Impaired health-related quality of life after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: late effects in a national cohort of 128 survivors.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for anal cancer, yet from follow-up many survivors seem to suffer from late effects. Data of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in anal cancer survivors are limited, and there is a growing interest in cancer survivorship. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A national cohort of all anal cancer survivors treated with curative chemoradiotherapy in 2000-2007 was invited to a cross-sectional study. Of 199 eligible survivors, 128 (64%) returned the questionnaires, the median time since diagnosis was 66 months. The median age was 61 years and 79% were women. HRQOL was evaluated with EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29, and neurotoxicity with the Scale of Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity. An age- and sex-matched reference group of volunteers (n = 269) not treated for pelvic cancer answered the same questionnaires. Results from QLQ-C30 of the reference group were compared to Norwegian and Dutch normative data. RESULTS: The mean scores of anal cancer survivors were poorer compared to volunteers and normative data. Anal cancer survivors reported significant impairment of function, especially social and role function, compared to the volunteers (difference ≥ 20 points, p < 0.001). Survivors had markedly increased scores for fatigue, dyspnoea, insomnia and diarrhoea (difference ≥ 15 points, p < 0.001). The global quality of life was significantly reduced (difference 15 points, p < 0.001). Anal cancer survivors had increased stool frequency, more buttock pain, flatulence, faecal incontinence, impotence (males), dyspareunia and reduced sexual interest (females) (difference ≥ 15 points, p < 0.001). There was increased frequency of tinnitus in survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Survivors after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer have significant long-term impairment of HRQOL. Reduced social, role and sexual function, and increased diarrhoea, incontinence for gas and stools, and buttock pain were commonly reported. Increased awareness of this may lead to better management of late effects and better care for cancer survivors.

Secondary treatment and predictive factors for second-line chemotherapy after first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Two consecutive studies have evaluated the efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line treatment in metastatic non-resectable colorectal cancer. One hundred and twelve patients were followed after end of first-line treatment and any secondary therapy registered. Fifty-three patients (47%) did not receive second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The main reason was too poor performance status (59%). These patients had a median survival of only 1.7 months after progression of first-line therapy. The best predictive factors at start of first-line chemotherapy for receiving later second-line chemotherapy were performance status and alkaline phosphatase level. Fifty-nine patients (53%) received irinotecan-based second-line therapy. Four (7%) patients had a partial response, and 28 (52%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival after second-line chemotherapy was 4.1 months and median survival 9.5 months. Median survival after first-line chemotherapy and secondary liver surgery was 34 months and five-year disease-free survival 8%. Survival among patients receiving both first- and second-line chemotherapy was 20.8 months, but only 8.9 months in patients not receiving second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Poor performance status or elevated alkaline phosphatase level at start of first-line chemotherapy predicts whether second-line chemotherapy will be given or not.

[Protective silicone prosthesis prior to radiotherapy of recurrent colonic cancer]. / Skjermende silikonprotese ved bestråling for residiv av coloncancer.

Radiation therapy for abdominal recurrence of colon cancer is rarely an option due to subsequent bowel injury. Our case is a woman who underwent resection for a large retroperitoneal recurrence of caecal cancer. Tumour deposits encasing the iliac vessels had to be left behind. A silicone breast prosthesis for displacement of the abdominal content was implanted, allowing postoperative irradiation with 50 Gy. The prosthesis was removed once radiotherapy was accomplished; tumour regression was then complete. Complications are described, so are indications for surgical management of local recurrences of colonic origin as well as technical aspects of abdominal implantation of displacing prostheses. At follow-up after eighteen months the patient has no signs of enteropathy, she enjoys a good quality of life, and she is free of disease. Still, her prognosis is considered uncertain.