p53-Suppressed Oncogene TET1 Prevents Cellular Aging in Lung Cancer.

The role of transcriptional regulator ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenease 1 (TET1) has not been well characterized in lung cancer. Here we show that TET1 is overexpressed in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas. TET1 knockdown reduced cell growth in vitro and in vivo and induced transcriptome reprogramming independent of its demethylating activity to affect key cancer signaling pathways. Wild-type p53 bound the TET1 promoter to suppress transcription, while p53 transversion mutations were most strongly associated with high TET1 expression. Knockdown of TET1 in p53-mutant cell lines induced senescence through a program involving generalized genomic instability manifested by DNA single- and double-strand breaks and induction of p21 that was synergistic with cisplatin and doxorubicin. These data identify TET1 as an oncogene in lung cancer whose gain of function via loss of p53 may be exploited through targeted therapy-induced senescence. SIGNIFICANCE: These studies identify TET1 as an oncogene in lung cancer whose gain of function following loss of p53 may be exploited by targeted therapy-induced senescence.See related commentary by Kondo, p. 1751.

Extent of allergic inflammation depends on intermittent versus continuous sensitization to house dust mite.

OBJECTIVE: House dust mite (HDM) exposure is used to model experimental asthma in mice. However, a direct comparison of inflammatory responses following continuous versus intermittent HDM exposure has not been reported. Therefore, we investigated whether the HDM dose at sensitization or challenge affects extent of inflammation in mice that were either continuously or intermittently sensitized with HDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C57BL/6 mice received either 10 continuous exposures with 10 µg HDM per exposure or two intermittent HDM exposures over a period of two weeks and were subsequently challenged by three instillations with HDM during the third week. For the intermittent model, mice were sensitized with 1 or 10 µg HDM and challenged on three consecutive days with 1 or 10 µg HDM. Inflammatory cells in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and epithelial cell hyperplasia and mucous cell metaplasia were quantified. RESULTS: Significantly higher levels of inflammation and mucous cell metaplasia were observed when mice were sensitized intermittently compared with continuously. Intermittent sensitization and challenge with 10 µg HDM caused maximum inflammation, mucous cell metaplasia, and epithelial cell hyperplasia. However, sensitization with 1 µg HDM only also showed increased inflammation when challenged with 10 µg HDM. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest major differences in adaptive immunity, depending on the sensitization protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Because of significant differences, the HDM sensitization protocol should be carefully considered when designing studies to investigate the underlying mechanisms of immunity in mouse models of asthma.