Deep learning in CT colonography: differentiating premalignant from benign colorectal polyps.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected by CT colonography using deep learning. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of an average risk colorectal cancer screening sample, polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on supine and prone CT colonography images and classified as premalignant (adenoma) or benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) according to histopathology. Two deep learning models SEG and noSEG were trained on 3D CT colonography image subvolumes to predict polyp class, and model SEG was additionally trained with polyp segmentation masks. Diagnostic performance was validated in an independent external multicentre test sample. Predictions were analysed with the visualisation technique Grad-CAM++. RESULTS: The training set consisted of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age: 63 ± 8 years, 40 men) comprising 169 polyp segmentations. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp segmentations. Model SEG achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.83 and 80% sensitivity at 69% specificity for differentiating premalignant from benign polyps. Model noSEG yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.75, 80% sensitivity at 44% specificity, and an average Grad-CAM++ heatmap score of ≥ 0.25 in 90% of polyp tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept study, deep learning enabled the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography and the visualisation of image regions important for predictions. The approach did not require polyp segmentation and thus has the potential to facilitate the identification of high-risk polyps as an automated second reader. KEY POINTS: • Non-invasive deep learning image analysis may differentiate premalignant from benign colorectal polyps found in CT colonography scans. • Deep learning autonomously learned to focus on polyp tissue for predictions without the need for prior polyp segmentation by experts. • Deep learning potentially improves the diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening by allowing for a more precise selection of patients who would benefit from endoscopic polypectomy, especially for patients with polyps of 6-9 mm size.

Machine Learning-based Differentiation of Benign and Premalignant Colorectal Polyps Detected with CT Colonography in an Asymptomatic Screening Population: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Background CT colonography does not enable definite differentiation between benign and premalignant colorectal polyps. Purpose To perform machine learning-based differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography in an average-risk asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening sample with external validation using radiomics. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective trial, colorectal polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on CT colonographic images and were classified as benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) or premalignant (adenoma) according to the histopathologic reference standard. Quantitative image features characterizing shape (n = 14), gray level histogram statistics (n = 18), and image texture (n = 68) were extracted from segmentations after applying 22 image filters, resulting in 1906 feature-filter combinations. Based on these features, a random forest classification algorithm was trained to predict the individual polyp character. Diagnostic performance was validated in an external test set. Results The random forest model was fitted using a training set consisting of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; 40 men) comprising 169 segmentations on CT colonographic images. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 segmentations. Random forest analysis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.96), a sensitivity of 82% (65 of 79) (95% CI: 74%, 91%), and a specificity of 85% (33 of 39) (95% CI: 72%, 95%) in the external test set. In two subgroup analyses of the external test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 in the size category of 6-9 mm and 0.90 in the size category of 10 mm or larger. The most important image feature for decision making (relative importance of 3.7%) was quantifying first-order gray level histogram statistics. Conclusion In this proof-of-concept study, machine learning-based image analysis enabled noninvasive differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps with CT colonography. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.

Proton computed tomography (pCT) has been proposed as an alternative to x-ray computed tomography (CT) for acquiring relative to water stopping power (RSP) maps used for proton treatment planning dose calculations. In parallel, it has been shown that dual energy x-ray CT (DECT) improves RSP accuracy when compared to conventional single energy x-ray CT. This study aimed at directly comparing the RSP accuracy of both modalities using phantoms scanned at an advanced prototype pCT scanner and a state-of-the-art DECT scanner. Two phantoms containing 13 tissue-mimicking inserts of known RSP were scanned at the pCT phase II prototype and a latest generation dual-source DECT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Definition FORCE). RSP accuracy was compared by mean absolute percent error (MAPE) over all inserts. A highly realistic Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was used to gain insight on pCT image artifacts which degraded MAPE. MAPE was 0.55% for pCT and 0.67% for DECT. The realistic MC simulation agreed well with pCT measurements ([Formula: see text]). Both simulation and experimental results showed ring artifacts in pCT images which degraded the MAPE compared to an ideal pCT simulation ([Formula: see text]). Using the realistic simulation, we could identify sources of artifacts, which are attributed to the interfaces in the five-stage plastic scintillator energy detector and calibration curve interpolation regions. Secondary artifacts stemming from the proton tracker geometry were also identified. The pCT prototype scanner outperformed a state-of-the-art DECT scanner in terms of RSP accuracy (MAPE) for plastic tissue mimicking inserts. Since artifacts tended to concentrate in the inserts, their mitigation may lead to further improvements in the reported pCT accuracy.