[A Case of Resected Type 4 Rectal Cancer with Difficulty in Preoperative Diagnosis].

We reported a case of Type 4 rectal cancer performed laparoscopic surgery. A 73-year-old man had diarrhea and constipation and underwent colonoscopy. From the first colonoscopy, histological findings of biopsy showed non-neoplastic cells. The results of colonoscopy strongly suggested the possibility of Type 4 rectal cancer. Therefore, we performed colonoscopy twice and he was diagnosed Type 4 rectal cancer. Computed tomography revealed no distant metastasis. He underwent radical laparoscopic surgery. The histopathological diagnosis was pStage Ⅲc(The 9th edition). He then received adjuvant chemotherapy but was relapsed at bones and lymph nodes. He died 18 months later after surgery.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in anastomosis site after distal gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) in the remnant stomach is increasing because of follow-up endoscopic surveillance programs. Endoscopic treatment appears to be desirable for EGC in the remnant stomach because it is less invasive than surgical resection. METHODS: In this retrospective study, to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for EGC in an anastomotic site, treatment results of ESD for EGC in an anastomotic site and in remnant stomach not involving an anastomotic site were compared. In total, 11 EGC lesions of anastomotic sites in 11 patients and 22 EGC lesions of remnant stomach not involving an anastomotic site in 21 patients were treated by ESD. RESULTS: All lesions were successfully treated by en bloc resection. There were three patients with perforations in the anastomotic site group. Although resected specimen size and tumor size were larger in the anastomotic site group than in the non-anastomotic site group (P < 0.01), the procedure duration was far longer in the anastomotic site group than in the non-anastomotic site group (P < 0.01). The speed of the procedure was faster in the non-anastomotic site group than in the anastomotic site group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although ESD for EGC in an anastomotic site is a time-consuming procedure and requires advanced techniques compared with ESD for EGC not involving an anastomotic site, a high en bloc resection rate was achieved. ESD by endoscopists with sufficient experience appears to be a feasible treatment for EGC in an anastomotic site.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm in patients with co-morbidities categorized according to the ASA Physical Status Classification.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has come to be widely performed for reduced invasiveness; however, its safety in patients with co-morbidities is not fully examined. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric ESD with co-morbidities categorized according to ASA Physical Status Classification. METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients of ASA 1 (no co-morbidities), 268 of ASA 2 (mild), and 19 of ASA 3 (severe) were treated by ESD for gastric neoplasms. We retrospectively compared clinicopathological features and treatment results of these three groups. RESULTS: Cases (by percent) treated with anticoagulant/platelet agents were more common in the higher ASA grades (ASA 1, 5.8%; ASA 2, 29.1%; ASA 3, 31.6%; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in case numbers treated under guideline criteria, curative resection (ASA 1, 79.6%; ASA 2, 79.9%; ASA 3, 78.9%), or complications related to the ESD procedure (e.g., postoperative bleeding, perforation, thermal injury). By a patient risk prediction model on surgery, i.e., P-POSSUM, morbidity was halved, and no patients died compared to a predicted death rate of 0.5-2%; however, total and complications unrelated to ESD procedure (e.g., aspiration pneumonia, ischemic heat attack) were more common in higher ASA grades (ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3: 15.4, 23.9, 26.3%, respectively, P = 0.014; 0.4, 7.1, 0%, respectively, P = 0.00087). Deviation rates from clinical pathway were more frequent and hospital stay (days) longer in higher ASA grades (ASA 1, ASA 2, ASA 3: 11.3, 17.9, 26.3%, respectively, P = 0.014; 8, 8, 9%, respectively, P = 0.0053). CONCLUSIONS: ESD is an efficient treatment for gastric neoplasms with co-morbidities. However, additional caution is required because co-morbidity is a risk factor for both total complications and complications unrelated to the ESD procedure, and may cause deviations in the clinical course and prolonged hospital stay.

Clinicopathological characteristics of abnormal micro-lesions at the oro-hypopharynx detected by a magnifying narrow band imaging system.

BACKGROUND: Narrow band imaging (NBI) with magnifying endoscopy (NBI-ME) allows the detection of abnormal micro-lesions smaller than 5 mm in diameter in the oro-hypopharynx that could not be visualized previously. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of abnormal micro-lesions of the oro-hypopharynx detected by NBI-ME. METHODS: Of the 62 lesions detected by NBI-ME, 40 abnormal micro-lesions in 37 patients were removed by endoscopic treatment and were pathologically evaluated. We reviewed the medical records of patients with these lesions and investigated the relationship between NBI-ME findings and pathological findings. RESULTS: Pathological examination revealed the following: high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) in nine (23%) lesions, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) in 22 (55%), pharyngitis in seven (18%) and papilloma in two (5%). Two NBI-ME findings, high microvascular density (MVD) and a brownish area (BA), were recognized more frequently as the grade of malignancy advanced. The likelihood ratio (confidential interval) for having HGIN in the patients with both MVD and BA was 13 (3.62-127). CONCLUSIONS: The pathological diagnosis of abnormal micro-lesions ranged from pharyngitis to HGIN. High MVD and BA may be important findings for grading the malignancy of abnormal micro-lesions.

Ex vivo pig training model for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has developed in recent years because of its high rate of en bloc resection. However, for many endoscopists, technical difficulty and risks of complications are great barriers to performing esophageal ESD. In this study, we developed an original training model for esophageal ESD using isolated pig esophagus and assessed this ex vivo model in endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD. METHODS: Three endoscopists without experience in esophageal ESD but with some experience in gastric ESD performed esophageal ESD of artificial lesions in 10 consecutive sessions using this ex vivo model. The en bloc resection rate, operation time, number of muscularis propria layer injuries, and presence of perforation were recorded. We evaluated the effectiveness of this training in the three endoscopists by comparing results from the first five sessions (former period) with those from the last five sessions (latter period). RESULTS: All three endoscopists achieved en bloc resections in all trials. In the former period, injury to the muscularis propria layer for each of the three endoscopists occurred a mean of 2.2 (1-3), 0.6 (0-1), and 3.2 (1-6) times, respectively. Perforation occurred in one session performed by one endoscopist. In the latter period, the mean number of muscularis propria layer injuries for each of the three endoscopists decreased to 0.2 (0-1), 0.2 (0-1), and 0.8 (0-2), respectively. The time of operation shortened from 35.0 (25-40), 36.4 (30-50), and 29.8 (23-43) min to 23.0 (16-31), 25.6 (23-28), and 29.2 (21-37) min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This original ex vivo training model was helpful to endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD in acquiring the basic skills for performing esophageal ESD.