Mortality and Morbidity of Surgical Management of Geriatric Ankle Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of geriatric ankle fractures is rising. With the substantial variation in the physiologic and functional status within this age group, our null hypothesis was that mortality and complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between patients who are aged 65 to 79 are equivalent to ORIF in patients who are aged 80 to 89. METHODS: Patients with ankle fracture were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Patients treated with ORIF were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided into two age cohorts: 65 to 79 years of age and 80 to 89 years of age. The primary outcome studied was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, revision surgery, surgical site infection, sepsis, wound dehiscence, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, blood transfusion, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency or failure, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2,353 ankle fractures: 1,877 were among 65 to 79 years of age and 476 were among 80 or older. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2-fold higher in the 80 to 89 years of age group compared with the 65 to 79 years of age group (1.47% versus 0.48%, P = 0.019). However, after controlling for the ASA class, 80 to 89 years of age patients no longer had a significantly higher mortality (P = 0.0647). Similarly, revision surgery rate (3.36% versus 1.81%, P = 0.036), transfusion requirement (2.94% versus 1.49%, P = 0.033), urinary tract infection (1.89% versus 0.75%, P = 0.023), and hospital length of stay (4.9 versus 2.9 days, P < 0.0001) were all significantly higher in the 80 to 90 years of age group compared with the 65 to 79 years old group. However, after controlling for the ASA class, 80 to 89 years old patients no longer had a rate of complications in comparison to the 65 to 79 years old age group. DISCUSSION: After controlling for comorbidities (ie, the ASA class), no increased risk is observed for the 30-day mortality or complication rate between geriatric ankle fracture in the 65 to 79 years old and the 80 to 99 years old age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III, retrospective study.

Evaluation of Spanish Language Proficiency and Resources Available in Academic Pediatric Orthopaedic Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Given the rapidly increasing population of Spanish-speaking patients in the United States, medical providers must have the capability to effectively communicate both with pediatric patients and their caregivers. The purpose of this study was to query the Spanish language proficiency of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, assess the educational resources available to Spanish-speaking patients and their families, and identify the barriers to care at academic pediatric orthopaedic centers. METHODS: The Web sites of medical centers within the United States that have pediatric orthopaedic surgery fellowships recognized by the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) were accessed. Web sites were investigated for a health library as well as the availability of interpreter services. Profiles of attending surgeons within each Pediatric Orthopaedic Department were evaluated for evidence of Spanish proficiency as well as educational qualifications. Centers were contacted by phone to determine if the resources and physicians who could converse in Spanish were different than what was readily available online and if automated instructions in Spanish or a person who could converse in Spanish were available. RESULTS: Forty-six centers with 44 fellowship programs were identified. The profiles of 12 of 334 (3.6%) surgeons who completed pediatric orthopaedic fellowships indicated Spanish proficiency. Seventeen physicians (5.1%) were identified as proficient in Spanish after phone calls. Thirty-eight pediatric orthopaedic centers (82.6%) noted interpreter service availability online, although services varied from around-the-clock availability of live interpreters to interpreter phones. When contacted by phone, 45 of 46 centers (97.8%) confirmed the availability of any interpreter service for both inpatient and outpatient settings. Sixteen centers (34.8%) had online information on orthopaedic conditions or surgical care translated into Spanish. Twenty centers (43.5%) did not have automated phone messages in Spanish or live operators that spoke Spanish. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of surgical providers in pediatric orthopaedic centers proficient in Spanish, demonstrating a large discrepancy with the growing Hispanic population. Interpreter services are widely available, although there is variability in the services provided. Considerable barriers exist to Spanish-speaking patients who attempt to access care by phone or online.

Fluoroscopy as Definitive Postreduction Imaging of Pediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures Is Safe and Saves Time.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate that formal postreduction radiographs may be unnecessary for closed, isolated pediatric wrist, and forearm when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used for reduction. Our institution changed the Emergency Department (ED) management protocol to reflect this by allowing orthopaedic providers to determine if fluoroscopy was acceptable to assess fracture reduction. We hypothesized that using fluoroscopy as definitive postreduction imaging would decrease total encounter time, without an increase in the rate of rereduction or surgery. METHODS: Patients with closed, isolated distal radius/distal ulna (DR/DU) or both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures that required sedation and reduction under mini C-arm fluoroscopy at our Level 1 pediatric ED were reviewed for 6 months both before and after this policy change. Before, all patients had formal postreduction radiographs; after, the decision was left to the orthopaedic physician. Timestamp data were collected, as was the need for rereduction or surgery. In addition to descriptive statistics, between-group differences were analyzed with the Student t test, χ test, and multivariable regression as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients (119 before, 124 after) had 165 DR/DU and 78 BBFA fractures. Demographic data were similar before and after. After protocol implementation, univariable analysis (Student t test) showed that sedation times were longer, while total ED time and the time from sedation beginning to discharge were similar. The proportion of patients requiring rereduction or surgery were similar.After multivariable regression, "fluoroscopy as definitive imaging" was the only independent determinant of the time intervals compared with using conventional radiography. Sedation was an average of 13.8 minutes longer (P<0.001), while the interval from sedation beginning to discharge was 15.8 minutes shorter (P=0.007), and total ED time was 33.0 minutes shorter (P=0.018). Fluoroscopy as definitive imaging was not a predictor of surgery (odds ratio=0.63, P=0.520), although having a BBFA increased the likelihood (odds ratio=4.50, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a protocol in which the provider could use mini C-arm fluoroscopy for definitive postreduction imaging did not result in increased rates remanipulation or need for surgery. Regression analysis further demonstrated time savings associated with foregoing conventional radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Radiation safety education as a component of orthopedic training.

Fluoroscopy poses an occupational hazard to orthopedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to examine resident and faculty understanding of radiation safety and to determine whether or not a radiation safety intervention would improve radiation safety knowledge. An anonymous survey was developed to assess attitudes and knowledge regarding radiation safety and exposure. It was distributed to faculty and residents at an academic orthopedic program before and after a radiation safety lecture. Pre- and post-lecture survey results were compared. 19 residents and 22 faculty members completed the pre-lecture survey while 11 residents and 17 faculty members completed the post-lecture survey. Pre-lecture survey scores were 48.3% for residents and 49.5% for faculty; post-lecture survey scores were 52.7% and 46.1% respectively. Differences between pre and post-survey scores were not significant. This study revealed low baseline radiation safety knowledge scores for both orthopedic residents and faculty. As evidence by our results, a single radiation safety information lecture did not significantly impact radiation knowledge. Radiation safety training should have a formal role in orthopedic surgery academic curricula.