Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(10): 1895-1903, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34503948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Near elimination of cervical cancer in the United States is possible in coming decades, yet inequities will delay this achievement for some populations. We sought to explore the effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on disparities in cervical cancer incidence between high- and low-poverty U.S. counties. METHODS: We calibrated a dynamic simulation model of HPV infection to reflect average counties in the highest and lowest quartile of poverty (percent of population below federal poverty level), incorporating data on HPV prevalence, cervical cancer screening, and HPV vaccination. We projected cervical cancer incidence through 2070, estimated absolute and relative disparities in incident cervical cancer for high- versus low-poverty counties, and compared incidence with the near-elimination target (4 cases/100,000 women annually). RESULTS: We estimated that, on average, low-poverty counties will achieve near-elimination targets 14 years earlier than high-poverty counties (2029 vs. 2043). Absolute disparities by county poverty will decrease, but relative differences are estimated to increase. We estimate 21,604 cumulative excess cervical cancer cases in high-poverty counties over the next 50 years. Increasing HPV vaccine coverage nationally to the Healthy People 2020 goal (80%) would reduce excess cancer cases, but not alter estimated time to reach the near-elimination threshold. CONCLUSIONS: High-poverty U.S. counties will likely be delayed in achieving near-elimination targets for cervical cancer and as a result will experience thousands of potentially preventable cancers. IMPACT: Alongside vaccination efforts, it is important to address the role of social determinants and health care access in driving persistent inequities by area poverty.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Erradicação de Doenças/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Áreas de Pobreza , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
2.
Pediatrics ; 146(6)2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33199466

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prioritize interventions for increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage based on cost-effectiveness from a US state perspective to inform decisions by policy makers. METHODS: We developed a dynamic simulation model of HPV transmission and progression scaled to a medium-sized US state (5 million individuals). We modeled outcomes over 50 years comparing no intervention to a one-year implementation of centralized reminder and recall for HPV vaccination, school-located HPV vaccination, or quality improvement (QI) visits to primary care clinics. We used probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess a range of plausible outcomes associated with each intervention. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated relative to a conservative willingness-to-pay threshold; $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) . RESULTS: All interventions were cost-effective, relative to no intervention. QI visits had the lowest cost and cost per QALY gained ($1538 versus no intervention). Statewide implementation of centralized reminder and recall cost $28 289 per QALY gained versus QI visits. School-located vaccination had the highest cost but was cost-effective at $18 337 per QALY gained versus QI visits. Scaling to the US population, interventions could avert 3000 to 14 000 future HPV cancers. When varying intervention cost and impact over feasible ranges, interventions were typically preferred to no intervention, but cost-effectiveness varied between intervention strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Three interventions for increasing HPV vaccine coverage were cost-effective and offered substantial health benefits. Policy makers seeking to increase HPV vaccination should, at minimum, dedicate additional funding for QI visits, which are consistently effective at low cost and may additionally consider more resource-intensive interventions (reminder and recall or school-located vaccination).


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Vacinação/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Estados Unidos
3.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 59(4): 778-786, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836536

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Palliative care aligns treatments with patients' values and improves quality of life, yet whether receipt of recommended elements of palliative care is associated with end-of-life outcomes is understudied. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether recommended elements of palliative care (pain and symptom management, goals of care, and spiritual care) precede in-hospital death and hospice referral and whether delivery by specialty palliative care affects that relationship. METHODS: We conducted structured chart reviews for decedents with late-stage cancer, dementia, and chronic kidney disease with a hospital admission during the six months preceding death. Measures included receipt of recommended elements of palliative care delivered by any clinician and specialty palliative care consult. We assessed associations between recommended elements of palliative care and in-hospital death and hospice referral using multivariable Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Of 402 decedents, 67 (16.7%) died in hospital, and 168 (41.8%) had hospice referral. Among elements of palliative care, only goals-of-care discussion was associated with in-hospital death (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.37; 95% CI 1.01-1.84) and hospice referral (IRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.31-2.61). Specialty palliative care consult was associated with a lower likelihood of in-hospital death (IRR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.73) and a higher likelihood of hospice referral (IRR 1.45; 95% CI 1.12-1.89) compared with no consult. CONCLUSION: Goals-of-care discussions by different types of clinicians commonly precede end-of-life care in hospital or hospice. However, engagement with specialty palliative care reduced in-hospital death and increased hospice referral. Understanding the causal pathways of goals-of-care discussions may help build primary palliative care interventions to support patients near the end of life.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Assistência Terminal , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(3): 753-761, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31650402

