Comparison of novel PSMA-targeting [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 with its albumin binding derivative [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a first-in-human study.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising target for diagnosis and radioligand therapy (RLT) of prostate cancer. Two novel PSMA-targeting radionuclide therapy agents, [177Lu]Lu-P17-087, and its albumin binder modified derivative, [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, were evaluated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The primary endpoint was dosimetry evaluation, the second endpoint was radiation toxicity assessment (CTCAE 5.0) and PSA response (PCWG3). METHODS: Patients with PSMA-positive tumors were enrolled after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. Five mCRPC patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and four other patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 (1.2 GBq/patient). Multiple whole body planar scintigraphy was performed at 1.5, 4, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 h after injection and one SPECT/CT imaging was performed at 24 h post-injection for each patient. Dosimetry evaluation was compared in both patient groups. RESULTS: Patients showed no major clinical side-effects under this low dose treatment. As expected [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 with longer blood circulation (due to its albumin binding) exhibited higher effective doses than [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 (0.151 ± 0.036 vs. 0.056 ± 0.019 mGy/MBq, P = 0.001). Similarly, red marrow received 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.048 ± 0.020 mGy/MBq, while kidney doses were 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.046 ± 0.022 mGy/MBq, respectively. [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 demonstrated excellent tumor uptake and faster kinetics; while [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 displayed a slower washout and higher average dose (7.75 ± 4.18 vs. 4.72 ± 2.29 mGy/MBq, P = 0.018). After administration of [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, 3/5 and 3/4 patients showed reducing PSA values, respectively. CONCLUSION: [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 displayed different pharmacokinetics but excellent PSMA-targeting dose delivery in mCRPC patients. These two agents are promising RLT agents for personalized treatment of mCRPC. Further studies with increased dose and frequency of RLT are warranted to evaluate the potential therapeutic efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (NCT05603559, Registered at 25 October, 2022). URL OF REGISTRY: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05603559 .

Comparisons of mpMRI, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in diagnosing prostate cancer based on tumor detection, localization and staging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of mpMRI, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in detecting and localizing lesions, and further clarify the accuracy of these examinations in tumor staging. METHODS: Seventy patients who underwent mpMRI, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and radical prostatectomy were enrolled. The abilities to detect index and clinically significant lesions by three examinations were compared. We further evaluated the ability of these examinations to localize lesions to the superior, inferior, anterior, posterior, left and right halves of the prostate and analyzed their accuracy in local and lymph node staging. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among mpMRI, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in their ability to detect index (p = 0.48, p = 0.23 and p = 0.07) and clinically significant lesions (p = 0.30, p = 0.29 and p = 0.06) or to localize lesions in six half divisions of the prostate. With postoperative pathology as reference, both mpMRI (p = 0.10) and mpMRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (p = 0.10) can accurately assess the local staging of prostate cancer. However, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT underestimates the local staging of prostate cancer (p < 0.01). Regarding lymph node staging, the three types of examination showed no significant differences compared to postoperative pathology (p = 0.63, p = 0.51 and p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: With postoperative pathology as reference, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT underestimates the local tumor staging. MpMRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has no obvious advantages in detecting, localizing or staging prostate cancer compared with mpMRI.

68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Assessment of Fibroblast Activation in Keloids : A Prospective Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Keloids are benign fibroproliferative disorders characterized by the massive proliferation of fibroblasts. Fibroblast activation plays a key role in the invasive growth of keloids. Therefore, a prospective pilot study was conducted to explore the value of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the assessment of keloids activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with keloid were enrolled to conduct 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT. All patients accepted surgery to remove part of the lesions within 1 week. SUV mean and SUV max were measured for semiquantitative analysis and compared with the Vancouver Scar Scale, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging, pathology, and immunohistochemical stains. RESULTS: A total of 123 lesions were detected in 25 patients, most of which were distributed in the anterior chest wall. The 68 Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was significantly different at different sites ( P < 0.0001). There was uptake heterogeneity within the keloid lesions, and a significant difference was found between the edge and center of some large lesions. The SUV max of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 showed significantly correlation with the Vancouver Scar Scale ( r = 0.565, P < 0.0001) moderately and the Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging parameters mildly. The SUV max of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 had a moderate correlation with FAPI expression ( r = 0.520, P = 0.022). Moreover, collagen, fibroblast activator protein, and Ki-67 expression were found higher at the edges of keloid tissue than in the center. CONCLUSIONS: 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT can reflect the distribution characteristics of activated fibroblasts in keloid tissue and may provide a novel method for keloid evaluation for further fibroblast-related therapies.

