Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutr Hosp ; 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39037198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: muscle mass (MM) plays an important role in the physical function of hemodialysis patients; however, muscle mass measurement can be unreliable and expensive. In contrast, the measurement of physical function (PF) is simple and inexpensive and may serve as an alternative. The aim of this study was to correlate the measurement of MM by computed tomography (CT) with physical function measurements and physical activity (PA) levels in HD patients. METHODS: this was a cross-sectional study that included 38 HD patients from a single HD clinic. Each participant had a CT scan to measure mid-thigh muscle mass. Physical function tests were assessed using the six-minute walk test (SMWT), handgrip strength (HGS) test, 5 x sit-to-stand test (STS5), timed up and go test (TUGT) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), while physical activity levels were measured using the Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between variables. RESULTS: handgrip strength was strongly positively correlated with thigh muscle area (r = 0.656, p ≤ 0.001) and weakly correlated with arm muscle area (r = 0.396, p = 0.002), SMWT (r = 0.373, p = 0.004), SPPB (r = 0.269, p = 0.041) and physical activity (r = 0.323, p = 0.013). There was also a trend for an inverse correlation between handgrip strenght and TUGT (r = -0.235, p = 0.076). Positive correlations were found between the thigh muscle area and the SPPB (r = 0.339, p = 0.009) and PA (r = 0.293, p = 0.025), while there was a trend for an inverse correlation between thigh muscle area and STS5 (r = -0.256, p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: several measures of PF and strenght were correlated with objectives measurements of MM, thus provide options for low-cost measurements related to muscle mass.

2.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ; 15(2): 718-725, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Short-daily haemodialysis (SDH) has been strongly recommended over conventional haemodialysis (CHD) for end-stage kidney disease patients, though few studies have directly compared the effects of these two haemodialysis (HD) modalities on clinical variables related to patient's health. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in individuals undergoing HD, comparing epidemiological, clinical, metabolic, inflammatory, anthropometric, bone health/metabolism, and skeletal muscle function according to dialysis modality. One-hundred seventy-eight patients (20.8% females, 62 ± 2.5 years old), were analysed in this study, 86 (48%) of whom were undergoing CHD versus 92 (51%) who were undergoing SDH. RESULTS: SDH patients had significantly higher serum albumin levels (3.93 vs. 3.66 g/dL, P < 0.0001) and higher Kt/v (2.6 vs. 2.38, P < 0.0001). SDH group presented a significantly lower number of erythropoietin-stimulating agents compared with CHD group (percentage: 53.3 vs. 83.7%, P < 0.0001) and had lower levels of serum phosphate (4.9 vs. 5.3 mg/dL, P = 0.004) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) (398.4 vs. 480.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared with CHD patients. In terms of bone health and metabolism, SDH patients had significantly higher total BMD, femur BMD, lumbar BMD, and femoral neck BMD compared with CHD patients (all P < 0.05). SDH patients also had lower anti-osteogenic and inflammatory biomarkers, including FGF23, sclerostin, TNF, IL-18, IL-17a, and C-reactive peptide (all P < 0.05). CHD modality was demonstrated to be a risk factor for low BMD (odds ratio: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.59-10.2, P = 0.003). In terms of skeletal muscle function, SDH patients had significantly higher 6-minute walking test (444.6 vs. 424.9 m, P = 0.04) and higher fat-free mass (52.3 vs. 51.68 kg, P = 0.02) compared with CHD patients. Higher fat-free mass and handgrip strength were associated with a 34% and 23% lower risk of low BMD, respectively. SDH patients had lower levels of the uremic toxin asymmetric dimethyl-l-arginine (ADMA) (1.8 vs. 2.07 µM, P = 0.002) and fasting blood glucose (132.6 vs. 141.7 mg/dL, P < 0.02) than CHD group. SDH patients also displayed higher levels of haemoglobin when compared with CHD group (11.9 vs. 10.2 g/dL, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study improves our understanding of the relationship between dialysis modality and clinical variables that may influence HD patient's health. Grip strength and lean mass were positively correlated with bone mineral density in HD patients regardless of dialysis modality. SDH was associated with better bone mineral density, inflammatory profile, and skeletal muscle function when compared with CHD patients. These findings provide more evidence of the clinical benefits of SDH that should be explored in greater detail.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Falência Renal Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Força da Mão , Estudos Transversais , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Força Muscular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA