Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma, finally a new standard?

Localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has the potential to be cured with surgery alone; however, some patients have a high risk of relapse and may benefit from additional treatment. Several efforts have been made to identify effective strategies, with mostly negative results. However, recent results with immune checkpoint inhibitors may change the current standard, and several ongoing trials are exploring new alternatives. In this perspective, we aim to provide an overview of previous adjuvant therapy efforts, current data supporting the use of checkpoint blockade, and a future outlook for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma.

MRI and Targeted Biopsy Essential Tools for an Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment Decision Making in Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer death worldwide. Historically, diagnosis was based on physical examination, transrectal (TRUS) images, and TRUS biopsy resulting in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Recently magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been identified as an evolving tool in terms of diagnosis, staging, treatment decision, and follow-up. In this review we provide the key studies and concepts of MRI as a promising tool in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer in the general population and in challenging scenarios, such as anteriorly located lesions, enlarged prostates determining extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion, and prior negative biopsy and the future role of MRI in association with artificial intelligence (AI).

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for muscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma: will it change current standards?

Immunotherapy, in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has shown activity in metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma, resulting in the approval of several ICI agents in the first- and second-line settings. This has led to an increased interest in studying their efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting for muscle invasive disease - an area of significant unmet need. This non-systematic review will look at the evidence supporting the use of ICI in the neoadjuvant setting for this tumor, results of early-phase studies, ongoing trials, and possible future applications for these drugs.

Developing a National Center of Excellence for Prostate Imaging.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize the most current literature regarding the most important aspects to consider when developing a center of excellence for prostate imaging and biopsy. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) has changed the way we diagnose and treat prostate cancer. This imaging modality allows for more precise identification of areas suspicious in terms of harboring prostate cancer, enabling performance of targeted mp-MRI-guided biopsies that have been demonstrated to yield superior cancer detection rates. Centers worldwide are increasingly adopting this technology. However, obtaining results comparable with those findings published in the literature can be challenging. The imaging and biopsy process entails the need for a multidisciplinary team including a dedicated radiologist, urologist, and pathologist. Adequate mp-MRI interpretation for accurate lesion identification, acquaintance with the biopsy technique selected, and precise characterization of Gleason Score/Grade Groupings are equal determinants of accurate biopsy results. Furthermore, all specialists are required to attain appropriate learning curves to ensure optimal results. In this review, we characterize crucial aspects to consider when developing a center of excellence for prostate imaging and biopsy as well as insights regarding how to implement them.

When to Order an MRI in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer remains the only solid tumor diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound-guided sampling of the gland, and not an image-based, lesion-directed approach. This technique has limitations in that it underdiagnoses clinically significant disease and overdiagnoses indolent tumors resulting in overtreatment of patients. Technical advances in MRI in the last decade have made this method the preferred imaging modality for prostate anatomy and for risk assessment of prostate cancer. As of 2018, the indications for MRI in the diagnosis and risk assessment of prostate cancer have expanded from preoperative evaluation to the pre-biopsy setting, as well as for surveillance protocols. This article summarizes the current role of multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of prostate cancer.

Experiencia inicial en seguridad, tolerancia y adherencia al uso de docetaxel en pacientes con cáncer de próstata castración sensibles en un centro oncológico nacional / Initial experience in safety, tolerance and adherence to the use of docetaxel in patients with sensitive castration prostate cancer in a national cancer center

