Direct Versus Indirect Revascularization for Moyamoya: a Large Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Moyamoya is a chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease of unknown etiology causing neovascularization of the lenticulostriate collaterals at the base of the brain. Although revascularization surgery is the most effective treatment for moyamoya, there is still no consensus on the best surgical treatment modality as different studies provide different outcomes. OBJECTIVE: In this large case series, we compare the outcomes of direct (DR) and indirect revascularisation (IR) and compare our results to the literature in order to reflect on the best revascularization modality for moyamoya. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology guidelines of moyamoya affected hemispheres treated with DR and IR surgeries across 13 academic institutions predominantly in North America. All patients who underwent surgical revascularization of their moyamoya-affected hemispheres were included in the study. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of symptomatic strokes. RESULTS: The rates of symptomatic strokes across 515 disease-affected hemispheres were comparable between the two cohorts (11.6% in the DR cohort vs 9.6% in the IR cohort, OR 1.238 (95% CI 0.651 to 2.354), p=0.514). The rate of total perioperative strokes was slightly higher in the DR cohort (6.1% for DR vs 2.0% for IR, OR 3.129 (95% CI 0.991 to 9.875), p=0.052). The rate of total follow-up strokes was slightly higher in the IR cohort (8.1% vs 6.6%, OR 0.799 (95% CI 0.374 to 1.709) p=0.563). CONCLUSION: Since both modalities showed comparable rates of overall total strokes, both modalities of revascularization can be performed depending on the patient's risk assessment.

Electronic versus paper patient-reported outcome measure compliance rates: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key tools used to inform clinical research and patient-centered care. Application of data collected from PROMs, however, may be limited by incomplete responses, and little is known regarding the efficacy of varied PROM delivery methods. The objective of this study was to compare PROMs compliance when delivered via paper and electronic formats. METHODS: Elective adult spinal deformity patients were screened for inclusion. Data collected included demographics, type of surgery, PROMs compliance, and discharge care. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed to compare pre- and postoperative compliance rates. RESULTS: Of the 474 included patients, 177 were administered paper PROMs, while 297 were electronic. Preoperatively, 101 patients (57.1%) had any portion of their paper PROMs available; 179 (60.3%) had any of their electronic PROMs available (p = 0.492). Among all patients, 76 (42.9%) and 170 (57.2%) had all of their completed preop PROMs available (p = 0.003). Among patients with any of their preop PROMs completed, 75.2% with paper and 95.0% with electronic were completed in their entirety (p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed among postoperative PROMs. MVA demonstrated electronic delivery as the only significant correlate with pre- and post-operative PROMs compliance (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed across modalities when considering any available PROMs, yet electronic PROM delivery was associated with higher completion of PROMs. In order to improve the quality of patient-reported data, electronic delivery with alternative methods of quality improvement may be considered to increase PROMs retention rates.

Robot-assisted carotid artery stenting: outcomes, safety, and operational learning curve.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past 2 decades, robots have been increasingly used in surgeries to help overcome human limitations and perform precise and accurate tasks. Endovascular robots were pioneered in interventional cardiology, however, the CorPath GRX was recently approved by the FDA for peripheral vascular and extracranial interventions. The authors aimed to evaluate the operational learning curve for robot-assisted carotid artery stenting over a period of 19 months at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was conducted, and 14 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted carotid artery stenting from December 2019 to June 2021 were identified. The metrics for proficiency were the total fluoroscopy and procedure times, contrast volume used, and radiation dose. To evaluate operator progress, the patients were divided into 3 groups of 5, 4, and 5 patients based on the study period. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients were included. All patients received balloon angioplasty and stent placement. The median degree of stenosis was 95%. Ten patients (71%) were treated via the transradial approach and 4 patients (29%) via the transfemoral approach, with no procedural complications. The median contrast volume used was 80 mL, and the median radiation dose was 38,978.5 mGy/cm2. The overall median fluoroscopy and procedure times were 24.6 minutes and 70.5 minutes, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in these times, from 32 minutes and 86 minutes, respectively, in group 1 to 21.9 minutes and 62 minutes, respectively, in group 3 (p = 0.002 and p = 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted carotid artery stenting was found to be safe and effective, and the learning curve for robotic procedures was overcome within a short period of time at a high-volume cerebrovascular center.

