteoporosis treatment for a mean time of 25.1 months (range 21 to 29 months). Bone histomorphometry results were compared with results from placebo-treated women with osteoporosis in the denosumab phase 3 pivotal fracture bone biopsy substudy, and BTMs were compared with subjects' pretreatment values. The results of this study showed normal histology and bone remodeling similar to those observed in untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. With treatment cessation, 100% of biopsy specimens had evidence of tetracycline labels. Biochemical markers were comparable to and highly correlated with pretreatment levels. These data confirm that the effects of denosumab on bone turnover at the tissue level are fully reversible.

Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover: six-year results of a phase 2 clinical trial.

CONTEXT: This is a study extension to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers as well as safety with 6 yr of denosumab treatment. DESIGN: We conducted an ongoing 4-yr, open-label, single-arm, extension study of a dose-ranging phase 2 trial. This paper reports a 2-yr interim analysis representing up to 6 yr of continuous denosumab treatment. SETTING: This multicenter study was conducted at 23 U.S. centers. PATIENTS: Of the 262 subjects who completed the parent study, 200 enrolled in the study extension and 178 (89%) completed the first 2 yr. INTERVENTION: All subjects received denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and one third radius; biochemical markers of bone turnover; and safety, reported as adverse events. RESULTS: Over a period of 6 yr, continuous treatment with denosumab resulted in progressive gains in BMD in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Reduction in bone resorption was sustained over the course of continuous treatment. Independent of past treatment and discontinuation period, subjects demonstrated responsiveness to denosumab therapy as measured by BMD and bone turnover markers. The safety profile of denosumab did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, denosumab was well tolerated and effective through 6 yr of continuous treatment in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.