Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 41(9): 1222-1229, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925842

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A decrease in intracochlear electrocochleographic (ECochG) amplitude during cochlear implantation has been associated with poorer postoperative hearing preservation in several short-term studies. Here, we relate the stability of ECochG during surgery to hearing preservation at 3- and 12-months. METHODS: Patients with hearing ≤80-dB HL at 500 Hz were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array. ECochG responses to short, high-intensity, 500-Hz pure tones of alternating polarity were recorded continuously from the apical-most electrode during implantation. No feedback was provided to the surgeon. ECochG amplitude was derived from the difference response, and implantations classified by the presence ("ECochG drop") or absence ("no drop") of a ≥30% reduction in ECochG amplitude during insertion. Residual hearing (relative and absolute) was reported against the ECochG class. RESULTS: ECochG was recorded from 109 patients. Of these, interpretable ECochG signals were recorded from 95. Sixty-six of 95 patients had an ECochG drop during implantation. Patients with an ECochG drop had poorer preoperative hearing above 1000 Hz. Hearing preservation (in decibels, relative to preoperative levels and functionally) was significantly poorer at 250-, 500-, and 1000-Hz at 3 months in patients exhibiting an ECochG drop. Twelve-month outcomes were available from 85 patients, with significantly poorer functional hearing, and greater relative and absolute hearing loss from 250 to 1000 Hz, when an ECochG drop had been encountered. CONCLUSION: Patients exhibiting ECochG drops during implantation had significantly poorer hearing preservation 12 months later. These observational outcomes support the future development of surgical interventions responsive to real-time intracochlear ECochG. Early intervention to an ECochG drop could potentially lead to prolonged improvements in hearing preservation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Perda Auditiva , Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Cóclea/cirurgia , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Humanos
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 89(6): 738-742, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30497101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In sudden and asymmetrical progressive sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is required to evaluate retrocochlear pathology and, with recent advances in MRI techniques, inner ear pathology. Given the limited literature regarding inner ear pathology associated with SNHL, we aimed to assess the incidence of retrocochlear and inner ear pathology, and congenital malformation on MRI in sudden SNHL (SSNHL) and progressive SNHL. METHODS: A total of 987 acoustic neuroma (AN) protocol MRI internal acoustic meatus studies performed at our institution to investigate SNHL between January 2013 and December 2015 inclusive were identified. Following categorization for indication of SSNHL versus progressive asymmetrical SNHL, MRIs with retrocochlear or inner ear abnormality, congenital malformation or other otology-related abnormality were identified, and further data were collected for these patients including patient demographics, associated symptomatology, management and outcomes. RESULTS: In SSNHL, aetiological abnormality on MRI was identified for 6.9% patients with AN present on 4% overall. 3.2% of MRIs for progressive asymmetrical SNHL identified a causative lesion with 2.3% of scans overall diagnosing AN. The incidence of congenital inner ear malformation on MRI in the setting of SSNHL and progressive asymmetrical SNHL are 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first retrospective study of inner ear MRI abnormalities in both SSNHL and progressive asymmetrical SNHL in Australia and one of the largest cohorts published in the literature to date. MRI must be performed in the setting of SNHL to ensure aforementioned and rarer causative lesions are identified.


Assuntos
Doenças Cocleares/diagnóstico por imagem , Orelha Interna/diagnóstico por imagem , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico por imagem , Perda Auditiva Súbita/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Labirinto/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Doenças Cocleares/complicações , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/complicações , Perda Auditiva Súbita/complicações , Humanos , Doenças do Labirinto/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroma Acústico/complicações , Neuroma Acústico/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
6.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 16(4): 201-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25317895

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential risk of pneumococcal meningitis associated with the use of a dexamethasone-eluting intracochlear electrode array as compared with a control array. METHODS: In two phases, adult Hooded-Wistar rats were implanted via the middle ear with an intracochlear array and were inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae 5 days post-surgery. Phase I created a dosing curve by implanting five groups (n = 6) with a control array, then inoculating 5 days later with different numbers of S. pneumoniae: 0 CFU, 10(3) CFU, 10(4) CFU, 10(4) CFU repeated, or 10(5) CFU (colony forming units). A target infection rate of 20% was aimed for and 10(4) CFU was the closest to this target with 33% infection rate. In phase II, we implanted two groups (n = 10), one with a dexamethasone-eluting array, the other a control array, and both groups were inoculated with 10(4) CFU of S. pneumoniae 5 days post-surgery. RESULTS: The dexamethasone-eluting array group had a 40% infection rate; the control array group had a 60% infection rate. This difference was not statistically significant with a P value of ≥0.5. CONCLUSION: The use of a dexamethasone-eluting intracochlear electrode array did not increase the risk of meningitis in rats when inoculated with S. pneumoniae via the middle ear 5 days following implantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Meningite Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Animais , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implante Coclear/métodos , Masculino , Meningite Pneumocócica/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Streptococcus pneumoniae
10.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 143(5 Suppl 3): S15-23, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20970686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This review describes the current concept of pneumococcal meningitis in cochlear implant recipients based on recent laboratory studies. It examines possible routes of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to the meninges in cochlear implant recipients. It also provides insights into fundamental questions concerning the pathophysiology of pneumococcal meningitis in implant recipients. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed database; English articles after 1960. Search terms: cochlear implants, meningitis, pneumococcus, streptococcus pneumonia. REVIEW METHODS: Narrative review. All articles relating to post-implant meningitis without any restriction in study designs were assessed and information extracted. RESULTS: The incidence of pneumococcal meningitis in cochlear implant recipients is greater than that of an age-matched cohort in the general population. Based on the current clinical literature, it is difficult to determine whether cochlear implantation per se increases the risk of meningitis in subjects with no existing risk factors for acquiring the disease. As this question cannot be answered in humans, the study of implant-related infection must involve the use of laboratory animals in order for the research findings to be applicable to a clinical situation. The laboratory research demonstrated the routes of infection and the effects of the cochlear implant in lowering the threshold for pneumococcal meningitis. CONCLUSION: The laboratory data complement the existing clinical data on the risk of pneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Orelha Interna/lesões , Meningite Pneumocócica/etiologia , Meningite Pneumocócica/fisiopatologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/fisiopatologia , Animais , Biofilmes , Orelha Interna/patologia , Humanos , Meningite Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Meningite Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus pneumoniae
11.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 143(5 Suppl 3): S9-14, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20970694

