Role of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Variants With Opposing Functional Effects as a Driver of Hypomorphic Expression of TNIP1 and Other Genes Within a Three-Dimensional Chromatin Network.

OBJECTIVE: Genetic variants in the region of tumor necrosis factor-induced protein 3-interacting protein 1 (TNIP1) are associated with autoimmune disease and reduced TNIP1 gene expression. The aim of this study was to define the functional genetic mechanisms driving TNIP1 hypomorphic expression imparted by the systemic lupus erythematosus-associated TNIP1 H1 risk haplotype. METHODS: Dual luciferase expression and electrophoretic mobility shift assays were used to evaluate the allelic effects of 11 risk variants on enhancer function and nuclear protein binding in immune cell line models (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]-transformed human B cells, Jurkat cells, and THP-1 cells), left in a resting state or stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ionomycin. HiChIP was used to define the regulatory 3-dimensional (3-D) chromatin network of the TNIP1 haplotype by detecting in situ long-range DNA contacts associated with H3K27ac-marked chromatin in EBV B cells. Then, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the expression of genes within the 3-D chromatin network. RESULTS: Bioinformatics analyses of 50 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the TNIP1 H1 risk haplotype identified 11 non-protein-coding variants with a high likelihood of influencing TNIP1 gene expression. Eight variants in EBV B cells, 5 in THP-1 cells, and 2 in Jurkat cells exhibited various allelic effects on enhancer activation, resulting in a cumulative suppressive effect on TNIP1 expression (net effect of risk variants -7.14 fold, -6.80 fold, and -2.44 fold, respectively; n > 3). Specifically, in EBV B cells, only 2 variants (rs10057690 and rs13180950) exhibited allele-specific loss of both enhancer activity and nuclear protein binding (each P < 0.01 relative to nonrisk alleles). In contrast, the rs10036748 risk allele reduced binding affinities of the transcriptional repressors basic helix-loop-helix family member 40/differentially expressed in chondrocytes 1 (bHLHe40/DEC1) (P < 0.05 relative to nonrisk alleles) and CREB-1 (P not significant) in EBV B cells, resulting in a gain of enhancer activity (P < 0.05). HiChIP and qRT-PCR analyses revealed that overall transcriptional repression of the TNIP1 haplotype extended to the neighboring genes DCTN4 and GMA2, both of which also showed decreased expression in the presence of the TNIP1 risk haplotype (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively, relative to the nonrisk haplotype); notably, it was found that these genes share a 3-D chromatin network. CONCLUSION: Hypomorphic TNIP1 expression results from the combined concordant and opposing effects of multiple risk variants carried on the TNIP1 risk haplotype, with the strongest regulatory effect in B lymphoid lineage cells. Furthermore, the TNIP1 risk haplotype effect extends to neighboring genes within a shared chromatin network.

SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1) and Brahma (BRM) are dispensable in multiple models of postnatal angiogenesis but are required for vascular integrity in infant mice.

BACKGROUND: Mammalian SWItch/Sucrose NonFermentable (SWI/SNF) adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes play important roles in embryonic vascular development by modulating transcription of specific target genes. We sought to determine whether SWI/SNF complexes likewise impact postnatal physiological and pathological angiogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1) and Brahma gene (BRM) are ATPases within mammalian SWI/SNF complexes and are essential for the complexes to function. Using mice with vascular-specific mutations in Brg1 or with a global mutation in Brm, we employed 3 models to test the role of these ATPases in postnatal angiogenesis. We analyzed neonatal retinal angiogenesis, exercise-induced angiogenesis in adult quadriceps muscles, and tumor angiogenesis in control and mutant animals. We found no evidence of defective angiogenesis in Brg1 or Brm mutants using these 3 models. Brg1/Brm double mutants likewise show no evidence of vascular defects in the neonatal retina or tumor angiogenesis models. However, 100% of Brg1/Brm-double mutants in which Brg1 deletion is induced at postnatal day 3 (P3) die by P19 with hemorrhaging in the small intestine and heart. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their important roles in embryonic vascular development, SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complexes display a surprising lack of participation in the 3 models of postnatal angiogenesis we analyzed. However, these complexes are essential for maintaining vascular integrity in specific tissue beds before weaning. These findings highlight the temporal and spatial specificity of SWI/SNF activities in the vasculature and may indicate that other chromatin-remodeling complexes play redundant or more essential roles during physiological and pathological postnatal vascular development.