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Persons living with serious illness often need skilled symptom management, communication, and spiritual support. Palliative care addresses these needs and may be delivered by either specialists or clinicians trained in other fields. It is important to understand core elements of palliative care to best provide patient-centered care. OBJECTIVE: To describe frequency, predictors, and timing of core elements of palliative care during the last 6 months of life. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Inpatient academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Decedents with cancer, dementia, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) admitted during the 6 months preceding death. EXPOSURES: We identified receipt and timing of core elements of palliative care: pain and symptom management, goals of care, spiritual care; and specialty palliative care utilization; hospital encounters; demographics; and comorbid diagnoses. We ran Poisson regression models to assess whether diagnosis or hospital encounters were associated with core elements of palliative care. RESULTS: Among 402 decedents, the mean (SD) number of appropriately screened and treated symptoms was 2.9 (1.7)/10. Among 76.1% with documented goals of care, 58.0% had a primary goal of comfort; 55.0% had documented spiritual care. In multivariable models, compared with decedents with cancer, those with dementia or CKD were less likely to have pain and symptom management (respectively, 31% (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85) and 17% (IRR, 0.83; CI, 0.71-0.97)). There was a median of 3 days (IQR, 0-173) between transition to a goal of comfort and death, and a median of 12 days (IQR, 5-47) between hospice referral and death. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although a high proportion of patients received elements of palliative care, transitions to a goal of comfort or hospice happened very near death. Palliative care delivery can be improved by systematizing existing mechanisms, including prompts for earlier goals-of-care discussion, symptom screening, and spiritual care, and by building collaboration between primary and specialty palliative care services.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Neoplasias , Assistência Terminal , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Medicare , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
5.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(12): 2818-2823, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31396813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systematic identification of patients allows researchers and clinicians to test new models of care delivery. EHR phenotypes-structured algorithms based on clinical indicators from EHRs-can aid in such identification. OBJECTIVE: To develop EHR phenotypes to identify decedents with stage 4 solid-tumor cancer or stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: We developed two EHR phenotypes. Each phenotype included International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes. We used natural language processing (NLP) to further specify stage 4 cancer, and lab values for CKD. SUBJECTS: Decedents with cancer or CKD who had been admitted to an academic medical center in the last 6 months of life and died August 26, 2017-December 31, 2017. MAIN MEASURE: We calculated positive predictive values (PPV), false discovery rates (FDR), false negative rates (FNR), and sensitivity. Phenotypes were validated by a comparison with manual chart review. We also compared the EHR phenotype results to those admitted to the oncology and nephrology inpatient services. KEY RESULTS: The EHR phenotypes identified 271 decedents with cancer, of whom 186 had stage 4 disease; of 192 decedents with CKD, 89 had stage 4-5 disease. The EHR phenotype for stage 4 cancer had a PPV of 68.6%, FDR of 31.4%, FNR of 0.5%, and 99.5% sensitivity. The EHR phenotype for stage 4-5 CKD had a PPV of 46.4%, FDR of 53.7%, FNR of 0.0%, and 100% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: EHR phenotypes efficiently identified patients who died with late-stage cancer or CKD. Future EHR phenotypes can prioritize specificity over sensitivity, and incorporate stratification of high- and low-palliative care need. EHR phenotypes are a promising method for identifying patients for research and clinical purposes, including equitable distribution of specialty palliative care.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Fenótipo , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Masculino , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Cancer Manag Res ; 11: 6793-6802, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413631

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The growing number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors often have multiple chronic conditions. Comparing nonmetastatic CRC survivors and matched noncancer controls, our objectives were to determine the odds of CRC survivors being diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related chronic conditions and their likelihood of control during the year after CRC diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC in the Veterans Affairs health care system from fiscal years 2009 to 2012 and matched each with up to 3 noncancer control patients. We used logistic regression to assess differences in the likelihood of being diagnosed with CVD-related chronic conditions and control between nonmetastatic CRC survivors and noncancer controls. RESULTS: We identified 9,758 nonmetastatic CRC patients and matched them to 29,066 noncancer controls. At baseline, 69.4% of CRC survivors and their matched controls were diagnosed with hypertension, 52.4% with hyperlipidemia, and 36.7% with diabetes. Compared to matched noncancer controls, CRC survivors had 57% higher odds of being diagnosed with hypertension (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.49-1.64) and 7% higher odds of controlled blood pressure (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.13) in the subsequent year. Compared to matched noncancer control patients, CRC survivors had half the odds of being diagnosed with hyperlipidemia (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.48-0.52) and lower odds of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) control (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.94). There were no significant differences between groups for diabetes diagnoses or control. CONCLUSION: Compared to noncancer controls, nonmetastatic CRC survivors have 1) greater likelihood of being diagnosed with hypertension and worse blood pressure control in the year following diagnosis; 2) lower likelihood of being diagnosed with hyperlipidemia or LDL control; and 3) comparable diabetes diagnoses and control. There may be a need for hypertension control interventions targeting cancer survivors.

7.
J Palliat Med ; 22(10): 1266-1270, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31090487

RESUMO

Background: Casarett et al. tested an intervention to improve timeliness of referrals to hospice. Although efficacious in the nursing home setting, it was not tested in other settings of care for seriously ill patients. We, therefore, adapted Casarett's intervention for use in home health (HH). Objective: To assess feasibility, acceptability, and patient outcomes of the adapted intervention. Design: We conducted a nine-week observational pilot test. Setting/Subjects: We conducted our pilot study with two HH agencies. Eligible patients included those who were high risk or frail (identified by the agencies' analytic software as being moderate to high risk for hospitalization or a candidate for hospice referral). Clinical managers identified eligible patients and registered nurses then delivered the intervention, screening patients for hospice appropriateness by asking about care goals, needs, and preferences and initiating appropriate follow-up for patients who screened positive. Measurements: We collected quantitative data on patient enrollment rates and outcomes (election of hospice and/or palliative care). We collected qualitative data on pilot staff experience with the intervention and suggestions for improvement. Results: Pilot HH agencies were able to implement the intervention with high fidelity with minimal restructuring of workflows; 14% of patients who screened positive for hospice appropriateness elected hospice or palliative care. Conclusions: Our findings suggest the adapted intervention was feasible and acceptable to enhance timeliness of hospice and palliative care referral in the HH setting. Additional adaptations suggested by pilot participants could improve impact of the intervention.


Assuntos
Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Cuidados Paliativos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina , Projetos Piloto
8.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 28(5): 882-889, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30733307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although rural cancer patients encounter substantial barriers to care, they more often report receiving timely care than urban patients. We examined whether geographic distance, a contributor to urban-rural health disparities, differentially influences treatment initiation and completion among insured urban and rural cervical cancer patients. METHODS: We identified women diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 from a statewide cancer registry linked to multipayer, insurance claims. Primary outcomes were initiation of guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis and, among stage IB2-IVA cancer patients, completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in 56 days. We estimated risk ratios using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural status, to examine the association between distance and treatment timing (initiation or completion). RESULTS: Among 999 stage IA-IVA patients, 48% initiated guideline-concordant care within 6 weeks of diagnosis, and 37% of 492 stage IB2-IVA cancer patients completed CCRT in 56 days. In urban areas, stage IA-IVA patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest treatment facility were less likely to initiate timely treatment compared with those <5 miles [risk ratio (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.54-0.95]. Among IB2-IVA stage cancer patients, rural women residing ≥15 miles from the nearest radiation facility were more likely to complete CCRT in 56 days (RR: 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-5.51). CONCLUSIONS: Geographic distance differentially influences the initiation and completion of treatment among urban and rural cervical cancer patients. IMPACT: Distance was an access barrier for insured cervical cancer patients in urban areas whereas rural patients may require more intensive outreach, support, and resources, even among those living closer to treatment.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
9.
Healthc (Amst) ; 7(1): 38-43, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29273303

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Studies show palliative care delivered concurrently with cancer treatment improves outcomes, yet palliative care integration with inpatient oncology is underused. A promising approach to improve integration is a triggered palliative care consultation (TPCC). This study evaluated the impact of two TPCC approaches on consistency and quality of consult implementation, operationalized as uptake and timeliness, on solid tumor medical and gynecologic oncology services at an academic hospital. METHODS: The study timeframe was 2010-2016. TPCC in gynecologic oncology began in 2014 and was supported by a single strategy (written guideline); TPCC in medical oncology began in 2015 and was supported by multiple strategies (e.g. training, chart review). Palliative care consult information was chart abstracted and linked to hospital encounter data. We compared the effect of a single strategy vs. usual care, and multiple strategies vs. a single strategy on implementation. Difference-in-differences modified Poisson regression models evaluated whether implementation differed after TPCC; we estimated adjusted relative risk (aRR), controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 8.8% of medical oncology and 11.0% of gynecologic oncology inpatient encounters involved palliative care consultation. In regression analyses, TPCC supported by a single strategy in gynecologic oncology was associated with greater uptake vs. usual care (aRR: 1.45, p < .05), and TPCC supported by multiple strategies in medical oncology was associated with greater uptake vs. a single strategy (aRR: 2.34, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Across two inpatient oncology services, TPCC supported by multiple strategies had the greatest impact on uptake. How strategies affect sustained use of palliative care consults remains to be investigated.


Assuntos
Enfermagem Oncológica/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Enfermagem Oncológica/métodos
10.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 111(5): 498-508, 2019 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30239824

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Differential use of endocrine therapy (ET) by race may contribute to breast cancer outcome disparities, but racial differences in ET behaviors are poorly understood. METHODS: Women aged 20-74 years with a first primary, stage I-III, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer were included. At 2 years postdiagnosis, we assessed nonadherence, defined as not taking ET every day or missing more than two pills in the past 14 days, discontinuation, and a composite measure of underuse, defined as either missing pills or discontinuing completely. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the relationship between race and nonadherence, discontinuation, and overall underuse in unadjusted, clinically adjusted, and socioeconomically adjusted models. RESULTS: A total of 1280 women were included; 43.2% self-identified as black. Compared to white women, black women more often reported nonadherence (13.7% vs 5.2%) but not discontinuation (10.0% vs 10.7%). Black women also more often reported the following: hot flashes, night sweats, breast sensitivity, and joint pain; believing that their recurrence risk would not change if they stopped ET; forgetting to take ET; and cost-related barriers. In multivariable analysis, black race remained statistically significantly associated with nonadherence after adjusting for clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.75 to 4.24) and after adding socioeconomic to clinical characteristics (adjusted odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.50 to 3.97) but was not independently associated with discontinuation after adjustment. Low recurrence risk perception and lack of a shared decision making were strongly predictive of ET underuse across races. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight important racial differences in ET-adherence behaviors, perceptions of benefits/harms, and shared decision making that may be targeted with culturally tailored interventions.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , População Negra , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca , Adulto , Idoso , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Avaliação de Sintomas , Tamoxifeno/uso terapêutico , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
11.
Gynecol Oncol ; 152(1): 112-118, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30442384

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Urban-rural health disparities are often attributed to the longer distances rural patients travel to receive care. However, a recent study suggests that distance to care may affect urban and rural cancer patients differentially. We examined whether this urban-rural paradox exists among patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: We identified individuals diagnosed with cervical cancer from 2004 to 2013 using a statewide cancer registry linked to multi-payer, insurance claims. Our primary outcome was receipt of guideline-concordant care: surgery for stages IA1-IB1; external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), concomitant chemotherapy, and brachytherapy for stages IB2-IVA. We estimated risk ratios (RR) using modified Poisson regressions, stratified by urban/rural location, to examine the association between distance to nearest facility and receipt of treatment. RESULTS: 62% of 999 cervical cancer patients received guideline-concordant care. The association between distance and receipt of care differed by type of treatment. In urban areas, cancer patients who lived ≥15 miles from the nearest surgical facility were less likely to receive primary surgical management compared to those <5 miles from the nearest surgical facility (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-0.98). In rural areas, patients living ≥15 miles from the nearest brachytherapy facility were more likely to receive treatment compared to those <5 miles from the nearest brachytherapy facility (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.14-2.58). Distance was not associated with the receipt of chemotherapy or EBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Among cervical cancer patients, there is evidence supporting the urban-rural paradox, i.e., geographic distance to cancer care facilities is not consistently associated with treatment receipt in expected or consistent ways. Healthcare systems must consider the diverse and differential barriers encountered by urban and rural residents to improve access to high quality cancer care.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Saúde da População Rural , Saúde da População Urbana
12.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 43(3): 249-260, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29533270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The implementation science literature has contributed important insights regarding the influence of formal policies and practices on health care innovation implementation, whereas informal implementation policies and practices have garnered little attention. The broader literature suggests that informal implementation policies and practices could also influence innovation use. PURPOSE: We used the Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation to further understand the role of formal and informal implementation policies and practices as determinants of implementation effectiveness. We examined their role within the context of initiatives to increase palliative care consultation in inpatient oncology. METHODS: We used a case study design in two organizational settings within one academic medical center: medical and gynecologic oncology. We completed semistructured interviews with medical (n = 12) and gynecologic (n = 10) oncology clinicians using questions based on organizational theory. Quantitative data assessed implementation effectiveness, defined as aggregated palliative care consult rates within oncology services from 2010 to 2016. Four palliative care clinicians were interviewed to gain additional implementation context insights. RESULTS: Medical oncology employed multiple formal policies and practices including training and clinician prompting to support palliative care consultation and a top-down approach, yet most clinicians were unaware of the policies and practices, contributing to a weak implementation climate. In contrast, gynecologic oncology employed one formal policy (written guideline of criteria for initiating a consult) but also relied on informal policies and practices, such as spontaneous feedback and communication; they adopted a bottom-up approach, contributing to broader clinician awareness and strong implementation climate. Both services exhibited variable, increasing consult rates over time. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Informal policies and practices may compensate or substitute for formal policies and practices under certain conditions (e.g., smaller health care organizations). Further research is needed to investigate the role of formal and informal policies and practices in shaping a strong and sustainable implementation climate and subsequent effective innovation implementation.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Ciência da Implementação , Oncologia/organização & administração , Inovação Organizacional , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 171, 2018 03 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29523146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the US. CRC survivors may have complex healthcare needs requiring care from both specialists and primary care. Our objective was to understand how CRC survivors perceive their survivorship care, especially management of their cardiovascular-related chronic diseases. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with non-metastatic CRC between 10/1/2007 and 12/31/2015 at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in North Carolina or Virginia. In 2016, we conducted telephone-based, semi-structured interviews to assess survivors' experiences with cancer survivorship and changes in health priorities. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. RESULTS: The 25 participants were, on average, 64 years old and approximately 4 years post-CRC diagnosis at the time of interview; most were white (60%), male (92%), and diagnosed with colon cancer (64%) as opposed to rectal cancer. CRC survivors reported: (1) a shift in focus from surviving cancer to reducing cardiovascular disease risk (e.g., by managing weight); (2) challenges with taking medications for CVD-related conditions; (3) new recognition of the importance of engaging with primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Experiences with cancer shapes how survivors view their health. Management of cardiovascular-related chronic disease is important to veteran CRC survivors. There is a need to deliver cardiovascular disease risk reduction programs tailored for CRC survivors.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Veteranos/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais/psicologia , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Virginia
14.
J Palliat Med ; 21(1): 62-68, 2018 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28772084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior research indicates that hospice and palliative care delivered in outpatient settings are associated with reduced hospital readmissions for cancer patients. However, little is known about how inpatient palliative care affects readmissions in oncology. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations among inpatient palliative care consultation, hospice use (discharge), and 30-day readmissions among patients with solid tumor cancers. METHODS: We identified all live discharges from a large tertiary cancer hospital between 2010 and 2016. Palliative care consult data were abstracted from medical charts and linked to hospital encounter data. Propensity scores were used to match palliative care consult to usual care encounters. Modified Poisson regression models estimated adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 30-day readmissions and hospice discharge. We compared predicted probabilities of readmission for palliative care consultation with hospice discharge, without hospice discharge, and usual care. RESULTS: Of 8085 eligible encounters, 753 involved a palliative care consult. The likelihood of having a 30-day readmission did not differ between palliative care consult and usual care groups (p > 0.05). However, the palliative care consult group was more likely than usual care to have a hospice discharge (aRR = 4.09, 95% CI: 3.07-5.44). The predicted probability of 30-day readmission was lower when palliative care consultation was combined with hospice discharge compared to usual care or consultation with discharge to nonhospice postacute care (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of inpatient palliative care on readmissions in oncology is largely driven by hospice enrollment. Strategies that combine palliative care consultation with hospice discharge may decrease hospital readmissions and improve cancer care quality.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Oncologia , Cuidados Paliativos , Readmissão do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 32(5): 355-361, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27958190

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Oncotype DX (ODX), a tumor gene profiling test, has been incorporated into clinical guidelines to aid in adjuvant chemotherapy decision making for early-stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients. Despite United States (U.S.) guidelines, less than half of eligible women receive testing. Reasons for low usage are unclear: Our objective was to better understand U.S. oncologists' ODX uptake and how they use ODX during adjuvant chemotherapy decision making. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured, ~30-minute phone interviews with medical and surgical oncologists in one U.S. State using purposive sampling. Oncologists were included if they saw greater than or equal to five breast cancer patients per week. Recruitment ended upon thematic saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and double-coded using template analysis. RESULTS: During analysis, themes emerged across three domains. First, organizational factors (i.e., departmental structure, ODX marketing, and medical/insurance guidelines) influenced ease of ODX use. Second, oncologists referenced the influence of interpersonal factors (e.g., normative beliefs and peer use of ODX) over their own practices and recommendations. Third, intrapersonal factors (e.g., oncologist attitudes, perceived barriers, and research gaps) were discussed: although oncologists largely held positive attitudes about ODX, they reported challenges with interpreting intermediate scores for treatment decisions and explaining test results to patients. Finally, oncologists identified several research gaps. CONCLUSIONS: As more tumor gene profiling tests are incorporated into cancer care for treatment decision making, it is important to understand their use in clinical practice. This study identified multi-level factors that influence ODX uptake into clinical practice, providing insights into facilitators and modifiable barriers that can be leveraged for improving ODX uptake to aid treatment decision making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina de Precisão , Pesquisa Qualitativa
16.
Dig Dis Sci ; 61(11): 3335-3345, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27480088

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA. Diabetes is common and increasing in incidence. Patients with compensated cirrhosis and diabetes may be at greater risk of clinical decompensation. We examined the risk of decompensation among a large sample of working-aged insured patients dually diagnosed with compensated cirrhosis and diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective study used MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Databases (2000-2013). Decompensation events included incident ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, acute renal failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Dually diagnosed patients were defined as patients with cirrhosis and diabetes using previously published ICD-9 coding strategies. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 72,731 patients with compensated cirrhosis, 20,477 patients (28.15 %) were diagnosed with diabetes. After controlling for patient characteristics and medication usage, the odds of developing any decompensation event were 1.14 times higher for patients with cirrhosis and diabetes than for patients with cirrhosis only (95 % CI 1.08-1.21, P value <0.01). In the Cox proportional hazard model, patients who were dually diagnosed with diabetes had a 1.32 times higher HR (95 % CI 1.26-1.39, P value <0.01) after controlling for time-to-event. CONCLUSIONS: Patients dually diagnosed with compensated cirrhosis and diabetes had a higher risk of having decompensation events. Careful management of diabetes in patients with liver disease may reduce the risk of clinical decompensation in this population.


Assuntos
Ascite/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Peritonite/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Ascite/etiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiologia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/epidemiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Encefalopatia Hepática/etiologia , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Peritonite/etiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(12): 4839-4847, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27465051

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Racial minority cancer patients may experience underuse of antiemetic medications to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). In addition to its adverse implications for quality of life, antiemetic underuse may contribute to observed disparities in acute illness during chemotherapy. To understand the potential contribution of CINV prophylaxis to breast cancer disparities, we assessed racial variation in potent antiemetic use and post-chemotherapy utilization related to CINV and the relationship between the two. METHODS: We used SEER-Medicare data to evaluate the health care utilization in the 14 days following chemotherapy initiation among black and white women receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy for breast cancer. We used modified Poisson regression to assess the relationship between (1) race and CINV-related utilization and (2) NK1 use and CINV-related utilization, overall and stratified by race. We report adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The study included 1130 women. Black women were 11 % less likely than white women to use neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1s) for CINV prophylaxis (p = 0.02); however, they experienced fewer CINV-related encounters following chemotherapy (unadjusted RR = 0.63, 95 %CI = 0.40-0.99; p = 0.05). After adjustment for clinical covariates, estimates were similar but no longer statistically significant (p = 0.07). Among white women, NK1 use was associated with increased CINV-related utilization (aRR NK1 users vs. non-users: 1.35, 95 % CI = 1.07-1.69, p = 0.01), likely resulting from unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSION: Black women were less likely to use NK1s- and CINV-related services. Racial variation in CINV-related services use may be partly explained by differential symptom reporting or access to care.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Náusea/etnologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Neurocinina-1/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/etnologia , Grupos Raciais , Vômito/etnologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , População Negra , Feminino , Humanos , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Qualidade de Vida , Vômito/induzido quimicamente
18.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 15(4): e199-e204, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27301717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and potentially deadly disease. Although the United States has robust cancer data reporting, information from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system has often been underrepresented in national cancer data sources. We describe veterans with incident CRC in terms of their patient and tumor characteristics and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed or treated with CRC at any VA institution in the fiscal years 2009 to 2012 were identified using 3 data sources: (1) VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR); (2) VA Corporate Data Warehouse; and (3) VA Reports and Measures Portal. The CRC frequencies within the VA population and survival curves were examined descriptively and compared with the national projections using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data. RESULTS: A total of 12,551 veterans with CRC were included in the present analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 65.5 years. Approximately 97% (n = 12,229) of the CRC cases were diagnosed among men. Approximately 44% (n = 5517) of the patients were diagnosed with localized disease. The 3-year survival rate was associated with age (P < .01) and stage (P < .01) at diagnosis. We identified a possible decrease in VA CRC incidence over time. CONCLUSION: Although the VA CRC patient population was heavily skewed toward the male gender, the patient and tumor characteristics were similar between the incident CRC cases reported by the VACCR and those reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. This suggests that research findings resulting from the VACCR might have applicability beyond the VA healthcare system setting.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos
19.
Cancer Invest ; 34(5): 205-12, 2016 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27124287

RESUMO

Oncotype DX testing (ODX), a tumor gene expression test, may improve breast cancer care, however, communicating results remains challenging. We identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing ODX results. We applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients, using template analysis in Atlas.ti. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes. Providers did not report discussing emotional aspects of managing uncertainty, assessing decision-making preferences, and evaluating decisions. A patient-centered approach may be a model for communicating about tumor gene expression tests.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Testes Genéticos , Comunicação em Saúde , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina , Oncologistas , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Incerteza
20.
J Oncol Pract ; 12(4): e423-36, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26957641

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently initiated small reimbursement adjustments to improve the value of care delivered under fee-for-service. To estimate the degree to which reimbursement influences physician decision making, we examined utilization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists among urologists as Part B drug reimbursement varied in a fee-for-service environment. METHODS: We analyzed treatment patterns of urologists treating 15,128 men included in SEER-linked Medicare claims who were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2003. We calculated a reimbursement generosity index to measure differences in GnRH agonist reimbursement among regional Medicare carriers and over time. We used multilevel analysis to control for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS: Among urologists treating early-stage and lower grade prostate cancer, variation in reimbursement was not associated with overuse of GnRH agonists from 2000 to 2003, a period of guideline stability (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: Small differences in androgen-deprivation therapy reimbursement generosity were not associated with differential use. Fee-for-service reimbursement changes currently being implemented to improve quality in fee-for-service Medicare may not affect patterns of cancer care.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/economia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/economia , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA