Effect of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia: an overview of systematic reviews / Efeito da farmacoterapia na fibromialgia: uma overview de revisões sistemáticas

Fibromyalgia is a debilitating and chronic pain processing disorder, in which the proportion of patients who achieve good results with pharmacotherapy is small. However, choosing the best available evidence on pharmacotherapy can optimize patient clinical outcomes. Objective: This overview aimed to identify in systematic reviews the effects of pharmacotherapy on fibromyalgia, considering the quality of the reviews and the efficacy of the outcomes. Methods: This search was performed in seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus and IPA. The methodological quality was evaluated using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018095943). Results: A total of 63 systematic reviews were selected after reading full texts, but only 8 of them were of moderate to high quality and were included in this overview. All included reviews were published in English, between 2012 and 2018, performed meta-analysis, used the American College of Rheumatology (1990) diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia, and jointly assessed pain improvement, adverse reactions, and withdrawal. Most reviews included only randomized controlled trials. Of the fourteen drugs addressed in systematic reviews evaluated, duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin showed evidence of improvement in pain (Moderate: ≤30%) and other fibromyalgia symptoms, as depression and fatigue. However, these medications presented significant withdrawals due to adverse reactions (mainly nausea, headache, dizziness and constipation). The rate of treatment withdrawal reached 36%. Conclusion: Few studies have high quality and sufficient evidence on the effect of medicines on fibromyalgia, resulting in a lack of support for prescribers to choose drugs that meet criteria for need, effectiveness, safety and compliance.

Fibromialgia é um distúrbio de processamento da dor debilitante e crônico, em que a proporção de pacientes que obtêm bons resultados com a farmacoterapia é pequena. No entanto, escolher a melhor evidência disponível sobre a farmacoterapia pode otimizar os resultados clínicos do paciente. Objetivo: Esta overview teve como objetivo identificar em revisões sistemáticas os efeitos da farmacoterapia na fibromialgia, considerando a qualidade das revisões e a eficácia dos resultados. Métodos: Esta busca foi realizada em sete bases de dados: PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE, Lilacs, Embase, Scopus e IPA. A qualidade metodológica foi avaliada usando A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. O protocolo foi registrado no PROSPERO (CRD42018095943). Resultados: Um total de 63 revisões sistemáticas foram selecionadas após a leitura de textos completos, mas apenas 8 delas eram de qualidade moderada a alta e foram incluídas nesta overview. Todas as revisões incluídas foram publicadas em inglês, entre 2012 e 2018, realizaram meta-análises, utilizaram os critérios de diagnósticos do American College of Rheumatology (1990) para fibromialgia e avaliaram conjuntamente a melhora da dor, reações adversas e retiradas. A maioria das revisões incluiu apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados. Dos quatorze medicamentos abordados nas revisões sistemáticas avaliadas, duloxetina, milnaciprano e pregabalina mostraram evidências de melhora da dor (moderada: ≤30%) e de outros sintomas da fibromialgia como depressão e fadiga. No entanto, esses medicamentos apresentaram retiradas significativas devido a reações adversas (principalmente náusea, cefaleia, tontura e constipação). A taxa de abandono ao tratamento chegou a 36%. Conclusão: Poucos estudos apresentam evidências suficientes e de alta qualidade sobre o efeito dos medicamentos na fibromialgia, resultando na falta de apoio para os prescritores escolherem medicamentos que atendam aos critérios de necessidade, eficácia, segurança e adesão.

An Overview of the Methodologies and the Quality of Studies on Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND: It is often unclear whether systematic reviews and primary studies are de-signed to elucidate the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions. This may compromise the use of the information in clinical or policy decisions. OBJECTIVE: This overview aimed to evaluate the methodological profiles of studies on fibromyalgia pharmacotherapy in terms of the quality and nature of the interventions (efficacy versus effective-ness). METHODS: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Re-views database. Seven databases were searched for relevant publications. Systematic reviews inves-tigating the effectiveness or efficacy of fibromyalgia pharmacotherapy were included. Methodolog-ical quality was investigated using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AM-STAR), and efficacy andeffectiveness were evaluated using Rating of Included Trials on the Effica-cy-effectiveness Spectrum (RITES). RESULTS: In this overview, 4,107 studies were initially identified. 8 systematic reviews and 34 prima-ry studies remained after overlaps were removed. Of the eight systematic reviews, 4.76% (n=3) and 7.93% (n=5) were of moderate and high quality, respectively. An analysis of systematic reviews clearly showed the criteria "participants characteristics" and "trial setting" with the most frequent answers as scales 1 and 2 (strong emphasis on efficacy or rather strong emphasis on efficacy), re-spectively. RITES analysis revealed that the most frequent response was "strong emphasis on effi-cacy" in 68% (92/136) of primary studies. CONCLUSION: This analysis showed, in both systematic reviews and primary studies, a predominantly strong emphasis on efficacy, suggesting the need for methodological quality improvement in future studies, especially those designed to provide evidence related to effectiveness. The protocol for this overview has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Sys-tematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42018095943).

Alcoholic monoterpenes found in essential oil of aromatic spices reduce allergic inflammation by the modulation of inflammatory cytokines.

Allergic inflammation is a response of the body against pathogens by cytokine release and leucocyte recruitment. Recently, there was an increase in morbimortality associated with allergic inflammation, especially asthma. The treatment has many adverse effects, requiring the search for new therapies. Monoterpenes are natural products with anti-inflammatory activity demonstrated in several studies and can be an option to inflammation management. Thus, we investigated the effects of citronellol, α-terpineol and carvacrol on allergic inflammation. The model of asthma was established by OVA induction in male Swiss mice. The monoterpenes were administered (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, i.p.) 1 h before induction. After 24hs, the animals were sacrificed to leucocytes and TNF-α quantification. Monoterpenes significantly decrease leucocyte migration and TNF-α levels, possibly by modulation of COX, PGE2 and H1 receptor, as demonstrated by molecular docking. These findings indicate that alcoholic monoterpenes can be an alternative for treatment of allergic inflammation and asthma.

Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Aloe saponaria Haw in a model of UVB-induced paw sunburn in rats.

Ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation mainly affects biological tissues by inducing an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production which leads to deleterious outcomes for the skin, including pain and inflammation. As a protective strategy, many studies have focused on the use of natural products. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Aloe saponaria on nociceptive, inflammatory, and oxidative parameters in a model of UVB-induced sunburn in adult male Wistar rats. Sunburned animals were topically treated with vehicle (base cream), 1% silver sulfadiazine (positive control) or A. saponaria (10%) once a day for 6days. UVB-induced nociception (allodynia and hyperalgesia), inflammation (edema and leukocyte infiltration) and oxidative stress (increases in H2O2, protein carbonyl levels and lipid peroxidation and a decrease in non protein thiol content) were reduced by both A. saponaria and sulfadiazine topical treatment. Furthermore, A. saponaria or its constituents aloin and rutin reduced the oxidative stress induced by H2O2 in skin homogenates in vitro. Our results demonstrate that topical A. saponaria treatment displayed anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in a UVB-induced sunburn model, and these effects seem to be related to its antioxidant components.