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Both clinical data and laboratory studies demonstrated the risk of pneumococcal meningitis post-cochlear implantation. This review examines strategies to prevent post-implant meningitis. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed database; English articles after 1980. Search terms: cochlear implants, pneumococcus meningitis, streptococcus pneumonia, immunization, prevention. REVIEW METHODS: Narrative review. All articles relating to post-implant meningitis without any restriction in study designs were assessed and information extracted. RESULTS: The presence of inner ear trauma as a result of surgical technique or cochlear implant electrode array design was associated with a higher risk of post-implant meningitis. Laboratory data demonstrated the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in preventing meningitis induced via the hematogenous route of infection. Fibrous sealing around the electrode array at the cochleostomy site, and the use of antibiotic-coated electrode array reduced the risk of meningitis induced via an otogenic route. CONCLUSION: The recent scientific data support the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendation of pneumococcal vaccination for the prevention of meningitis in implant recipients. Nontraumatic cochlear implant design, surgical technique, and an adequate fibrous seal around the cochleostomy site further reduce the risk of meningitis.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Orelha Interna/lesões , Meningite Pneumocócica/etiologia , Meningite Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Orelha Interna/patologia , Eletrodos , Humanos , Meningite Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus pneumoniae
12.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 133(10): 987-94, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17938321

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine if a 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) reduces the risk of meningitis in healthy rats after cochlear implantation. DESIGN: Interventional animal study. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-six rats (18 immunized and 18 unimmunized) received cochlear implantations and were then infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae via 3 different routes (hematogenous, middle ear, and inner ear) in numbers sufficient to induce meningitis. RESULTS: The rats with implants that received PPV23 were protected from meningitis when the bacteria were delivered via the hematogenous and middle-ear routes (Fisher exact test P<.05). However, the protective effect of the vaccine in the rats with implants was only moderate when the bacteria were inoculated directly into the inner ear. CONCLUSIONS: Our animal model clearly demonstrates that immunization can protect healthy rats with a cochlear implant from meningitis caused by a vaccine-covered serotype. This finding supports the notion that all current and future implant recipients should be vaccinated against S pneumoniae.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Meningite Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/análise , Implantes Cocleares/microbiologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Meninges/microbiologia , Meninges/patologia , Meningite Pneumocócica/etiologia , Meningite Pneumocócica/patologia , Fotomicrografia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/patologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidade , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 136(4): 589-96, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17418257

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study goals were to examine whether cochlear implantation increases the risk of meningitis in the absence of other risk factors and to understand the pathogenesis of pneumococcal meningitis post cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Four weeks following surgery, 54 rats (18 of which received a cochleostomy alone, 18 of which received a cochleostomy and acute cochlear implantation using standard surgical techniques, and 18 of which received a cochlear implant) were infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae via three different routes of bacterial inoculation (middle ear, inner ear, and intraperitoneal) to represent all potential routes of bacterial infection from the upper respiratory tract to the meninges. RESULTS: The presence of a cochlear implant reduced the threshold of bacteria required to cause pneumococcal meningitis from all routes of infection in healthy animals. CONCLUSION: The presence of a cochlear implant increases the risk of pneumococcal meningitis regardless of the route of bacterial infection. SIGNIFICANCE: Early detection and treatment of pneumococcal infection such as otitis media may be required, as cochlear implantation may lead to a reduction of infectious threshold for meningitis.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Meningite Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Animais , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidade
14.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 133(3): 250-9, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17372082

