[Spasticity-correcting surgery can have long-lasting effects]. / Spasticitetskorrigerande kirurgi kan ge långvariga förbättringar.

Spasticity is a common secondary complication after injuries to the central nervous system (CNS). Spasticity may severely impair arm and hand function, and consequently, affect an individual's function, resulting in disabilities or limiting activities and participation. Today, there is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of available spasticity treatments. The population of adults with spasticity problems due to a CNS injury is heterogenic. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in customizing treatment to individual needs. The planning of treatment should consider the remaining upper limb functions and the patient's potential to improveme. Spasticity-correcting surgery is an option that seems underutilized. This article describes a structured and standardized program for the preoperative assessment, the surgical technique and the postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing upper limb spasticity-correcting surgery.

Grasp and Release Test for Tetraplegic Hand Assessment: an update of the Grasp and Release Test.

The Grasp and Release Test (GRT) was originally developed to measure effectiveness of an implanted neuroprosthesis in people with tetraplegia. Its ease of use and lack of floor and ceiling effects culminated in recommendations for inclusion in a battery of tests to measure outcome following upper limb reconstructive surgery. However, the length of time taken to administer the GRT in a clinical setting, lack of instructions of accepted grasp patterns in the upper limb reconstructive surgery population and scoring procedures lead to differences in reporting outcomes using this measure. In order to ensure clinical utility for the upper limb reconstructive surgery population, revisions of the original test instructions have been made and are reported in this article. Further testing of the psychometric properties of the new measure are currently underway.

Linking Prioritized Occupational Performance in Patients Undergoing Spasticity-Correcting Upper Limb Surgery to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

Background: Spasticity is generally caused by damage to the spinal cord or the areas of the brain that controls movements, which poses significant limitations in occupational tasks. Objectives: The aims of the study were to (I) describe prioritized occupational performance problems (POPP) among patients who underwent upper limb spasticity-correcting surgery and map them to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health (ICF); (II) assess outcomes postsurgery; (III) assess whether the results are influenced by the diagnosis, gender, and residual muscle function; and (IV) assess correlation between changes in COPM and gains in grasp ability and grip strength. Methods: In this retrospective study, assessments occurred pre- and postsurgery, including the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), grip strength, and grasp ability. POPP were transformed to prioritized occupational performance goals (POPG) during subsequent rehabilitation. Results: 60 patients with a history of spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 42; 59%), stroke (n = 25; 34%), traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 4; 6%), and reason unknown (n = 1; 1%) were included, with a mean age of 57 (±13) years. Of those, 11 had bilateral surgery, generating 71 COPM forms and 320 POPG. The POPG were mapped to the ICF activity and participation chapter, most often to self-care (n = 131; 41%), domestic life (n = 68; 21%), and mobility (n = 58; 18%). COPM scores were significantly increased postsurgery, irrespective of diagnosis, gender, and muscle function. No clear correlation between COPM improvement and hand function gains was shown. Conclusion: Patients who underwent spasticity-correcting upper limb surgery identified difficulties with a wide range of occupational tasks that they considered as important to regain. Treatment-induced gains in occupational performance were significant but had no clear correlation with gains in grasp ability and hand strength. Independent of diagnosis, gender, and residual muscle function, it seems important to address the activity- and participation-specific aspects in the assessment and rehabilitation of patients.

Reproducibility, Construct Validity, and Responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire, TUAQ. Part 2.

