Effective treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection improves survival and affects graft-versus-host disease: a multicenter study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The impact of CDI and its treatment on allo-HCT outcomes and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), including gastrointestinal GVHD (GI-GVHD) is not well established. This multicenter study assessed real-life data on the first-line treatment of CDI and its impact on allo-HCT outcomes. Retrospective and prospective data of patients with CDI after allo-HCT were assessed. We noted statistically significant increase in the incidence of acute GVHD and acute GI-GVHD after CDI (P = 0.005 and P = 0.016, respectively). The first-line treatment for CDI included metronidazole in 34 patients, vancomycin in 64, and combination therapy in 10. Treatment failure was more common with metronidazole than vancomycin (38.2% vs. 6.2%; P < 0.001). The need to administer second-line treatment was associated with the occurrence or exacerbation of GVHD (P < 0.05) and GI-GVHD (P < 0.001) and reduced overall survival (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the risk of death was associated with acute GVHD presence before CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.19; P = 0.009) and the need to switch to second-line treatment (HR, 4.83; P < 0.001). The efficacy of the initial CDI treatment affects survival and occurrence of immune-mediated GI-GVHD after allo-HCT. Therefore, agents with higher efficacy than metronidazole (vancomycin or fidaxomicin) should be administered as the first-line treatment.

Exploring 5-year changes in general and skin health-related quality of life in psoriatic arthritis patients.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) carries a severe disease burden, often leading to deterioration of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Different comorbidities that are relatively prevalent in PsA are also responsible for compromised HRQoL. To assess real-world data of a 5-year follow-up cohort of PsA patients, focusing on changes in general HRQoL, skin HRQoL, and comorbidities. In this prospective observational study, 114 outpatients diagnosed with PsA were examined at baseline and after 5 years. Data collection included demographics, clinical disease activity measures, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). General HRQoL was assessed with a 15D instrument, and skin HRQoL was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). During the 5-year follow-up, no significant deterioration in HRQoL assessed by 15D (23.53 vs. 23.08, p = 0.85) and DLQI (3.48 vs. 2.68, p = 0.07) was observed. There was no observed decline in other PROMs. The mean total number of comorbidities increased (1.13 vs. 1.39, p < 0.01). A significant improvement in disease activity measures, including 66/68 swollen/tender joint count, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (all p < 0.01), and Psoriatic Arthritis Severity Index (p = 0.04) was seen. A higher proportion of patients at 5 years were treated with b/tsDMARDs (37.7% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.03). Despite an increased number of comorbidities over 5 years, our PsA cohort showed no decline in HRQoL. This can be attributed to the widespread adoption of modern treatments, leading to improved disease control and the preservation of baseline HRQoL.

Exploring pain catastrophizing and its associations with low disease activity in rheumatic inflammatory disorders.

Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive mechanism associated with the exaggerated experience of pain, increased rumination and feelings of helplessness. The main objective of this study was to explore whether increased pain catastrophizing is independently associated with a lower proportion of low disease activity (LDA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA). Demographics, comorbidities, treatment, disease activity measures and patient-reported outcome data were recorded in RA, PsA and axSpA patients. Pain catastrophizing score (PCS) was assessed using a standardised questionnaire. For each diagnosis, composite disease activity scores with distinct cut-off values for LDA, i.e. DAS28-CRP (RA), DAPSA (PsA) and ASDAS-CRP (axSpA) were calculated and used as the dependent variable in logistic regression reflecting LDA achieved. A total of one thousand two hundred and twenty nine patients were included: 580 with RA, 394 with PsA and 255 with axSpA. In the multivariable analysis, pain catastrophizing was independently associated with LDA rates in axSpA (OR 0.33, 95% CI [0.12, 0.88]) amongst tested groups. In RA (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.64, 1.28]) and PsA (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.55, 1.07]), a statistically significant association was not observed. Higher PCS was independently associated with not achieving LDA in axSpA. Our data, however, indicate that pain catastrophizing, which also reflects a patient's personality traits and coping abilities, plays a less important role for the patient than general pain perception.

Pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: biopsychosocial perspective and impact on health-related quality of life.