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cáncer de próstata (PC) es una enfermedad de alta incidencia y prevalencia (90/100.00 habitantes) y constituye la segunda causa por muerte oncológica en hombres, fenómeno que acontece en su fase metastásica (mPC). El tratamiento estándar en esta etapa corresponde a la terapia de deprivación androgénica (TDA) que produce una respuesta oncológica favorable en términos de descenso del PSA y estabilización y/o regresión de las metástasis. Ésta primera etapa (castración sensible) dura en promedio 2 a 3 años, tras lo cual ocurre una independización tumoral del estímulo androgénico, fenómeno conocido como castración-resistencia (mCRPC). En esta etapa la quimioterapia (QMT) con docetaxel prolonga la sobrevida aproximadamente 4 meses, lo cual en conjunto con otros tratamientos de segunda línea (abiraterona, enzalutamida, etc.) logra alcanzar una sobrevida media desde el diagnostico de mCRPC de 24 meses. Diversos estudios (CHAARTED y STAMPEDE) han demostrado que el inicio de docetaxel junto con TDA en pacientes con mPC castración-sensible (mCSPC) prolongan sobrevida global hasta 17 meses, especialmente si hay alto volumen de enfermedad. El objetivo del estudio es describir las características clínicas, la respuesta oncológica inicial y el perfil de efectos adversos de pacientes con mCSPC sometidos a docetaxel. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo entre mayo 2014 a Julio 2017. Se incluyeron pacientes ng/ml (rango 10,8 - 5550) y mediana de seguimiento 6 meses (rango 3 ­ 20). Catorce pacientes tenían Gleason > 8, 18 eran M+ de los cuales 9 eran viscerales. Solo uno recibió tratamiento local previo. La mediana de inicio de QMT fue 3,1 (0 ­ 6,1) meses post inicio TDA.Dieciséis pacientes completaron docetaxel y 4 siguen en curso. No hubo suspensión de QMT por efectos adversos. Los más frecuentes fueron diarrea (8/20), neuropatía (5/20) y vómitos (2/20). La mayoría fue grado 1 y solo tres presentaron complicaciones grado 3 (diarrea, leucopenia y trombocitopenia). No hubo complicaciones grado 4 -5. Diez pacientes alcanzaron un antígeno < 2 ng/ml a las 12 semanas post tratamiento y 7 presentaron recidiva bioquímica durante el seguimiento. Uno tuvo respuesta imagenológica completa, 10 respuesta parcial, 7 estabilidad y 2 mostraron progresión. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de Docetaxel en mCSPC es seguro, presenta escasos efectos adversos (la mayoría de intensidad leve) que no motivan suspensión. El tratamiento con docetaxel exhibe una respuesta prometedora en términos de control de PSA, sin embargo se requiere mayor seguimiento de esta cohorte para evaluar impacto en sobrevida. con mCSPC con enfermedad de alto volumen (metástasis óseas extra-axiales, viscerales o Gleason 9-10) y ECOG 0-1. Los pacientes recibieron TDA y seis ciclos de Docetaxel. Se registraron datos demográficos, clínicos, histopatológicos, PSA, imagenológicos (RECIST V1.1) y toxicidad (NCI CAE 4.0) RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 20 pacientes, mediana de edad 63 años (rango 49 ­ 75). Mediana PSA de ingreso 267,5 ng/ml (rango 10,8 - 5550) y mediana de seguimiento 6 meses (rango 3 ­ 20). Catorce pacientes tenían Gleason > 8, 18 eran M+ de los cuales 9 eran viscerales. Solo uno recibió tratamiento local previo. La mediana de inicio de QMT fue 3,1 (0 ­ 6,1) meses post inicio TDA.Dieciséis pacientes completaron docetaxel y 4 siguen en curso. No hubo suspensión de QMT por efectos adversos. Los más frecuentes fueron diarrea (8/20), neuropatía (5/20) y vómitos (2/20). La mayoría fue grado 1 y solo tres presentaron complicaciones grado 3 (diarrea, leucopenia y trombocitopenia). No hubo complicaciones grado 4 -5. Diez pacientes alcanzaron un antígeno < 2 ng/ml a las 12 semanas post tratamiento y 7 presentaron recidiva bioquímica durante el seguimiento. Uno tuvo respuesta imagenológica completa, 10 respuesta parcial, 7 estabilidad y 2 mostraron progresión. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de Docetaxel en mCSPC es seguro, presenta escasos efectos adversos (la mayoría de intensidad leve) que no motivan suspensión. El tratamiento con docetaxel exhibe una respuesta prometedora en términos de control de PSA, sin embargo se requiere mayor seguimiento de esta cohorte para evaluar impacto en sobrevida.(AU)

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is a disease with high incidence and prevalence (90/100.000 habitants) and the second cause of cancer related death in men. Standard treatment in this setting is androgen-deprivation therapy (TDA), which causes decrease in PSA levels and stabilization or regression of metastatic lesions. Responses in castration sensitive phase last in average 3 years, after which tumor is described to become independent from the androgenic stimuli, reaching a castration-resistance (mCRPC) state. At this point chemotherapy with docetaxel as well as second line treatments (abiraterone, enzalutamide, among others)have shown to improve survival in 4 months with mean survival from diagnosis of mCRPC of 24 months. Studies including CHAARTED and STAMPEDE have demonstrated that early treatment with docetaxel with ADT in patients with mCSPC prolongs overall survival, especially if high volume disease exists. This study describes the clinical characteristics, initial oncologic response and side effects profile of mCSPC treated with Docetaxel plus ADT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive Retrospective study from May 2014 to July 2017. mCSPC patients with high volume disease (extra axial bone metastasis, visceral metastasis or Gleason 9-10) and ECOG 0-1 were included. Patients received ADT and 6 cycles of Docetaxel. Demographic, clinical and histopathological characteristicswere registered, together with PSA, radiologic data (RECIST V1.1) and toxicity (NCI CAE 4.0). RESULTS: 20 patients were included, median age 63 years (49-75 range). Median initial PSA 267,5 ng/ml (10,8-5550 range), and median follow up 6 months (3-20 range). Fourteen patients had Gleason > 8, 18presented bone metastasis and 9/14 viscerametastasis. Only 1 patient received previous local treatment. Median initialtime to initiation of Docetaxel post ADT was 3,1 (0-6,1) months.Sixteen patients completed docetaxel and 4 are still receiving treatment. There was no chemotherapy suspension due side effects. Most frequent side effects were diarrhea (8/20), neuropathy (5/20) and vomiting (2/20). Most were grade 1 and three patients presented grade 3 side effects (diarrhea, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia). No grade 4-5 side effects were reported.Ten patients reached PSA< 2 ng/m after 12 weeks of treatment, and 7 had biochemical relapse during follow up. One had complete radiologic response, 10 partial response, 7 remained stable and 2 showed progression of disease. CONCLUSION: The use of docetaxel in mCSPC isassociated to few side effects and none requiredsuspension of treatment. Treatment with Docetaxel exhibits promising results in terms of decrease in PSA, however longer follow up and greater number of patients are required to report benefits in overall survival.(AU)

Renal functional outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy: the National Cancer Institute experience with robotic partial nephrectomy for 3 or more tumors in a single kidney.

OBJECTIVE: To identify renal function outcomes after robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy (RMxPNx), we reviewed our institutional database at the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. To our knowledge, we present the largest series of RMxPNx renal function outcomes to date. Robotic partial nephrectomy has been employed for oncologic control and to prevent dialysis dependence in hereditary multifocal renal cell carcinoma conditions. We have termed robotic surgery on a single kidney with three or more lesions a RMxPNx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated patients from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution (NIH/NCI) that underwent RMxPNx from 2007 to 2013. Demographic and operative data were compiled with statistical analysis with T test performed to determine renal function outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent RMxPNx. Mean number of tumors removed was 8.63 (range 3-52). Mean preoperative creatinine and eGFR were 1.02 ± 0.26 mg/dL and 85.4 ± 21.5 mL/min, respectively. Postoperatively, creatinine increased from baseline by 0.45 mg/dL (p < 0.001). Similarly, a mean decrease in eGFR by 24.6 mL/min was observed (p < 0.001). At 3-month follow-up, the creatinine increase from baseline was 0.05 mg/dL (p = 0.10) and mean decrease in eGFR was 3.01 mL/min (p = 0.21). When stratifying based on preoperative CKD stages I-III, similar results were observed. CONCLUSION: Robotic multiplex partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible approach to patients with multifocal renal masses. These complex surgeries have a demonstrated learning curve, but this minimally invasive approach for nephron-sparing surgery allows patients to preserve renal function where they would otherwise require open surgery or a radical nephrectomy.

Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS/METHODS: From March 2007 to January 2015, 421 consecutive patients with prostate cancer (PCa) underwent preoperative MP-MRI and RP. BCR-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical and imaging variables predictive of BCR. Logistic regression was performed to generate a nomogram to predict three-year BCR probability. RESULTS: Of the total cohort, 370 patients met inclusion criteria with 39 (10.5%) patients experiencing BCR. On multivariate analysis, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (p = 0.01), biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.0008), MP-MRI suspicion score (p = 0.03), and extracapsular extension on MP-MRI (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with time to BCR. A nomogram integrating these factors to predict BCR at three years after RP demonstrated a c-index of 0.84, outperforming the predictive value of Gleason score and PSA alone (c-index 0.74, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The addition of MP-MRI to standard clinical factors significantly improves prediction of BCR in a post-prostatectomy PCa cohort. This could serve as a valuable tool to support clinical decision-making in patients with moderate and high-risk cancers.

Postoperative elevation in creatine kinase and its impact on renal function in patients undergoing complex partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors associated with development of postoperative elevation of creatine kinase (CK) and study its effect on renal function in patients who underwent complex multifocal partial nephrectomy (PN). METHODS: Patients who underwent PN at National Cancer Institute between January 2007 and December 2012 were included in the study. Elevated serum CK was defined as >2000 U/L. Kidney function was assessed using serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Changes were reported as percent change from preoperative values and compared using the Wilcoxon test. Regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of elevation in CK and decline in eGFR. RESULTS: From 407 total cases, 207 had adequate CK data for analysis. Median number of tumors removed was 3 (1-70). Median peak CK was 1458 (82-36,788). Forty-two percent developed CK elevation >2000 U/L. Factors associated with postoperative elevation of CK > 2000 were young age (p = 0.009), high BMI (p = 0.003) and operating room time (p < 0.001). Although CK > 2000 was associated with significantly greater decline in eGFR (37.4 vs. 20.3 %, p < 0.001) in immediate postoperative period, this change largely resolved to a much less clinically relevant (9.2 vs 3.3 %, p = 0.040) change after 3 months. On multivariate analysis, postoperative elevation in CK was not found to be an independent factor determining renal function at 3 months. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, a significant proportion of patients developed CK elevations >2000 U/L. While patients with elevated CK had more decline in eGFR in immediate postoperative period, postoperative elevations of CK did not appear to impact overall long-term renal function in patients undergoing PN.

Lack of Impact of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Intraoperative Levels of Prostate Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells.

PURPOSE: While the significance of circulating tumor cells in clinically localized cancer remains controversial, it has been reported that surgical tumor manipulation can increase circulating tumor cells, including during open prostatectomy. To our knowledge it is unknown whether this cell shedding also occurs during minimally invasive prostatectomy, which minimizes tumor palpation and uses earlier vascular control. We tested the impact of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on intraoperative circulating tumor cell levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circulating tumor cell counts were compared in peripheral blood specimens from 25 patients treated with robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy preoperatively vs intraoperatively after prostate excision, in addition to 11 healthy blood donors. Circulating tumor cell detection was performed using EpCAM immunomagnetic enrichment and multiparametric flow cytometry quantification of viable EpCAM positive/prostate specific membrane antigen positive/CD45 negative cells. Intraoperative cell counts and increases were tested in univariable analyses for associations with perioperative variables, histopathology and postoperative progression. RESULTS: Circulating tumor cells were detected in 0% of healthy controls compared to 48% and 52% of prostatectomy cases preoperatively and intraoperatively, respectively (range 1 to 8 cells). There was no difference in the incidence or mean number of circulating tumor cells preoperatively vs intraoperatively. Of the patients 60% had no intraoperative change from preoperative levels. Intraoperative cell increases vs decreases were equally infrequent (each 20%) with no intraoperative increase greater than 1 circulating tumor cell. Intraoperative circulating tumor cell detection was not significantly associated with prostatectomy operative characteristics, histopathology or early postoperative progression at a median 21-month followup. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not cause significant intraoperative increases in circulating tumor cells in contrast to historical reports of open prostatectomy. These findings may aid urologists in counseling candidates for robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding the possibility of intraoperative tumor cell shedding.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the highest percentage core involvement (HPCI) and corresponding tumor length (CTL) on systematic 12-core biopsy (SBx) and targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography (MRI/TRUS) fusion biopsy (TBx), with total MRI prostate cancer (PCa) tumor volume (TV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients meeting criteria for active surveillance (AS) based on outside SBx, who underwent 3.0T multiparametric prostate MRI (MP-MRI), followed by SBx and TBx during the same session at our institution were examined. PCa TVs were calculated using MP-MRI and then correlated using bivariate analysis with the HPCI and CTL for SBx and TBx. RESULTS: For TBx, HPCI and CTL showed a positive correlation (R(2)=0.31, P<0.0001 and R(2)=0.37, P<0.0001, respectively) with total MRI PCa TV, whereas for SBx, these parameters showed a poor correlation (R(2)=0.00006, P=0.96 and R(2)=0.0004, P=0.89, respectively). For detection of patients with clinically significant MRI derived tumor burden greater than 500 mm(3), SBx was 25% sensitive, 90.9% specific (falsely elevated because of missed tumors and extremely low sensitivity), and 54% accurate in comparison with TBx, which was 53.6% sensitive, 86.4% specific, and 68% accurate. CONCLUSIONS: HPCI and CTL on TBx positively correlates with total MRI PCa TV, whereas there was no correlation seen with SBx. TBx is superior to SBx for detecting tumor burden greater than 500 mm(3). When using biopsy positive MRI derived TVs, TBx better reflects overall disease burden, improving risk stratification among candidates for active surveillance.

Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the performance of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy (FB) for monitoring patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing mp-MRI and FB of target lesions identified on mp-MRI between August 2007 and August 2014 were reviewed. Patients meeting AS criteria (Clinical stage T1c, Gleason grade ≤ 6, prostate-specific antigen density ≤ 0.15, tumor involving ≤ 2 cores, and ≤ 50% involvement of any single core) based on extended sextant 12-core TRUS biopsy (systematic biopsy [SB]) were included. They were followed with subsequent 12-core biopsy as well as mp-MRI and MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy at follow-up visits until Gleason score progression (Gleason ≥ 7 in either 12-core or MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy). We evaluated whether progression seen on mp-MRI (defined as an increase in suspicion level, largest lesion diameter, or number of lesions) was predictive of Gleason score progression. RESULTS: Of 152 patients meeting AS criteria on initial SB (mean age of 61.4 years and mean prostate-specific antigen level of 5.26 ng/ml), 34 (22.4%) had Gleason score ≥ 7 on confirmatory SB/FB. Of the 118 remaining patients, 58 chose AS and had at least 1 subsequent mp-MRI with SB/FB (median follow-up = 16.1 months). Gleason progression was subsequently documented in 17 (29%) of these men, in all cases to Gleason 3+4. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mp-MRI for Gleason progression was 53% (95% CI: 28%-77%) and 80% (95% CI: 65%-91%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of mp-MRI for increase in Gleason were also 53% and 80%, respectively. The number needed to biopsy to detect 1 Gleason progression was 8.74 for SB vs. 2.9 for FB. CONCLUSIONS: Stable findings on mp-MRI are associated with Gleason score stability. mp-MRI appears promising as a useful aid for reducing the number of biopsies in the management of patients on AS. A prospective evaluation of mp-MRI as a screen to reduce biopsies in the follow-up of men on AS appears warranted.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Prostate Biopsy in Stratifying Men for Risk of Extracapsular Extension at Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging detects extracapsular extension by prostate cancer with excellent specificity but low sensitivity. This limits surgical planning, which could be modified to account for focal extracapsular extension with image directed guidance for wider excision. In this study we evaluate the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in extracapsular extension detection and determine which preoperative variables predict extracapsular extension on final pathology when multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts organ confined disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2007 to March 2014, 169 patients underwent pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy, extended sextant 12-core biopsy and radical prostatectomy at our institution. A subset of 116 men had multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging negative for extracapsular extension and were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: The 116 men with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging negative for extracapsular extension had a median age of 61 years (IQR 57-66) and a median prostate specific antigen of 5.51 ng/ml (IQR 3.91-9.07). The prevalence of extracapsular extension was 23.1% in the overall population. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extracapsular extension were 48.7%, 73.9%, 35.9% and 82.8%, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis only patient age (p=0.002) and magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy Gleason score (p=0.032) were independent predictors of extracapsular extension on final radical prostatectomy pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the low sensitivity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extracapsular extension, further tools are necessary to stratify men at risk for occult extracapsular extension that would otherwise only become apparent on final pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy Gleason score can help identify which men with prostate cancer have extracapsular extension that may not be detectable by imaging.