OBJECTIVE: To test reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire (TUAQ), a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses perceived performance and satisfaction with 10 standardized activities. DESIGN: Outcome measure psychometric evaluation. SETTING: Spinal cord injury units in 2 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Reproducibility: 47 individuals with tetraplegia. Construct validity and responsiveness: 33 individuals with tetraplegia undergoing surgery to restore hand function (N=80). INTERVENTIONS: Reproducibility: The TUAQ was completed on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart. Construct validity and responsiveness: Participants completed the TUAQ prior to surgery and 3-12 months after hand reconstruction surgery. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach α. Two agreement parameters were examined: the SEM and minimal detectable change with 90% confidence interval (MDC90). Construct validity was evaluated using Pearson product moment correlation against a priori hypotheses. Responsiveness was assessed using paired t tests and effect size. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability and internal consistency was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 for performance scale and 0.88 for satisfaction, Cronbach α of 0.92 and 0.90, respectively). For agreement the SEM scores were 4.7 and 3.5, with MDC90 of 10.9 and 8.2, respectively. Responsiveness and construct validity showed sound results with no ceiling or floor effects and with large effect size (>1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TUAQ demonstrates good psychometric properties for reliability and agreement for persons with tetraplegia and responsiveness and construct validity for surgical reconstruction of hand function for persons with tetraplegia. The TUAQ appears appropriate to be used as a patient-reported outcome measure for clinical and research purposes in this population.

The impact of upper limb spasticity-correcting surgery on the everyday life of patients with disabling spasticity: a qualitative analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the patient perspective of their experiences of daily life after spasticity-correcting surgery for disabling upper limb (UL) spasticity after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with UL spasticity resulting from SCI (n= 6) or stroke (n= 2) were interviewed 6-9 months after spasticity-correcting surgery. A phenomenographic approach was used to analyze the interviews. RESULTS: Five themes emerged from the interviews: (1) bodily changes, such as increased muscle strength, range of motion, and reduced muscle-hypertonicity; (2) improved occupational performance, facilitating tasks, mobility, and self-care; (3) regained control, explicating the perception of regaining bodily control and a more adaptable body; (4) enhanced interpersonal interactions, entailing the sense of being more comfortable undertaking social activities and personal interactions; and (5) enhanced psychological well-being, including having more energy, increased self-esteem, and greater happiness after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The participants experienced improvements in their everyday lives, including body functions, activities, social life, and psychological well-being. The benefits derived from surgery made activities easier, increased occupational performance, allowed patients regain their roles and interpersonal interactions, and enhanced their psychological well-being.Implications for rehabilitationSpasticity-correcting surgery benefits patients by improving bodily functions, which in turn, enable gains in activities, social life, and psychological well-being.Patients' experiences of increased body functions, such as enhanced mobility and reduced muscle hypertonicity, appear to increase the sense of bodily control.The surgery can increase participation and psychological well-being, even for patients whose functional or activity level did not improve after the treatment.The benefits expressed by the individuals in this study can be used to inform, planning, and in discussion with patients and other healthcare professionals about interventions targeting spasticity.

Toward Consensus in Assessing Upper Limb Muscle Strength and Pinch and Grip Strength in People With Tetraplegia Having Upper Limb Reconstructions.

OBJECTIVES: To reach agreement on standardized protocols for assessing upper limb strength and grip and pinch force for upper limb reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia. METHODS: Selected members of an expert panel composed of international therapists formed at the 2018 International Congress for Upper Limb Surgery for Tetraplegia conducted a literature review of current practice that identified gaps and inconsistencies in measurement protocols and presented to workshop attendees. To resolve discrepancies, a set of questions was presented to workshop attendees who voted electronically. Consensus was set at 75% agreement. RESULTS: For manual muscle testing, consensus was reached for using the Medical Research Council scale, without plus or minus, and the use of resistance through range when testing grade 4 and grade 5 strength. Pectoralis major and serratus anterior should be routinely tested, however there was no consensus on other shoulder muscles. Grip and pinch strength should be tested according to the American Society of Hand Therapists positioning. For grip strength, either the Jamar or Biometrics dynamometer expressed in kilograms should be used. For grip and pinch strength, three measurements should be performed at each testing. No consensus was reached on a device for pinch strength. CONCLUSION: This work is an important step to enable comparable data in the future. Further consensus methods will work toward developing more comprehensive guidelines in this population. Building international consensus for pre- and postoperative measures of function supports objective evaluation of novel therapies and interpretation of multicenter studies.