Pain catastrophizing (PC), defined as tendency to describe pain in more exaggerated terms, to ruminate more or to feel helpless about it. Main objective was to illuminate PC in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), revealing its prevalence and associations from a biopsychosocial perspective, including its association with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Measures reflecting the biological, social and psychological perspective were recorded in RA, PsA and axSpA outpatients. Biological variables including demographics, disease activity and patient reported outcomes (PROs) along with variables reflecting psychological and social domains were collected. RAND12 questionnaire was used to explore HRQoL and standardized questionnaire was used to reveal pain catastrophizing score (PCS). 1229 patients were recruited (RA 580, PsA 394, axSpA 255). Mean (SD) PCS were for RA 1.88 (1.39), PsA 2.06 (1.45) and axSpA 2.27 (1.37). Proportion of pain catastrophizers (score ≥ 4) was not statistically different between RA (10.5%), PsA (12.7%) and axSpA (15.3%). Across all diagnoses, variables reflecting biological subjective domain explained more PCS variability (adjusted R2 35.3-49.9%) than psychological (28.4-33.6%), social (22.4-28.4%) and biological objective (4.3-9.9%) domains. HRQoL was significantly lower in pain catastrophizers across all diagnoses. No substantial differences in proportion of pain catastrophizers between RA, PsA and axSpA patients were found. Higher PCS (score ≥ 4) was best explained by biological subjective measures and corresponded with inferior HRQoL in all diseases. Several biological objectives, psychological and social measures were also associated with higher PCS.

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) with probable mesentery involvement with associated hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) - how to treat it?

Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTL) is a rare, cutaneous lymphoma involving subcutaneous adipose tissue. SPTL is associated in less than 20% with hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS). A 5-year overall survival rate is inferior in patients with SPTL and HPS (46%) as compared with 91% in patients without HPS. No standardized therapy for SPTCL has yet been established. This is a case of 35-year-old Caucasian man with a one-month history of B symptoms with the suspicion of Still's disease, at admission with leucopenia, high LDH, ferritin, sIl-R2, and triglycerides levels, hepatosplenomegaly, small right supraclavicular nodule, and irregular thickening of trunk subcutaneous tissue. The abdomen MRI showed generalized thickening of mesentery and colonic mucosa. In the patient, diagnosis of SPTCL was established with secondary HPS. CHOEP chemotherapy and modified HLH 2014 protocol were applied with subsequent high dose chemotherapy (BEAM) supported by autologous stem cells transplantation. Treatment was complicated by pancytopenia and pneumonia. The outcome of the disease treated by intensive protocol seems to be good.

[Giving medico-legal opinions in cases with suspicion of medical mistake. part 2. Expert evidence in cases with suspicion of medical mistake - expectations, possibilities, threats ].

Problems of medical mistake and therapeutic failure are inextricably linked with realization of medical services. In recent years, mostly by the media and increasing demanding attitude, a rapid increase of initiated cases opened by judicial body in conjunction with medical mistake made by medical staff is observed. Making medico-legal opinions is not easy task and often face many difficulties. These consist of lacks in medical documentation, time rigor, formal tightening and need to create team that consist of both forensic medicine specialist and clinicians, who together shall write complex medico-legal opinion. This article touches the essence of the opinion-making problem in the aspect of medical mistake. It shows specifics of the role of forensic medicine specialist, his challenges and difficulties in creating opinions. The article confronts real possibilities of court experts with expectations of judicial body, outlining new challenges and dangers which court experts have to face.

[Giving medico-legal opinions in cases with suspicion of medical mistake.part 1. between medicine and justice.]

Creating medico-legal opinion is a sophisticated investigative, analytical, decision-making and creative process. Forensic medicine specialist in cooperation with clinical medicine consultants, on the basis of evidence analysis, which was gathered during procedures and contained in the acts has to create an objective and essential opinion. This opinion is a vital, very important and irreplaceable proof in every case. Judicial body consults with forensic medicine specialist or specialists if there are circumstances for settlement of which there is a need of classified informations - art. 193 of Penalty Code. Forensic medicine specialists face many difficulties which may have effect on quality, positiveness of opinion, compliance with the deadline, increasing expectancy of judicial body or sides. It is very difficult to find clinical specialists which except their clinical knowledge have basic knowledge about law, the role and duties of an court expert. In this article we discuss creating-opinion problems, role and position of court expert in confrontation with expectations of judicial body and the Justice with particular emphasis on medical mistakes and assessment of medical proceedings. We show the complexity of creating of medical opinions, especially these institutional.