American Society of Transplant Surgeons Normothermic Regional Perfusion Standards: Ethical, Legal, and Operational Conformance.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Transplant Surgeons convened a multidisciplinary working group to address operational, ethical, and legal considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) procurement. METHODS: The working group, comprising members from American Society of Transplant Surgeons and AST across various disciplines including transplant surgery, hepatology, critical care, and bioethics, collaborated to formulate recommendations and guidance for NRP procurement. RESULTS: The following topics were identified by the group as essential standards that need to be addressed for ethical, legal, and operational conformance: terminology; conceptualization of death in the context of NRP; and communication, logistics, and training and competency. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen recommendations that support the ethical and legal acceptability of NRP in the United States and set expectations for the conduct of NRP procedures are provided.

US Liver Transplant Outcomes After Normothermic Regional Perfusion vs Standard Super Rapid Recovery.

Importance: Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is an emerging recovery modality for transplantable allografts from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors. In the US, only 11.4% of liver recipients who are transplanted from a deceased donor receive a cDCD liver. NRP has the potential to safely expand the US donor pool with improved transplant outcomes as compared with standard super rapid recovery (SRR). Objective: To assess outcomes of US liver transplants using controlled donation after circulatory death livers recovered with normothermic regional perfusion vs standard super rapid recovery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study comparing liver transplant outcomes from cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR. Outcomes of cDCD liver transplant from January 2017 to May 2023 were collated from 17 US transplant centers and included livers recovered by SRR and NRP (thoracoabdominal NRP [TA-NRP] and abdominal NRP [A-NRP]). Seven transplant centers used NRP, allowing for liver allografts to be transplanted at 17 centers; 10 centers imported livers recovered via NRP from other centers. Exposures: cDCD livers were recovered by either NRP or SRR. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). Secondary end points included primary nonfunction (PNF), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary anastomotic strictures, posttransplant length of stay (LOS), and patient and graft survival. Results: A total of 242 cDCD livers were included in this study: 136 recovered by SRR and 106 recovered by NRP (TA-NRP, 79 and A-NRP, 27). Median (IQR) NRP and SRR donor age was 30.5 (22-44) years and 36 (27-49) years, respectively. Median (IQR) posttransplant LOS was significantly shorter in the NRP cohort (7 [5-11] days vs 10 [7-16] days; P < .001). PNF occurred only in the SRR allografts group (n = 2). EAD was more common in the SRR cohort (123 of 136 [56.1%] vs 77 of 106 [36.4%]; P = .007). Biliary anastomotic strictures were increased 2.8-fold in SRR recipients (7 of 105 [6.7%] vs 30 of 134 [22.4%]; P = .001). Only SRR recipients had IC (0 vs 12 of 133 [9.0%]; P = .002); IC-free survival by Kaplan-Meier was significantly improved in NRP recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion and Relevance: There was comparable patient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients of cDCD donors recovered by NRP vs SRR, with reduced rates of IC, biliary complications, and EAD in NRP recipients. The feasibility of A-NRP and TA-NRP implementation across multiple US transplant centers supports increasing adoption of NRP to improve organ use, access to transplant, and risk of wait-list mortality.

Quality measures in pre-liver transplant care by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.

Normothermic regional perfusion procurement for abdominal organ donors: techniques and troubleshooting.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a novel procurement technique for donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the United States. It was pioneered by cardiothoracic surgery programs and is now being applied to abdominal-only organ donors by abdominal transplant programs. Multiple technical approaches can be used for abdominal-only NRP DCD donors and this review describes these techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: NRP has been associated with higher utilization of organs, particularly liver and heart grafts, from DCD donors and with better recipient outcomes. There are lower rates of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients and lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy in liver transplant recipients. These benefits are driving increased interest from abdominal transplant programs in using NRP for DCD procurements. SUMMARY: This paper describes the technical aspects of NRP DCD that allow for maximization of its use based on different donor and policy characteristics.

Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in the United States: current state and future directions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a novel procurement technique for donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the United States. It was pioneered by cardiothoracic surgery programs and is now being applied to abdominal-only organ donors by abdominal transplant programs. RECENT FINDINGS: Liver and kidney transplantation from thoracoabdominal NRP (TA-NRP) donors in the United States was found to have lower rates of delayed kidney graft function and similar graft and patient survival versus recipients of cardiac super rapid recovery (SRR) DCD donors. The excellent outcomes with NRP have prompted the expansion of NRP technology to abdominal transplant programs. SUMMARY: Excellent early outcomes with liver and kidney transplantation have prompted the growth of NC-NRP procurement for abdominal-only DCD donors across the US, and now requires standardization of technical and nontechnical aspects of this procedure.

