Bone cement implantation syndrome in hip arthroplasty: Frequency, severity and prevention.

INTRODUCTION: Cemented femoral implants incur a serious risk of potentially fatal accidents in case of bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS). As French data are sparse regarding this issue, Orthorisq, the official accreditation body for orthopedic surgeons, conducted an inter-professional survey: 1) to assess the frequency of BCIS, 2) to analyze risk factors related to the patient and to professional practices, and 3) to set out guidelines to reduce frequency and/or severity. HYPOTHESIS: French data on BCIS are underestimated and need updating to ease communication between colleagues. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In 2019, Orthorisq ran a survey of its members' practices and a "mirror" survey of anesthesiologists. In the decade from 2009 to 2018, the 775 respondent orthopedic surgeons, both occasional and systematic "cementers", reported their experience with a declared annual rate of 80,112 arthroplasties, including 63,799 (79.6%) in scheduled surgery. Some of the survey questions concerned cementing technique. With the help of the French College of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 305 anesthesiologists responded to the mirror survey. RESULTS: The 776 orthopedic surgeons reported 1896 cementing accidents with 387 deaths during the study decade. Accidents were 6-fold more frequent in traumatology than in scheduled orthopedic surgery (0.71% versus 0.12%) and, more importantly, were more serious: mortality was 10-fold higher (0.17% versus 0.017% [p<0.001]). Certain "tricks and tips" intended to improve cementing quality, such as a dedicated system and especially a plug, significantly increased the risk of BCIS (p<0.001). Over the same period, the 305 anesthesiologists had been involved in 490 cementing accidents; 88 (29%) had been faced by at least 1 death, most often in emergency settings (60/28). While 753 surgeons (96%) reported warning the anesthetists and 571 (74%) waited for agreement before cementing, only 109 (36%) and 124 (41%) anesthetists reported being systematically alerted to cementing and implant reduction, respectively. The rate of serious accidents was 0.19% and mortality was 0.05%, for a cumulative probability of 0.24% per year. Extrapolated to the data of the ATIH Technical Agency of Hospitalization Information and subtracting arthroplasties by "never-cementers", these figures indicate 311 accidents with 65 deaths in femoral BCIS for 2018. DISCUSSION: In scheduled surgery, BCIS was exceptional, but the rate in traumatology was much higher. Certain techniques intended to improve femoral cementing quality actually increased the risk of BCIS; in high-risk patients, especially in traumatology, non-cemented femoral implants or else a 1st-generation cementing technique should therefore be preferred. Prevention of BCIS and/or reduction of severity require identification of at-risk patients and good communication between surgeons and anesthesiologists, especially at the various steps of the checklist. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case series.

A prospective, comparative, radiological, and clinical study of the influence of the "remplissage" procedure on shoulder range of motion after stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair.

BACKGROUND: Certain failures of arthroscopic Bankart repairs seem to be related to the presence of a Hill-Sachs defect. It has been suggested that Hill-Sachs lesions can be treated by "remplissage" (filling in) of the defect. The effect of this procedure on the mobility of the shoulder is not known. PURPOSE: To determine if filling in the Hill-Sachs defect with rotator cuff tendon would modify the range of motion of the operated shoulder. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective study of 2 patient populations (arthroscopic Bankart repair alone vs Bankart and remplissage) was undertaken after selecting patients using the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS). Patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion seen on anteroposterior radiographs had a remplissage procedure if this procedure allowed them to obtain an ISIS lower than 4. The main clinical outcome was the range of motion (external rotation at the side [ER1], external rotation in abduction [ER2], internal rotation [IR], and forward elevation), assessed by the difference between each shoulder at 1 and 2 years' follow-up. Complications, recurrence, and the Walch-Duplay scores were noted at the same time. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference was noted in the range of motion between each group: ER1, difference of 4° (P = .22); ER2, difference of 3° (P = .49); anterior elevation, difference of 5° (P = .35); and internal rotation, 2 vertebrae (P = .22). The rate of recurrence was identical in both groups (6.25%). For patients without redislocation, the Walch-Duplay score was excellent (14/17) or good (3/17) in the first group and excellent (12/15) or good (3/15) in the second group. Posterosuperior pain during forceful movements or when tired was noted in one third of patients having undergone remplissage. CONCLUSION: The remplissage technique did not alter the range of motion of the shoulder compared with Bankart procedure alone; however, one third of patients did experience posterosuperior pain.

Bone-retinaculum-bone reconstruction for chronic posttraumatic instability of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb.

PURPOSE: This study presents an autograft technique for the surgical management of chronic posttraumatic instability of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint by using a bone-retinaculum-bone graft from the second compartment of the extensor retinaculum. METHODS: The bone-retinaculum-bone graft was harvested from the second compartment. The graft ends were fixed into the host site with screws. Fourteen patients (12 ulnar, 2 radial collateral ligament tears) had the procedure. All patients were reviewed by an independent observer using objective and subjective criteria, the mean follow-up time was 20 months. RESULTS: Results were satisfactory overall (8 excellent, 4 good, 1 fair, 1 poor that subsequently was fused). All patients returned to their former jobs. All but one had a clinically stable first MCP joint; grasp was 87%, pinch was 80%, MCP joint range of motion (ROM) was 91%, and interphalangeal joint ROM was 98% of the unoperated side. CONCLUSIONS: Early results are encouraging. This procedure preserves ROM of the MCP and interphalangeal joints of the thumb, improves strength, and gives the stability required for proper thumb function.