Deep learning reconstruction CT for liver metastases: low-dose dual-energy vs standard-dose single-energy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess image quality and liver metastasis detection of reduced-dose dual-energy CT (DECT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to standard-dose single-energy CT (SECT) with DLIR or iterative reconstruction (IR). METHODS: In this prospective study, two groups of 40 participants each underwent abdominal contrast-enhanced scans with full-dose SECT (120-kVp images, DLIR and IR algorithms) or reduced-dose DECT (40- to 60-keV virtual monochromatic images [VMIs], DLIR algorithm), with 122 and 106 metastases, respectively. Groups were matched by age, sex ratio, body mass index, and cross-sectional area. Noise power spectrum of liver images and task-based transfer function of metastases were calculated to assess the noise texture and low-contrast resolution. The image noise, signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of liver and portal vein, liver-to-lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (LLR), lesion conspicuity, lesion detection rate, and the subjective image quality metrics were compared between groups on 1.25-mm reconstructed images. RESULTS: Compared to 120-kVp images with IR, 40- and 50-keV VMIs with DLIR showed similar noise texture and LLR, similar or higher image noise and low-contrast resolution, improved SNR and lesion conspicuity, and similar or better perceptual image quality. When compared to 120-kVp images with DLIR, 50-keV VMIs with DLIR had similar low-contrast resolution, SNR, LLR, lesion conspicuity, and perceptual image quality but lower frequency noise texture and higher image noise. For the detection of hepatic metastases, reduced-dose DECT by 34% maintained observer lesion detection rates. CONCLUSION: DECT assisted with DLIR enables a 34% dose reduction for detecting hepatic metastases while maintaining comparable perceptual image quality to full-dose SECT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Reduced-dose dual-energy CT with deep learning image reconstruction is as accurate as standard-dose single-energy CT for the detection of liver metastases and saves more than 30% of the radiation dose. KEY POINTS: • The 40- and 50-keV virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improved lesion conspicuity compared with 120-kVp images with iterative reconstruction while providing similar or better perceptual image quality. • The 50-keV VMIs with DLIR provided comparable perceptual image quality and lesion conspicuity to 120-kVp images with DLIR. • The reduction of radiation by 34% by DLIR in low-keV VMIs is clinically sufficient for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases.

The value of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in whole-brain computed tomography perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) are valuable tools for diagnosing acute ischemic stroke (AIS). It is essential to obtain high-quality CTP and CTA images in short time. This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of brain CTP and CTA images generated from CTP reconstructed by a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm on patients with AIS. Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 54 patients with suspected AIS undergoing non-contrast CT and CTP within 24 hours. CTP datasets were reconstructed with three levels of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo algorithm [ASIR-V 0% with filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V 40%, and ASIR-V 80%] and three levels of DLIR, including low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). CTA images were generated using the CTP datasets at the peak arterial phase. Objective parameters including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and noise reduction rate. Subjective evaluation was assessed according to Abels scoring system. Perfusion parameters and detection accuracy for infarction core lesions were evaluated. The objective and subjective image quality of CTA images were also evaluated. Results: All reconstructions produced similar CT values (P>0.05). With the increase of ASIR-V and DLIR reconstruction strength, image noise decreased, while SNR and CNR increased for CTP images, especially in white matter. DLIR-H, DLIR-M, and ASIR-V80% yielded higher subjective scores than did ASIR-V40% and FBP. DLIR-H provided the highest noise reduction rate and detection accuracy. No significant difference was found in conventional parameters, the volume of infarct core, or ischemic penumbra among the 6 groups (P>0.05). The objective evaluation of reconstructed CTA images was comparable in DLIR-H, DLIR-M, and ASIR-V80% (P>0.05). The subjective scores of the DLIR-H and DLIR-M images were higher than those of the other groups, especially ASIR-V40% and FBP (P<0.05). Conclusions: Compared with FBP and ASIR-V40%, DLIR-H, DLIR-M, and ASIR-V80% improved the overall image quality of CTP and CTA images to varying degrees. Furthermore, DLIR-H and DLIR-M showed the best performance. DLIR-H is the best choice in diagnosing AIS with improved detection accuracy for cerebral infarction. Reconstructing CTA images using CTP datasets could reduce contrast agent and radiation dose.

Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether reduced-dose (RD) gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) of 40 keV virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) enhanced the early detection and diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS: Thirty-five participants with pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled from March to August 2022 after routine care abdominal computed tomography (CT). GSI mode was used for contrast-enhanced CT, and two portal venous phase CT images were obtained [standard-dose (SD) CT dose index (CTDIvol) = 15.51 mGy, RD CTDIvol = 7.95 mGy]. The 40 keV-VMI were reconstructed via filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 60 %, AV60) of both SD and RD images. RD medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-M) and RD high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) were used to reconstruct the 40 keV-VMI. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver and the lesions were objectively evaluated. The overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence were subjectively evaluated, to compare the differences in evaluation results among the different images. RESULTS: All 35 participants (mean age: 59.51 ± 11.01 years; 14 females) underwent SD and RD GSI portal venous-phase CT scans. The dose-length product of the RD GSI scan was reduced by 49-53 % lower than that of the SD GSI scan (420.22 ± 31.95) vs (817.58 ± 60.56). A total of 219 lesions were identified, including 55 benign lesions and 164 metastases, with an average size of 7.37 ± 4.14 mm. SD-FBP detected 207 lesions, SD-AV60 detected 201 lesions, and DLIR-M and DLIR-H detected 199 and 190 lesions, respectively. For lesions ≤ 5 mm, there was no statistical difference between SD-FBP vs DLIR-M (χ2McNemar = 1.00, P = 0.32) and SD-AV60 vs DLIR-M (χ2McNemar = 0.33, P = 0.56) in the detection rate. The CNR, SNR, and noise of DLIR-M and DLIR-H 40 keV-VMI images were better than those of SD-FBP images (P < 0.01) but did not differ significantly from those of SD-AV60 images (P > 0.05). When the lesions ≤ 5 mm, there were statistical differences in the overall diagnostic sensitivity of lesions compared with SD-FBP, SD-AV60, DLIR-M and DLIR-H (P＜0.01). There were no statistical differences in the sensitivity of lesions diagnosis between SD-FBP, SD-AV60 and DLIR-M (both P＞0.05). However, the DLIR-M subjective image quality and lesion diagnostic confidence were higher for SD-FBP (both P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Reduced dose DLIR-M of 40 keV-VMI can be used for routine follow-up care of colorectal cancer patients, to optimize evaluations and ensure CT image quality. Meanwhile, the detection rate and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of small lesions, early liver metastases is not obviously reduced.

Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?

OBJECTIVES: To compare the image quality and hepatic metastasis detection of low-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with full-dose filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative reconstruction (IR). METHODS: A contrast-detail phantom consisting of low-contrast objects was scanned at five CT dose index levels (10, 6, 3, 2, and 1 mGy). A total of 154 participants with 305 hepatic lesions who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in a prospective non-inferiority trial with a three-arm design based on phantom results. Data sets with full dosage (13.6 mGy) and low dosages (9.5, 6.8, or 4.1 mGy) were acquired from two consecutive portal venous acquisitions, respectively. All images were reconstructed with FBP (reference), IR (control), and DLIR (test). Eleven readers evaluated phantom data sets for object detectability using a two-alternative forced-choice approach. Non-inferiority analyses were performed to interpret the differences in image quality and metastasis detection of low-dose DLIR relative to full-dose FBP/IR. RESULTS: The phantom experiment showed the dose reduction potential from DLIR was up to 57% based on the reference FBP dose index. Radiation decreases of 30% and 50% resulted in non-inferior image quality and hepatic metastasis detection with DLIR compared to full-dose FBP/IR. Radiation reduction of 70% by DLIR performed inferiorly in detecting small metastases (< 1 cm) compared to full-dose FBP (difference: -0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.178 to 0.047) and full-dose IR (difference: -0.123; 95% CI: -0.182 to 0.053) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLIR enables a 50% dose reduction for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases while maintaining comparable image quality to full-dose FBP and IR. KEY POINTS: • Non-inferiority study showed that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can reduce the dose to oncological patients with low-contrast lesions without compromising the diagnostic information. • Radiation dose levels for DLIR can be reduced to 50% of full-dose FBP and IR for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases, while maintaining comparable image quality. • The reduction of radiation by 70% by DLIR is clinically acceptable but insufficient for detecting small low-contrast hepatic metastases (< 1 cm).