Unspoken Truths: Mental Health Among Academic Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the current state of mental health within the surgical workforce in the United States. BACKGROUND: Mental illness and suicide is a growing concern in the medical community; however, the current state is largely unknown. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of the academic surgery community assessing mental health, medical error, and suicidal ideation. The odds of suicidal ideation adjusting for sex, prior mental health diagnosis, and validated scales screening for depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol use disorder were assessed. RESULTS: Of 622 participating medical students, trainees, and surgeons (estimated response rate=11.4%-14.0%), 26.1% (141/539) reported a previous mental health diagnosis. In all, 15.9% (83/523) of respondents screened positive for current depression, 18.4% (98/533) for anxiety, 11.0% (56/510) for alcohol use disorder, and 17.3% (36/208) for PTSD. Medical error was associated with depression (30.7% vs. 13.3%, P <0.001), anxiety (31.6% vs. 16.2%, P =0.001), PTSD (12.8% vs. 5.6%, P =0.018), and hazardous alcohol consumption (18.7% vs. 9.7%, P =0.022). Overall, 13.2% (73/551) of respondents reported suicidal ideation in the past year and 9.6% (51/533) in the past 2 weeks. On adjusted analysis, a previous history of a mental health disorder (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.04-3.65, P =0.033) and screening positive for depression (aOR: 4.30, 95% CI: 2.21-8.29, P <0.001) or PTSD (aOR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.61-9.44, P =0.002) were associated with increased odds of suicidal ideation over the past 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 7 respondents reported suicidal ideation in the past year. Mental illness and suicidal ideation are significant problems among the surgical workforce in the United States.

A cross-sectional survey study of the impact of COVID-19 on resident training, education, and lifestyle across multiple surgical specialties in the Baylor Scott and White Health Care System.

Due to high-risk exposure to COVID-19 that surgical residents encounter in their training, residency programs have modified their training methods drastically. In this study, we administered a voluntary online survey analyzing the impact of COVID-19 among residents in multiple surgical specialties. A total of 26 surgical trainees completed the survey. The specialties of residents who completed the survey included general surgery (65.4%), orthopedic surgery (15.4%), oral and maxillofacial surgery (11.5%), and ophthalmology (7.7%). Most survey participants agreed or strongly agreed that the cancellation of elective operations (81%), delay of scheduled operations (81%), and decreased surgical volume (73%) affected their clinical training. However, the majority did not report that the pandemic affected their clinical preparedness for their chosen career or changed their plans for surgical subspecialty. Although many participants agreed or strongly agreed that they felt fatigued when facing another day at work (58%) or feeling emotionally drained at work (58%), the majority reported that they positively impact patients' lives (88%). In conclusion, the pandemic had a significant impact on surgical trainees, but has not changed their perceived readiness for surgical practice or career decisions. Participants reported signs of burnout; however, most found satisfaction with their clinical work.

How Surgical Research Gave Birth to a New Clinical Surgical Field: A Viewpoint from the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study.

BACKGROUND: Uterus transplantation (UTx) has come of age in the 21st century, building on the 20th century developments in vascular anastomosis and effective immunosuppressive protocols that have enabled solid organ transplantation to become the life-extending and life-improving treatment option we know today. However, UTx has the goal of enabling reproduction, meaning that research has focused on establishment of pregnancy and healthy live birth in addition to surgical technique and immunosuppression. SUMMARY: The Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS), established at Baylor University Medical Center in 2015, is one of four UTx programs in the USA, and it holds the distinction of being home not only to the first US live birth but also the highest volume UTx program worldwide, with 23 uterus transplants performed to date, resulting in 15 live births. Innovations pioneered at our center span all aspects of the UTx process, all seeking to improve success for recipients in terms of achieving pregnancy and live birth, while also minimizing the burden on donors and recipients. They have included the following: (1) a deceased donor hysterectomy approach that allows the uterus to be procured prior to cross clamp; (2) proof of concept with use of only superior uterine veins after procuring both the superior and inferior uterine veins during the donor surgery, enabling the choice of the best option in terms of size and location for outflow, while also preserving ovary viability in living donors; (3) contribution to robot-assisted technique/minimally invasive technique with vaginal extraction of the uterus graft for living donor surgeries, shortening donor recovery times; (4) developing a robot-assisted technique for graft hysterectomies, improving recovery times for recipients at the end of their UTx journey; (5) refining immunosuppression protocols to enable embryo transfer as early as 3 months after induction therapy, increasing recipients' chances for achieving up to two live births during the 5 years posttransplant the UTx protocol specifies; and (6) building on our clinical trial experience to now offer UTx in the U.S. outside the setting of a clinical study. KEY MESSAGES: Our center along with others throughout the world has demonstrated that UTx can be reproducible, result in live births from both living and deceased donors, and be safely introduced as a clinical option. Due to the complexity of UTx as well as the need for long-term multidisciplinary care, centers implementing UTx should have an established abdominal transplant program, a gynecologic surgery program, high-risk obstetric and neonatal care, and institutional support and oversight, and should partner with established UTx programs for protocol development and operative proctoring.

Variation in donation after circulatory death hospital policies in a single donor service area.

BACKGROUND: Historically, there has been wide variation among hospital policies for donation after circulatory death (DCD) processes. With more DCD donors as well as more organs from DCD donors being utilized, it is time to revisit the variability in DCD hospital policies. METHODS: Collection of hospital characteristics, DCD referrals and completions, and DCD policies from the Southwest Transplant Alliance Donor Service Area. Content analysis of DCD hospital policies. RESULTS: We found variability in referral requirements, discussion elements for authorization, pre-mortem interventions and process elements. Most policies allow prepping and draping (84.7% [83 of 98]) and premortem heparin administration (78.6% [77 or 98]). A minority allow femoral cannulation prior to extubation (19.4% [19 of 98]) or during the hands-off period (15.3% [15 of 98]). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a national effort to achieve consistency and clarity in DCD hospital policies based on our findings of continued variability in DCD hospital policies.

Robotic Donor Hysterectomy Results in Technical Success and Live Births After Uterus Transplantation: Subanalysis Within the Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) Clinical Trial.

Minimally invasive procurement of uterine grafts for transplantation can decrease living donor recovery time. We examined recipient outcomes for grafts procured by robotic-assisted donor hysterectomies with transvaginal extraction in the Dallas UtErus Transplant Study (DUETS). All 5 grafts were successfully transplanted. Recipients had a median 4.5-hour surgical time, 0.25 L estimated blood loss, and 4-day hospital stay. Four recipients had grade III surgical complications and three had acute cellular rejection. At 18 months, graft viability was 100%, with an 80% live birth rate. This report demonstrates the feasibility and reproducible success of using uterus grafts from living donors who underwent robotic-assisted donor hysterectomy.

Uterus transplantation: ethical considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Uterus transplantation (Utx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility the opportunity to carry their own pregnancies. As Utx transitions from an experimental to standard clinical procedure, we review the status of the ethical issues applicable to the stakeholders involved. RECENT FINDINGS: With more than 65 Utx procedures reported to date, evidence is accruing that enables the chance of success - a live birth - for the recipient to be weighed against the risks the recipient incurs through the Utx process, as well as risks to living donors undergoing surgery, to children exposed in utero to immunosuppressants and the uterine graft environment, and to third parties related to uterus procurement from multiorgan deceased donors. Experience has also informed aspects of recipient and donor autonomy that must be safeguarded. SUMMARY: Clinical trial results provides a basis for weighing the interests of the stakeholders implicated in Utx, and so can inform transplant centers' and regulatory bodies' development of policies and protocols that will determine access to Utx and allocation of organs, together with other considerations of justice. Additional evidence, particularly on long-term outcomes, is needed, and new questions can be expected to arise as access to and indications for Utx broaden.

Ethical considerations in pediatric solid organ transplantation.

Solid organ transplantation is now an accepted therapeutic modality for children and teenagers suffering from a wide variety of complex medical conditions. Unfortunately, patients continue to die while on the organ waiting list as there remains an imbalance between the number of recipients listed for transplantation and the number of donors available. The organ allocation process continues to generate ethical questions and debates. In this publication, we discuss some of the most frequently reported ethical matters in the field of pediatric solid organ transplantation.

Cost Analysis of Liver Acquisition Fees Before and After Acuity Circle Policy Implementation.

Importance: Acuity circles (AC) liver allocation policy was implemented to eliminate donor service area geographic boundaries from liver allocation and to decrease variability in median Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at transplant and wait list mortality. However, the broader sharing of organs was also associated with more flights for organ procurements and higher costs associated with the increase in flights. Objective: To determine whether the costs associated with liver acquisition changed after the implementation of AC allocation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center cost comparison study analyzed fees associated with organ acquisition before and after AC allocation implementation. The cost data were collected from a single transplant institute with 2 liver transplant centers, located 30 miles apart, in different donation service areas. Cost, recipient, and transportation data for all cases that included fees associated with liver acquisition from July 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020, were collected. Exposures: Primary liver offer acceptance with associated organ procurement organization or charter flight fees. Main Outcomes and Measures: Specific fees (organ acquisition, surgeon, import, and charter flight fees) and total fees per donor were collected for all accepted liver donors with at least 1 associated fee during the study period. Results: Of 213 included donors, 171 were used for transplant; 90 of 171 (52.6%) were male, and the median (interquartile range) age of donors was 41.0 (30.0-52.8) years in the pre-AC period and 36.9 (24.0-48.8) years in the post-AC period. There was no significant difference in the post-AC compared with pre-AC period in median (range) MELD score (24 [8-40] vs 25 [6-40]; P = .27) or median (range) match run sequence (15 [1-3951] vs 10 [1-1138]; P = .31), nor in mean (SD) distance traveled (155.83 [157.00] vs 140.54 [144.33] nautical miles; P = .32) or percentage of donors requiring flights (58.5% [69 of 118] vs 56.8% [54 of 95]; P = .82). However, costs increased significantly in the post-AC period: total cost increased 16% per accepted donor (mean [SD] of $52 966 [13 278] vs $45 725 [9300]; P < .001) and 55% per declined donor (mean [SD] of $15 865 [3942] vs $10 217 [4853]; P < .001). Contributing factors included more than 2-fold increases in the proportions of donors incurring import fees (31.4% [37 of 118] vs 12.6% [12 of 95]; P = .002) and surgeon fees (19.5% [23 of 118] vs 9.5% [9 of 95]; P = .05), increased acquisition fees (10% increase; mean [SD] of $43 860 [3266] vs $39 980 [2236]; P < .001), and increased flight expenses (43% increase; mean [SD] of $12 904 [6066] vs $9049 [5140]; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: The unintended consequences of implementing broader sharing without addressing organ acquisition fees to account for increased importation between organ procurement organizations must be remedied to contain costs and ensure viability of transplant programs.

How to Optimize Your Research During a Pandemic - A Summary of Discussions From the Association for Academic Surgery Town Hall and Lessons Learned From 2020.

The year 2020 was an unprecedented year for all of us, including for the academic surgery research community. Both stay-at-home and social distancing restrictions posed challenges to our personal and professional lives. The Association for Academic Surgery held its inaugural webinar-based panel discussion titled Association for Academic Surgery Town Hall with its topic on how to optimize research during a pandemic. This article summarizes the highlights from that discussion and lessons learned from the academic surgery research community in 2020.

Selective screening imaging of the aortoiliac arterial system in kidney transplant candidates with non-contrast pelvic computed tomography.

Non-contrast pelvic computed tomography (CT) can detect severe iliac artery calcifications that present technical contraindications to kidney transplantation (TCT). We screened 454 asymptomatic patients with a history of any of the following: hemodialysis >10 years, diabetes mellitus >20 years, coronary artery disease (CAD) with percutaneous or surgical interventions, carotid disease, diabetes with below-/above-knee amputations, and heart-kidney transplantation candidacy. Patients with normal dorsalis pedis and/or tibialis posterior pulses were not screened. A total of 8.4% had severe calcifications with TCT; CT determined laterality for implantation in 13.9%. No patients with the following characteristics were classified as TCT: age <40 years, hemodialysis >10 years, carotid arterial disease, prior lower extremity amputation, or heart-kidney transplantation candidacy. CAD was associated with TCT in univariate though not multivariate analysis. Limiting screening to patients >40 years, with DM >20 years, or with CAD, 9.8% had a TCT and CT determined transplant laterality in 14.2%. Screening for severe iliac artery calcifications is useful for selected kidney transplantation candidates over age 40. It can assist with laterality choice or surgeon determination of TCT. Cost and radiation exposure risks should be weighed against the morbidity risks from unnecessary surgery.

Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: A mixed-methods study of the Dallas uterus transplant study (DUETS) participants.

BACKGROUND: Uterus transplantation (Utx) has achieved clinical success but little is known about motivations and experiences of UTx recipients. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 UTx recipients in addition to collecting quantitative demographic and clinical data. Closed-ended interview questions were treated as categorical variables. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative data. Bivariate analysis tested associations between categorical variables. RESULTS: Themes that emerged included: the decision to pursue UTx is a process, primary motivations for UTx are specific to the experience of gestation, and alternative options did not offer the same value as UTx. There was no association between disease etiology, clinical status, or perception of UTx risk with information needs or donor preference. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that UTx is a unique treatment option that some women with AUFI find preferable to adoption and surrogacy and, as such, should be discussed as a parenthood option with women diagnosed with AUFI.