Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; : e019236, 2021 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33794658

RESUMO

Background Recurrence of mitral regurgitation (MR) after surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) varies and may require reoperation. Redo mitral valve surgery can be technically challenging and is associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of MitraClip as a treatment strategy after failed SMVR and identify procedure modifications to overcome technical challenges. Methods and Results This international multicenter observational retrospective study collected information for all patients from 16 high-volume hospitals who were treated with MitraClip after failed SMVR from October 29, 2009, until August 1, 2017. Data were anonymously collected. Technical and device success were recorded per modified Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Overall, 104 consecutive patients were included. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.5% and median age was 73 years. At baseline, the majority of patients (82%) were in New York Heart Association class ≥III and MR was moderate or higher in 86% of patients. The cause of MR pre-SMVR was degenerative in 50%, functional in 35%, mixed in 8%, and missing/unknown in 8% of patients. The median time between SMVR and MitraClip was 5.3 (1.9-9.7) years. Technical and device success were 90% and 89%, respectively. Additional/modified imaging was applied in 21% of cases. An MR reduction of ≥1 grade was achieved in 94% of patients and residual MR was moderate or less in 90% of patients. In-hospital all-cause mortality was 2%, and 86% of patients were in New York Heart Association class ≤II. Conclusions MitraClip is a safe and less invasive treatment option for patients with recurrent MR after failed SMVR. Additional/modified imaging may help overcome technical challenges during leaflet grasping.

2.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 2(3): yty096, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31020173

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac tumours are of rare incidence and usually occur in the form of secondary tumours. Most metastatic tumours are melanomas, sarcomas, lung, and haematological malignancies. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the heart are extremely unusual. This case report demonstrates a solitary high-grade NEC of the heart with an individual therapy strategy and follow-up. CASE SUMMARY: A 50-year-old gentleman presented with a 2 days history of recurrent episodes of chest pain. Echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed tumorous lesions of the ventricles and aortic valve with large circular pericardial effusion. Histopathology results of the biopsy revealed a poorly differentiated small cell tumour of the neuroendocrine type. Despite further investigations with multiple imaging modalities and laboratory, no primary was found. Chemotherapy was initiated but size progression of the tumour was detected. As no other tumorous lesions were detected and resection was not possible because of the tumour complexity, decision on heart transplantation was made. However, due to the necessary immunosuppression after the heart transplantation, multiple metastasis where discovered in the course of treatment. DISCUSSION: The presence of a NEC in the heart without evidence of any other metastasis or evidence of primary tumour in other organs is clinically unique. For this individual case, heart transplantation was the therapy of choice due to tumour progression under chemotherapy and lacking possibility of resection, as no other suspect lesion was found other than the ones found in the heart. However, the risk of exacerbation of undiscovered micrometastases under necessary immunosuppression following the heart transplantation should be considered.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA