Do dysplastic proximal resection margins predict the risk of anastomotic recurrence and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Positive proximal resection margins are strongly associated with anastomotic recurrence in esophageal cancer. However, the prognostic significance of dysplastic proximal resection margins remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the dysplastic proximal resection margin can predict anastomotic recurrence and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Between 2000 and 2014, patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received a nonpalliative resection and survived the perioperative period were included. Two expert pathologists independently reviewed the proximal resection margin status, which was classified as negative, dysplastic, or positive. The kappa statistic was used to test interobserver reliability. Anastomotic recurrence and overall survival served as the main outcome measures. The study cohort consisted of 469 patients (445 males and 27 females). There was an excellent interobserver agreement for negative (kappa = 0.88), dysplastic (kappa = 0.88), and positive (kappa = 1) proximal resection margins-which were identified in 418 (89.1%), 37 (7.9%), and 14 (3.0%) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 21.6 months, 30 (6.4%) patients developed an anastomotic recurrence. Compared with patients with negative proximal resection margins (24/418, 5.7%), the occurrence of anastomotic recurrence was more commonly observed in those with positive proximal resection margins (3/14, 21.4%, P = 0.017) but not in those with dysplastic proximal resection margins (3/37, 8.1%, P = 0.56). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified positive proximal resection margins (hazard ratio: 5.93, P = 0.010) and advanced clinical stage (hazard ratio: 12.04, P = 0.023) as independent risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. Dysplastic proximal resection margins were not retained in the model as an independent predictor (hazard ratio: 1.38, P = 0.602). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with negative (38.2%) and dysplastic margins (27.0%) were similar (P = 0.814), and significantly higher than that observed in those with positive proximal resection margins (9.5%, P = 0.015). In conclusion, dysplastic proximal resection margins can be identified in at least 7.9% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but neither they are associated with an increased risk of anastomotic recurrence nor they portend a poor overall survival.

Association between the thoroughness of the histopathological examination and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieve pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy.

The College of American Pathologists guidelines recommend examining at least four representative tumor blocks for determining pathological T stage in patients with primarily resected esophageal cancer. Whether the same pathological requirements are adequate in patients undergoing esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) remains unclear. We hypothesized that current examination protocols may underestimate the presence of microscopical residual disease after nCRT, potentially leading to under-staging. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with esophageal squamous cancer (ESCC) who were diagnosed as having pathological complete response (pCR) following nCRT. The thoroughness of the pathological examination in pCR patients was examined using (i) the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area (≤4 vs. >4), and (ii) the block quotient (calculated as the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks examined in suspicious tumor area). A total of 91 patients were enrolled. The mean number of blocks used to confirm pCR was 4.8 (range: 2-14). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the entire cohort were 55% and 65%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified the block quotient as the only independent predictor of OS and DFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated an optimal cutoff value of 1.4 for the block quotient. Among the patients who achieved pCR, the 5-year DFS differed significantly between subjects with a low (≤1.4) or high (>1.4) block quotient (76% vs. 47%, respectively, P = 0.03). The block quotient (calculated by the pretreatment tumor length divided by the number of blocks) - which reflects the meticulousness of the histopathological examination for confirming pCR - is associated with survival in ESCC patients.