RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), in addition to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been shown to be effective in the surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis with appropriate patient selection. In clinical studies, it has demonstrated superior functional results with lower complication rates. In clinical practice, these advantages must be weighed against the disadvantage of an increased revision rate, especially in younger patients with sports and work activities. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome as well as the time to return to daily activities, work, and sports after revision of UKA to TKA with those of primary UKA and primary TKA using a matched-pair analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on a matched-pair analysis at two defined time points, always comparing 28 patients who underwent either revision of a UKA to a TKA, primary UKA, or primary TKA. Patients completed the Oxford Knee Score, UCLA score, Knee Society score, and WOMAC score during standardized follow-up. In addition, postoperative patient satisfaction and return to activities of daily living, work, and sports were recorded in a standardized manner, and a clinical examination was performed. RESULTS: The four functional scores studied showed a common trend in favor of UKA, followed by primary TKA and revision TKA. The differences between converted UKA and primary TKA were not significant. However, at 3.2 years after the last surgery, the results of the converted UKA were significantly lower than those of the primary UKA. Return to work and sports tended to occur the earliest after UKA, followed by TKA and the revision group. All groups showed a tendency to engage in low-impact sports. CONCLUSION: The functional results of revised UKA were significantly inferior to those of primary UKA based on a 3-year follow-up. Return to work, sports, and activities of daily living tended to take longer after revision than after primary implantation of either a UKA or a TKA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Esportes , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Volta ao Esporte , Atividades Cotidianas , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgiaRESUMO
In the northern forelands of the Alps, farmers report an increase of Jacobaea aquatica in production grasslands. Due to its toxicity, the species affects grassland productivity and calls for costly control measures. We are investigating the extent to which management practices or climatic factors are responsible for the increase of the species and how the situation will change due to climate change. We tested for effects of management intensity, fertilization, agri-environmental measures, and soil disturbance, and modeled the occurrence of the species under rcp4.5 and rcp8.5 scenarios. The main determinants of the occurrence of the species are soil type and summer rainfall. A high risk is associated with wet soils and > 400 mm of rain between June and August; an influence of the management-related factors could not be detected. Under the climate-change scenarios, the overall distribution decreases and shifts to the wetter alpine regions. Thus, the current increase is rather a shift in the occurrence of the species due to the altered precipitation situation. Under future climatic conditions, the species will decline and retreat to higher regions in the Alps. This will decrease the risk of forage contamination for production grassland in the lowlands.