Impact of Treating Depression on Associated Comorbidities: A Systematic Literature Review.

Objective: To identify and summarize data that describe the impact of effectively treating major depressive disorder (MDD) on the severity or risk of serious comorbidities.Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and several congresses were searched. Searches included terms related to MDD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and physical comorbidities and were restricted to English-language publications. Searches were conducted in November 2019 for the previous 2 years for conference proceedings; no date restriction was applied to the database searches.Study Selection: Included studies were RCTs or meta-analyses that assessed depression therapies. Studies were required to report a statistically significant improvement in depression scores as well as the concurrent impact on comorbidities. A total of 1,997 articles were initially identified for screening.Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data and assessed study quality.Results: A total of 30 studies, including 24 RCTs (N = 6,333) and 6 meta/pooled analyses of RCTs, were included. Findings in several comorbidity categories were mixed; for example, in half (4 of 8) of the identified studies in people with cardiovascular disease and depression, individuals who received treatment leading to reduced depressive symptoms compared with a control arm also had a significantly decreased incidence of cardiovascular events or significantly improved cardiac disease symptom/severity scores compared with controls. Significant improvements in comorbid disease severity observed alongside improvements in depressive symptoms were also noted in studies of comorbid Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain and fibromyalgia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Conclusions: Effective treatment of MDD may lead to a reduction in the severity of certain serious comorbidities. These results highlight the importance of appropriate and timely treatment of MDD.

Characterizing Treatment Utilization Patterns for Trigeminal Neuralgia in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a rare orofacial disorder characterized by severe unilateral paroxysmal pain in the region of the fifth cranial nerve. Clinical guidelines recommend carbamazepine (only US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for TN) and oxcarbazepine as first-line therapies. We utilized the US Truven Health MarketScan database to examine treatment patterns among patients with TN. METHODS: Included patients were aged 18 years and above, newly diagnosed with TN (≥2 TN diagnoses ≥14 days apart; no diagnosis in the previous year), continuously enrolled 1 year before index, with ≥3 years' follow-up postindex. We assessed utilization of selected pharmacotherapies (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, gabapentin, baclofen, duloxetine, topiramate), surgery (posterior fossa, radiosurgery), and injections (peripheral anesthetic injections, Gasserian ganglion procedures) for TN. RESULTS: In total, 3685 patients were included (2425 commercial, 1260 Medicare; 71.8% female; age, mean [SD], 59 [15] y). Overall, 72.5% of patients received at least 1 studied medication, most commonly carbamazepine (51.7%) or gabapentin (48.6%). In total, 65% of pharmacologically treated patients had ≥2 treatment episodes; 41.6% had ≥3 (defined by a change in pharmacotherapy [monotherapy/combination] regimen). Overall, 12.3% had surgery and 7.3% injections; 42.9% received opioids for TN. CONCLUSIONS: In the 3 years after diagnosis, patients with TN in the United States receive a variety of pharmacological treatments, including opioids, despite carbamazepine being the only approved medication. A notable proportion utilize surgeries/injections. A high proportion of pharmacologically treated patients receive multiple treatment episodes, suggesting frequent therapy switching, perhaps because of suboptimal efficacy/tolerability. Our data suggest a high burden of illness associated with TN.

Pim kinase substrate identification and specificity.

The Pim family of Ser/Thr kinases has been implicated in the process of lymphomagenesis and cell survival. Known substrates of Pim kinases are few and poorly characterized. In this study we set out to identify novel Pim-2 substrates using the Kinase Substrate Tracking and Elucidation (KESTREL) approach. Two potential substrates, eukaryotic initiation factor 4B (eIF4B) and apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API-5), were identified from rat thymus extracts. Sequence comparison of the Pim-2 kinase phosphorylation sites of eIF4B and mouse BAD, the only other known Pim-2 substrate, revealed conserved amino acids preceding the phosphorylated serine residue. Stepwise replacement of the conserved residues produced a consensus sequence for Pim kinase recognition: RXRHXS. Pim-1 and Pim-2 catalyzed the phosphorylation of this recognition sequence 20-fold more efficiently than the original (K/R-K/R-R-K/R-L-S/T-a; a = small chain amino acid) Pim-1 phosphorylation site. The identification of the novel Pim kinase consensus sequence provides a more sensitive and versatile peptide based assay for screening modulators of Pim kinase activity.

Discovery and characterization of a substrate selective p38alpha inhibitor.

A novel inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38), CMPD1, identified by high-throughput screening, is characterized herein. Unlike the p38 inhibitors described previously, this inhibitor is substrate selective and noncompetitive with ATP. In steady-state kinetics experiments, CMPD1 was observed to prevent the p38alpha-dependent phosphorylation (K(i)(app) = 330 nM) of the splice variant of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2a) that contains a docking domain for p38alpha and p38beta, but it did not prevent the phosphorylation of ATF-2 (K(i)(app) > 20 microM). In addition to kinetic studies, isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance experiments were performed to elucidate the mechanism of inhibition. While isothermal titration calorimetry analysis indicated that CMPD1 binds to p38alpha, CMPD1 was not observed to compete with ATP for p38alpha, nor was it able to interrupt the binding of p38alpha to MK2a observed by surface plasmon resonance. Therefore, deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) was employed to study the p38alpha.CMPD1 inhibitory complex, to provide new insight into the mechanism of substrate selective inhibition. The DXMS data obtained for the p38alpha.CMPD1 complex were compared to the data obtained for the p38alpha.MK2a complex and a p38alpha.active site binding inhibitor complex. Alterations in the DXMS behavior of both p38alpha and MK2a were observed upon complex formation, including but not limited to the interaction between the carboxy-terminal docking domain of MK2a and its binding groove on p38alpha. Alterations in the D(2)O exchange of p38alpha produced by CMPD1 suggest that the substrate selective inhibitor binds in the vicinity of the active site of p38alpha, resulting in perturbations to regions containing nucleotide binding pocket residues, docking groove residues (E160 and D161), and a Mg(2+) ion cofactor binding residue (D168). Although the exact mechanism of substrate selective inhibition by this novel inhibitor has not yet been disclosed, the results suggest that CMPD1 binding in the active site region of p38alpha induces perturbations that may result in the suboptimal positioning of substrates and cofactors in the transition state, resulting in selective inhibition of p38alpha activity.