Involving Patients and Clinicians in the Design of Wireframes for Cancer Medicines Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Care: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment is a key component of health care systems, and the increasing number of cancer medicines is expanding the treatment landscape. However, evidence of the impact on patients has been focused more on chemotherapy toxicity and symptom control and less on the effect of cancer medicines more broadly on patients' lives. Evolving electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) presents the opportunity to secure early engagement of patients and clinicians in shaping the collection of quality-of-life metrics and presenting these data to better support the patient-clinician decision-making process. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to obtain initial feedback from patients and clinicians on the wireframes of a digital solution (patient app and clinician dashboard) for the collection and use of cancer medicines ePROMs. METHODS: We adopted a 2-stage, mixed methods approach. Stage 1 (March to June 2019) consisted of interviews and focus groups with cancer clinicians and patients with cancer to explore the face validity of the wireframes, informed by the technology acceptance model constructs (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention to use). In stage 2 (October 2019 to February 2020), the revised wireframes were assessed through web-based, adapted technology acceptance model questionnaires. Qualitative data (stage 1) underwent a framework analysis, and descriptive statistics were performed on quantitative data (stage 2). Clinicians and patients with cancer were recruited from NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, the largest health board in Scotland. RESULTS: A total of 14 clinicians and 19 patients participated in a combination of stage 1 interviews and focus groups. Clinicians and patients indicated that the wireframes of a patient app and clinician dashboard for the collection of cancer medicines ePROMs would be easy to use and could focus discussions, and they would be receptive to using such tools in the future. In stage 1, clinicians raised the potential impact on workload, and both groups identified the need for adequate IT skills to use each technology. Changes to the wireframes were made, and in stage 2, clinicians (n=8) and patients (n=16) indicated it was "quite likely" that the technologies would be easy to use and they would be "quite likely" to use them in the future. Notably, clinicians indicated that they would use the dashboard to enable treatment decisions "with around half" of their patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the importance of consulting both patients and clinicians in the design of digital solutions. The wireframes were perceived positively by patients and clinicians who were willing to use such technologies if available in the future as part of routine care. However, challenges were raised, and some differences were identified between participant groups, which warrant further research.

Predicting mortality after hospitalisation for COPD using electronic health records.

BACKGROUND: Few prognostic models exist for patients hospitalised with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); most are based on small cohorts enroled by specialists in academic centres. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide an opportunity to develop more representative models, although they may not record some variables used in existing models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: for this retrospective cohort study, using EHRs, we identified 17,973 patients with an unplanned hospitalisation for COPD (in any diagnostic position) in the Glasgow area between 2011 and 2017. Patients with known lung cancer were excluded. EHR were linked to prior admissions, community prescribing and laboratory data. A pragmatic, parsimonious multivariable model was developed to predict 90-day mortality. RESULTS: we identified 12 variables strongly related to prognosis, including age, sex, length of index hospitalisation stay, prior diagnosis of cancer (excluding lung cancer) or dementia, prescription of oxygen or digoxin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and serum chloride, urea, creatinine and albumin. The model achieved excellent calibration with reasonable discrimination (area under the curve: 0.806; 95% CI: 0.792-0.820). A risk-score was developed and an electronic risk-calculator is provided. CONCLUSIONS: a small number of variables, including prescriptions and laboratory data obtained from routine EHRs predict 90-day mortality after a hospitalisation for COPD. The risk-calculator provided might prove useful for service-evaluation and audit, to guide clinical management and to risk-stratify and select patients to be invited to participate in clinical research.

Information needs of specialist healthcare professionals: a preliminary study based on the West of Scotland Colorectal Cancer Managed Clinical Network.

OBJECTIVES: Funded by Research in the Workplace Award (RIWA) 2001, the study investigated the information needs and use of NHS library services by members of the West of Scotland Colorectal Cancer Managed Clinical Network (MCN), a single subject, cross boundary, multi-professional organization. METHOD: A postal questionnaire sent out in October 2002 was returned by 100 members and follow-up interviews were held in March 2003 with 11 of the respondents. The questions related to access to resources, library services such as literature searches, current awareness and training. They also explored the use of electronic resources and the Internet. RESULTS: Respondents were mainly hospital doctors and a few nurses from across five health boards. Most had access to a library, although not all made use of it, possibly an indication of the need for improved communications between librarians and health-care staff. Generally, research and professional development were reported as reasons for needing cancer information, but on further investigation the motivation to conduct literature searches was more related to patient care. Examples included treatment of unusual cases, locating information for patients and identifying guidelines. There are indications of unmet needs for local contact information and evaluated patient information. CONCLUSION: Development of a cancer portal within the NHS Scotland e-Library available from May 2004 based on the Managed Knowledge Network (MKN) concept is attempting to address many of the issues raised in the survey, including inequities of access to services and signposting to a variety of types of information.