Clinical implications of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based nomogram applied to prostate cancer active surveillance.

PURPOSE: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may be beneficial in the search for rational ways to decrease prostate cancer intervention in patients on active surveillance. We applied a previously generated nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict active surveillance eligibility based on repeat biopsy outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 85 patients who met active surveillance criteria at study entry based on initial biopsy and who then underwent 3.0 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy between 2007 and 2012. We assessed the accuracy of a previously published nomogram in patients on active surveillance before confirmatory biopsy. For each cutoff we determined the number of biopsies avoided (ie reliance on magnetic resonance imaging alone without rebiopsy) over the full range of nomogram cutoffs. RESULTS: We assessed the performance of the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging active surveillance nomogram based on a decision to perform biopsy at various nomogram generated probabilities. Based on cutoff probabilities of 19% to 32% on the nomogram the number of patients who could be spared repeat biopsy was 27% to 68% of the active surveillance cohort. The sensitivity of the test in this interval was 97% to 71% and negative predictive value was 91% to 81%. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based nomograms may reasonably decrease the number of repeat biopsies in patients on active surveillance by as much as 68%. Analysis over the full range of nomogram generated probabilities allows patient and caregiver preference based decision making on the risk assumed for the benefit of fewer repeat biopsies.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies obtained from axial and sagittal approaches.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer detection rates and concordance between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsy cores obtained from axial and sagittal approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional records of MRI-US fusion-guided biopsy were reviewed. Detection rates for all cancers, Gleason ≥3 + 4 cancers, and Gleason ≥4 + 3 cancers were computed. Agreement between axial and sagittal cores for cancer detection, and frequency where one was upgraded the other was computed on a per-target and per-patient basis. RESULTS: In all, 893 encounters from 791 patients that underwent MRI-US fusion-guided biopsy in 2007-2013 were reviewed, yielding 4688 biopsy cores from 2344 targets for analysis. The mean age and PSA level at each encounter was 61.8 years and 9.7 ng/mL (median 6.45 ng/mL). Detection rates for all cancers, ≥3 + 4 cancers, and ≥4 + 3 cancers were 25.9%, 17.2%, and 8.1% for axial cores, and 26.1%, 17.6%, and 8.6% for sagittal cores. Per-target agreement was 88.6%, 93.0%, and 96.5%, respectively. On a per-target basis, the rates at which one core upgraded or detected a cancer missed on the other were 8.3% and 8.6% for axial and sagittal cores, respectively. Even with the inclusion of systematic biopsies, omission of axial or sagittal cores would have resulted in missed detection or under-characterisation of cancer in 4.7% or 5.2% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cancer detection rates, Gleason scores, and core involvement from axial and sagittal cores are similar, but significant cancer may be missed if only one core is obtained for each target. Discordance between axial and sagittal cores is greatest in intermediate-risk scenarios, where obtaining multiple cores may improve tissue characterisation.

The role of image guided biopsy targeting in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation.

PURPOSE: Men diagnosed with atypical small acinar proliferation are counseled to undergo early rebiopsy because the risk of prostate cancer is high. However, random rebiopsies may not resample areas of concern. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy offers an opportunity to accurately target and later retarget specific areas in the prostate. We describe the ability of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy to detect prostate cancer in areas with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy were performed in 1,028 patients from March 2007 to February 2014. Of the men 20 met the stringent study inclusion criteria, which were no prostate cancer history, index biopsy showing at least 1 core of atypical small acinar proliferation with benign glands in all remaining cores and fusion targeted rebiopsy with at least 1 targeted core directly resampling an area of the prostate that previously contained atypical small acinar proliferation. RESULTS: At index biopsy median age of the 20 patients was 60 years (IQR 57-64) and median prostate specific antigen was 5.92 ng/ml (IQR 3.34-7.48). At fusion targeted rebiopsy at a median of 11.6 months 5 of 20 patients (25%, 95% CI 6.02-43.98) were diagnosed with primary Gleason grade 3, low volume prostate cancer. On fusion rebiopsy cores that directly retargeted areas of previous atypical small acinar proliferation detected the highest tumor burden. CONCLUSIONS: When magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy detects isolated atypical small acinar proliferation on index biopsy, early rebiopsy is unlikely to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Cores that retarget areas of previous atypical small acinar proliferation are more effective than random rebiopsy cores.

Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic yield of analysing biparametric (T2- and diffusion-weighted) magnetic resonance imaging (B-MRI) for prostate cancer detection compared with standard digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Review of patients who were enrolled in a trial to undergo multiparametric-prostate (MP)-MRI and MR/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy at our institution identified 143 men who underwent MP-MRI in addition to standard DRE and PSA-based prostate cancer screening before any prostate biopsy. Patient demographics, DRE staging, PSA level, PSA density (PSAD), and B-MRI findings were assessed for association with prostate cancer detection on biopsy. RESULTS: Men with detected prostate cancer tended to be older, with a higher PSA level, higher PSAD, and more screen-positive lesions (SPL) on B-MRI. B-MRI performed well for the detection of prostate cancer with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (compared with 0.66 and 0.74 for PSA level and PSAD, respectively). We derived combined PSA and MRI-based formulas for detection of prostate cancer with optimised thresholds. (i) for PSA and B-MRI: PSA level + 6 x (the number of SPL) > 14 and (ii) for PSAD and B-MRI: 14 × (PSAD) + (the number of SPL) >4.25. AUC for equations 1 and 2 were 0.83 and 0.87 and overall accuracy of prostate cancer detection was 79% in both models. CONCLUSIONS: The number of lesions positive on B-MRI outperforms PSA alone in detection of prostate cancer. Furthermore, this imaging criteria coupled as an adjunct with PSA level and PSAD, provides even more accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.

Image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer.

The adoption of routine prostate specific antigen screening has led to the discovery of many small and low-grade prostate cancers which have a low probability of causing mortality. These cancers, however, are often treated with radical therapies resulting in long-term side effects. There has been increasing interest in minimally invasive focal therapies to treat these tumors. While imaging modalities have improved rapidly over the past decade, similar advances in image-guided therapy are now starting to emerge--potentially achieving equivalent oncologic efficacy while avoiding the side effects of conventional radical surgery. The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature regarding the basis of various focal therapy techniques such as cryotherapy, microwave, laser, and high intensity focused ultrasound, and to discuss the results of recent clinical trials that demonstrate early outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.

Identification of threshold prostate specific antigen levels to optimize the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen sensitivity increases with lower threshold values but with a corresponding decrease in specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound targeted biopsy detects prostate cancer more efficiently and of higher grade than standard 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy but the optimal population for its use is not well defined. We evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound targeted biopsy vs 12-core biopsy across a prostate specific antigen continuum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients enrolled in a prospective trial who underwent 12-core transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound targeted biopsies from August 2007 through February 2014. Patients were stratified by each of 4 prostate specific antigen cutoffs. The greatest Gleason score using either biopsy method was compared in and across groups as well as across the population prostate specific antigen range. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as Gleason 7 (4 + 3) or greater. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,003 targeted and 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsies were performed, of which 564 diagnosed prostate cancer for a 56.2% detection rate. Targeted biopsy led to significantly more upgrading to clinically significant disease compared to 12-core biopsy. This trend increased more with increasing prostate specific antigen, specifically in patients with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 and greater than 10 ng/ml. Prostate specific antigen 5.2 ng/ml or greater captured 90% of upgrading by targeted biopsy, corresponding to 64% of patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent fusion biopsy. Conversely a greater proportion of clinically insignificant disease was detected by 12-core vs targeted biopsy overall. These differences persisted when controlling for potential confounders on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer upgrading with targeted biopsy increases with an increasing prostate specific antigen cutoff. Above a prostate specific antigen threshold of 5.2 ng/ml most upgrading to clinically significant disease was achieved by targeted biopsy. In our population this corresponded to potentially sparing biopsy in 36% of patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Below this value 12-core biopsy detected more clinically insignificant cancer. Thus, the diagnostic usefulness of targeted biopsy is optimized in patients with prostate specific antigen 5.2 ng/ml or greater.