Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled. RESULTS: Twenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05-6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.10). CONCLUSION: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42022379276.

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in immunotherapy for gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. With the development of immunotherapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer has improved. At present, ICIs combined with other therapies or dual ICI strategies in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer have shown clinical effectiveness and controllable safety. In addition, predictive biomarkers facilitate the precise selection of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to explore rational combinations and reliable predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy. This article reviews the recent advances in ICIs and relevant predictive biomarkers in the treatment of gastric cancer.

In recent years, with the application of immunotherapy, clinical efficacy in gastric cancer has been effectively improved. At present, it is encouraging that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has become the first choice for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, researchers remain committed to exploring the efficacy of immunotherapy in combination with various therapies. Equally important, the identification of biomarkers can facilitate the selection of patients suitable for immunotherapy. This article summarizes important immunotherapy clinical trials and discusses therapeutic combinations and biomarkers being explored.

PIK3CD induces cell growth and invasion by activating AKT/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer.

The catalytic subunit p110δ of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) encoded by PIK3CD has been implicated in some human solid tumors. However, its roles in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain largely unknown. Here we found that PIK3CD was overexpressed in colon cancer tissues and CRC cell lines and was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) of patients with colon cancer. The ectopic overexpression of PIK3CD significantly promoted CRC cell growth, migration and invasion in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. In contrast, inhibition of PIK3CD by specific small-interfering RNA or idelalisib dramatically suppressed CRC cell growth, migration and invasion in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Moreover, PIK3CD overexpression increased AKT activity, nuclear translocation of ß-catenin and T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) transcriptional activity and decreased glycogen synthase kinase 3ß (GSK-3ß) activity, whereas PIK3CD inhibition exhibited the opposite effects. Furthermore, PIK3CD-mediated cell growth, migration and invasion were reversed by blockade of AKT signaling or depletion of ß-catenin. In addition, PIK3CD expression in colon cancer tissues positively correlated with ß-catenin abnormal expression, which was an independent predictor for OS of colon cancer patients. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that PIK3CD is an independent prognostic factor in CRC and that PIK3CD induces CRC cell growth, migration and invasion by activating AKT/GSK-3ß/ß-catenin signaling, suggesting that PIK3CD might be a novel prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for CRC.