Acupuncture for Pain.

Acupuncture has been increasingly used as an integrative or complementary therapy for pain. It is well-tolerated with little risk of serious adverse effects. Traditional acupuncture and nontraditional techniques, such as electroacupuncture and dry needling, often result in reported pain improvement. Multiple factors may contribute to variability in acupuncture's therapeutic effects, including needling technique, number of needles used, duration of needle retention, acupuncture point specificity, number of treatments, and numerous subjective (psychological) factors. Controlled trials have been published on pain syndromes, such as acupuncture for acute and chronic low back pain, knee osteoarthritis, headache, myofascial pain, neck pain, and fibromyalgia. For some conditions, enough data are available for systematic evaluations or meta-analyses. Acupuncture may provide modest benefits in the treatment of chronic low back pain, tension headache and chronic headache, migraine headache prophylaxis, and myofascial pain. Although patients receiving acupuncture for acute low back pain and knee osteoarthritis report less pain, the improvement with true (verum) acupuncture over sham acupuncture is not clinically significant for these conditions. These two conditions illustrate a recurring pattern in acupuncture trials, in which the additional improvement that can be attributed to verum over sham acupuncture, even when statistically significant, is of less clinical significance. This pattern supports the notion that acupuncture treatment has a notable placebo response, or meaning response, that may be responsible for much of its demonstrated benefits. For certain patients, especially those who are unresponsive or intolerant to standard therapies, acupuncture is a reasonable treatment option.

A 39-Year-Old Man With Diabetes, Pleuritic Chest Pain, and Multiple Cavitary Lung Nodules.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old male presented to the ED with a 2-day history of fever (Temperature-Maximum 39°C), nonbloody productive cough, and worsening right-sided pleuritic chest pain. The patient denied shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, sinus symptoms, and abdominal pain. His medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin, 11.1), hyperlipidemia, and depression. He smoked marijuana but denied tobacco or illicit drug use. He reported no recent travels. He reported a 1-week history of left molar pain that began after he siphoned stagnant water with a straw from a refrigerator drip pan. He lived in Ohio all of his life. He denied any sick contacts. His medications include Lantus insulin at night, metformin, glimepiride, pravastatin, and Remeron.

Undergraduate students trained to provide basic health care screening in an underserved community: a door-to-door campaign.

OBJECTIVE: Millions of Americans fail to receive proper preventative care and/or have poorly managed chronic conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine if local student volunteers could be utilized to assess hypertension in an underserved community. The two primary objectives included first determining if student volunteers could be effectively trained to perform blood pressure screening and if they could then successfully provide such screening door-to-door in a targeted community. RESULTS: Volunteers were recruited from local universities, trained and skill tested in basic medical techniques and simulated door-to-door interactions. Of 43 initial students, 37 successfully completed written and competency exams. During the two-weekend community engagement, 220 individuals answered door knocks and 80 agreed to screening. Of those without a previous diagnosis of hypertension, 70.9% had an abnormal reading as did 87% of those who had been previously diagnosed with hypertension. This methodology was implemented at minimal cost and was perceived as a benefit by both students and community members. CONCLUSIONS: The study scope did not allow longer-term follow up for those with abnormal readings, but did serve as a reminder for those diagnosed with hypertension to monitor their status and as an indication for those undiagnosed that they may need to seek further care. Our findings are important because they show that undergraduate students are a viable source of volunteers for performing medically-related community outreach.

In-home medication reviews: a novel approach to improving patient care through coordination of care.

The use of multiple medications, in persons 65 years and older, has been linked to increased risk for cognitive impairment, falls, hip fractures, hospitalizations, adverse drug reactions, and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine if trained undergraduate students, in conjunction with pharmacists, could provide in-home medication reviews and demonstrate benefit to the health and welfare of a senior population affiliated with a primary care facility. Students received training in the completion of an in-home medication inventory, assessing a home for fall risk, and performing blood pressures. Once trained and proven proficient students performed the assessments in homes of Decatur Family Medicine Residency patients 65 years and older. Collected medication inventories were reviewed by a hospital pharmacist for fall risk medications, major drug interactions, or duplicate therapy. Changes to patient management were made by the primary care provider as needed. In all, 75 students visited 118 patients in Fall 2010. Findings from the medication review include: 102 (86%) patients were prescribed at least one fall risk medication; 43% were prescribed 3 or more; 14% had the potential for a major drug interaction; and 7% were prescribed duplicate therapies. Fifty-seven patients had a subsequent change made to their clinical medication list. The results demonstrate that an in-home outreach can be successfully performed by student volunteers and provide data of high clinical relevance and use. This application of the patient-centered medical home can readily and directly improve patient safety.