Experience With Ventriculoperitoneal and Lumboperitoneal Shunting for the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Single Institution Series.

BACKGROUND: CSF shunting is among the most widely utilized interventions in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS) are 2 possible treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare complications, malfunction, infection, and revision rates associated with VPS compared to LPS. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify baseline and treatment characteristics for patients diagnosed with IIH treated with VPS or LPS. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients treated with either VPS (74.2%) or LPS (25.8%) were identified. The mean follow-up was 35 mo. Shunt revision was required in 40.9% of patients. There was a nonsignificant higher rate of revision with LPS (52.4%) than VPS (36.4%, P = .07). In multivariate analysis, increasing patient age was associated with higher odds of shunt revision (P = .04). LPS had higher odds of shunt revision, yet this association was not significant (P = .06). Shunt malfunction was the main indication for revision occurring in 32.7%, with a significantly higher rate with LPS than VPS (P = .03). In total, 15 patients had shunt infection (9.4% VPS vs 12.2% LPS P = .50). The only significant predictor of procedural infection was the increasing number of revisions (P = .02). CONCLUSION: The incidence of shunt revision was 40.9%, with increasing patient age as the sole predictor of shunt revision. The incidence of shunt malfunction was significantly higher in patients undergoing LPS, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of shunt infection between the 2 modalities.

Early experience with a novel 088 long sheath in transradial neurointerventions.

BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures has several clear benefits compared to transfemoral access. In this study, we report our initial experience with neuroendovascular procedures performed via transradial access using the novel Ballast 088 long sheath. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 91 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures via TRA using the Ballast 088 long sheath. Data collection was performed on indication for procedure, number of vessels selectively catheterized, fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, radiation exposure, failure of radial access and conversion to transfemoral access, periprocedural complications, and procedural outcomes. RESULTS: Amongst 91 patients, the average age was 65.5 years ± 14.2 with 45 (49.5 %) female patients. 25 (27.5 %) patients underwent aneurysm treatment, 2 (2.2 %) AVM/AVF embolization, 28 (30.8 %) intracranial or extracranial stenting, 31 (34.1 %) stroke treatment, and 5 (5.5 %) underwent diagnostic angiogram. The mean number of target vessels catheterized was 1.07 ± 0.25, the mean procedure duration (minutes) was 96.5 ± 57.2, mean fluoroscopy time (minutes) was 21.9 ± 14.2, mean contrast dose (ml) was 112.7 ± 66.7, and mean radiation exposure (Gycm2) was 54.82 ± 41.37. The success rate of target vessel catheterization was 100 %. There were no complications resulting in long term sequelae. Access complications occurred in 1 (1.1 %) patients. Transfemoral conversion was required in 3 (3.3 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Ballast 088 long sheath is safe and effective for TRA in neuroendovascular procedures with a low rate of complications and conversion.

Comparison of Transradial vs Transfemoral Access in Neurovascular Fellowship Training: Overcoming the Learning Curve.

BACKGROUND: The transradial access (TRA) is rapidly gaining popularity for neuroendovascular procedures as there is strong evidence for its benefits compared to the traditional transfemoral access (TFA). However, the transition to TRA bears some challenges including optimization of the interventional suite set-up and workflow as well as its impact on fellowship training. OBJECTIVE: To compare the learning curves of TFA and TRA for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in neuroendovascular fellowship training. METHODS: We prospectively collected diagnostic angiogram procedural data on the performance of 2 neuroendovascular fellows with no prior endovascular experience who trained at our institution from July 2018 until June 2019. Metrics for operator proficiency were minutes of fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and volume of contrast used. RESULTS: A total of 293 diagnostic angiograms were included in the analysis. Of those, 57.7% were TRA and 42.3% were TFA. The median contrast dose was 60 cc, and the median radiation dose was 14 000 µGy. The overall complication rate was 1.4% consisting of 2 groin hematomas, 1 wrist hematoma, and 1 access-site infection using TFA. The crossover rate to TFA was 2.1%. Proficiency was achieved after 60 femoral and 95 radial cases based on fluoroscopy time, 52 femoral and 77 radial cases based on procedure time, and 53 femoral and 64 radial cases based on contrast volume. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that the use of TRA can be safely incorporated into neuroendovascular training without causing an increase in complications or significantly prolonging procedure time or contrast use.

Feasibility and initial experience of left radial approach for diagnostic neuroangiography.

Neuroangiography has seen a recent shift from transfemoral to transradial access. In transradial neuroangiography, the right dominant hand is the main access used. However, the left side may be used specifically for left posterior circulation pathologies and when right access cannot be used. This study describes our initial experience with left radial access for diagnostic neuroangiography and assesses the feasibility and safety of this technique. We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of consecutive patients between April 2018 and January 2020, and identified 20 patients whom a left radial access was used for neurovascular procedures. Left transradial neuroangiography was successful in all 20 patients and provided the sought diagnostic information; no patient required conversion to right radial or femoral access. Pathology consisted of anterior circulation aneurysms in 17 patients (85%), brain tumor in 1 patient (5%), and intracranial atherosclerosis disease involving the middle cerebral artery in 2 patients (10%). The left radial artery was accessed at the anatomic snuffbox in 18 patients (90%) and the wrist in 2 patients (10%). A single vessel was accessed in 7 (35%), two vessels in 8 (40%), three vessels in 4 (20%), and four vessels in 1 (5%). Catheterization was successful in 71% of the cases for the right internal carotid artery and in only 7.7% for the left internal carotid artery. There were no instances of radial artery spasm, radial artery occlusion, or procedural complications. Our initial experience found the left transradial access to be a potentially feasible approach for diagnostic neuroangiography even beyond the left vertebral artery. The approach is strongly favored by patients but has significant limitations compared with the right-sided approach.

Incidence and predictors of ophthalmic artery occlusion in intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of ophthalmic artery (OA) occlusion in patients treated with selective ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC) for chemotherapy infusion for retinoblastoma. Also, to evaluate technical, anatomical, tumorous, and patient-related factors that are predictors of OA occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with intraocular retinoblastoma and managed with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC). RESULTS: The total study cohort included 208 retinoblastoma tumors of 208 eyes in 197 consecutive patients who underwent 688 attempted IAC infusions overall with a total of 624 successful OAC infusions. The total incidence of ophthalmic artery thrombosis was 11.1% (23/208). The numbers of successful OAC procedures before diagnosing OA occlusion were one OAC in six cases (27.3%), two in seven cases (31.8%), three in four cases (18.2%), four in one case (4.5%), five in two cases (9.1%), and six in one case (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Local factors relating to the chemotherapy and selective microcatheterization of the OA are essential factors in the development of OA thrombosis, as seen by the association of OA thrombosis with the frequency of IAC.

Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study.

BACKGROUND: The transradial approach (TRA) reduces mortality, morbidity, access site complications, hospital cost, and length of stay while maximizing patient satisfaction. We aimed to assess the technical success and safety of TRA for elderly patients (aged ≥75 years). METHODS: A retrospective chart review and comparative analysis was performed for elderly patients undergoing a diagnostic cerebral angiogram performed via TRA versus transfemoral approach (TFA). Also, a second comparative analysis was performed among the TRA cohort between elderly patients and their younger counterparts. RESULTS: Comparative analysis in the elderly (TRA vs TFA) showed no significant differences for contrast dose per vessel (43.7 vs 34.6 mL, P=0.106), fluoroscopy time per vessel (5.7 vs 5.2 min, P=0.849), procedure duration (59.8 vs 65.2 min, P=0.057), conversion rate (5.8% vs 2.9%, P=0.650), and access site complications (2.3% vs 2.9%, P=1.00). Radiation exposure per vessel (18.9 vs 51.9 Gy cm2, P=0.001) was significantly lower in the elderly TRA group.The second comparison (TRA in elderly vs TRA in the young) showed no significant differences for contrast dose per vessel (43.7 vs 37.8 mL, P=0.185), radiation exposure per vessel (18.9 vs 16.5 Gy cm2, P=0.507), procedure duration (59.8 vs 58.3 min, P=0.788), access site complication (2.3% vs 1.7%, P=0.55), and conversation rate (5.8% vs 1.8%, P=0.092). A trend for prolonged fluoroscopy time per vessel (5.7 vs 4.7 min, P=0.050) was observed in the elderly TRA group. CONCLUSIONS: TRA is a technically feasible and safe option for diagnostic neurointerventional procedures in the elderly. Our small elderly cohort was not powered enough to show a significant difference in terms of access site complications between TRA and TFA.

Effect of Shunting on Visual Outcomes and Headache in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Visual dysfunction and headache are major symptoms in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We aimed to evaluate the improvement of these symptoms in patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VPS) and lumboperitoneal (LPS) shunting. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify baseline and treatment characteristics for patients diagnosed with IIH over 10 years. Visual outcomes and headache were evaluated at the latest follow-up post shunting. RESULTS: We included 163 patients with a mean age of 32.6 years. Most patients (74.2%) underwent VPS versus 25.8% of patients who received LPS. After a mean follow-up duration of 35 months, there was a 58.3% decrease in patients reporting headache (P = 0.006), an 87.7% decrease in papilledema (P = 0.1), a 100% resolution of diplopia with VPS or LPS, and an 88.5% decrease in transient visual obscurations (P = 1). In the worse eye, improved visual acuity (VA) occurred in 53.7% of eyes (P = 1), was stable in 16.4%, and worsened in 29.8%. The mean LogMAR VA was improved by 0.06 LogMAR (20/68) in the worse eye (P = 0.97) and 0.08 LogMAR (20/31) in the better eye (P = 0.7). The visual function that impairs daily activity was decreased by 55.4% (P = 0.08). Patients shunted within 1 month of presentation had a significantly higher rate of headache (P = 0.04) and VA improvement (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VPS and LPS are effective in improving visual symptoms and headache in patients with IIH.

Carotid Blowout Management in the Endovascular Era.

BACKGROUND: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potential complication of head and neck cancer, and its therapy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in endovascular techniques have improved patient outcomes. In this study, we report outcomes of emergent endovascular intervention for CBS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained neurovascular database and identified 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS from 2008-2019 at our institution. Data collection was performed on patient demographics, type of cancer, previous cancer treatments, type of CBS, location of bleed, diagnostic workup, endovascular treatment, and procedural outcomes and complications. RESULTS: A total of 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS were performed from 2008-2019 at our single academic institution. Technical success was achieved in 100% of endovascular procedures. Procedural stroke occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, procedural mortality occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, recurrent CBS occurred in 4 (10.5%) procedures, and fatal rehemorrhage occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure. Regarding secondary outcomes, delayed stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, whereas there were no cases of delayed infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular treatment of CBS is safe and effective with relatively low rates of morbidity and mortality compared with other currently available treatment modalities. However, the overall rate of complications demands attention and sheds light on the need for further improvement in management.

Access Through the Anatomical Snuffbox for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Single Institution Series.