Pharmacological effects and mechanisms of paeonol on antitumor and prevention of side effects of cancer therapy.

Cancer represents one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Conventional clinical treatments include radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, these treatments have inherent limitations, such as multidrug resistance and the induction of short- and long-term multiple organ damage, ultimately leading to a significant decrease in cancer survivors' quality of life and life expectancy. Paeonol, a nature active compound derived from the root bark of the medicinal plant Paeonia suffruticosa, exhibits various pharmacological activities. Extensive research has demonstrated that paeonol exhibits substantial anticancer effects in various cancer, both in vitro and in vivo. Its underlying mechanisms involve the induction of apoptosis, the inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion and migration, angiogenesis, cell cycle arrest, autophagy, regulating tumor immunity and enhanced radiosensitivity, as well as the modulation of multiple signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT and NF-κB signaling pathways. Additionally, paeonol can prevent adverse effects on the heart, liver, and kidneys induced by anticancer therapy. Despite numerous studies exploring paeonol's therapeutic potential in cancer, no specific reviews have been conducted. Therefore, this review provides a systematic summary and analysis of paeonol's anticancer effects, prevention of side effects, and the underlying mechanisms involved. This review aims to establish a theoretical basis for the adjunctive strategy of paeonol in cancer treatment, ultimately improving the survival rate and enhancing the quality of life for cancer patients.

Dual targeting PET tracer [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD in patients with lung neoplasms: a pilot exploratory study.

Rationale: Early discovery, accurate diagnosis, and staging of lung cancer is essential for patients to receive appropriate treatment. PET/CT has become increasingly recognized as a valuable imaging modality for these patients, but there remains room for improvement in PET tracers. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD, a dual-targeting heterodimeric PET tracer that recognizes both fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and integrin αvß3 for detecting lung neoplasms, by comparing it with [18F]FDG and single-targeting tracers [68Ga]Ga-RGD and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI. Methods: This was a pilot exploratory study of patients with suspected lung malignancies. All 51 participants underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT, of which: 9 participants received dynamic scans, 44 participants also underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scan within two weeks, 9 participants underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan and 10 participants underwent [68Ga]Ga-RGD PET/CT scan. The final diagnosis was made based on histopathological analyses and clinical follow-up reports. Results: Among those who underwent dynamic scans, the uptake of pulmonary lesions increased over time. The optimal timepoint for a PET/CT scan was identified to be 2 h post-injection. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD had a higher detection rate of primary lesions than [18F]FDG (91.4% vs. 77.1%, p < 0.05), higher tumor uptake (SUVmax, 6.9 ± 5.3 vs. 5.3 ± 5.4, p < 0.001) and higher tumor-to-background ratio (10.0 ± 8.4 vs. 9.0 ± 9.1, p < 0.05), demonstrated better accuracy in mediastinal lymph node evaluation (99.7% vs. 90.9%, p < 0.001), and identified more metastases (254 vs. 220). There was also a significant difference between the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD and [68Ga]Ga-RGD of primary lesions (SUVmax, 5.8 ± 4.4 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our small scale cohort study, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT gave a higher primary tumor detection rate, higher tracer uptake, and improved detection of metastases compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD also had advantages over [68Ga]Ga-RGD and was non-inferior to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI. We thus provide proof-of-concept for using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT for diagnosing lung cancer. With the stated advantages, the dual-targeting FAPI-RGD should also be explored for therapeutic use in future studies.

A prospective head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with primary prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and biodistribution of two similar PET agents, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, in the same group of primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated, histologically confirmed PCa by needle biopsy were enrolled. Each patient underwent [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT within a week. In addition to visual analysis, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis. RESULTS: [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT detected more positive tumors than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (202 vs. 190, P = 0.002), both for intraprostatic lesions (48 vs. 41, P = 0.016) and metastatic lesions (154 vs. 149, P = 0.125), especially for intraprostatic lesions in low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients (21/23 vs. 15/23, P = 0.031). Furthermore, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT exhibited a significantly higher SUVmax for most matched tumors (13.7 ± 10.2 vs. 11.4 ± 8.3, P < 0.001). For normal organs, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT showed significantly lower activity in the kidney (SUVmean: 20.1 ± 6.1 vs. 29.3 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) and urinary bladder (SUVmean: 6.5 ± 7.1 vs. 20.9 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), but displayed a higher uptake in the parotid gland (SUVmean: 8.7 ± 2.6 vs. 7.6 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), liver (SUVmean: 7.0 ± 1.9 vs. 3.7 ± 1.3, P < 0.001), and spleen (SUVmean: 8.2 ± 3.0 vs. 5.2 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrated higher tumor uptake and better tumor detectability than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, especially in low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients, which indicated that [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 may serve as an alternative agent for detection of PCa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 68Ga-P16-093 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Primary Prostate Cancer Patients (NCT05324332, Registered 12 April 2022, retrospectively registered). URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324332 .

Hydroxysafflor yellow A regulates lymphangiogenesis and inflammation via the inhibition of PI3K on regulating AKT/mTOR and NF-κB pathway in macrophages to reduce atherosclerosis in ApoE-/- mice.

BACKGROUND: Macrophage-mediated inflammatory infiltration and pathological lymphangiogenesis around atherosclerotic plaques are newly highlighted treatment targets of atherosclerosis. Although the effect of Hydroxysafflor yellow A(HSYA) on atherosclerosis was clear, few studies focus on the regulation of HSYA on such mechanisms. PURPOSE: This study aimed to uncover the key site of HSYA on improving atherosclerosis by regulating macrophage-induced inflammation and lymphangiogenesis. STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to explore the new mechanism of HSYA on alleviating atherosclerosis in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: We determined the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor C(VEGF-C) in Raw264.7 cells and high-fat diet fed ApoE knockout (ApoE-/-) mice. Raw264.7 cells were treated with HSYA under the stimulation of LPS and ox-LDL. HFD induced ApoE-/- mice were given different concentrations of HSYA-saline solution by tail vein injection and ATV-saline suspension by gavage. C57/B6j mice fed with chow diet were used for the control group. H&E, oil red O and immunofluorescence staining analysis were used for visualizing the pathological changes. The biological impact of HSYA was evaluated by body weight, lipid metabolism, inflammation levels, and corresponding function indexes of kidney and liver. RT-qPCR and western blot methods were conducted to determine the expression of the inflammation and lymphangiogenesis factors. Molecular docking and microscale thermophoresis analysis were used to verify the combination of HSYA and PI3K. RESULTS: In vivo, HSYA reduced the plaque formation, hepatic steatosis and inflammation-related lymphangiogenesis (IAL). It also changed the serum levels of inflammation (VEGF-C, TNF-α, IL-6, VCAM1, MCP1), lipid indexes (LDL, CHOL, TRIG) and relevant lymphangiogenesis (VEGF-C and LYVE-1) and inflammation (VCAM-1 and IL-6) signals in the aorta. In vitro, HSYA regulated Akt/mTOR and NF-κB activation by the inhibition of PI3K in macrophages. CONCLUSION: HSYA affects inflammation and inflammation-associated lymphangiogenesis via suppressing PI3K to affect AKT/mTOR and NF-B pathway activation in macrophages, showing a comprehensive protective effect on atherosclerosis.

Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: This pilot study was prospectively designed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of PET/CT using a PSMA-specific tracer [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and a glucose metabolism probe 2-[18F]FDG in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients. METHODS: Forty-two pathologically confirmed ccRCC patients were included. Within 1 week, each patient underwent [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT. In addition to visual analysis of tumor number, the standardized uptake value (SUV) was measured for semiquantitative comparison and correlation analysis. RESULTS: For primary ccRCC patients, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate (19/22 vs. 13/22, P = 0.031) and higher tumor uptake (15.7 ± 9.0 vs. 5.1 ± 3.4, P < 0.001) than 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT. In addition, the SUVmax of the primary tumor on [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT was significantly correlated with pT stage (for [68Ga]Ga-P16-093, r = 0.550, P = 0.008; for 2-[18F]FDG, r = 0.514, P = 0.014) and WHO/ISUP grade (for [68Ga]Ga-P16-093, r = 0.566, P = 0.006; for 2-[18F]FDG, r = 0.492, P = 0.020), respectively. For metastatic ccRCC patients, [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT also demonstrated a better detection rate (21/22 vs. 14/22, P = 0.008) and higher tumor uptake (11.0 ± 6.4 vs. 4.4 ± 2.7, P < 0.001) than 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT. The SUVmax on [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT had a significant association with PSMA expression in primary ccRCC (r = 0.776, P < 0.001) and metastatic ccRCC (r = 0.626, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET/CT demonstrates significantly better tumor detectability than 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for ccRCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 68Ga-P16-093 and 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients (NCT05432947, Registered 27 June 2021, retrospectively registered) URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05432947 .

Safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Rationale: This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and survival of 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: Thirty patients with metastatic NETs were prospectively enrolled and treated with 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE (3 intended cycles at 8 to 12-week intervals, 3.7 GBq/cycle). Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. The treatment response was graded according to RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Patients tolerated therapy well without acute adverse effects. During peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), no grade 4 toxicity was observed in any of the patients; grade 3 hematotoxicity was recorded in 4 patients, including grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (13.3%) and grade-3 anemia in 1 patient (3.3%); grade 3 hepatotoxicity was recorded in 1 (3.3%) patient, and no grade 2/3/4 nephrotoxicity was observed. On long-term follow-up, none of the patients developed grade 4 hematotoxicity or nephrotoxicity of any grade, reversible grade 3 hematotoxicity (thrombocytopenia) occurred in 1 patient. There was no incidence of leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome for the duration of follow-up. Of 27 patients with RECIST-measurable disease, partial response and stable disease were seen in 9 and 14 patients, respectively, resulting in a response rate of 33.3% and disease control rate of 85.2%. Of 29 patients evaluable for response on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 14 had partial response and 11 had stable disease, with a response rate of 48.3% and disease control rate of 86.2%. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 57 months after the first 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE PRRT with a median follow-up of 46 months. The median PFS was 36 months, and the median OS was not reached. Ki-67 index of greater than 10% was associated with poorer PFS (P = 0.012). Conclusions: Our results suggest that PRRT with approximately 3.7 GBq 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE has acceptable toxicity profile and is effective in treating metastatic NET with high disease control rate. In addition, 177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE achieved a favorable survival outcome with encouraging PFS.

A prospective head-to-head comparison of 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD and 68 Ga-DOTATATE in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD, a dual somatostatin receptor 2- and integrin αVß3-targeting tracer, to 68 Ga-DOTATATE in a single group of patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS: Thirty-five patients with histologically confirmed GEP-NETs (5 grade 1, 28 grade 2, and 2 grade 3 tumours) were prospectively enrolled with informed consent. The primary tumour mainly originated from the pancreas and rectum. All patients were scanned with both 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD PET/CT and 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT within a week and compared on a head-to-head basis. Sixteen patients also had conventional 18F-FDG PET/CT. Images were evaluated semi-quantitatively using maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of tumour and tumour-to-background ratio. RESULTS: All patients had at least one positive lesion on each of the two scans. A total of 1190 and 1106 lesions were detected on 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD images and 68 Ga-DOTATATE images, respectively (P = 0.152). 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD PET/CT revealed significantly more lesions in the liver than 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (634 vs. 532, P = 0.021). Both tracers produced comparable results for detecting primary tumours (20 vs. 20, P = 1.000), lymph node metastases (101 vs. 102, P = 0.655), and bone metastases (381 vs. 398, P = 0.244). The tumour SUVmax in 12 patients was significantly higher for 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD than for 68 Ga-DOTATATE (27.2 ± 13.6 vs. 19.5 ± 10.0, P < 0.001); among them, 9 had 18F-FDG PET/CT and all were found to be FDG-positive. The remaining 23 patients had significantly higher 68 Ga-DOTATATE uptake than 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD uptake (22.3 ± 16.4 vs. 11.9 ± 7.5, P < 0.001); among them, 7 had 18F-FDG PET/CT and 6 were FDG-negative. Generally, 68 Ga-DOTATATE demonstrated higher tumour SUVmax than 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD (20.8 ± 16.0 vs. 14.2 ± 8.9, P < 0.001), including primary tumours, liver lesions, lymph node lesions, and bone lesions. However, the tumour-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher when using 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD compared with that when using 68 Ga-DOTATATE (8.4 ± 5.5 vs. 4.7 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD performed better than 68 Ga-DOTATATE in detection of liver metastases with a higher tumour-to-background ratio. Moreover, 68 Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD tended to demonstrate higher uptake over 68 Ga-DOTATATE in FDG-avid NETs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dual SSTR2 and Integrin αvß3 Targeting PET/CT Imaging (NCT02817945, registered 5 November 2018). URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02817945.