Activity gains after upper limb surgery for spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury.

Spasticity is a common and increasingly prevalent secondary complication of spinal cord injury. The aim of the study was to evaluate patient-experienced gains in prioritized activities after surgery to reduce the effects of spasticity in upper limbs in tetraplegia. The study includes evaluation of 30 operations for 27 patients performed on hypertonic tetraplegic hands during 2007-2015 using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Activity performance increased at both 6 months and 12 months by a mean of 3.0 and 2.9 points, respectively. Satisfaction increased by 3.3 and 3.4, respectively. All types of activities improved, with wheelchair manoeuvring as one of the highest rated. The intervention increased prioritized activity performance and persisted at least 12 months after surgery. Patients with mild upper limb impairment showed greater improvement after surgery. After operation, patients were able to perform 71% of their prioritized activities, which they could not perform before. Patients' satisfaction with the performance was high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Adaptive motor cortex plasticity following grip reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia.

BACKGROUND: Tendon transfer is a surgical technique for restoring upper limb motor control in patients with cervical spinal cord injuries (SCI), and offers a rare window into cortical neuroplasticity following regained arm and hand function. OBJECTIVE: Here, we aimed to examine neuroplasticity mechanisms related to re-established voluntary motor control of thumb flexion following tendon transfer. METHODS: We used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to test the hypothesis that restored limb control following tendon transfer is mediated by activation of that limb's area of the primary motor cortex. We examined six individuals with tetraplegia who underwent right-sided surgical grip reconstruction at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. All were right-handed males, with a SCI at the C6 or C7 level, and a mean age of 40 years (range = 31-48). The average number of years elapsed since the SCI was 13 (range = 6-26). Six right-handed gender- and age-matched control subjects were included (mean age 39 years, range = 29-46). Restoration of active thumb flexion in patients was achieved by surgical transfer of one of the functioning elbow flexors (brachioradialis), to the paralyzed thumb flexor (flexor pollicis longus). We studied fMRI responses to isometric right-sided elbow flexion and key pinch, and examined the cortical representations within the left hemisphere somatomotor cortex a minimum of one year after surgery. RESULTS: Cortical activations elicited by elbow flexion did not differ in topography between patients and control participants. However, in contrast to control participants, patients' cortical thumb flexion activations were not topographically distinct from their elbow flexion activations. CONCLUSION: This result speaks against a topographic reorganization in which the thumb region regains thumb control following surgical tendon transfer. Instead, our findings suggest a neuroplastic mechanism in which motor cortex resources previously dedicated to elbow flexion adapt to control the thumb.

Early Active Rehabilitation After Grip Reconstructive Surgery in Tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the concept of early active rehabilitation after tendon transfer to restore grip function in tetraplegia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two nonprofit rehabilitation units in Sweden and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with tetraplegia who underwent tendon transfer to restore grip ability during 2009 to 2013 (N=49). INTERVENTION: Reconstructive tendon transfer surgery with early active rehabilitation to restore grip ability in tetraplegia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Grip and pinch strength, grip ability test, and outcome of prioritized activities. RESULTS: In the 49 surgeries performed, postoperative complications included 2 patients with bleeding and 2 infections related to the surgery. There were no reported ruptures or lengthening of transferred tendons. Within 24 hours after surgery, all 47 patients (100%) with finger flexion reconstruction succeeded to activate their finger flexion. All but 1 patient with reconstructed thumb flexion sucessfully activated their thumb flexion (n=40). Three weeks after surgery, all patients (100%) were able to perform basic activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living were achieved by 74%. One year after surgery, the maximum grip strength in restored finger flexion was on average 6.9kg (range, 1.5-15kg; n=29). The maximum pinch strength in restored thumb flexion was on average 3.7kg (range, 1-20; n=29). On average, grip ability improved from 33 to 101 (n=19) according to the COPM. Prioritized activity limitations, as measured with the COPM, equated to an average of 3.5 steps (2.5 steps preoperatively to 6 steps postoperatively). Patients' perceived satisfaction with this improvement was 4 steps (increasing from 2 steps preoperatively to 6 steps postoperatively). CONCLUSIONS: Grip reconstructive surgery followed by early active rehabilitation can be considered a reliable procedure that leads to substantial improvements in grip and pinch strength and activity performance among patients with tetraplegia.