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of pneumococcal meningitis in healthy rats that received a severe surgical trauma to the modiolus and osseous spiral lamina or the standard insertion technique for acute cochlear implantation. DESIGN: Interventional animal studies. SUBJECTS: Fifty-four otologically normal adult Hooded-Wistar rats. INTERVENTIONS: Fifty-four rats (18 of which received a cochleostomy alone; 18, a cochleostomy and acute cochlear implantation using standard surgical techniques; and 18, a cochleostomy followed by severe inner ear trauma) were infected 4 weeks after surgery with Streptococcus pneumoniae via 3 different routes (hematogenous, middle ear, and inner ear) to represent all potential routes of bacterial infection from the upper respiratory tract to the meninges in cochlear implant recipients with meningitis. RESULTS: Severe trauma to the osseous spiral lamina and modiolus increased the risk of pneumococcal meningitis when the bacteria were given via the middle or inner ear (Fisher exact test, P<.05). However, the risk of meningitis did not change when the bacteria were given via the hematogenous route. Acute electrode insertion did not alter the risk of subsequent pneumococcal meningitis for any route of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Severe inner ear surgical trauma to the osseous spiral lamina and modiolus can increase the risk of pneumococcal meningitis. Therefore, every effort should be made to ensure that cochlear implant design and insertion technique cause minimal trauma to the bony structures of the inner ear to reduce the risk of pneumococcal meningitis.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear/efeitos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efeitos adversos , Orelha Interna/lesões , Meningite Pneumocócica/etiologia , Animais , Orelha Interna/patologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus pneumoniae
15.
Otol Neurotol ; 27(8): 1152-61, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16980916

RESUMO

HYPOTHESIS: A minimal threshold of Streptococcus pneumoniae is required to induce meningitis in healthy animals for intraperitoneal (hematogenous), middle ear, and inner ear inoculations, and this threshold may be altered via recent inner ear surgery. BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the number of reported cases of cochlear implant-related pneumococcal meningitis since 2002. The pathogenesis of pneumococcal meningitis is complex and not completely understood. The bacteria can reach the central nervous system (CNS) from the upper respiratory tract mucosa via either hematogenous route or via the inner ear. The establishment of a threshold model for all potential routes of infection to the CNS in animals without cochlear implantation is an important first step to help us understand the pathogenesis of the disease in animals with cochlear implantation. METHODS: Fifty-four otologically normal adult Hooded Wistar rats (27 receiving cochleostomy and 27 controls) were inoculated with different amounts of bacterial counts via three different routes (intraperitoneal, middle ear, and inner ear). Rats were monitored during 5 days for signs of meningitis. Blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and middle ear swabs were taken for bacterial culture, and brains and cochleae were examined for signs of infection. RESULTS: The threshold of bacterial counts required to induce meningitis is lowest in rats receiving direct inner ear inoculation compared with both intraperitoneal and middle ear inoculation. There is no change in threshold between the group of rats with cochleostomy and the control (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A minimal threshold of bacteria is required to induce meningitis in healthy animals and is different for three different routes of infection (intraperitoneal, middle ear, and inner ear). Cochleostomy performed 4 weeks before the inoculation did not reduce the threshold of bacteria required for meningitis in all three infectious routes. This threshold model will also serve as a valuable tool, assisting clinicians to quantitatively analyze if the presence of a cochlear implant or other CNS prostheses alter the risk of meningitis.


Assuntos
Cóclea/cirurgia , Meningite Pneumocócica/microbiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidade , Animais , Implante Coclear , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Meningite Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Fatores de Risco , Streptococcus pneumoniae/crescimento & desenvolvimento
16.
ANZ J Surg ; 76(12): 1106-9, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17199699

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements can be used for the early detection and management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. IAP values are widely thought to be atmospheric or subatmospheric. However, there are no reports that describe normal IAP values using urinary bladder pressure measurements in patients not suspected of having a raised IAP level. This study sought to determine these normal values to aid our interpretation of IAP measurements in post-surgical patients or patients with suspected increased IAP. METHODS: Urinary bladder pressure measurements were carried out in 40 men and 18 women awake medical or non-abdominal surgery inpatients with existing indwelling catheters. Measurements were made in the supine, 30 degrees and 45 degrees sitting positions. Comparisons were carried out to determine the effects on urinary bladder pressure of body position, sex and a suspected diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy. RESULTS: Median values for IAP were higher if measured in a more upright position (P < 0.0001). Median values were supine, 9.5 cmH2O (range, 1-18 cmH2O); 30 degrees upright, 11.5 cmH2O (range, 3-19 cmH2O); and at 45 degrees upright, 14.0 cmH2O (range, 4-22 cmH2O). Measurements recorded were neither atmospheric nor subatmospheric. IAP was higher in men compared with women in the supine and 30 degrees positions (P < 0.05) but not in the 45 degrees position (P = 0.083). There was no significant difference between patients with and without suspected benign prostatic hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Normal IAP using urinary bladder pressure in awake patients are above atmospheric pressure. As a patient is moved from the supine into the upright position, IAP measurements increase.


Assuntos
Abdome/fisiologia , Decúbito Dorsal/fisiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Síndromes Compartimentais/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão , Estudos Prospectivos , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatologia , Valores de Referência , Bexiga Urinária/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA