Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 36: 100716, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33665292

RESUMO

While fertility preservation is a major concern among reproductive age cancer patients, little is known about access and use of fertility preserving services. We examined use of fertility preserving services among men with common solid tumors. A total of 3648 men age 18-40 including 2610 (71.6%) with testicular cancer, 939 (25.7%) with colorectal and 99 (2.7%) with prostate cancer were identified. Fertility preservation services were utilized in 9.3% of men overall including 4.1% who underwent fertility evaluation only and 7.8% who had a fertility preservation procedure. The rate of fertility preservation services rose from 6.6% (95%CI, 3.2-10.0) in 2008 to 12.4% (95%CI, 7.3-17.5) in 2017 (P = 0.04). Use of fertility preservation service was more common in patients with testicular (11.6%, aRR = 3.31; 95% CI 2.22-4.92) and prostate cancer (6.1%, aRR = 3.14; 95% CI 1.28-7.70) compared to those with colon cancer (3.4%). Younger men were more likely to utilize fertility preservation services. 11.5% of men age ≤ 35 years vs. 5.2% of men 36-40 used these services (P < 0.0001). Fertility preservation services were used in 10.8% of those who received chemotherapy (aRR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.45-2.27) and in 8.1% of those who received radiation (aRR = 1.30 95% CI, 0.98-1.73). Medicaid patients were less likely to receive fertility preservation services than those with commercial insurance (0.7% vs. 10.1%; aRR = 11.58, 95%CI 2.10-63.69). These data indicate that while use of fertility preserving services is increasing, overall use of services is low among reproductive age males with cancer.

2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 221(4): 328.e1-328.e16, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31108063

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the rates and predictors of fertility preservation services among reproductive-aged women with common cancers in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We used the MarketScan database to identify women 18-45 years of age with lung, breast, colorectal, or cervical cancer who underwent surgery and chemotherapy from 2009 through 2016. Services from 3 months before to 3 months after chemotherapy for evaluation for fertility preservation, laboratory testing for fertility evaluation, and fertility-preserving procedures were captured. Multivariable models were used to assess the factors associated with the use of fertility-preservation services. RESULTS: A total of 18,781 women, including 386 cervical, 1372 colorectal, 246 lung, and 16,777 with breast cancer, were identified. In women 18-35 years old, 11.7% underwent evaluation for fertility preservation, 13.7% underwent laboratory testing, and 6.3% pursued fertility-preserving procedures. The rates of office evaluation, laboratory testing, and performance of procedure were 3.3%, 7.5%, and 1.9 % in women aged 36-40 years and 0.5%, 7.2%, and 0.3% in those aged 41-45 years, respectively. The rate of fertility preservation evaluation rose from 1.0% in 2009 to 5.5% in 2016 (risk ratio, 4.66, 95% confidence interval, 2.38-9.11) while use of fertility-preserving procedures increased from 1.0% to 4.6% (risk ratio, 3.84, 95% confidence interval, 1.94-7.59) during the same time period. In a multivariable model, use of any fertility-preserving interventions were more common in patients with breast cancer (adjusted risk ratio, 2.30, 95% confidence interval, 1.30-4.06), those in the Northeast (adjusted risk ratio, 1.24, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.40), and in younger women (18-35 years) (adjusted risk ratio, 2.59, 95% confidence interval, 2.32-2.89). CONCLUSION: Although limited by lack of information regarding cancer stage and desire for future fertility, only a small fraction of reproductive-aged female cancer patients receiving chemotherapy are evaluated in a nationwide sample for fertility preservation or undergo fertility-preserving procedures.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade/tendências , Neoplasias/terapia , Ovário/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/tendências , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Criopreservação/estatística & dados numéricos , Criopreservação/tendências , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Fertilização in vitro/tendências , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Recuperação de Oócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Recuperação de Oócitos/tendências , Ovário/transplante , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA