Prospects of focal adhesion kinase inhibitors as a cancer therapy in preclinical and early phase study.

INTRODUCTION: FAK, a nonreceptor cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, plays a crucial role in tumor metastasis, drug resistance, tumor stem cell maintenance, and regulation of the tumor microenvironment. FAK has emerged as a promising target for tumor therapy based on both preclinical and clinical data. AREAS COVERED: This paper aims to summarize the molecular mechanisms underlying FAK's involvement in tumorigenesis and progression. Encouraging results have emerged from ongoing clinical trials of FAK inhibitors. Additionally, we present an overview of clinical trials for FAK inhibitors, examining their potential as promising treatments. The pertinent studies gathered from databases including PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: Since the first finding in 1990s, targeting FAK has became the focus of interests in many pharmaceutical companies. Through 30 years' discovery, the industry and academy gradually realized the features of FAK target which may not be a driver gene but a solid defense system for the cancer initiation and development. Currently, the ongoing clinical regimens involving FAK inhibition are all the combination strategies in which FAK inhibitors can further strengthen the cancer cell killing effects of other testing agents. The emerging positive signal in clinical trials foresee targeting FAK as class will be an effective mean to fight against cancers.

Targeting of focal adhesion kinase enhances the immunogenic cell death of PEGylated liposome doxorubicin to optimize therapeutic responses of immune checkpoint blockade.

BACKGROUNDS: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is widely considered to exert long-term treatment benefits by activating antitumor immunity. However, many cancer patients show poor clinical responses to ICB due in part to the lack of an immunogenic niche. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is frequently amplified and acts as an immune modulator across cancer types. However, evidence illustrates that targeting FAK is most effective in combination therapy rather than in monotherapy. METHODS: Here, we used drug screening, in vitro and in vivo assays to filter out that doxorubicin and its liposomal form pegylated liposome doxorubicin (PLD) showed synergistic anti-tumor effects in combination with FAK inhibitor IN10018. We hypothesized that anti-tumor immunity and immunogenic cell death (ICD) may be involved in the treatment outcomes through the data analysis of our clinical trial testing the combination of IN10018 and PLD. We then performed cell-based assays and animal studies to detect whether FAK inhibition by IN10018 can boost the ICD of PLD/doxorubicin and further established syngeneic models to test the antitumor effect of triplet combination of PLD, IN10018, and ICB. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the combination of FAK inhibitor IN10018, and PLD/doxorubicin exerted effective antitumor activity. Notably, the doublet combination regimen exhibited response latency and long-lasting treatment effects clinically, outcomes frequently observed in immunotherapy. Our preclinical study confirmed that the 2-drug combination can maximize the ICD of cancer cells. This approach primed the tumor microenvironment, supplementing it with sufficient tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to activate antitumor immunity. Finally, different animal studies confirmed that the antitumor effects of ICB can be significantly enhanced by this doublet regimen. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that targeting FAK by IN10018 can enhance the ICD of PLD/doxorubicin, further benefiting the anti-tumor effect of ICB. The animal tests of the triplet regimen warrant further discovery in the real world.

Simultaneous inhibition of FAK and ROS1 synergistically repressed triple-negative breast cancer by upregulating p53 signalling.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype lacking effective targeted therapies, necessitating innovative treatment approaches. While targeting ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) with crizotinib has shown promise, resistance remains a limitation. Recent evidence links focal adhesion kinase (FAK) to drug resistance, prompting our study to assess the combined impact of FAK inhibitor IN10018 and crizotinib in TNBC and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. METHODS: We employed the Timer database to analyze FAK and ROS1 mRNA levels in TNBC and adjacent normal tissues. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between FAK, ROS1, and TNBC clinical prognosis using the GSE database. We conducted various in vitro assays, including cell viability, colony formation, flow cytometry, EdU assays, and western blotting. Additionally, TNBC xenograft and human TNBC organoid models were established to assess the combined therapy's efficacy. To comprehensively understand the synergistic anti-tumor mechanisms, we utilized multiple techniques, such as RNA sequencing, immunofluorescence, cell flow cytometry, C11-BODIPY staining, MDA assay, and GSH assay. RESULTS: The Timer database revealed higher levels of FAK and ROS1 in TNBC tissues compared to normal tissues. Analysis of GEO databases indicated that patients with high FAK and ROS1 expression had the poorest prognosis. Western blotting confirmed increased p-FAK expression in crizotinib-resistant TNBC cells. In vitro experiments showed that the combination therapy down-regulated cyclin B1, p-Cdc2, and Bcl2 while up-regulating BAX, cleaved-Caspase-3, cleaved-Caspase-9, and cleaved PARP. In TNBC xenograft models, the tumor volume in the combination therapy group was 73% smaller compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the combination therapy resulted in a 70% reduction in cell viability in human TNBC organoid models (p < 0.0001). RNA sequencing analysis of TNBC cells and xenograft tumor tissues highlighted enrichment in oxidative stress, glutathione metabolism, and p53 pathways. The combined group displayed a fivefold rise in the reactive oxygen species level, a 69% decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio, and a sixfold increase in the lipid peroxidation in comparison to the control group. Western blotting demonstrated p53 upregulation and SCL7A11 and GPX4 downregulation in the combination group. The addition of a p53 inhibitor reversed these effects. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the combination of IN10018 and crizotinib shows synergistic antitumor effects in TNBC. Mechanistically, this combination inhibits cell proliferation, enhances apoptosis, and induces ferroptosis, which is associated with increased p53 levels.

Targeting focal adhesion kinase boosts immune response in KRAS/LKB1 co-mutated lung adenocarcinoma via remodeling the tumor microenvironment.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutation is one of the most common oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, however, the response to immunotherapy is heterogeneous owing to the distinct co-occurring genomic alterations. KRAS/LKB1 co-mutated lung adenocarcinoma displays poor response to PD-1 blockade whereas the mechanism remains undetermined. METHODS: We explored the specific characteristics of tumor microenvironment (TME) in KL tumors using syngeneic KRASG12DLKB1-/- (KL) and KRASG12DTP53-/- (KP) lung cancer mouse models. The impact of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor on KL lung tumors was investigated in vitro and in vivo through evaluation of both KL cell lines and KL lung cancer mouse models. RESULTS: We identified KL tumors as "immune-cold" tumors with excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) collagen deposition that formed a physical barrier to block the infiltration of CD8+T cells. Mechanistically, abundant activated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) resulted from FAK activation contributed to the formation of the unique TME of KL tumors. FAK inhibition with a small molecular inhibitor could remodel the TME by inhibiting CAFs activation, decreasing collagen deposition and further facilitating the infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells, including CD8+ T cells, DC cells and M1-like macrophages into tumors, hence, converting "immune-cold" KL tumors into "immune-hot" tumors. The combined FAK inhibitor and PD-1 blockade therapy synergistically retarded primary and metastatic tumor growth of KL tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified FAK as a promising intervention target for KL tumors and provided basis for the combination of FAK inhibitor with PD-1 blockade in the management of KL lung cancers.

Synergism of FAK and ROS1 inhibitors in the treatment of CDH1-deficient cancers mediated by FAK-YAP signaling.

CDH1 deficiency is common in diffuse gastric cancer and triple negative breast cancer patients, both of which still lack effective therapeutics. ROS1 inhibition results in synthetic lethality in CDH1-deficient cancers, but often leads to adaptive resistance. Here, we demonstrate that upregulation of the FAK activity accompanies the emergence of resistance to ROS1 inhibitor therapy in gastric and breast CDH1-deficient cancers. FAK inhibition, either by FAK inhibitors or by knocking down its expression, resulted in higher cytotoxicity potency of the ROS1 inhibitor in CDH1-deficient cancer cell lines. Co-treatment of mice with the FAK inhibitor and ROS1 inhibitors also showed synergistic effects against CDH1-deficient cancers. Mechanistically, ROS1 inhibitors induce the FAK-YAP-TRX signaling, decreasing oxidative stress-related DNA damage and consequently reducing their anti-cancer effects. The FAK inhibitor suppresses the aberrant FAK-YAP-TRX signaling, reinforcing ROS1 inhibitor's cytotoxicity towards cancer cells. These findings support the use of FAK and ROS1 inhibitors as a combination therapeutic strategy in CDH1-deficient triple negative breast cancer and diffuse gastric cancer patients.

Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) Inhibition Synergizes with KRAS G12C Inhibitors in Treating Cancer through the Regulation of the FAK-YAP Signaling.

KRAS mutation is one of the most prevalent genetic drivers of cancer development, yet KRAS mutations are until very recently considered undruggable. There are ongoing trials of drugs that target the KRAS G12C mutation, yet acquired drug resistance from the extended use has already become a major concern. Here, it is demonstrated that KRAS G12C inhibition induces sustained activation of focal adhesive kinase (FAK) and show that a combination therapy comprising KRAS G12C inhibition and a FAK inhibitor (IN10018) achieves synergistic anticancer effects. It can simultaneously reduce the extent of drug resistance. Diverse CDX and PDX models of KRAS G12C mutant cancer are examined and synergistic benefits from the combination therapy are consistently observed. Mechanistically, it is found that both aberrant FAK-YAP signaling and FAK-related fibrogenesis impact on the development of KRAS G12C inhibitor resistance. This study thus illustrates the mechanism of resistance of cancer to the treatment of KRAS G12C inhibitor, as well as an innovative combination therapy to improve treatment outcomes for KRAS G12C mutant cancers.

Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase enhances antitumor response of radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer through CD8+ T cells.

Objective: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly malignancy, due in large part to its resistance to conventional therapies, including radiotherapy (RT). Despite RT exerting a modest antitumor response, it has also been shown to promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Previous studies demonstrated that focal adhesion kinase inhibitors (FAKi) in clinical development inhibit the infiltration of suppressive myeloid cells and T regulatory (T regs) cells, and subsequently enhance effector T cell infiltration. FAK inhibitors in clinical development have not been investigated in combination with RT in preclinical murine models or clinical studies. Thus, we investigated the impact of FAK inhibition on RT, its potential as an RT sensitizer and immunomodulator in a murine model of PDAC. Methods: We used a syngeneic orthotopic murine model to study the effect of FAKi on hypofractionated RT. Results: In this study we showed that IN10018, a small molecular FAKi, enhanced antitumor response to RT. Antitumor activity of the combination of FAKi and RT is T cell dependent. FAKi in combination with RT enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration significantly in comparison to the radiation or FAKi treatment alone (P < 0.05). FAKi in combination with radiation inhibited the infiltration of granulocytes but enhanced the infiltration of macrophages and T regs in comparison with the radiation or FAKi treatment alone (P < 0.01). Conclusions: These results support the clinical development of FAKi as a radiosensitizer for PDAC and combining FAKi with RT to prime the tumor microenvironment of PDAC for immunotherapy.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis in Chinese patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) has demonstrated efficacy in nasal polyposis (NP) in Western populations, data in Asian populations is limited. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study evaluated MFNS 200 µg twice per day (BID) vs placebo in Chinese adults with bilateral nasal polyps (graded as 1, 2, or 3 by the investigator). A 14-day placebo run-in period was followed by a 16-week treatment period with MFNS 200 µg BID vs placebo (1:1 ratio). The co-primary endpoints were change from baseline in nasal congestion/obstruction averaged over the first 4 weeks of treatment and change from baseline in the total polyp size score (sum of scores from the left and right nasal fossa) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included other sinonasal symptoms scores and safety outcomes such as monitoring laboratory measurements, vital signs, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: There were 748 patients randomized, 375 received MFNS 200 µg BID and 373 received placebo. The between-treatment difference in least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in nasal congestion/obstruction over 4 weeks of treatment was -0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22 to -0.06) for MFNS vs placebo (p = 0.0007). The between-treatment difference in LS mean change from baseline in total polyp size score at week 16 was -0.30 (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.15) for MFNS vs placebo (p < 0.0001). Serious AEs were rare (0.5% and 0.8% in MFNS and placebo groups, respectively) and considered not drug-related. There were significantly more AEs of epistaxis with MFNS vs placebo (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that MFNS was effective and well tolerated in this population of adult, Chinese patients with NP.

Penetration of garenoxacin into lung tissues and bone in subjects undergoing lung biopsy or resection.

OBJECTIVE: Concentrations of garenoxacin in plasma and samples of lung parenchyma, bronchial mucosa, and bone were determined following single-dose administration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Open-label, non-randomized study in which subjects undergoing invasive lung biopsy or resection were given a single 600-mg oral dose of garenoxacin. Lung parenchyma, and, if possible, bronchial mucosa and bone (i.e., flat bone with sinus mucosa or long bone from the lower legs) samples and corresponding plasma samples were obtained 2-4, 4-6, 10-12, or 20-24 h post-dose. Garenoxacin concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography with dual mass spectrometry. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects enrolled and completed the study. Garenoxacin plasma concentrations (mean +/- standard deviation) during the 24-h period ranged from 1.9 +/- 1 to 7.4 +/- 3 mug/mL. Garenoxacin concentrations in lung tissue (15.2 +/- 9 mug/g) peaked at 4-6 h and decreased to 3.7 +/- 3 mug/g at 20-24 h. Mean ratios between bronchial mucosa and plasma ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 over a 24-h period. At 12 h, the mean ratio between bone and plasma was 0.56. Garenoxacin concentrations in lung tissue exceeded the MIC(90) for common respiratory pathogens by at least 61-fold. Garenoxacin was safe and well tolerated. Forty-five adverse events were reported by 26 subjects; none were determined to be attributable to garenoxacin by the investigators. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Garenoxacin achieved 24-h concentrations in pulmonary tissues that exceeded the MIC(90) for common respiratory pathogens. A controlled study involving a larger number of lung and bone tissue samples is needed to further confirm these findings.

Effect of an aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid on the bioavailability of garenoxacin in healthy volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of an aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid (Al-Mg antacid), which contains a high concentration of cations, on the pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, control-balanced, residual-effects-design study. SETTING: Pharmaceutical company-affiliated study clinic. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy volunteers who were garenoxacin naïve. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive three of six oral treatments, each separated by a 7-day washout period: garenoxacin 600 mg administered alone, with concomitant Al-Mg antacid, 2 or 4 hours before Al-Mg antacid, or 2 or 4 hours after Al-Mg antacid. The Al-Mg antacid dose was 20 ml, which contained aluminum hydroxide 900 mg and magnesium hydroxide 800 mg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics and safety of garenoxacin were assessed. For each treatment, serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis of garenoxacin were collected before and up to 72 hours after garenoxacin dosing. Absence of effect of Al-Mg antacid on garenoxacin area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) were concluded if the 90% confidence interval of the adjusted geometric mean ratios with and without the antacid were contained within 0.80-1.25 and 0.70-1.43, respectively. Exposure to garenoxacin measured by AUC(0-infinity), a parameter well correlated with efficacy, was reduced by 58% when coadministered with Al-Mg antacid and reduced by 22% and 16% when administered 2 and 4 hours after the antacid, respectively. Administration of garenoxacin 4 hours before Al-Mg antacid had no effect on AUC(0-infinity) or C(max) of garenoxacin, whereas administration 2 hours before the antacid resulted in a nonclinically relevant (12%) reduction in AUC(0-infinity) of garenoxacin. CONCLUSION: Exposure to garenoxacin was significantly decreased when garenoxacin was coadministered with Al-Mg antacid or within 2 hours after the antacid. The magnitude of the changes in garenoxacin exposure suggests that garenoxacin should be administered at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after administration of Al-Mg antacid or other cation-containing products.