Rehabilitation After Posterior Deltoid to Triceps Transfer in Tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the rehabilitation concept after posterior deltoid to triceps transfer in patients with tetraplegia. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Rehabilitation units. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with tetraplegia who had posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer and had muscle strength measurements 1 year postsurgery from 2009 to 2013 (N=44). INTERVENTIONS: Posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer to restore elbow extension and postoperative rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Elbow extension range of motion and muscle strength and the modified Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). RESULTS: Surgery was performed on 53 arms. No major complications (eg tendon rupture, lengthening) were reported. Muscle strength measured 1 year after surgery was on average grade 3 (out of 5) in the 53 operated arms. The ability to extend the elbow against gravity was achieved in 62% of the arms (muscle strength of grade ≥3). In patients with a preoperative elbow extension deficit (n=14), the deficit was reduced on average from 16° to 9°. The performance of the prioritized activities as measured with the COPM improved on average 2.6 scale steps, from 3.3 to 5.9. Satisfaction with the performance improved on average 3.2 scale steps, from 2.8 to 6.0. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer with the applied rehabilitation protocol is a safe and effective procedure. There were no tendon ruptures, and all patients were able to complete the rehabilitation protocol. The shorter restriction time after surgery allows the patient to be independent at an earlier stage of the rehabilitation and reduces hospitalization or care burden.

Rehabilitation After Spasticity-Correcting Upper Limb Surgery in Tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the early active rehabilitation concept developed for spasticity-correcting surgery in tetraplegia and to report the outcomes in grip ability and change of performance and satisfaction in patients' prioritized activities 1 year postoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Nonprofit rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent surgeries for correction of spasticity in tetraplegic hands between 2009 and 2013 in the studied unit (N=37). INTERVENTIONS: Spasticity-correcting upper limb surgery with early active rehabilitation to restore grip ability in tetraplegia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Grasp and release test (GRT) and modified Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). RESULTS: All patients could accomplish the early active rehabilitation concept. The complication rate related to the treatment was low. Compared with preoperatively, all evaluated individuals experienced improvements in grasp ability and activity performance and satisfaction at 1-year follow-up. The performance in prioritized activities, as measured by the COPM, improved by 2.6 scale steps. Satisfaction with performance improved 3.0 scale steps postoperatively (n=21). The grasp ability, measured by the GRT, improved significantly, from 80 preoperatively to 111 (n=10). CONCLUSIONS: The surgery, combined with the early active rehabilitation protocol, is a reliable and safe procedure. The ability to use the hand improved, and gains were maintained at least 1 year after surgery in all patients with respect to both the objective grasp ability and patients' subjective rating of their performance and satisfaction in their prioritized activities. The procedure should therefore be considered as an adjunct to other treatments of upper limb spasticity in spinal cord injury.

Measurement of Outcomes of Upper Limb Reconstructive Surgery for Tetraplegia.

