The Impact of Renal Impairment in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation With Melphalan Conditioning.

Background: There are no standard renal dose adjustments for melphalan conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of melphalan dosing and chronic kidney disease (CKD) on transplant-related outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, and MM patients who underwent ASCT between February 2016 and September 2021 were included. Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (Mel200) or 140 mg/m2 (Mel140) was administered. The cohort was divided based on renal function: creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 60 mL/min (no-CKD) and CrCl < 60 mL/min (CKD). Outcomes measured include PFS, OS, treatment-related mortality (TRM), incidence of adverse events, hospitalization duration, and hospital readmission within 30 days. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, t-test, and Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression model was used to account for melphalan dose adjustment. Results: A total of 124 patients were included (n = 108 no-CKD, and n = 16 CKD). Median age was 62 years, majority (62%) were male, and 97% had at least a partial response at time of ASCT. Of the 124 patients, nine (7%) received Mel140. Five of these patients had CKD (CrCl range: 26 - 58 mL/min), with one on hemodialysis. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13.6 vs. 14.9 days and median time to platelet engraftment was 18.3 vs. 18.5 days in the CKD group vs. no-CKD group, respectively (P = 0.03 and P = 0.8). When adjusting for melphalan dose reduction, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was not statistically significant (P = 0.11). At a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the median PFS for the CKD vs. no-CKD group was 60 vs. 46 months (P = 0.3). One-year OS was 93.8% in the CKD group vs. 97% in the no-CKD group. There was a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 mucositis in the CKD group vs. no-CKD group (P = 0.013). Conclusions: There is no significant difference in engraftment, PFS, or OS for MM patients with CKD vs. no-CKD receiving melphalan conditioning for ASCT. Severe mucositis was significantly more common in the CKD group, including when accounting for melphalan dose reduction.

Real-World Experience of Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia on Hypomethylating Agents With or Without Venetoclax at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Background: Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy is a standard treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, data are limited in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) populations and in those with poor-risk disease. A retrospective review was conducted involving patients with AML who received HMA alone or in combination with VEN (VEN + HMA). Methods: VEN + HMA was compared to HMA alone in first-line and R/R settings. Patients were stratified by specific HMA and line of therapy. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) up to 6 months from start of treatment. Results: Fifty-two patients were evaluated for efficacy and 78 patients for safety. ORR was 67% (VEN + HMA) versus 80% (HMA) in the first line and 50% versus 22% in R/R setting. A greater clinical benefit was seen with VEN + HMA compared to HMA in both lines of therapy (first-line: 87% vs. 80%; R/R: 75% vs. 67%). The median duration of response was longer with VEN + HMA first-line, but shorter in the R/R setting compared to HMA (8.3 vs. 7.2 months and 2.5 vs. 3.7 months, respectively). Of the 32 patients who responded to therapy, 63% had a complex karyotype. Survival benefits were greater with VEN + HMA in both lines of therapy, although not statistically significant. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in all patients receiving VEN, and 95% of these patients also experienced grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were three cases of tumor lysis syndrome. Conclusion: The addition of VEN to HMA has consistently shown benefit as first-line treatment and may have some benefit in R/R settings as well. Further studies are needed to compare across various lines of treatment and unfavorable disease. Dynamic strategies that improve toxicity management should be considered.

Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Recent advances in immunotherapy have resulted in the development of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, such as axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). However, axi-cel administration is not without risks of toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of 37 patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma evaluated the incidence and severity of common and severe safety events after axi-cel treatment in a real-world setting. Ninety percent of patients had received 3 or more prior lines of therapy (median prior therapies 3, range 2-7) before receiving CAR-T therapy, and 32.4% had relapsed after prior stem-cell transplantation. RESULTS: All but one patient experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of any grade (97.3%). Of those 36 patients, 83.3% experienced maximum CRS grade of 1 or 2, occurring after a median of 27 hours and persisting for a median of 6 days. Twenty-seven patients (73.0%) experienced neurotoxicity of any grade. Of those 27 patients, 96.3% experienced maximum neurotoxicity grade of 2 or higher, occurring after a median of 145 hours (6 days) and persisting for a median of 7 days. All 10 patients aged 65 or older had neurotoxicity of grade 2 or higher, compared to 59.3% (11/27) under age 65 (P = .02). Patients with baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 were significantly more likely to have shorter time to neurotoxicity compared to patients with performance status of 0 (P = .01). CONCLUSION: With more real-life experience and data, we will be able to define and refine management of toxicities unique to CAR-T therapy.

Corticosteroids for the management of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Due to enhanced T-cell activity, immune checkpoint inhibitors cause immune-related adverse effects. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of immune-related adverse effect management but the optimal strategy has not been determined, putting patients at risk for steroid-related adverse effects and potentially decreased efficacy of immunotherapy. This study aims to characterize the use of corticosteroids for the management of immune-related adverse effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective, single-center evaluation of patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate corticosteroid use for immune-related adverse effects, including starting dose, taper strategy, total duration, and resumption of immunotherapy. Secondary objective was to describe the incidence and significance of hyperglycemia. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients met inclusion criteria and experienced 123 immune-related adverse effects. Prednisone was used most commonly (67%) at an average starting dose of 0.88 mg/kg (range 0.07-17.0). On average, steroid tapers began 9.2 days after initiation (range 0-89) and were continued for a total of 84.2 days (range 3-693). In 21.1% of cases, checkpoint inhibitor therapy was not delayed and 68.6% resumed checkpoint inhibitors, while the patient was taking steroids (30.4 mg prednisone on average, range 5-80). On average, checkpoint inhibitor therapy was resumed 18.6 days after detection of immune-related adverse effect (range 0-150). Clinically relevant hyperglycemia occurred in 8.9%. CONCLUSION: Utilization of steroids for immune-related adverse effect at our institution is highly variable. The majority of patients received prolonged courses of steroids and resumed checkpoint inhibitor therapy with concomitant steroids above recommended doses. Additional monitoring for hyperglycemia and other steroid associated adverse effects should be considered.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Analysis of Dual Antiplatelet Therapies Within an Integrated Delivery System.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay of care for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients; however, uncertainty exists in real-world practice about comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of different oral P2Y12 inhibitors in PCI patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients treated between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013. Patients received clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or more than 1 antiplatelet (switch) during PCI. Outcomes were evaluated for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding at 1 year. Propensity score matching with Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine predictors of MACE and bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 8127 patients were included: clopidogrel (n = 6872), prasugrel (n = 605), ticagrelor (n = 181), and switch (n = 469). Treatment with prasugrel was associated with the lowest risk of MACE using multivariate regression (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.36-0.92; P = 0.02). In the propensity score-matched analysis, only the prasugrel group was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with the clopidogrel group. Clopidogrel was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding using multivariate regression (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.42-0.98; P = 0.042). Both ticagrelor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.11-3.59) and the switch groups (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.09-2.50) were associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel. However, no differences were found in the propensity score-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Dual antiplatelet therapies differed in both MACE and bleeds in a real-world setting of PCI. Prasugrel was associated with fewer MACE, whereas clopidogrel had fewer major bleeding events.