Efficacy and Safety of the TYK2/JAK1 Inhibitor Brepocitinib for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Brepocitinib is a TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of several immunologic diseases. The efficacy and safety of oral brepocitinib were assessed in participants with moderately-to-severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase IIb study, participants were randomized to receive 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg of brepocitinib once daily or placebo, advancing to 30 mg or 60 mg of brepocitinib once daily at week 16. The primary endpoint was the response rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) in disease activity at week 16. Secondary endpoints included response rates according to the ACR50/ACR70 response criteria, 75% and 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/PASI90) score, and minimal disease activity (MDA) at weeks 16 and 52. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Overall, 218 participants were randomized and treated. At week 16, the brepocitinib 30 mg and 60 mg once daily groups had significantly greater ACR20 response rates (66.7% [P = 0.0197] and 74.6% [P = 0.0006], respectively), versus the placebo group (43.3%), and significantly higher ACR50/ACR70, PASI75/PASI90, and MDA response rates. Response rates were maintained or improved through week 52. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate; serious adverse events (15) in 12 participants (5.5%) included infections in 6 participants (2.8%) in the brepocitinib 30 mg and 60 mg once daily groups. No major adverse cardiovascular events or deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Treatment with brepocitinib at dosages of 30 mg and 60 mg once daily was superior to placebo at reducing signs and symptoms of PsA. Brepocitinib was generally well tolerated throughout the 52-week study, with a safety profile consistent with those found in other brepocitinib clinical trials.

A Review of Labeling Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Endpoints for New Oncology Drugs Approved by the European Medicines Agency (2017-2021).

OBJECTIVE: A review of new oncology indications approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for 2012-2016 showed that 33% of new drugs had labeling based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We reviewed labeling text based on PRO endpoints for new oncology indications approved during 2017-2021. METHODS: New oncology drugs approved by EMA to treat indications of cancers during 2017-2021 were identified from the EMA website. PRO-related language reported in EMA summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) were summarized and compared with similar findings reported for oncology indications approved during 2012-2016. RESULTS: Review documents by the EMA during 2017-2021 were available for 49 new oncology drugs for 70 cancer indications. Submissions for 52 (74.3%) of the 70 indications included PRO data for EMA review. Of all submissions, 14 (20.0%) approvals contained PRO-related language in the SmPC. Broad concepts such as health-related quality of life were most common and found in 8 of 14 (57.1%) PRO-related labels. CONCLUSION: PRO-related language appeared in SmPCs for 20% of all indications of new oncology drugs approved by EMA during 2017-2021 compared with approximately 33% of EMA approvals during 2012-2016. PRO-related labeling during the same periods showed a greater decline (from 47% to 27%) for indications of new oncology drugs that also included PRO data. One possible reason for this decline may be the increase in open-label studies from 62% between 2012 and 2016 to approximately 79% between 2017 and 2021.

Voice Analysis of Cancer Experiences Among Patients With Breast Cancer: VOICE-BC.

Patient experience literature in early-stage breast cancer (eBC) is limited. This study used a mixed-methods approach to examine patient conversations from public online forums to identify and evaluate eBC-related themes. Among 60,000 eBC-related posts published September 2014-2019, text from a random subset of 15,000 posts was extracted and grouped into linguistically similar, mutually exclusive clusters using an advanced natural language processing (NLP) algorithm. Clusters were characterized using four quantitative metrics: betweenness centrality (linguistic similarity to other areas of the cluster network), sentiment (general attitude toward a topic), recency (average date of posts), and volume (total number of posts). This analysis represented 3906 unique users (67% and 33% obtained from cancer-specific and general health/nonhealth forums, respectively). Of the 27 clusters identified, most important were "discussing recurrence & progression," "understanding diagnosis & prognosis," and "understanding cancer, biomarkers, and treatments." Several major themes related to recurrence risk, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment were identified. Additional emphasis on communicating the disease recurrence risk and shared decision-making could strengthen patient-clinician partnerships.

The Patient Experience with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogenous group of rare tumors that involve the connective tissue in the body (e.g. muscle, tendons). As with many rare tumors, little is known about the impact of STS on patient well-being. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to better understand current knowledge related to patient experience and quality of life (QOL) following diagnosis of STS. METHODS: A systematic review of English-language articles published from 2005 to 2015 was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Evidence-Based Medicine databases. The review included recent conference proceedings and advocacy websites. Articles were eligible if they included adult STS patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or details on patient experience. RESULTS: Overall, 3430 articles were identified and 20 were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 14 were clinical studies that included PRO measures, 1 summarized PRO measures used in STS studies, and 5 described the STS patient experience. Patients with STS report a range of impacts on QOL, including emotional well-being, body image, functional deficit following surgery, and practical considerations such as child care and work. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have published either qualitative or quantitative data on the patient experience with STS. While STS has a measurable impact on QOL, there is a lack of detailed information in the published literature. Although PROs are used in clinical studies of STS, they are not STS-specific and may not capture the unique needs of this population. There is a need for qualitative research to better understand both patient and caregiver experiences in STS.