Artesunate inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells by down-regulating the expression of BTBD7.

In recent years, more and more studies have shown that antiparasitic drugs can affect a variety of biological processes of tumor cells and exhibit a potential anti-tumor activity. Although artesunate (ART), a strong bioactive derivative of artemisinin and widely used clinically against malaria, was found to have an inhibitory effect on tumor cells, it is still unclear whether ART could regulate the tumor malignancy of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of ART on migration capacities in NSCLC cell lines of A549 and H1975. Cell migration capacity was remarkably inhibited by ART treatment. The expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin was upregulated, while mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, vimentin and FN1) were inhibited by ART in both protein and mRNA levels in A549 and H1975 cells, indicating ART could suppress the epidermal interstitial transformation (EMT) of NSCLC cells. Meanwhile, BTBD7 was found highly expressed in tumor tissues of NSCLC patient and associated with poor prognosis. The anti-migration activity of ART was found to be mediated by the inhibition of BTBD7 mRNA expression and was reversed when the cells were transiently transfected with the BTBD7 overexpression plasmid. Our study demonstrated the potent anti-migratory activity of ART, thereby presenting it as a new candidate for clinical therapy in NSCLC.

Angiogenesis and Hepatic Fibrosis: Western and Chinese Medicine Therapies on the Road.

Hepatic fibrosis is a common feature of almost all chronic liver diseases. Formation of new vessels (angiogenesis) is a process strictly related to the progressive fibrogenesis which leads to cirrhosis and liver cancer. This review mainly concerns the relationship between angiogenesis and hepatic fibrosis, by considering the mechanism of angiogenesis, cells in angiogenesis, anti-angiogenic and Chinese medicine therapies.

Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer is the standard surgical treatment as a curative measure or for palliation. Esophagogastric anastomotic leakage and stricture are common life-threatening postoperative complications (more so if the leakage occurs in the chest), and the success of the anastomosis created in the reconstruction of the resected esophagus can highly influence morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was undertaken on 291 patients treated for carcinoma of the esophagus between January 2004 and December 2008. The study excluded 36 patients (12%) who were inoperable. Patients were assigned to 2 treatment groups that consisted of 128 patients in group A and 127 patients in group B according to a restricted, permuted block randomization plan. Patients in group A underwent an esophagogastrectomy with wrapping of the pedicle omental flap around the esophagogastric anastomosis. Group B patients underwent an esophagogastrectomy with only a stapled technique. RESULTS: Of all 255 patients who received an esophagogastric anastomosis, 226 (89%) were discharged from the hospital within 15 days of operation. There was no significant difference between these 2 groups in regard to the incidence of pulmonary complications, abdominal or thoracic infections, and days of hospital stay. Anastomotic leaks occurred in a single patient from group A (1%) and in 7 patients from group B (6%). In group A, 33 patients underwent transhiatal esophagogastrectomy and 95 had thoracic esophagogastrectomy, which resulted in an anastomotic leakage in 1 (3%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. In group B, 42 patients had transhiatal esophagogastrectomy and 85 had thoracic esophagogastrectomy, which resulted in anastomotic leakage in 5 (12%) and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. The leakage ratio of group B was significant greater than that of group A (P < .05). Two patients were excluded during the evaluation of the benign stricture due to hospital mortality. Anastomotic strictures were noted in 8 patients from group A (6%) and 20 patients from group B (16%), and the difference in the incidence of anastomotic strictures between these 2 groups was statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Wrapping of the pedicle omental flap around the esophagogastric stapled anastomosis site decreases the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture rate after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, thereby decreasing the morbidity and mortality of the procedure.