Local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents: a systematic review of preclinical evidence of interactions and cancer biology.

Background: Local anaesthetics are widely used for their analgesic and anaesthetic properties in the perioperative setting, including surgical procedures to excise malignant tumours. Simultaneously, chemotherapeutic agents remain a cornerstone of cancer treatment, targeting rapidly dividing cancer cells to inhibit tumour growth. The potential interactions between these two drug classes have drawn increasing attention and there are oncological surgical contexts where their combined use could be considered. This review examines existing evidence regarding the interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents, including biological mechanisms and clinical implications. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Selection criteria were designed to capture in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies assessing interactions between local anaesthetics and a wide variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The data were synthesised using a narrative approach because of the anticipated heterogeneity of included studies. Results: Initial searches yielded 1225 relevant articles for screening, of which 43 met the inclusion criteria. The interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents were diverse and multifaceted. In vitro studies frequently demonstrated altered cytotoxicity profiles when these agents were combined, with variations depending on the specific drug combination and cancer cell type. Mechanistically, some interactions were attributed to modifications in efflux pump activity, tumour suppressor gene expression, or alterations in cellular signalling pathways associated with tumour promotion. A large majority of in vitro studies report potentially beneficial effects of local anaesthetics in terms of enhancing the antineoplastic activity of chemotherapeutic agents. In animal models, the combined administration of local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents showed largely beneficial effects on tumour growth, metastasis, and overall survival. Notably, no clinical study examining the possible interactions of local anaesthetics and chemotherapy on cancer outcomes has been reported. Conclusions: Reported preclinical interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents are complex and encompass a spectrum of effects which are largely, although not uniformly, additive or synergistic. The clinical implications of these interactions remain unclear because of the lack of prospective trials. Nonetheless, the modulation of chemotherapy effects by local anaesthetics warrants further clinical investigation in the context of cancer surgery where they could be used together. Clinical trial registration: Open Science Framework (OSF, project link: https://osf.io/r2u4z).

Virtual multi-institutional tumor board: a strategy for personalized diagnoses and management of rare CNS tumors.

PURPOSE: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) integrate clinical, molecular, and radiological information and facilitate coordination of neuro-oncology care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our MTB transitioned to a virtual and multi-institutional format. We hypothesized that this expansion would allow expert review of challenging neuro-oncology cases and contribute to the care of patients with limited access to specialized centers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from virtual MTBs held between 04/2020-03/2021. Data collected included measures of potential clinical impact, including referrals to observational or therapeutic studies, referrals for specialized neuropathology analysis, and whether molecular findings led to a change in diagnosis and/or guided management suggestions. RESULTS: During 25 meetings, 32 presenters discussed 44 cases. Approximately half (n = 20; 48%) involved a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In 21% (n = 9) the diagnosis was changed or refined based on molecular profiling obtained at the NIH and in 36% (n = 15) molecular findings guided management. Clinical trial suggestions were offered to 31% (n = 13), enrollment in the observational NCI Natural History Study to 21% (n = 9), neuropathology review and molecular testing at the NIH to 17% (n = 7), and all received management suggestions. CONCLUSION: Virtual multi-institutional MTBs enable remote expert review of CNS tumors. We propose them as a strategy to facilitate expert opinions from specialized centers, especially for rare CNS tumors, helping mitigate geographic barriers to patient care and serving as a pre-screening tool for studies. Advanced molecular testing is key to obtaining a precise diagnosis, discovering potentially actionable targets, and guiding management.

Preoperative initiation of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for a complex case of cardiac tamponade.

In this case report, we present an alternative approach to the anaesthetic management of patients presenting with delayed postoperative cardiac tamponade physiology. Given that pericardiocentesis was deemed unsafe, and a protracted surgical dissection was anticipated, peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support was established prior to induction of anaesthesia to prevent catastrophic circulatory failure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of planned preoperative commencement of peripheral VA-ECMO in a complex case of cardiac tamponade. We discuss the challenges associated with this case and the process for selecting this strategy. We also describe the role of transoesophageal echocardiography in planning the surgical approach. This report is completed by a discussion on the topic of delayed postoperative pericardial effusion and tamponade.

Anaesthesia and cancer recurrence: the influence of perioperative anaesthetic technique on cancer recurrence after surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, and incidence is increasing. Excisional surgery is essential in approximately 70% of solid organ tumours. Emerging research in onco-anaesthesiology suggests that perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic techniques might influence long-term oncologic outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective, randomized control trials (RCTs) demonstrate that perioperative regional and neuraxial anaesthetic techniques do not affect cancer recurrence. Ongoing trials are investigating the potential outcome benefits of systemic lidocaine. Retrospective studies indicate improved postoperative oncologic outcomes for certain types of breast cancer with higher intraoperative opioid dosage, nuancing available evidence on the effect of opioids. RCT evidence suggests that propofol has no beneficial effect compared with volatiles on breast cancer recurrence, although it remains unclear whether this applies to other cancer types. SUMMARY: Although regional anaesthesia definitively does not affect cancer recurrence, ongoing prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints are awaited to establish if other anaesthetic or analgesic techniques influence cancer recurrence. Until such trials conclusively identify a causal relationship, insufficient evidence exists to recommend specific anaesthetic or analgesic techniques for tumour resection surgery based on altering the patient's risk of recurrence.

Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine and Metastatic Cancer Recurrence - A Narrative Review.

Cancer is a major global health problem and the second leading cause of death worldwide. When detected early, surgery provides a potentially curative intervention for many solid organ tumours. Unfortunately, cancer frequently recurs postoperatively. Evidence from laboratory and retrospective clinical studies suggests that the choice of anaesthetic and analgesic agents used perioperatively may influence the activity of residual cancer cells and thus affect subsequent recurrence risk. The amide local anaesthetic lidocaine has a well-established role in perioperative therapeutics, whether used systemically as an analgesic agent or in the provision of regional anaesthesia. Under laboratory conditions, lidocaine has been shown to inhibit cancer cell behaviour and exerts beneficial effects on components of the inflammatory and immune responses which are known to affect cancer biology. These findings raise the possibility that lidocaine administered perioperatively as a safe and inexpensive intravenous infusion may provide significant benefits in terms of long term cancer outcomes. However, despite the volume of promising laboratory data, robust prospective clinical evidence supporting beneficial anti-cancer effects of perioperative lidocaine treatment is lacking, although trials are planned to address this. This review provides a state of the art summary of the current knowledge base and recent advances regarding perioperative lidocaine therapy, its biological effects and influence on postoperative cancer outcomes.

The Effect of Lidocaine and Bosutinib on 4T1 Murine Breast Cancer Cell Behaviour In Vitro.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Systemic lidocaine has recently emerged as a promising agent possessing numerous potentially anti-neoplastic effects. In vitro studies suggest that lidocaine may prevent metastasis by acting on the tyrosine kinase enzyme Src. Intravenous lidocaine has been reported to reduce pulmonary metastasis in vivo in a murine breast cancer model, however the beneficial effect is abolished by the Src inhibitor bosutinib. In this study we examined whether lidocaine and/or bosutinib affects 4T1 breast cancer cell activity in vitro and whether any drug interactions similar to that seen in murine models occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4T1 murine breast cancer cells were exposed to lidocaine and/or bosutinib. Cell viability after 1 h of exposure was measured using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cell migration after 24 h of exposure was measured using the Oris™ migration assay. RESULTS: Lidocaine and bosutinib alone or combined inhibited 4T1 cell viability and migration, but only at supratherapeutic concentrations. Bosutinib did not modulate lidocaine's effect on viability or migration at any concentration tested. CONCLUSION: Although lidocaine may inhibit 4T1 metastasis in vivo, a direct effect on 4T1 cells is not detectable in vitro at non-toxic concentrations and unlike murine model testing, no unusual interaction with bosutinib was detected. Lidocaine's anti-metastatic properties are likely to be complex and multifactorial and difficult to replicate outside of a biological host.

Effects of Lidocaine and Src Inhibition on Metastasis in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer Surgery.

Breast cancer recurs in 20% of patients following intended curative resection. In vitro data indicates that amide local anaesthetics, including lidocaine, inhibit cancer cell metastasis by inhibiting the tyrosine kinase enzyme Src. In a murine breast cancer surgery model, systemic lidocaine reduces postoperative pulmonary metastases. We investigated whether the additional administration of bosutinib (a known Src inhibitor) influences lidocaine's observed beneficial effect in this in vivo model. Female BALB/c mice (n = 95) were inoculated with 25,000 4T1 cells into the mammary fad pad and after 7 days the resulting tumours were excised under sevoflurane anaesthesia. Experimental animals were randomized to one of four treatments administered intravenously prior to excision: lidocaine, bosutinib, both lidocaine and bosutinib in combination, or saline. Animals were euthanized 14 days post-surgery and lung and liver metastatic colonies were evaluated. Post-mortem serum was analysed for MMP-2 and MMP-9, pro-metastatic enzymes whose expression is influenced by the Src pathway. Lidocaine reduced lung, but not liver metastatic colonies versus sevoflurane alone (p = 0.041), but bosutinib alone had no metastasis-inhibiting effect. When combined with lidocaine, bosutinib reversed the anti-metastatic effect observed with lidocaine on sevoflurane anaesthesia. Only lidocaine alone reduced MMP-2 versus sevoflurane (p = 0.044). Both bosutinib (p = 0.001) and bosutinib/lidocaine combined (p = 0.001) reduced MMP-9 versus sevoflurane, whereas lidocaine alone did not. In a murine surgical breast cancer model, the anti-metastatic effects of lidocaine under sevoflurane anaesthesia are abolished by the Src inhibitor bosutinib, and lidocaine reduces serum MMP-2. These results suggest that lidocaine may act, at least partly, via an inhibitory effect on MMP-2 expression to reduce pulmonary metastasis, but whether this is due to an effect on Src or via another pathway remains unclear.