QUality of life and Economic evaluation after neuroSTimulation for Epilepsy (QUESTE) in adolescents and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study in The Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders. Antiseizure medication (ASM) is the first choice of treatment, however, 30% of epilepsy patients are drug-resistant. For these patients, neuromodulation can be an option, especially when epilepsy surgery is not possible or did not lead to seizure freedom. Epilepsy is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL), which heavily depends on seizure control.The most recent Cochrane reviews have shown that vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus, lead to a responder rate OR of, respectively, 1.93 and 1.20. The question arises if neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) will be more cost-effective than sole treatment with ASM. The current study aims to determine the change in QoL after neuromodulation. Secondarily, we will aim to study the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective cohort study aims at including 100 patients aged 16 or above who will be referred for neuromodulation, from January 2021 to January 2026. After informed consent, QoL and other relevant parameters will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery. Data on seizure frequency will be derived from patient charts. We expect that DRE patients will report better QoL after neuromodulation. Even if they would still report seizures, the treatment can be seen as useful. This is especially true when patients can participate in society again to a greater extent than before treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The board of directors of participating centres all gave permission for this study to commence. The medical ethics committees decided that this study does not fall under the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). The findings of this study will be presented at (inter)national conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9033.

Assessment of need for hemostatic evaluation in patients taking valproic acid: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Valproic acid (VPA) is a frequently prescribed anti-epileptic drug. Since its introduction side effects on hemostasis are reported. However, studies show conflicting results, and the clinical relevance is questioned. We aimed to determine the coagulopathies induced by VPA in patients who undergo high-risk surgery. The study results warrant attention to this issue, which might contribute to reducing bleeding complications in future patients. METHODS: Between January 2012 and August 2020, 73 consecutive patients using VPA were retrospectively included. Extensive laboratory hemostatic assessment (including platelet function tests) was performed before elective high-risk surgery. Patient characteristics, details of VPA treatment, and laboratory results were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: 46.6% of the patients using VPA (n = 73) showed coagulopathy. Mainly, platelet function disorder was found (36.4%). Thrombocytopenia was seen in 9.6% of the patients. Data suggested that the incidence of coagulopathies was almost twice as high in children as compared to adults and hypofibrinogenemia was only demonstrated in children. No association was found between the incidence of coagulopathies and VPA dosage (mg/kg/day). CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients using VPA were diagnosed with coagulopathy, especially platelet function disorder. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the need for comprehensive laboratory testing before elective high-risk surgery in these patients.

Single-Cell Recordings to Target the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients with Refractory Epilepsy.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is a promising treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. However, therapy response varies and precise positioning of the DBS lead is potentially essential for maximizing therapeutic efficacy. We investigate if single-cell recordings acquired by microelectrode recordings can aid targeting of the ANT during surgery and hypothesize that the neuronal firing properties of the target region relate to clinical outcome. We prospectively included 10 refractory epilepsy patients and performed microelectrode recordings under general anesthesia to identify the change in neuronal signals when approaching and transecting the ANT. The neuronal firing properties of the target region, anatomical locations of microelectrode recordings and active contact positions of the DBS lead along the recorded trajectory were compared between responders and nonresponders to DBS. We obtained 19 sets of recordings from 10 patients (five responders and five nonresponders). Amongst the 403 neurons detected, 365 (90.6%) were classified as bursty. Entry into the ANT was characterized by an increase in firing rate while exit of the ANT was characterized by a decrease in firing rate. Comparing the trajectories of responders to nonresponders, we found differences neither in the neuronal firing properties themselves nor in their locations relative to the position of the active contact. Single-cell firing rate acquired by microelectrode recordings under general anesthesia can thus aid targeting of the ANT during surgery, but is not related to clinical outcome in DBS for patients with refractory epilepsy.

Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography.

BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established diagnostic technique for the localization of the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy. In vivo accuracy of SEEG electrode positioning is of paramount importance since higher accuracy may lead to more precise resective surgery, better seizure outcome and reduction of complications. OBJECTIVE: To describe experiences with the SEEG technique in our comprehensive epilepsy center, to illustrate surgical methodology, to evaluate in vivo application accuracy and to consider the diagnostic yield of SEEG implantations. METHODS: All patients who underwent SEEG implantations between September 2008 and April 2016 were analyzed. Planned electrode trajectories were compared with post-implantation trajectories after fusion of pre- and postoperative imaging. Quantitative analysis of deviation using Euclidean distance and directional errors was performed. Explanatory variables for electrode accuracy were analyzed using linear regression modeling. The surgical methodology, procedure-related complications and diagnostic yield were reported. RESULTS: Seventy-six implantations were performed in 71 patients, and a total of 902 electrodes were implanted. Median entry and target point deviations were 1.54 mm and 2.93 mm. Several factors that predicted entry and target point accuracy were identified. The rate of major complications was 2.6%. SEEG led to surgical therapy of various modalities in 53 patients (69.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that entry and target point localization errors can be predicted by linear regression models, which can aid in identification of high-risk electrode trajectories and further enhancement of accuracy. SEEG is a reliable technique, as demonstrated by the high accuracy of conventional frame-based implantation methodology and the good diagnostic yield.

Interactions between antiepileptic and chemotherapeutic drugs.

Cancer and epilepsy commonly co-occur, and concomitant administration of antiepileptic (AEDS) and chemotherapeutic drugs (CTDs) is necessary in many cases. Many drugs are metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme system, and coadministration of AEDs and CTDs can lead to clinically relevant interactions by induction or inhibition of enzymes in shared metabolic pathways. These interactions can cause insufficient tumour and seizure control or lead to unforeseen toxicity. Enzyme-inducing AEDs reduce the effects of taxanes, vinca alkaloids, methotrexate, teniposide, and camptothecin analogues. Inhibition of the metabolism of nitrosoureas or etoposide by valproic acid can lead to CTD toxicity. Poor seizure control may result from the combinations of phenytoin with cisplatin or corticosteroids, and valproic acid with methotrexate. Increased toxicity of AEDs can occur when phenytoin is combined with 5-fluorouracil. Use of enzyme-inducing AEDs should be avoided in patients with cancer, particularly in association with chemotherapy. Generally, valproic acid-although not free from interactions-would be the agent of first choice. Some of the newer AEDs not metabolised by the P450 system may prove to be good alternatives.

Treating seizures in patients with brain tumors: Drug interactions between antiepileptic and chemotherapeutic agents.

Seizures are a common complication in patients with primary brain tumors or brain metastases that require treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, because many AEDs and chemotherapeutics share common metabolic pathways via the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, there is potential for drug interactions. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital are potent enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs) that can cause a decrease in the serum concentration of chemotherapeutics, potentially compromising antitumor activity. Likewise, chemotherapeutics can alter the pharmacokinetics of EIAEDs, resulting in decreased seizure control. Other agents, such as valproic acid, are enzyme-inhibiting AEDs that can impede the metabolism of other drugs, potentially increasing the serum concentration of chemotherapeutics. Therefore, patients receiving valproic acid with concomitant chemotherapy should be monitored closely. A new generation of AEDs that are not metabolized by CYP isoenzymes is currently being developed. Of these, gabapentin and levetiracetam show the most promise in treating epileptic seizures in patients with brain tumors. Interactions between these newer AEDs and chemotherapeutic agents have not been reported. In summary, the potential interactions between AEDs and chemotherapy should be anticipated and appropriate proactive adjustments implemented. Future studies will define the role of newer AEDs in the treatment of patients with primary brain tumors.