BACKGROUND: Distal transradial catheterization in the anatomic snuffbox is an alternate route of access that has started to gain consideration for neuroendovascular procedures. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and outcomes and present our institution's experience in performing neuroendovascular procedures via distal transradial access (dTRA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 120 patients who underwent consecutive neuroendovascular procedures via dTRA in the anatomic snuffbox. Data collection was performed on indication for procedure, sheath size, number of vessels selectively catheterized, fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, radiation exposure, conversion to femoral approach, access site complication, and procedure success. RESULTS: Of 120 patients with an average age of 54.7 yr ± 14.7, 73 (60.8%) underwent diagnostic angiograms, 38 (31.7%) underwent follow-up angiograms, and 9 (7.5%) underwent therapeutic procedures. The overall mean number of vessels catheterized was 2.5 ± 0.1 per procedure, the mean procedure time was 68.3 min ± 43.4, the mean fluoroscopy time was 10.8 min ± 7.6, the mean contrast dose was 70.6 mL ± 39.1, and the mean radiation exposure was 27 672.2 mGycm2 ± 42 728.4. Successfully completed therapeutic procedures included aneurysm 1 (0.8%), arteriovenous malformation (AVM)/arteriovenous fistula/carotid cavernous fistula 7 (5.8%), and 1 (0.8%) other treatment. Three patients (2.5%) required adjunct transfemoral endovenous access for AVM embolization. Two minor complications (1.67%) were a local wrist hematoma and a radial artery vasospasm without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: Distal radial artery catheterization in the anatomic snuffbox is a safe and effective access site to perform neuroendovascular procedures. Complications and conversion rate are low making it a safe alternative.

Predictors of ventriculostomy infection in a large single-center cohort.

OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure. While this procedure is simple and effective, infection is a major limiting factor. Factors predictive of infection reported in the literature are not conclusive. The aim of this retrospective, single-center large series was to assess the rate and independent predictors of ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI). METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent EVD placement between January 2012 and January 2018. RESULTS: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. The infection rate was 3.1% (n = 12). Variables that were significantly associated with VAI were EVD replacement (OR 10, p = 0.001), bilateral EVDs (OR 9.2, p = 0.009), duration of EVD placement (OR 1.1, p = 0.011), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.0, p = 0.001), CSF leak (OR 12.9, p = 0.001), and increased length of hospital stay (OR 1.1, p = 0.002). Using multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of VAI were female sex (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.1-47.4; p = 0.043), EVD replacement (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.44-50.72; p = 0.027), increased CSF output/day (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0-1.02; p = 0.023), and CSF leak (OR 15.1, 95% CI 2.6-87.1; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VAI was 3.1%. Routine CSF collection (every other day or every 3 days) and CSF collection when needed were not associated with VAI. The authors recommend CSF collection when clinically needed rather than routinely.

Ophthalmic artery catheterization for retinoblastoma treatment: does reflux affect tumor response?

BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma (Rb) has been established as a primary treatment for the disease. To determine whether the presence of reflux into the ICA is associated with tumor response or with any other adverse events in pediatric retinoblastoma patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with Rb and managed with ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC). RESULTS: The total study cohort included 205 Rb tumors of 205 eyes in 194 consecutive patients who underwent 624 successful intra-arterial chemotherapy infusions using OAC. Of the 205 eyes, 65 eyes (32.7%) underwent 157 OAC procedures constituted group A (no reflux), 64 eyes (31.2%) underwent 236 OAC procedures constituted group B (variable pattern), and 74 eyes (36.1%) underwent 231 OAC procedures constituted group C (reflux). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the three cohorts. Also, there was no significant difference in tumor characteristics between the three groups, except for genetic status. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of tumor response at completion of the treatment regimen. Complete tumor response was achieved at 70.2% in Group A, at 83.3% in Group B, and at 78.5% in group C (P=0.39). Similarly, eye enucleation occurred at 38.5% in group A, 31.8% in group B, and 31.5% in group C. None of the patients in both groups had any neurological adverse events or new onset of seizures. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of reflux, which may complicate the procedure and prolong it, was not associated with poor outcomes in our analysis.