Reconstructive arm/hand surgery for tetraplegia is performed to improve arm/hand function and therefore personal well-being for individuals who accept such elective surgeries. However, changes at an impairment level do not always translate into functional or quality of life changes. Therefore, multiple outcome tools should be used that incorporate sufficient responsiveness to detect changes in arm/hand function, activity and participation, and quality of life of the individuals involved. This narrative review aims to assist clinicians to choose the most appropriate tools to assess the need for reconstructive surgery and to evaluate its outcomes. Our specific objectives are (1) to describe aspects to consider when choosing a measure and (2) to describe the measures advised by an international therapist consensus group established in 2007. All advised measures are appraised in terms of the underlying construct, administration, and clinical relevance to arm/hand reconstructions. Essentially there are currently no criterion standard measures to evaluate the consequences of reconstructive arm/hand surgery. However, with judicious use of available measures it is possible to ensure the questions asked or tasks completed are relevant to the surgical reconstruction(s) undertaken. Further work in this field is required. This would be best met by immediate collaboration between 2 outcome's tool developers and by analysis of pre- and postoperative data already held in various international sites, which would allow further evaluation of the measures already in use, or components thereof.

From regained function to daily use: experiences of surgical reconstruction of grip in people with tetraplegia.

PURPOSE: To capture patients' relearning processes from regained function to improvements in daily life after grip reconstructive surgery in tetraplegia. SUBJECTS: Eleven people with tetraplegia who underwent grip reconstructive surgery during February 2009 to March 2011. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted 7 to 17 months after surgery and analysed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Determination to reach a higher level of independence was the core concept to integrate regained function into daily life. There were 3 phases identified; "Initiate activity training," "Establish hand control in daily activities," and "Challenge dependence." Between the phases psychological stages occurred, first; "a belief in improved ability", and later in the process; "confidence in ability". The process to fully integrate regain function in daily life was described as long and time-consuming. However, the participants claimed it useful to do the skills training in their home environment, without long-term in clinic rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Relearning activities in daily life after a grip reconstruction is a time-consuming and demanding process. It includes skills training, mental strategies and psychological stages together with environmental and social factors. Accordingly, rehabilitation after grip reconstruction in tetraplegia should focus on both grip skills and psychological stages, to encourage that patient's keep their determination and achieve greater independence. Implications for Rehabilitation There is a stepwise process to transform improved function into daily use. The most important factor to transform improved function into daily use was motivation to reach a higher independence. Other important factors were; skills training, use of individual learning strategies, belief and confidence in personal ability, social and environmental factors. There was a long and demanding process to fully transform the improved function into daily use. The participants preferred to do activity training in the specific environment, usually at home.

Upper extremity reconstruction in non-traumatic spinal cord injuries: An under-recognized opportunity.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the usefulness of surgical improvement of arm and hand function in patients with non-traumatic spinal cord injury who differ significantly from individuals with post-traumatic tetraplegia with respect to age, injury pattern, gender and socio-economic factors. DESIGN: Case series. Tests were conducted preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. PATIENTS: The results of 14 upper extremity reconstructions in 11 patients (7 women, 4 men) with spinal cord injury, mean age at injury 49 years (standard deviation (SD) 12), were reviewed. METHODS: Key pinch strength, grip strength and first web space opening were recorded pre- and post-operatively in all patients, 5 patients (7 hands) were evaluated prospectively regarding manual dexterity. RESULTS: All parameters were significantly improved. Strength of key pinch increased from 0.3 kg in 1 case and zero in 10 cases to a mean of 1.6 kg (SD 0.9). Mean grip strength increased from 0 to 3.2 kg (SD 4.5). Maximal distance between thumb and index increased from 2.1 cm (SD 4.1) to 6.4 cm (SD 4.4). Manual dexterity increased. CONCLUSION: Individuals with stable non-traumatic tetraplegia benefit from surgical rehabilitation of their upper extremities. The number of non-traumatic spinal cord injuries is likely to increase as lifespan increases worldwide, and further research into the functional rehabilitation of this population will therefore become increasingly relevant.

Enhanced independence: experiences after regaining grip function in people with tetraplegia.

PURPOSE: To explore how surgical reconstruction of grip affects everyday life for patients with tetraplegia, with special emphasis on patients perspective of their perceived changes. DESIGN: Qualitative method. SUBJECTS: Eleven people (aged 22-73) with tetraplegia who had undergone surgical reconstruction to restore grip function. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted 7-17 months after surgery and analysed using Grounded theory. RESULTS: The core concept describing the participants experienced gains after grip reconstructive surgery was "enhanced independence". It was associated with changes in both practical and psychological aspects of independence. Practical aspects identified were: "perform more activities", "smoother everyday life", "renewed ability to participate in social activities", "less dependence on assistance" and "less restricted by physical environment". Psychological aspects of independence included "regained privacy", "increased manageability", "regained identity", "recapture a part of the body" and "share positive experiences with relatives and friends". Encompassing all categories was the concept "self-efficacy in hand control". It was seen as a result included in the enhanced independency core but also as an important factor for the development of all the other categories. CONCLUSION: Participants in this study experienced enhanced independence after grip reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation. The enhanced independence included both practical and physical aspects and it influenced all domains using the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health model; body function and structure, activities, participation, personal factors and environmental factors. Implications for Rehabilitation Patients with tetraplegia experience grip reconstruction as a useful intervention, an enhanced independence, related to their improved hand control. The increased hand control impacted not only physical aspects but also practical and psychological aspects. It also influenced social and community participation and the interference the environment had on the person. Self-efficacy was both a result of the intervention and a catalyst allowing the subcategories to develop. Therefore, self-efficacy in hand control seems to be an important factor to focus on during the rehabilitation process.

Activity gains after reconstructions of elbow extension in patients with tetraplegia.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction of triceps function in persons with tetraplegia is an established surgical intervention. The purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate patient perspective of gains in activity and satisfaction after surgical reconstruction of triceps function and subsequent rehabilitation. METHODS: We studied the effects of surgery and rehabilitation in 14 persons (19 arms) treated with deltoid-to-triceps transfer. We used Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement standards to capture the performance and satisfaction of patient-identified activity goals. Follow-up was performed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. To make group analyses, we classified activity goals according to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health categories of activities and participation, as well as relative to the position of the arm in space. RESULTS: Patients reported improvement in performance after surgery, and satisfaction was rated even higher. Improvement was seen in all types of activities that patients had prioritized. No single goal was rated lower at 12 months' follow-up than before surgery. The most common activity gains were related to "driving a wheelchair" and the ability to "reach out," each of which represented 20% of expressed goals. Although "driving a wheelchair" and "moving the body" (transfers) were common goals, the smallest improvements for both performance and satisfaction after 12 months were seen in these areas. We observed the highest performance improvement in the category of "writing" and the ability to "stretch out the arm when lying down." CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in activity continues over the first year after triceps reconstruction. Complex activities continue to improve over a longer period than simpler activities. We saw the highest improvement in activities performed without the aid of gravity and activities highly dependent on coordination. Such actions are difficult to compensate for by technique or skills, and therefore elbow extension is essential for performance. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Performance of prioritized activities is not correlated with functional factors after grip reconstruction in tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between perceived performance in prioritized activities and physical conditions related to grip reconstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical outcome study. PATIENTS: Forty-seven individuals with tetraplegia were included in the study. Each participant underwent tendon transfer surgery in the hand between November 2002 and April 2009 and had a complete 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Functional characteristics and performance data were collected from our database and medical records. Patients' perceived performances in prioritized activities were recorded using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement. Preoperative data included age at surgery, time since injury, severity of injury, sensibility and hand dominance. At 1-year follow-up, grip strength, key pinch strength, finger pulp-to-palm distance, distance between thumb and index finger and wrist flexion were measured. Correlation rank coefficient was used to test the possible relationship between physical data and activity performance. RESULTS: There were improvements in both functional factors and in rated performance of prioritized activities after surgery. There was no correlation between performance change and any of the physical functions, the factors known before surgery, or the functional outcome factors. CONCLUSION: No correlation exists between a single functional outcome parameter and the patients' perceived performance of their prioritized goals in reconstructive hand surgery in tetraplegia.