Coworker Reports about Unprofessional Behavior in Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient reports of unprofessional conduct by surgeons have been linked to postprocedure complications and increased risk for malpractice claims. Coworkers are also positioned to observe and report unprofessional behaviors, including concerns related to delivery of competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. This study compared rates of coworker concerns between plastic surgeons and other physicians (other surgical specialists and nonsurgeons), and characterized whether plastic surgery subspecialties differed in their rates of complaints. METHODS: Coworker concern data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were retrieved from the Vanderbilt Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy's Coworker Observation Reporting System database. Specialty was classified as plastic surgery, non-plastic surgical, and nonsurgical. The plastic surgery cohort was further characterized by sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type (reconstructive only, aesthetic only, or hybrid), and postresidency training (ie, completion of a fellowship). RESULTS: The study cohort included 34,170 physicians (302 plastic surgeons, 7593 non-plastic surgeons, and 26,275 nonsurgeons). A greater proportion of plastic surgeons (13.6%) had one or more coworker concerns compared with nonsurgeons (10.8%) and non-plastic surgeons (6.1%) ( P < 0.001). The most prevalent concern category reported for plastic surgeons was clear and respectful communication. Among plastic surgeons who had no concerns versus those who had at least one concern, there was no significant difference when comparing sex, medical school graduation year, predominant practice type, or postresidency training. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons in this cohort study received more coworker reports than other surgeons and nonsurgical physicians. These data may be used by institutions to identify plastic surgeons at risk for preventable postprocedure complications and intervene with peer feedback intended to promote self-regulation.

Alpha Defensin-1 Biomarker Outperforms Culture in Diagnosing Breast Implant-Related Infection: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Prompt diagnosis of breast implant infection is critical to reducing morbidity. A high incidence of false-negative microbial culture mandates superior testing modalities. Alpha defensin-1 (AD-1), an infection biomarker, has outperformed culture in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection with sensitivity/specificity of 97%. After previously demonstrating its feasibility in breast implant-related infection (BIRI), this case-control study compares the accuracy of AD-1 to microbial culture in suspected BIRI. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, prospective, multicenter study was conducted of adults with prior breast implant reconstruction undergoing surgery for suspected infection (cases) or prosthetic exchange/revision (controls). Demographics, perioperative characteristics, antibiotic exposure, and implant pocket fluid were collected. Fluid samples underwent microbial culture, AD-1 assay, and adjunctive markers (C-reactive protein, lactate, cell differential); diagnostic performance was assessed by means of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with values of P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Fifty-three implant pocket samples were included (cases, n = 20; controls, n = 33). All 20 patients with suspected BIRI exhibited cellulitis, 65% had abnormal drainage, and 55% were febrile. All suspected BIRIs were AD-1 positive (sensitivity, 100%). Microbial culture failed to grow any microorganisms in four BIRIs (sensitivity, 80%; P = 0.046); Gram stain was least accurate (sensitivity, 25%; P < 0.001). All tests demonstrated 100% specificity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses yielded the following areas under the curve: AD-1, 1.0; microbial culture, 0.90 ( P = 0.029); and Gram stain, 0.62 ( P < 0.001). Adjunctive markers were significantly higher among infections versus controls ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings confirm the accuracy of AD-1 in diagnosing BIRI and indicate superiority to microbial culture. Although further study is warranted, AD-1 may facilitate perioperative decision-making in BIRI management in a resource-efficient manner. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.

Perspectives of Orthopedic Surgery Program Directors on the USMLE Step 1 Scoring Change.

The orthopedic surgery residency application process is highly competitive, and residency programs rely on objective measures, such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, to assist in applicant selection. To deemphasize standardized test scores and improve student well-being, governing bodies have elected to change the Step 1 examination to a pass/fail grading system beginning in 2022. Given the utility of Step 1 in the orthopedic surgery residency application process, this change will significantly affect how applicants are assessed. To determine how this change will affect the process, we developed and validated a 19-item anonymous electronic survey and invited program directors (PDs) from orthopedic surgery residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to respond. The 86 surveys that were completed represented a 43.2% response rate (86 of 199). Only 4.7% of orthopedic surgery PDs believe that this change is a good idea, and 91.7% of PDs believe that the change will make it more difficult to compare applicants objectively. In addition, 90.7% of PDs report that they will increase emphasis on the Step 2 CK (clinical knowledge) examination in comparing residency applicants for their program, with 90.4% of PDs reporting that they will require students to submit their Step 2 scores via the Electronic Residency Application Service. These results indicate that changing the Step 1 scoring to pass/fail is unpopular among orthopedic surgery PDs. Further, losing the numeric Step 1 score will increase reliance on Step 2 scores and emphasis on less objective measures, such as where an applicant attended medical school. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):e257-e262.].

Successful prevention of secondary burn progression using infliximab hydrogel: A murine model.

INTRODUCTION: Burn injury remains a serious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Severity of burns is determined by the percentage of burned area compared to the body surface area, age of patient, and by the depth of skin and soft tissue involvement; these factors determine management as well as prospective outcomes. The pathophysiology of partial- to full-thickness burn conversion remains poorly understood and is associated with a worse overall prognosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that an altered inflammatory response may play a significant role in this conversion and therefore a reduction in early inflammation is crucial to ultimately decreasing burn severity and morbidity. We hypothesize that the application of a microcapillary gelatin-alginate hydrogel loaded with anti-TNF-α (infliximab) monoclonal antibodies to a partial-thickness burn will reduce inflammation within partially burned skin and prevent further progression to a full-thickness burn. METHODS: Assembly of the microfluidic hydrogels is achieved by embedding microfibers within a hydrogel scaffold composed of a gelatin-alginate blend, which is then soaked in a solution containing anti-TNF-α antibodies for drug loading. 12 young (2-4 months) and 12 old (>16 months) mice were given partial thickness burns. The treatment cohort received the anti-TNF-α infused hydrogel with an occlusive dressing and the control cohort only received an occlusive dressing. Mice were euthanized at post-burn day 3 and skin samples were taken. Burn depth was evaluated using Vimentin immunostaining. RESULTS: All mice in the treatment cohort demonstrated decreased conversion of burn from partial to full thickness injury (old = p < 0.01, young = p < 0.001) as compared to the control group. Old mice had greater depth of burn than young mice (p < 0.001). There were greater eosinophils in the treatment cohort for both young and old mice, but it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The application of a novel microcapillary gelatin-alginate hydrogel infused with anti-TNF-α antibody to partial thickness burns in mice showed reduction in partial to full thickness burn secondary progression as compared to controls using this murine model; this promising finding might help decrease the high morbidity and mortality associated with burn injuries.

Unusual presentation of empyema necessitans: case report and review of the literature.

Empyema necessitans is characterized by the extension of a pleural empyema into adjacent structures beyond the pleural space. Although rare, it adds significant complications to patients already suffering from pleural empyema. Standard of surgical care has yet to be characterized or described in the literature. Here, we describe the unusual presentation of a 55-year-old man with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus empyema necessitans and outline both our surgical intervention and thoracic reconstruction. We present our case's presentation, management, and outcome. We then review the literature and describe a multidisciplinary approach for management. Empyema necessitans is a very rare and morbid condition requiring urgent intervention to promote optimal outcomes.

Tools to Increase Resident Aesthetic Clinic Volume.

INTRODUCTION: Resident Aesthetic Clinics (RACs) are an important element for training in plastic surgery residency programs. RACs provide increased exposure to aesthetic surgery as well as greater autonomy in clinical decision making. In an effort to increase RAC volume and thereby enhance resident education, we made two important changes to our operations. First, we reduced the resident surgeons' fees by 75%, and second, we began utilizing social media to promote our residency program and their involvement in aesthetic surgery. METHODS: Total RAC cases were queried using a RAC specific billing code and individual chief resident case logs for quality control. To generate an accurate timeframe, cases and procedures were compared from 18 months before and after the implemented changes. RESULTS: We found that the number of cases and procedures increased by 135% and 255%, respectively. The five most commonly performed procedures were liposuction, augmentation mammoplasty, abdominoplasty, mastopexy, and rhytidectomy. CONCLUSION: By both reducing the resident surgeons' fee and promoting the RAC on social media, we have demonstrated a pronounced increase in both cases and procedures performed by residents. As other institutions seek to increase resident exposure to aesthetic surgery, they may consider similar changes to these. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors: www.springer.com/00266 ."