Female sex does not influence 30-day stroke and mortality rates after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Sex-based differences in outcomes for the treatment of carotid arterial disease remains a controversial topic. The main objective of this study was to determine if gender differences influence 30-day stroke and mortality rates after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a large series of patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all patients undergoing endarterectomy performed by a single surgeon between January 1, 1993 and December 15, 2010. The analysis included data from 1,046 CEAs (683 men and 363 women). RESULTS: There were no differences found in 30-day stroke, death, or combined stroke and death rates between women and men. The 30-day stroke rate was 1.6% for women and 1.8% for men (P = 0.98), with no significant differences between asymptomatic patients (1.7% for women vs. 1.2% for men; P = 0.70) or symptomatic patients (1.6% for women vs. 2.1% for men; P = 0.74). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.8% for women and 0.9% for men (P = 0.85) with no significant differences between asymptomatic patients (0.8% for women vs. 1.2% for men; P = 0.77) and symptomatic patients (0.8% for women vs. 0.7% for men; P = 0.84). There was a similar low risk for the combined outcome of stroke and death (1.9% for women vs. 2.2% for men; P = 0.92), with no differences between asymptomatic patients (1.7% for women vs. 1.6% for men; P = 0.89) or symptomatic patients (2.1% for women vs. 2.5% for men; P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex does not influence 30-day stroke and mortality rates after CEA, regardless of preoperative symptom status.

Steal syndrome complicating upper extremity hemoaccess procedures: incidence and risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Steal syndrome is a potentially grave complication of upper extremity hemoaccess (HA) in patients with renal failure. To determine the incidence and risk factors for steal in these patients at the St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, a tertiary care centre for vascular surgery and dialysis, we reviewed data from patients requiring hemodialysis between September 1986 and July 2000. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We excluded all venous catheter and lower extremity procedures. There remained 325 upper extremity procedures in 217 patients. Data were collected from the patients' charts or by interview. First by univariate analysis and then by multivariate analysis for independent risk factors, we studied the effect on the development of steal of age, sex, race diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular disease, smoking, proximal procedures based on the brachial artery, distal procedures based on the radial artery, the use of prosthetic graft material and the creation of autologous fistulas. RESULTS: The incidence of steal was 6.2%. The significant independent risk factors were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 5.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-18.08, p = 0.01) and Aboriginal race (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.07-12.04, p = 0.04). An increasing risk for each year of advancing age at the time of procedure was suggested but was not significant (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.09 p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are diabetic or Aboriginal are at increased risk for steal with upper extremity HA procedures. This knowledge can guide discussion of dialysis options and informed consent. If upper extremity HA procedures are undertaken in patients at risk, they should be closely monitored and early intervention applied if necessary.